- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Editorial Policies
- Conflict of Interest
- Statement of Informed Consent
- Human and Animal Rights Statement
- Publishing Ethics
- Language
- Units of Measurement
- Misconduction Policy
- Authorship
- Erratum & Withdrawal Policy
- Preprint Policy
- Indexing and Archiving
- Disclaimer
- Advertising Policy
- Copyright & License
- Ethical Oversight
- Article Processing Charges
- Special Issue Policy
Focus and Scope
Environmental psychologists study focus on the relationship between the environment and behavior, thinking, or well-being (e.g., energy conservation, vandalism, activism, automobile use, recycling, water use). Regarding the definition of environment, we will be focusing on: 1) The natural environment that is the sum of various natural elements needed for human survival, is the material premise of human survival and development. Mainly including the composition of organic matter and inorganic composition of factors, human psychological phenomena affected by the natural environment, human psychological activities and natural activities have a great relationship. 2) The social environment that is based on the natural environment, human beings through a series of conscious activities formed by the environmental system, including the economic environment, political environment, educational environment, ethical environment, cultural environment and so on. 3) The physical environment that is independent of the existence of people in the environment, in addition to the natural environment factors also include man-made physical environment factors, such as interpersonal space, buildings and so on. 4) The psychological environment refers to the individuals or groups-environment interactions, i.e., perceived, understood, grasped, and created by the environment..
Key topics include:
· Environmental psychology
1. Environmental perception
2. Environmental behaviour
3. Environmental design
· Social Psychology
1. Social perception
2. Social Behaviour
3. Interpersonal Relationships
· Environment and Mental Health
1. Mental Health
2. Coping mechanisms
3. Emotions and the Environment
· Sustainability and Behavioural Sciences
1. Sustainable Development
2. Behavioural change theory
3. Social norms and environmental behaviour
· Climate Psychology
1. Psychological impacts of climate change
2. Behavioural responses
3. Climate education
· Interdisciplinary research
1. Environment and social sciences
2. Technology and psychology
3. culture and environment
Section Policies
Editorials
Editorials reflect the opinion of an Editorial Board member or staff for particular Journal highlighting recent changes, concerned issues or announcements in relevance to the journal. This may include editorial management and policies.
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Book reviews
Book reviews can be a review of a single book or an essay on multiple books on the same subject or multiple books from the same author.
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Research Articles
Research articles should contain completely new principal research testifying major contributions to the field. The study should represent new findings or discoveries in a subject area that were not published before.
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Review Articles
Review articles are summarized descriptions of recent findings and significant developments at particular subject area of research considering the Journal’s scope. They should include critical assessments of novel technologies, evaluation of subject advancement, elucidate unresolved questions, comparative analysis with a substantial coverage of previous works and highlight future prospects. Although there are no restrictions with the length and content of a review, authors should consider drawing readers’ attention and interest with quality information.
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Commentaries
Commentaries are that unsolicited commentaries or analysis from reader(s) targeting specific published articles in the journal. Commentaries will be subjected to peer-review and may be published in both online and printed versions of the journal.
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Case Reports
Case reports that summarize the execution and results of cases involving environment social psychology studies. Submissions will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are usually solicited by the editors.
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Opinions
Opinions are short articles that reflect the author’s viewpoints on a particular subject, technique, or recent findings. They should highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the topic presented in the opinion.
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. has always been committed to providing high-quality and influential academic publications and recognizes the importance of peer review in ensuring the quality and reliability of publications. Therefore, the Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. has established a rigorous peer-review policy. All manuscripts submitted to Environment and Social Psychology will follow a strict double-blind peer review process, and reviewers and authors will remain anonymous throughout the process, with peer review comments not being made public. Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. does not accept reviewers recommended by authors for peer review.
Peer reviewers should not work at the same institution as any of the authors, or have recently (within the past 3 years) served as mentors, close collaborators, or joint funders.
Our peer review process includes the following steps:
*Initial review: After a manuscript is submitted to the journal, managing editors will conduct an initial review to check whether it fits within the scope of the journal, has a proper structure, and is free from plagiarism(use the iThenticate), etc. Manuscripts that do not meet our standards and ethics policy will be directly rejected. Manuscripts that pass the initial review will enter the next stage.
