Sea level pressure response to the specification of eddy-resolving sea surface temperature in simulations of Australian east coast lows

Authors

  • Christopher R S Chambers
  • Gary B Brassington
  • Jinyu Sheng
  • Ian Simmonds
  • Kevin Walsh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18063/SOM.2016.01.001

Keywords:

pressure, Australia, temperature, sea, cyclone

Abstract

Four east coast lows (ECLs) were simulated with the Weather Research and Forecast model to investigate the influence of the sea surface temperature (SST) distribution on the sea level pressure (SLP). Each ECL was simulated with two different SST datasets: the Bluelink SST field and NCEP skin temperature field. The former resolved eddies in the East Australian Current while the latter did not. The simulated SLP fields in the eddy-resolving SST runs were compared with those in the non-eddy-resolving SST runs. On time-scales of about 48 hours, higher SSTs were asso-ciated with lower SLPs. The spatial scale of the SLP response was similar to that of the ocean eddies, indicative of the rapidity and robustness of the response given the rapidly evolving conditions within the storms. On shorter time-scales, the SLP response to SST change can become substantially larger. The largest reductions in SLP in the eddy-resolving SST runs were associated with regions of deep atmospheric convection that warm the tropospheric column. These areas were shown to be related to the SST distribution with the greatest SLP reductions associated with convection over strong SST gradient regions. The landfall of a damaging convective mesoscale low pressure system on 8 June 2007 was also investigated. It was found that a region of strong SST gradients on the southern flank of a large warm ocean eddy was associated with lower pressures at the time of formation of this meso-low. In addition, the only case that simulated the low pressure at the correct time (albeit at not quite the correct location) was the eddy-resolved SST run. It was hy-pothesized that the development of this meso-low that impacted the coast around Newcastle, was enhanced because of the eddy-scale SST distribution at the time.

References

Bridgeman H A. (1986). The Sygna storm at Newcastle-12 years later. Meteorology Australia, 3(5), 10–16.

Browning K A and Landry C R. (1962). Airflow Within a Tornadic Storm. Preprints Tenth Weather Radar Conference. Washington DC, American Meteorological Society, 116– 122.

Chambers C R S, Brassington G B, Simmonds I, et al. (2014). Precipitation changes due to the introduction of ed-dy-resolved sea surface temperatures into simulations of the “Pasha Bulker” Australian east coast low of June 2007. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 125(1–2): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00703-014-0318-4.

Charney J and Eliassen A. (1964). On the growth of the hurricane depression. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 21(1): 68–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0068:OTGOTH>2.0.CO;2.

Cione J J, Raman S and Pietrafesa L J. (1993). The effect of Gulf Stream-induced baroclinicity on the U.S. East Coast winter cyclones. Monthly Weather Review, 121(2): 421–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<0421:TEOGSI>2.0.CO;2.

Dudhia J. (1989). Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 46(20): 3077–3107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3077:NSOCOD>2.0.CO;2.

Emanuel K A. (1986). An air-sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: Steady-state maintenance. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 43(6): 585–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0585:AASITF>2.0.CO;2.

Emanuel K A. (1988). The maximum intensity of hurricanes. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 45(7): 1143–1155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<1143:TMIOH>2.0.CO;2.

Giordani H, Caniaux G. (2001). Sensitivity of cyclogenesis to sea surface temperature in the northwestern Atlantic. Monthly Weather Review, 129(6): 1273–1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<1273:SOCTSS>2.0.CO;2.

Global Climate and Weather Modeling Branch. (2003). The GFS atmospheric model. NCEP Office Note 442.

Griffies S M, Harrison M J, Pacanowski R C. (2008). A Technical Guide to MOM4. GFDL Ocean Group Technical Report NO. 5.

Hamon B V. (1965). The East Australian Current, 1960-1964. Deep-Sea Research, 12(6): 899–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(65)90813-2.

Hendricks E A, Montgomery M T and Davis C A. (2004). The role of “vortical”hot towers in the formation of tropical cyclone Diana (1984). Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 61(11): 1209–1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1209:TROVHT>2.0.CO;2.

Holland G J, Lynch A H and Leslie M L. (1987). Australian east-coast cyclones. Part 1: Synoptic overview and case study. Monthly Weather Review, 115(12): 3024–3036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<3024:AECCPI>2.0.CO;2.

Hong S Y, Noh Y and Dudhia J. (2006). A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Monthly Weather Review, 134(9): 2318–2341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1.

