Published
2023-06-14
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Social cognitive theory-assisted learning of Arabic: A study of self-regulated learning strategies, social media usage, and motivation
Xuan Di
Department of Oriental Languages, Anhui International Studies University
Wail Muin Ismail
Department of Educational Foundations and Humanities Faculty of Education, University of Malaya
Muhammad Azhar Zailani
Department of Language and Literacy Education Faculty of Education, University of Malaya
Ruihua Li
Department of Oriental Languages, Anhui International Studies University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v8.i1.1543
Keywords: social cognitive theory, self-regulated learning strategies, social media usage, motivation, academic achievement
Abstract
Social cognitive theory (SCT) has widely been used in second or foreign language learning. Multiple studies have also verified its importance in language learning. This present study examines the role that SCT plays in assisting the learning of Arabic by analysing the relationships among self-regulated learning strategies (SRLS), social media usage (SMU), and motivations of Arabic learners. A total of 317 university-grade Arabic learners participated in the present study. The self-regulated online learning questionnaire (SOL-Q), a social media usage questionnaire, and the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) were used to understand the current issues that Arabic learners face. A quantitative analysis of the data revealed that most of the Arabic learners had medium levels of SRLS and SMU and high levels of motivation. Furthermore, SRLS and motivation significantly affected the Grade Point Average (GPA)-based academic achievements of these Arabic learners. The findings of this study verify that SRLS, SMU, and motivation have a triadic reciprocal correlation with SCT in the context of learning the Arabic language.References
[1]. Bandura A, Walters RH. Social learning theory. Hoboken, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1977.
[2]. Atkinson D. Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 2002; 86(4): 525–545. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00159.
[3]. Matsuoka R, Evans DR, Ozawa M, et al. Socio-cognitive approach in second language acquisition research. The Journal of Nursing Studies: National College of Nursing, Japan 2004; 3(1): 3.
[4]. Pessoa L. Attention, motivation, and emotion. In: The Oxford handbook of attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
[5]. Nemati A. Memory vocabulary learning strategies and long-term retention. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education 2009; 1(2): 14–24. doi: 10.4314/marang.v20i1.56821.
[6]. Ismail ARBH. The teaching of Arabic in the Faculty of Islamic Studies in the National University of Malaysia [PhD thesis]. Salford: University of Salford; 1993.
[7]. Andrade MS, Bunker EL. A model for self-regulated distance language learning. Distance Education 2009; 30(1): 47–61. doi: 10.1080/01587910902845956.
[8]. Latif KM. Pencapaian pelajar kelas aliran agama dalam aspek pertuturan Bahasa Arab: Satu kajian kes (Indenosian) [Speaking skill achievements of religious streamed students: A case study] [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya; 2004.
[9]. Ismail Z, Othman MS, Abdullah AR, et al. Masalah penguasaan kemahiran mendengar dan bertutur Bahasa Arab dan Jepun: Satu kajian perbandingan (Indonesian) [Problems of Arabic and Japanese speaking skills: A comparative study]. In: Ariffin K (editor). Pendidikan bahasa di Malaysia: Isu, amalan dan cabaran. Shah Alam: Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA); 2005. p. 131–149.
[10]. Sheikh Salleh SI. Masalah penguasaan pertuturan Bahasa Arab di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Agama di Selangor (Indonesian) [The problem of Arabic speaking skill among the students of religious secondary schools in Selangor]. In: Ismail MR, Pa MT (editors). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: University Malaya Publications; 2006.
[11]. Suhid A, Mutalib LA, Ahmad AM. Application of Arabic language communication model in teaching and learning of Islamic Education. World Journal of Islamic History and Civilization 2012; 2(2): 95–101. doi: 9574/1/00003336_88607.
[12]. Ainon M, Abdullah H. Guru sebagai pendorong dalam darjah (Indonesian) [Teachers as motivators in classroom]. Bentong: PTS Profesional Pubilising Sdn. Bhd.; 2005.
[13]. Mohamad N, Abdullah N, Salleh S, et al. Kajian penilaian modul BA UiTM (2002) peringkat ijazah (Indonesian) [UiTM BA module assessment study (2002) diploma rating]. Selangor, Malaysia: Institut Penyelidikan, Pembangunan & Pengkormesialan UiTM; 2004.
[14]. Zimmerman BJ. Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology 1986; 11(4): 307–313. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5.
[15]. Zimmerman BJ. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 2005; 81: 329–339. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.
[16]. Zimmerman BJ, Pons MM. Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal 1986; 23(4): 614–628. doi: 10.3102/00028312023004614.
[17]. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 2010; 53(1): 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
[18]. Smith SD, Caruso JB. The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010 [Internet]. Educause; 2011. Available from: https://www.ship.edu/globalassets/pcde/ecar_study_highlights.pdf.