*Reviewers assignment: If the manuscript passes the initial review, managing editors will assign it to multiple independent expert reviewers in the field for peer review. Managing editors will evaluate the expertise, research background, and experience of the potential experts and ensure that the selection of peer reviewers is fair, transparent, and impartial.
*Reviewers submit reports: Reviewers will conduct a comprehensive evaluation and review of the manuscript, providing detailed opinions and suggestions. If supplementary materials are included in the submission, the reviewers will also evaluate them in the same way as the main manuscript.
*Final decision: The Editor-in-Chief will make the final decision based on at least two review comments and inform the author. The final decision is Accept, Revisions Required(Minor revision), Resubmit for Review(Major revision), or Reject.
-If the decision is to Accept the submission, the managing editor will directly send an acceptance letter, arrange for further processing, and eventually publish the article.
-If the decision is to Revisions Required, the author should make revisions and resubmit the manuscript within 7-14 days, the editor will review the revised manuscript and make a decision.
-If the decision is to Resubmit for Review, the author will have 14-30 days to make revisions and resubmit for a second round of review, until the manuscript is accepted.
-If the decision is to Reject the submission, the managing editor will directly notify the author and archive the submission.
All articles that have been accepted for publication will be deemed to have completed the peer review process. Before publication online, manuscripts will undergo text editing, layout editing, and proofreading. Authors will receive proofs for review and verification before publication to ensure the accuracy and consistency of the article.
Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. peer review policy aims to ensure that every article published by Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. has undergone a professional, fair and transparent review process. We appreciate the support and cooperation of our reviewers and authors, whose efforts have helped us maintain high-quality and reliable publications.
Authors can appeal against the rejection of their manuscript. Appeals must be made by writing to editorial_office@as-pub.com, with detailed reasons for the appeal and a point-by-point response to the reviewer's opinions. The decision to appeal will be made by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal based on the relevant information of the article. The decision on the appeal is final, with no exceptions.
All manuscripts submitted to Environment and Social Psychology undergo rigorous double blind peer review.
- The initial submission made by the author is reviewed by the editor to ensure its adherence to the editorial policies of ESP.
- The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) determines if the topic of the manuscript is within the scope of ESP.
- On the advice of the EIC, EIC assign an editor to select and assign reviewers for the manuscript.
- After the evaluations by the reviewers have been received, the EIC makes one of the following recommendations: Accept manuscript, Accept manuscript with minor revisions, Major revisions required or Reject manuscript.
- If the decision is minor revisions, the authors have 15 days to resubmit the revised manuscript.
- If the decision is major revisions, the authors have 30 days to resubmit the revised manuscript.
- Upon resubmission, the EIC makes the final decision on whether the manuscript can proceed for production. In cases where a major revision was needed, the manuscript will be first sent to the initially assigned reviewers again for their evaluation and reassessment, before the EIC makes the final decision.
- Authors may appeal for a rejected submission. Appeal requests must be made in writing to editorial_office@as-pub.com with detailed reasons for the appeal and point by point responses to the reviewers’ remarks. Decisions on appeals are final.
Publication Frequency
The publication frequency of Environment and Social Psychology is monthly.
Open Access Policy
Environment and Social Psychology is a Gold Open Access journal. It believes that making research freely available to the public helps promoting the research results benefiting the scholarly community.
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations – free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article
- Ease of Search – publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online
Manuscripts submitted to ESP are double blind peer-reviewed and if accepted for publication, are freely available without charge for readers.
ESP operates on the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) publishing license since 2023 Vol.8 No.2 that defines permitted re-use, which allows for the copying, distribution, and transmission of the published work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated.
Editorial Policies
Authors should read the “Author Guidelines” before making a submission, and make sure that the manuscripts were written in accordance to the style and specifications of the journal’s policy.
All manuscripts submitted to Environment and Social Psychology are subject to rigorous peer review. Prior to the peer review process, the manuscripts will be screened for acceptable English language, novelty and relevance to the Focus and Scope of the journal.
Any manuscripts submitted to Environment and Social Psychology will be treated as confidential materials. The manuscripts will not be disclosed to anyone except individuals such as editorial staff, reviewers and editors who participate in the initial screening, review, processing and preparation of the manuscript for publication (if accepted).
