3D Monte Carlo simulation modeling for the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-incorporated polymer nanocomposite using resistance network formation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18063/msacm.v2i2.672Keywords:
Simulation, Electrical Conductivity, Carbon Nanotube, Polymer Nanocomposite, electrical percolationAbstract
High electrical and thermal conductivity associated with high stiffness and strength offer tremendous opportunities to the development of a series of carbon nanotube incorporated composite materials for a variety of applications. In particular, a small amount of carbon fibers or carbon nanotubes in a non-conductive polymer will transform a composite into a conductive material, which reveals superb potential of their future application in electronic devices. The relation between the amount of carbon nanotubes in a polymer and the electrical conductivity of it can be studied experimentally as well as theoretically with various simulation models. A three-dimensional (3D) Monte Carlo simulation model using resistance network formation was developed to study the relation between the electrical conductivity of the polymer nanocomposite and the amount of carbon nanotubes dispersed in it. In this model, carbon nanotubes were modeled as curvy cylindrical nanotubes with various lengths and fixed tube diameter, all of which were randomly distributed in a non-conductive constrained volume, which represents polymer. The model can be used to find the volumetric electrical resistance of a constrained cubic structure by forming a comprehensive resistance network among all of the nanotubes in contact. As more and more nanotubes were added into the volume, the electrical conductivity of the volume increases exponentially. However, once the amount of carbon nanotubes reached about 0.1 % vt (volume percentage), electrical percolation was detected, which was consistent with the experimental results. This model can be used to estimate the electrical conductivity of the composite matrix as well as to acquire the electrical percolation threshold.References
Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991; 354(6348): 56–58.
Collins PG, Avouris P. Nanotubes for electronics. Scientific American 2000; 283(6): 62–69.
Rueckes T, Kim K, Joselevich E, et al. Carbon nanotube-based nonvolatile random access memory for molecular computing. Science 2000; 289(5476): 94–97.
Wong SS, Joselevich E, Woolley AT, et al. Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre-sized probes in chemistry and biology. Nature 1998; 394(6688): 52–55.
Fan S, Chapline MG, Franklin RN, et al. Self-oriented regular arrays of carbon nanotubes and their field emission properties. Science 1999; 283: 512–514.
Yao Z, Henk W, Postma C, et al. Carbon nanotube intramolecular junctions. Nature 1999; 402: 273–276.
Foygel M, Morris D, French A, et al. Theoretical and computational studies of carbon nanotube composites and suspensions: Electrical and thermal conductivity. Physical Review B 2005; 71: 104201.
Li C, Thostenson ET, Chou T. Dominant role of tunneling resistance in the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube–based composites. Applied Physics Letters 2007; 91: 223114.
Ounaies Z, C Park, KE Wise, et al. Electrical properties of single wall carbon nanotube reinforced polyimide composites. Composites Science and Technology 2003; 63: 1637–1646.
Dalmas F, Dendievel R, Chazeau L, et al. Carbon nanotube-filled polymer composites. Numerical simulation of electrical conductivity in three-dimensional entangled fibrous networks. Acta materialia 2006; 54: 2923–2931.
Hoenlein W, Kreupl F, Duesberg GS, et al. Carbon nanotube applications in microelectronics. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies 2004; 27: 629–634.
Thostenson ET, Ren Z, Chou TW. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Composites science and technology 2001; 61: 1899–1912.
Wei BQ, Vajtai R, Ajayan PM. Reliability and current carrying capacity of carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters 2001; 79: 1172–1174.
Berber S, Kwon YK, Tomanek D. Unusually high thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes. Physical review letters 2000; : 4613.
Ouyang M, Huang JL, Cheung CL, et al. Energy gaps in" metallic" single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 2001; 292: 702–705.
Kim YJ, Shin TS, Do CH, et al. Electrical conductivity of chemically modified multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon 2005; 43: 23–30.
Kirkpatrick S. Percolation and conduction. Reviews of modern physics 1973; 45: 574.
Stauffer D. Scaling theory of percolation clusters. Physics reports 1979; 54: 1–74.
Coleman JN, Curran S, Dalton AB, et al. Percolation-dominated conductivity in a conjugated-polymer-carbon-nanotube composite. Physical Review B 1998; 58: R7492.
Zeng X, Xu X, Shenai PM, et al. Characteristics of the electrical percolation in carbon nanotubes/polymer nanocomposites. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2011; 115: 21685–21690.
Bauhofer W, Kovacs JZ. A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon nanotube polymer composites. Composites Science and Technology 2009; 69: 1486–1498.
Pike GE, Seager CH. Percolation and conductivity: A computer study. I. Physical review B 1974; 10: 1421.
Seager CH, Pike GE. Percolation and conductivity: A computer study. II. Physical Review B 1974; 10: 1435.
Balberg I, Binenbaum N. Computer study of the percolation threshold in a two-dimensional anisotropic system of conducting sticks. Physical Review B 1983; 28: 3799.
Balberg I, Binenbaum N, Wagner N. Percolation thresholds in the three-dimensional sticks system. Physical Review Letters 1984; 52: 1465.
Narayanunni V, Gu H, Yu C. Monte Carlo simulation for investigating influence of junction and nanofiber properties on electrical conductivity of segregated-network nanocomposites. Acta Materialia 2011; 59(11): 4548–4555.
Fuhrer MS, Nygård J, Shih L, et al. Crossed nanotube junctions. Science 2000; 288(5465): 494–497.