Jacobs N A, Lackmann G M and Raman S. (2005). The combined effects of Gulf Stream-induced baroclinicity and upper-level vorticity on US east coast extratropical cyclo-genesis. Monthly Weather Review, 133(8): 2494–2501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/MWR2969.1.

Jacobs N A, Raman S, Lackmann G M, et al. (2008). The influence of the Gulf Stream induced SST gradients on the US East Coast winter storm of 24–25 January 2000. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(21): 6145–6174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160802175561.

Janjic Z I. (1994). The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Monthly Weather Review, 122(5): 927–945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:TSMECM>2.0.CO;2.

Kuwano-Yoshida A, Minobe S and Xie S P. (2010). Precipitation response to the Gulf Stream in an atmospheric GCM. Journal of Climate, 23(13): 3676–3698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3261.1.

McInnes K L, Leslie L M and McBride J L. (1992). Numerical simulation of cut-off lows on the Australian east coast: Sensitivity to sea-surface temperature. International Jour-nal of Climatology, 12(8): 783–795.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370120803.

Lim E P and Simmonds I. (2002). Explosive cyclone development in the Southern Hemisphere and a comparison with Northern Hemisphere events. Monthly Weather Review, 130(9): 2188–2209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2188:ECDITS>2.0.CO;2.

Miller B I. (1958). On the maximum intensity of hurricanes. Journal of Meteorology, 15(2): 184–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1958)015<0184:OTMIOH>2.0.CO;2.

Mills G A, Webb R, Davidson N et al. (2010). The Pasha Bulker east coast low of 8 June 2007. CAWCR technical report NO. 23.

Mlawer E J, Taubman S J, Brown P D, et al. (1997). Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102 (D14): 16663–16682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237.

O’Neill L W, Chelton D B and Esbensen S K. (2010a). The effects of SST-induced surface wind speed and direction gradients on midlatitude surface vorticity and divergence. Journal of Climate, 23(2): 255–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2613.1.

O’Neill L W, Esbensen S K, Thum N, et al. (2010b). Dynamical analysis of the boundary layer and surface wind responses to mesoscale SST perturbations. Journal of Climate, 23(3): 559–581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2662.1.

Oke P R, Brassington G B, Griffin D A, et al. (2008). The Bluelink ocean data assimilation system (BODAS). Ocean Modelling, 21(1–2): 46–70. http://10.1016/j.ocemod.2007.11.002.

Park K A, Cornillon P and Codiga D L. (2006). Modification of surface winds near ocean fronts: Effects of Gulf Stream rings on scatterometer (QuikSCAT, NSCAT) wind observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(C3): C03021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003016.

Pepler A S, Di Luca A, Ji F, et al. (2015). Impact of identification method on the inferred characteristics and variability of Australian East Coast Lows, Monthly Weather Review, 143(3): 864–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00188.1.

Persing J andMontgomery M T. (2003). Hurricane superintensity. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 60(19): 2349–2371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2349:HS>2.0.CO;2.

Pope C. (1968). Winter cyclogenesis with tropical characteristics over the Gulf Stream. Monthly Weather Review, 96(12): 867–875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1968)096<0867:WCWTCO>2.0.CO;2.

Roebber P J. (1984). Statistical analysis and updated climatology of explosive cyclones. Monthly Weather Review, 112(8): 1577–1589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<1577:SAAUCO>2.0.CO;2.

Sanders F and Gyakum J R. (1980). Synoptic-dynamic climatology of the “bomb”. Monthly Weather Review, 108(10): 1589–1606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1589:SDCOT>2.0.CO;2.

Schiller A, Oke P R, Brassington G B, et al. (2008). Eddy-resolving ocean circulation in the Asian-Australian region inferred from an ocean reanalysis effort. Progress in Oceanography, 76 (3), 334–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2008.01.003.

Skamarock W C, Klemp J B, Dudhia J, et al. (2005). A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2. NCAR Technical Note, 468.

Small T J, deSzoeke S P, Xie S P, et al. (2008). Air–sea interaction over ocean fronts and eddies. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 45(3–4), 274–319. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2008.01.001.

Thompson G, Rasmussen R M and Manning K. (2004). Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: Description and sensitivity analysis. Monthly Weather Review, 132(2): 519–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0519:EFOWPU>2.0.CO;2.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-13

Issue

Vol 1, No 1 (Published)

Section

Articles

License

Authors contributing to Satellite Oceanography and Meterology agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, that the work is not used for commercial purposes, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. With this license, the authors hold the copyright without restrictions and are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions as long as the Satellite Oceanography and Meterology is the original publisher of the articles.