The journal will not accept a manuscript that has been published or is under consideration for publication in any other journal. The author needs to notify the journal if the data presented in the manuscript has been ever presented in conferences or other similar forums. The author will need to fill up the submission checklist to ensure that these criteria are fulfilled.
After acceptance, the Publisher will have the right to edit the work for the original edition and for any revision.
Conflict of Interest
Conflicts of interest may exist when professional judgements concerning a primary interest has the possibility of being influenced by a secondary interest (e.g.,financial gains). It is to be noted that even perceptions of conflicts of interest are as important as the actual conflicts of interest.
Any agreements with study sponsors (for profit or non-profit), which interfere with the authors’ access to the study data, ability to analyse or interpret the data and publish manuscripts independently according to their own decision, should be avoided by authors at all costs.
A declaration of interests for all authors must be received before an article can be reviewed and accepted for publication.
For authors:
While submitting, authors must list all competing interests relevant to this work, including but not limited to:
- Funding sources
- The role of sponsors in the work design, data collection, and results of the analysis.
- Whether the author is serving on the editorial board of this journal submitting to.
For editors and reviewers:
Editors and reviewers must declare any possible conflict of interests in connection with the manuscript, and if necessary, they must avoid the peer review process. When Editorial Board Members publish articles in the served journal, the editorial office will actively emphasize it so that the authors know that they recuse the potential peer review process.
Common reasons for editors and reviewers to be replaced include but are not limited to:
- The editor or reviewer works at the same organization as one of the authors.
- The editor or reviewer is one of the authors of this work.
- The editor or reviewer is on the avoidance list from the author(s).
- The editor or reviewer has a financial relationship or personal relationship with an author.
Statement of Informed Consent
Clients have a right to their privacy and it should not be violated without informed consent. Authors should protect their clients’ right to privacy by requesting oral or written consent from the clients or client’s parents/guardians/next of kin to publish his/her data, including photographs, prior to publication. Other details such as the race, ethnicity, religion or cultural background of a subject under study should be mentioned only when it is believed to have an impact on course of the disease and/or treatment discussed in the study. If changing the biographical details and/or identifying characteristics is done in order to protect anonymity, authors should provide assurance that the changes do not falsify the scientific meaning of a manuscript/report. The informed consent form/agreement should be included as a supplementary document of a manuscript during submission.
Human and Animal Rights Statement
Humans: When the submitted manuscript involves experiments performed on human subjects, including healthy volunteers, authors should adhere to WMA Declaration of Helsinki and indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the author's Institutional Review Board or Research Ethics Committee. Any possible adverse consequences of the work for ecosystems, populations or individual organisms must be weighed against the possible gains in knowledge and its practical applications. Authors are encouraged to follow the CARE guidelines while reporting a clinical case that involves the human subject.
Animals: When reporting experiments involving animals, authors should abide by relevant international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. For studies involving client-owned animals, author(s) must declare that they have obtained the oral or written informed client consent during submitting and adhere to a high standard (best practice) of veterinary care.
Authors are encouraged to follow the ARRIVE guidelines while reporting animal research.
Experiments on non-human primates should be performed in accordance with the recommendations set out in the Weatherall report (The Use of Non-Human Primates in Research).
Publishing Ethics
This Journal requests all members involved in the journal publishing process to adhere to the Core Practices on publication ethics as stipulated by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
The publisher strictly adheres to the guidelines and best practices, which include Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals from the International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE) and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing developed by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) and World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).
The journal editors take all possible misconducts seriously. The Editors, authors or readers can forward their concerns to the journal if they find out that the description in a submitted article may constitute an academic fraud, research misconduct or publication malpractice. The concerns or complaints on the possible allegations submitted to the journal will be dealt with promptly and appropriately according to the procedure set out in the COPE flowchart on complaints. The complainant may direct all inquiries and correspondence to the Publisher at editorial_office@as-pub.com.
