PDF

Published

2021-07-11

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Duan, J., Ren, X., Luo, W., & Tian, X. (2021). The Influence of Family Social Class on Career Choice: From the Perspective of Social Cognition. Environment and Social Psychology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v6.i2.1386

The Influence of Family Social Class on Career Choice: From the Perspective of Social Cognition

Jinyun Duan

School of Education Soochow University

Xiaoyun Ren

School of Education Soochow University

Wenjie Luo

School of Education Soochow University

Xiaoming Tian

School of Education, Suzhou University of Science and Technology


DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v6.i2.1386


Keywords: Family social class, Career choice, Social stratum cognitive theory, Self-construal, Individualism and collectivism values

Abstract

Based on the cognitive theory of social stratum, this paper discusses the influence of family social stratum on self-concern and others’ concern career choice, as well as its mechanism and boundary conditions. Through questionnaire method (Study 1)and experimental method (Study 2), the results show that family social class is positively correlated with ego-focused occupations and negatively correlated with others concerned occupations; independent self-construal plays a mediating role between family social stratum and ego-focused occupation, while interdependent self-construal plays a mediating role between family social stratum and other concerned occupation; individual and collectivist values regulate the family social class by predicting the indirect effect of career choice through self-construal.

References

[1]. Bubany ST, Krieshok TS, Black MD, et al. College Students’ Perspectives on Their Career Decision Making. Journal of Career Assessment 2018; 16: 177-197.

[2]. Vilhjálmsdóttir G, Arnkelsson GB. Social Aspects of Career Choice from the Perspective of Habitus Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2013; 83: 581-590.

[3]. Cober RT. Brown DJ, Keeping LM, et al. Recruitment on the Net: How Do Organizational Web Site Characteristics in Fluence Applicant Attraction? Journal of Management 2004; 30: 623-646.

[4]. Walker HJ, Feild HS, Giles WF. et al. So What Do You Think of the Organization? A Contextual Priming Explanation for Recruitment Web Site Characteristics as Antecedents of Job Seekers’ Organizational Image Perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2011; 114: 165-178.

[5]. Aaker JL, Williams P. Empathy Versus Pride: The Influence of Emotional Appeals Across Cultures. Journal of Consumer Research 1998; 25: 241-261.

[6]. Cable DM, Judge TA. Person-Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996; 67: 294-311.

[7]. Lauver KJ, Kristof-Brown A. Distinguishing between Employee’s Perceptions of Person Job and Person-Organization Fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2001; 59: 454-470.

[8]. Grossmann I, Varnum MEW. Social Class, Culture, and Cognition. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2010; 2: 81-89.

[9]. Guo Y, Yang S, Li J, et al. Research on Equity from the Perspective of Social Stratum Psychology. Advances in Psychological Science 2015; 23: 1299-1311.

[10]. Blustein DL, Chaves AP, Diemer MA, et al. Voices of the Forgotten Half: The Role of Social Class in the School-to-Work Transition. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2002; 49: 311-323.

[11]. Kraus MW, Piff PK, Mendoza-Denton R, et al. Social Class, Solipsism, and Contextualism: How the Rich Are Different from the Poor. Psychological Review 2012; 119: 546-572.

[12]. Belmi P, Neale MA, Reiff D, et al. The Social Advantage of Miscalibrated Individuals: The Relationship Between Social Class and Overconfidence and Its Implications for Class-Based Inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2019; 118: 254-282.

[13]. Dietze P, Knowles ED. Social Class and the Motivational Relevance of Other Human Beings: Evidence from Visual Attention. Psychological Science 2016; 10: 1-11.

[14]. Piff PK, Kraus MW, Côté S, et al. Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2015; 99: 771-784.

[15]. Piff PK, Moskowitz JP. Wealth, Poverty, and Happiness: Social Class is Differentially Associated with Positive Emotions. Emotion 2018; 18: 902-905.

[16]. Kraus MW, Piff PK, Mendoza-Denton R, et al. Social Class, Solipsism, and Contextualism: How the Rich Are Different from the Poor. Psychological Review 2012; 119: 546-572.

[17]. Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the Self: Implication for Cognition, Emotion and Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991; 98: 224-253.

[18]. Liu Y. Research Status and Prospect of Self Construction Advances in Psychological Science 2011; 19: 427-439.

[19]. Oeberst A, Wu S. Independent vs. Interdependent Self-Construal and Interrogative Compliance: Intra and Cross-Cultural Evidence. Personality and Individual Differences 2015; 85: 50-55.

[20]. Na J, Chan MY, Lodi-Smith J, et al. Social-Class Differences in Self-Concept Clarity and Their Implications for Well-Being. Journal of Health Psychology 2016; 23: 951-960.

[21]. Stephens NM, Fryberg SA, Markus HR. When Choice Does Not Equal Freedom: A Sociocultural Analysis of Agency in Working-Class American Contexts. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2011; 1: 33-41.

[22]. Stephens NM, Markus HR, Phillips LT. Social Class Culture Cycles: How Three Gateway Contexts Shape Selves and Fuel Inequality. Annual Review of Psychology 2014; 65: 611-634.

[23]. Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior 1994; 45: 79-122.

[24]. Super DE. The Psychology of Careers. New York: Harper Row; 1957.

[25]. Arpaci I, Baloğlu M, Kesici Ş. The Relationship among Individual Differences in Individualism-Collectivism, Extraversion, and Self-Presentation. Personality and Individual Differences 2018; 121: 89-92.

[26]. Cross SE, Hardin EE, Gercek-Swing B. The What, How, Why, and Where of Self-Construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2011; 15: 142-179.

[27]. Cross SE, Bacon PL, Morris ML. The Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal and Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000; 78: 791-808.

[28]. Triandis HC. Individualism-Collectivism and Personality. Journal of Personality 2001; 69: 907-924.

[29]. Lu X. Research Report on Social Strata in Contemporary. China, Beijing: Social Science Literature Press; 2002.

[30]. Ng IW. A Cross Cultural Study of Power and Power Motivation in China and the United States. [PhD Thesis]. The University of Michigan; 2007.

[31]. Han J, Ling J. Emotional Appeal in Recruitment Advertising and Applicant Attraction: Unpacking National Cultural Differences. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2016; 37: 1-22.

[32]. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.

[33]. Callan MJ, Kim H, Gheorghiu AI, et al. The Interrelations Between Social Class, Personal Relative Deprivation, and Prosociality. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2017; 8: 660-669.

[34]. Liu WM, Ali SR, Soleck G, et al. Using Social Class in Counseling Psychology Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2004; 51: 3-18.

[35]. Kraus MW, Piff PK, Keltner D. Social Class as Culture: The Convergence of Resources and Rank in the Social Realm. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2011; 20: 246-250.

[36]. Oyserman D. The Lens of Personhood: Viewing the Self and Others in a Multicultural Society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993; 65: 993-1009.

[37]. Grossmann I, Jowhari N. Cognition and the Self: Attempt of An Independent Close Replication of the Effects of Self-Construal Priming on Spatial Memory Recall. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2018; 74: 65-73.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com