[19]. Conner JO. Youth organizers as young adults: Their commitments and contributions. Journal of Research on Adolescence 2011; 21(4): 923–942. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00766.x.
[20]. Dörnyei Z. Motivation strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
[21]. Zimmerman BJ, Kitsantas A. The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-regulated learning and practice. In: Elliot A, Dweck CS (editors). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford Press; 2005. p. 509–526.
[22]. Matzat U, Vrieling EM. Self-regulated learning and social media—A ‘natural alliance’? Evidence on students’ self-regulation of learning, social media use, and student–teacher relationship. Learning, Media and Technology 2016; 41(1): 73–99. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1064953.
[23]. Zimmerman BJ. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In: Handbook of self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2000. p. 13–39.
[24]. Mahmoodi MH, Kalantari B, Ghaslani R. Self-regulated learning (SRL), motivation and language achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 98: 1062–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.517.
[25]. Winne PH, Hadwin AF. The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In: Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008. p. 297–314.
[26]. Krejcie M, Morgan DW. Determining sample size of the research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1970; 30(3): 607–610. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308.
[27]. Jansen RS, Van Leeuwen A, Janssen J, et al. Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 2017; 29(1): 6–27. doi: 10.1007/s12528-016-9125-x.
[28]. Monachesi P, Mossel E, Posea V, et al. LTfLL-D6. 1: Social and informal learning support design [Internet]. The Netherlands: Open Univeristy of the Netherlands; 2008. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/30695297/LTfLL_D6_1_Social_and_informal_learning_support_design.
[29]. Piaw CY. Mastering research statistics. New York, United States: McGraw Hill; 2013.
[30]. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011; 19(2): 139–152. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
[31]. Ma R, Oxford RL. A diary study focusing on listening and speaking: The evolving interaction of learning styles and learning strategies in a motivated, advanced ESL learner. System 2014; 43: 101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.12.010.
[32]. Andrade MS, Evans NW. Principles and practices for response in second language writing: Developing self-regulated learners. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2012.
[33]. Hashemyolia S, Asmuni A, Ayub AFM, et al. Motivation to use self-regulated learning strategies in learning management system amongst science and social science undergraduates. Asian Social Science 2015; 11(3): 49–56. doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n3p49.
[34]. Seker M. The use of self-regulation strategies by foreign language learners and its role in language achievement. Language Teaching Research 2016; 20(5): 600–618. doi: 10.1177/1362168815578550.
[35]. Dörnyei Z, Ushioda E. Teaching and researching: Motivation. 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman Pearson; 2011.
[36]. Väljataga T, Pata K, Tammets K. Considering students’ perspectives on personal and distributed learning environments in course design. In: Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global; 2011. p. 85–108.
[37]. Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A. Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education 2012; 15(1): 3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002.
[38]. Varasteh H, Ghanizadeh A, Akbari O. The role of task value, effort-regulation, and ambiguity tolerance in predicting EFL learners’ test anxiety, learning strategies, and language achievement. Psychological Studies 2016; 61(1): 2–12. doi: 10.1007/s12646-015-0351-5.
[39]. Van’t Klooster JWJR, Janssen M. Ervaringen met het gebruik van sociale media in het Voortgezet Onderwijs (Dutch) [Experiences of using social media in Secondary Education]. In: Proceedings NIOC 2011; 2011 Apr 7–8; Heerlen, Netherlands. Heerlen: Open Universiteit; 2011.
[40]. Michikyan M, Dennis J, Subrahmanyam K. Can you guess who I am? Real, ideal, and false self-presentation on Facebook among emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood 2015; 3(1): 55–64. doi: 10.1177/2167696814532.
[41]. Tariq W, Mehboob M, Khan MA, et al. The impact of social media and social networks on education and students of Pakistan. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI) 2012; 9(4): 407–411.
[42]. Junco R. Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior 2012; 28: 187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026.
[43]. Junco R, Elavsky CM, Heiberger G. Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology 2013; 44: 273–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x.
[44]. Karpinski AC, Duberstein A. A description of Facebook use and academic performance among undergraduate and graduate students. San Diego: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2009. p. 5–10.
[45]. Nalwa K, Anand AP. Internet addiction in students: A cause of concern. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2003; 6(6): 653–656. doi: 10.1089/109493103322725441.
[46]. Lopez-Morteo G, López G. Computer support for learning mathematics: A learning environment based on recreational learning objects. Computers & Education 2007; 48(4): 618–641. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.014.
[47]. Perry NE, Winne PH. Learning from learning kits: gStudy traces of students’ self-regulated engagements with computerized content. Educational Psychology Review 2006; 18(3): 211–228. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9014-3.