This Journal adopts a zero-tolerance policy concerning any academic misconducts and ethical violations in research and publication regardless of the severity of these issues. The violations include plagiarism, falsification of research, data fabrication, submitting manuscripts of others as one’s own, submission of the same manuscript to different publication venues at the same time and breached intellectual property rights. In cases of suspected misconduct and ethical violation, a panel will be formed to investigate the allegation. If the allegation is supported by evidence, the submitted manuscript in question will be declined for consideration in the journal and all authors will be informed in this regard. A retraction initiated by authors or by the journal is required to take place if the paper has already been published, and the retraction will be made public. Authors of the work in question will receive the Panel’s Decision via email and all appeals regarding the decision will have to be made to the Publisher at editorial_office@as-pub.com within 28 days of the decision date.
Language
All articles should be written in English—either British or American as long as consistency is observed.
Authors should ensure that all submitted manuscripts are written in clear, coherent, and precise English in order to optimize readability.
Authors whose first language is not English may want to have their manuscripts professionally edited before the final submission to ensure that the academic content of the paper is fully understood by its prospective readers.Units of Measurement
Units of measurement should be presented using only System International (SI) units.
Misconduction Policy
Duplicate Submission
Manuscripts submitted to ESP should:
1) not have been published before;
2) not concurrently be submitted elsewhere.
If part of a manuscript has been published or will be published elsewhere, the authors must let the editors know in a cover letter. If duplicate submission is detected during peer review, the manuscript may be rejected. If it is detected after publication, the paper may be retracted.
Plagiarism
The journal will strictly not accept manuscripts that are found to be plagiarized. The journal will verify the originality of submitted manuscripts with iThenticate, the plagiarism detection software.
If a manuscript uses a text copied directly from another source, this text must be written in quotation marks and original source must be cited. If any kind of plagiarism is detected during the review process, the manuscript will be rejected.
Authors and researchers can also use iThenticate to screen their work before submission by visiting http://www.ithenticate.com.
Authorship
Authorship of a scholarly paper should be limited to individuals who have contributed substantially to its intellectual content. Participation solely in the acquisition of funding or general supervision of the research group is not sufficient for authorship. All authors should hold the responsibility of fairly evaluating their respective roles and their co-authors’ roles in the project. This is to ensure that authorship is attributed according to a fixed standard in all publications for which they will be listed as authors.
In order to be listed as an author for a paper, one should have contributed sufficiently in the project. A co-author is expected to have contributed to some component of the work which led to the paper, or be involved in interpretation of its results. All authors should have a say in the final approval of the version to be published, in addition to reviewing the final manuscript prior to submission.
Individuals who do not meet the above requirements, but have provided a valuable contribution to the work, may be acknowledged for their contribution as appropriate to the publication.
Changes to Authorship
The authors should carefully check the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript. The Editorial Office considers the authorship list is definitive by the time the original submission is received.
Any addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should be made only before the manuscript is accepted for publication. The corresponding author should provide the reasons for the change in authorship list and the proof of written confirmation from all authors (including the existing authors, author(s) to be added and/or removed) agreeing with such change, to the Editorial Office.
The requests for authorship changes need to be approved by the Editorial Office before any changes can be made.
Erratum & Withdrawal Policy
Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. is committed to maintaining academic integrity and quality, we make policies for the correction and retraction of articles published. If authors find an error or inaccuracy in an article published in our journals, or need to retract an article, please refer to the following policies:
Correction
If authors discover any errors or need to make changes to an article before/after publication, authors should notify our editorial department as soon as possible. We will communicate with the author to ensure that corrections are made in a timely manner and that the least disruption to the manuscript is maintained as possible. Corrections should cover corrections limited to substantive, factual errors. We will not approve corrections that involve only the author's opinion or inference.
- We will clearly mark corrections in the article, and send the corrected version to the authors for confirmation and publish without error (to ensure that readers get the correct information).
- Our editorial department will update the metadata of the article.
*All major errors will be accompanied by a separate correction notice, and Environment and Social Psychology will: publish a separate correction notice that links back electronically to the corrected version. Conversely, minor errors that do not affect the reliability of the academic content or the reader’s understanding of the academic content will no longer be notified separately for correction. We will add a footnote to the article to inform readers that the article has been corrected.
For authors who wish to correct their names in their published work, please see our Authorship Changes.
Withdrawal policy
The editors of Arts and Science Press are responsible for ensuring the academic integrity of the articles published in the journal. Therefore, in cases of misconduct, the journal editorial department will retract articles when necessary.
Article withdrawal
Considering the amount of time spent by editors and reviewers on handling the manuscript, we have formulated the policy for authors to withdraw requests, as follows:
Once the manuscript is submitted to a journal, it represents that the author has carefully decided to publish the manuscript in our journal. If the author needs to withdraw the article submitted to the journal but not published for any reason, the author needs to submit a formal request to the editorial department of the journal:
- Withdrawal requests must be submitted to the journal editorial department by the first or corresponding author of the article, with a full and detailed withdrawal statement. Also, the author submitting the request will need to obtain written consent from all co-authors.
- If the article is already in the peer review or publication process, the author will need to provide more specific reasons for the withdrawal and bear all costs incurred as a result.
- Only valid and reasonable reasons for withdrawal will be considered, and the decision to withdraw a submission will ultimately rest with the managing editor or editor-in-chief.
Article retraction
Regarding published articles, retractions will be considered by the author or editor in the following cases, but not limited to:
- There are substantive errors, ethical violations, duplicate publications, or other violations of academic integrity, morality, ethics, laws and regulations.
- The credibility and readability of the article have been seriously compromised.
- The author has not taken appropriate action to correct the error or problem.
We hope that the policy will provide better safeguards for authors and readers to ensure the quality and reliability of scholarly journals. Article retraction decisions will be made by the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Standards for dealing with retractions have been developed by several library and scholarly bodies, and this practice has been adopted for article retraction by Arts and Science Press:
- Publish a separate retraction statement titled "Retraction: [Article Title]" that will link to the retracted article.
- Add a "retracted" watermark to the published version of the record for the article. The record will be kept in our journal's database, along with the reason and date of the retraction, to ensure data transparency and integrity.
Authors should note that if their accepted papers or articles in the publication are retracted for academic misconduct and ethical violations in research and publication, the article processing fee paid will not be refunded.
The policy is not exhaustive, and the decision to retract a retraction publication will be made at the discretion of the managing editor to safeguard the journal's academic reputation and publication standards.
Circumstances under which an article may be deleted
In rare cases, Environment and Social Psychology may need to remove articles from the online platforms. This will only be considered in the following cases:
-The article is defamatory, violates the privacy of others or other legal rights;
-Violation of a certain professional ethics or other illegal circumstances.
Expression of Concern
Environment and Social Psychology will consider concern detailing the focus and ongoing actions, if:
-Inconclusive evidence of author research or publication misconduct
-The results of this publication have not been completed and due to various complexities, the investigation will not be completed for a considerable period of time
All corrections, retractions, and concerns are freely accessible at the time of publication.
Errata
All publisher-introduced changes are highlighted to the author at the proof stage and any errors are ideally identified by the author and corrected by the publisher before final publication. Any errors in published articles discovered by readers, authors, editors, etc., please contact the journal editor. Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. will only instigate a corrigendum to a published article after receiving approval and instructions from the editor.
Withdrawal
If authors change their mind and decide not to pursue publication of papers with the journal, they must write a letter addressed to our editors at editorial_office@as-pub.com, explaining the reason(s) of submission withdrawal. Consents of all co-authors must be obtained for author-initiated submission withdrawal. The decision to withdraw a submission would eventually rest with the editors, including the Editor-in-Chief.
It is relatively more difficult to withdraw a paper that has been processed for peer-review or is under peer-review compared to withdrawing a new submission because the editors and reviewers have expended much time and energy in the editorial process and manuscript evaluation, respectively. To withdraw a paper that has been processed for peer-review, authors should clearly argue their case on scientific reasons; only valid and sound reasons will be accepted. He/she would be required to pay a penalty fee (USD 200). Authors are advised to keep in mind that an article should only be withdrawn if the authors detect significant error or flaws, as it is not an acceptable practice to withdraw an article after it has been sent for peer review. Once the approval of submission withdrawal is granted, the submission will be removed from the journal’s online submission system, and a confirmation email of submission withdrawal will be sent to the authors. The withdrawal process is considered to be complete once the author receives a confirmation of withdrawal from the Journal Editorial Office.
Submission withdrawal is also possible for accepted papers that have not been formally published, including the newly accepted papers and Articles in Press.
Withdrawal of accepted papers and Articles in Press is usually editor-initiated. The reasons of withdrawing accepted papers and Articles in Press are similar to those of retracting a published article, i.e., academic misconducts and ethical violations in research and publication regardless of the severity of these issues. The misconducts and violations include plagiarism, falsification of research, data fabrication, submitting manuscripts of others as one’s own, submission of the same manuscript to different publication venues at the same time and breached intellectual property rights. Once the suspected misconduct and ethical violation is brought to our attention, the editors will organize an investigation and authors are required to cooperate in the investigation; any accepted papers or Articles in Press subject to investigation at this stage will not be arranged for article production or finalization. A Panel will be organized to investigate the allegations. If the allegations are proven true with supporting evidence, the accepted paper or Article in Press will be marked for withdrawal, and a notification email regarding the Panel’s Decision will be sent to all authors of the work. Any appeals regarding the Panel’s Decision will have to be made to the Publisher within 14 days of the decision date. In the absence of an appeal from the authors within the 14 days, the submission will be removed from the journal’s online submission system, and a confirmation email of submission withdrawal will be sent to the authors.
Authors should note that any amounts of paid Article Processing Charge will not be refunded if their accepted papers or Articles in Press are withdrawn on the grounds of academic misconducts and ethical violations in research and publication.
Preprint Policy
Authors are permitted to post their non-peer-reviewed original research manuscripts to community preprint servers such as bioRxiv, medRxiv, and PeerJ Preprint before or in parallel with the formal submission to Environment and Social Psychology. During submission, authors are obliged to declare in the cover letter if the corresponding preprint version of their submission has been deposited on a preprint server, and provide any associated accession numbers or DOIs.
Nonetheless, authors are not allowed to post any versions of articles that have been revised as a result of peer review, accepted for publication or published in the journal on a preprint server. The manuscript whose corresponding preprint version has been indexed (e.g., in MEDLINE or PubMed) will not be considered.
This policy applies to original research papers only. This journal reserves the right not to consider for publication or publish material that has been formally published in digital media that shall not be construed as preprint servers.
We encourage formal citation of preprints in the reference list, where appropriate.
Indexing and Archiving
Environment and Social Psychology (ESP) is currently indexed in the Scopus database. All articles published in ESP are immediately searchable via Google Scholar. ESP is also being continually evaluated by other academic databases for inclusion.
ESP is archived by Portico.
Authors are encouraged to self-archive the final version of their published articles into institutional repositories (such as those listed in the Directory of Open Access Repositories).
Authors are also encouraged to use the final PDF version published on the website of Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd.
Disclaimer
- For authors: Once submitting a manuscript, it means that you have been aware of all publishing policies & ethics, and will strictly abide by them.
- For reviewers: Once accepting the request to become a reviewer, it means that you must be aware of the peer review policies, and proactively disclose of all potential conflicts of interest, and guarantee that an article will be judged fairly and objectively.
- For publisher: This journal is not liable to the statements, perspectives, and opinions contained in the published articles. The appearance of advertisements in the journal shall not be construed as a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised and/or the safety thereof. This journal and the Publisher disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas or products referred to in the articles or advertisements.
Advertising Policy
All advertisements are subject to approval to the Publisher. Advertisements must comply with the relevant regulations in the country where the advertisements appear. For more inquiries, please send email to editorial_office@as-pub.com.
Copyright & License
- Authorship
- Artificial Intelligence in Writing
- Deceased Authors
- Authorship Changes
- Copyright and Licensing
Authorship
Each author should make substantial contributions to the conception or design of the article, including but not limited to the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data, writing a manuscript or making substantive revisions to the manuscript. All authors need to review the final version of the manuscript before submission and should also comment on the final approval of the forthcoming version of the article.
Individuals who do not meet the above requirements but have made valuable contributions to the article can be listed in the Acknowledgments of the manuscript.
The author’s contribution should be stated in the cover letter when submitting the manuscript.
Artificial Intelligence in Writing
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT or large scale language models in research publications is expanding rapidly with the rapid development of AI technology. The Arts and Science Press will continue to adapt and refine its policy on the use of AI tools in writing. According to COPE position statement on the response to AI tools:
- AI tools can not be listed as authors or co-authors of papers. Because they cannot be held responsible for the submissions and do not have the ability to manage copyright and licensing agreements.
- Authors who use AI tools in their submissions (including but not limited to: during the writing of the article or when collecting and analyzing data) must be transparent in disclosing in the Methods or acknowledgement section of the paper how the AI tool was used and which tool was used.
- Authors are fully responsible for the content of their manuscript, including but not limited to: sections produced by an AI tool or data analyzed using AI tools in the research process.
- The editors of the Environment and Social Psychology and the Arts and Science Press reserve the right to reject or withdraw the manuscript directly if the use of AI tools in the manuscript is concealed.
Deceased Authors
When a co-author of an article passes away during the writing, submission or peer review process, the corresponding author or co-authors should promptly inform the editorial team of the journal. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to acknowledge the deceased author's contribution to the article and to identify any potential conflicts of interest. After publication, the editorial team will add a note to the list of authors to clarify the identity of the deceased author and to indicate their contribution to the research work.
Authorship Changes
Once the manuscript is submitted, it means that the authorship has been determined. If the authorship needs to be changed after submission, it shall be handled according to the following instruction:
-If the authorship needs to be added/deleted or the order of the author needs to be changed before the article is published, the corresponding author needs to explain the reason for the change to the editor by email and provide a statement that all authors agree to the change, and then the editor will handle it accordingly;
-If the authorship needs to be added/deleted or the order of the author needs to be changed after the article is published, the corresponding author needs to explain the reason for the change to the editor by email and provide a statement that all authors agree to the change. After the review of the editorial office the corresponding modification will be made and a correction notice will be issued.
Copyright and Licensing
Copyright for all articles published in the Environment and Social Psychology belongs to the author. The authors also grant permission to the publisher to publish, reproduce, distribute and transmit the articles.
Environment and Social Psychology publishes accepted manuscripts under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors submitting papers for publication in Environment and Social Psychology agree to apply the CC BY-NC 4.0 license to their work. For non-commercial purposes, anyone may copy, redistribute material, remix, transform and construct material in any media or format, provided that the terms of the license are observed and the original source is properly cited.
Authors must obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, tables, or any extracts of text) which is not in the public domain or for which they do not hold the copyright. The journal may not publish material from other publications without permission.
In exceptional cases, articles may be licensed differently. If you have specific conditions that do not allow this permission (e.g. those relating to funding), please make this clear to the journal editorial team at the time of submission. Exceptions will be at the discretion of the publisher.
The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.
All articles published by the Environment and Social Psychology are licensed under the Creative Commons International Licenses. Without any explicit request from the corresponding author during submission stage, a paper will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) by default since 2023 Vol.8 No.2. The authors who would like to publish their work under a noncommercial license, i.e., Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), they should express explicit request during the submission stage. Please include statement below in the Comments for the Editor column on the submission page:
The contributors or authors for this submission entitled “[MANUSCRIPT TITLE]”, i.e. [NAMES of ALL AUTHORS], have given their consents to alter the Creative Commons license to *CC BY-NC 4.0* under which this submission will be published in Environment and Social Psychology.
Ethical Oversight
Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. strictly abides by the Core Practice and Ethical Oversight of COPE, and all the editorial process is based on the best practice in the ethics of scholarly publishing. The Editorial Office strictly screens the originality and authenticity of every submission, and once unethical behaviors is under suspicion including but not limited to plagiarism, dishonesty, and multiple submissions, the manuscript will not go through the next step.
Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. usually strictly suspects the ethical problem under COPE’s guidance. If subjects involve populations or animals, all the research process must comply with local or regular international guidelines in the research field, and authors will be asked to submit the necessary information of approval identifiers or granting committee such as reference numbers. Reviewers and EiC are experts of your interest field, and they will make the objective decision based on the normality, authenticity and academic value of your research. In case of necessity, Editorial Office will contact the granting committee for further verification. Editorial Office obtains the right to reject the submission without any reference information.
Human subjects have the right of privacy, and Editorial Office advocates hiding sensitive and identifiable information of subjects such as face pictures and identical information. Informed Content Statement whether oral or written must be obtained from all the subjects at the submitting stage. If subjects are vulnerable populations, the Informed Content Statement should be obtained from their guardian or kinsfolk. All the submissions are considered to be private, and the publisher promises not to disclose it to a third party except for the normal publishing process.
Article Processing Charges
The Article Processing Charges are meant to support the journal’s associated expenses. The publication fee for each manuscript accepted for publication is US $ 1700. Click here to make the payment
Environment and social psychology is an Open Access Journal under Arts and Science Press, All articles published in Environment and social psychology are accessible electronically from the journal website without the need for subscription fees or other forms of payment from the readers. In order to ensure our content is freely available for the benefit of a wider audience while uncompromising our journal quality, an Article Processing Charge (APC) is applicable to all authors who wish to submit their articles to the journal. The APC is intended to cover the underlying costs of article processing, such as peer-review, copyediting, typesetting, publishing, content depositing and archiving processes. Those charges are applicable only to authors whose manuscripts have been successfully accepted after peer-review.
*At Arts and Science Press, we strongly believe that the APC should not become a barrier in the publication process. A range of discounts or waivers are offered to authors who are not able to cover the APC. Authors can write in to apply for a waiver and requests will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Waiver Policy
ESP is committed to promoting the academic development in the world without any financial barrier to knowledge sharing and learning. There has developed a waiver policy especially for authors from low-income countries. Authors who are interested in applying for a waiver could contact editorial_office@as-pub.com. ESP reserves the right to approve or reject a waiver application.
Special Issue Policy
Guest Editors are responsible for the proposal of Special Issues, and they work with journal editors throughout the editorial process. The Special Issue Program aims to increase the visibility and citations in a certain research community. There may be many different Special Issues with different interests in the related field.
Articles accepted in one of Special Issues will be published in the regular issues of the journal. That has broad benefits:
- Earlier visibility and the vast majority of readers across the topics community.
- Be cited by peers and get more citations.
- Quickly learning about the current scientific research.
1. Ways to be a Guest Editor
- Editorial staff will search and invite experts who have outstanding achievements in the certain field. Usually, it will be a group of Guest Editors to drive a Special Issue. The group members are usually invited by the leader of Guest Editors.
- Readers or authors who have good topics could submit proposals to editorial_office@as-pub.com. EiC or Senior Editors will evaluate the value of the proposal. If the proposal is accepted, the submitter will serve as Guest Editor of the Special Issue. Editors will cooperate to promote the development of Special Issues.
A Special Issue should include the title, keywords, introduction of the Special Issue, Guest Editors with E-mail, and submission deadline. Usually, the summary of a Special Issue should be provided by Guest Editors. The Editorial Office will make a flyer for further advertising.
2. Special Issue Ethics
Arts and Science Press Pte. Ltd. strictly abides by the Core Practices of COPE. All the new submissions will go through a double blind peer-reviewed process. Authors should provide a list of experts who should be excluded from peer review. The editorial process should comply with the Editorial Policies of this journal. If there is any potential conflict of interest, reviewers or editors should inform the Editorial Office and avoid the whole review process. In the event of unethical behaviors during the editorial process including but not limited to plagiarism, fabrication, citation manipulation, and authorship misconduct, please do not hesitate to contact editorial_office@as-pub.com.
3. Workflow of a Special Issue
A new submission should be submitted through the open journal system. Guest Editors (GE) will check the relevance between the new manuscript and the scope of one of the Special Issues. Then, editorial staff will screen the originality of the new submission by iThenticate. Any manuscript without enough originality may be rejected. The Editorial Office will assign the new submission to GE or reviewers for further review comments. A strict double blind peer-reviewed process with no less than two reviewers is implemented. GE have the responsibility to oversight the whole editorial process. All the comments are collected to GE, who will make the final decision on whether it is accepted, rejected, or should be revised. Once the manuscript is accepted, the author(s) will be informed and the manuscript will go through the production stage. It will be archived in the current volume/issue with marked in a collection of the Special Issue.