PDF

Published

2023-07-06

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Gao, B., Liao, F., & Xie, H. (2023). Parents, children, and electronic games: Analyzing the formation path and countermeasures of contradictions. Environment and Social Psychology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v8.i1.1638

Parents, children, and electronic games: Analyzing the formation path and countermeasures of contradictions

Biao Gao

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics Jiangxi Publishing & Media Group CO., LTD.

Feiyu Liao

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics

Huiqin Xie

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics


DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v8.i1.1638


Keywords: electronic games, expectation bias, game addition, parental attitude, parent-child relationship

Abstract

This study aims to explore the relationship between electronic games, children, and parents, as well as the issue of parental prejudice towards games. While society’s attitude towards electronic games has become more rational and inclusive, many parents still hold a negative attitude toward their children’s exposure to games. Existing literature focuses more on studying games addiction behavior or its characteristics, neglecting society’s deep-seated contradictions. Therefore, this study starts with the characteristics and needs of electronic games, children, and parents and first applies the concept of expectation bias to analyze and explain the contradictions between parents, children, and games. The needs of parents and children have given rise to their respective expectations for electronic games. Still, due to their misunderstandings about games, there has been a deviation in expectations, leading to conflicts between parents and children. Based on the conclusion, this study aims to help parents view their children’s exposure to electronic games more rationally and provide corresponding solutions and strategies.

References

[1]. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ. Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science 2001; 12(5): 353–359. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00366.

[2]. Denham J, Spokes M. Thinking outside the ‘murder box’: Virtual violence and pro-social action in video games. The British Journal of Criminology 2019; 59(3): 737–755. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azy067.

[3]. Ferguson CJ, Copenhaver A, Markey P. Reexamining the findings of the American Psychological Association’s 2015 task force on violent media: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2020; 15(6): 1423–1443. doi: 10.1177/1745691620927666.

[4]. Smirni D, Garufo E, Di Falco L, Lavanco G. The playing brain. The impact of video games on cognition and behavior in pediatric age at the time of lockdown: A systematic review. Pediatric Reports 2021; 13(3): 401–415. doi: 10.3390/pediatric13030047.

[5]. Sun Y, Sun M. How peer influence mediates the effects of video games playing on adolescents’ aggressive behavior. Children and Youth Services Review 2021; 130: 106225.

[6]. Weber R, Ritterfeld U, Mathiak K. Does playing violent video games induce aggression? Empirical evidence of a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Media Psychology 2006; 8(1): 39–60. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0801_4.

[7]. Kuperczko D, Kenyeres P, Darnai G, et al. Sudden gamer death: Non-violent death cases linked to playing video games. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22(1): 824. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04373-5.

[8]. Tan Q, Xiong L, Li H, et al. Generative logic and governance direction of youth electronic game addiction in digital age. Journal of Shandong Sport University 2022; 38(5): 25–31.

[9]. Fu X, Yang Y. An investigation on parents’ attitudes towards preschool children playing video games. Educational Practice and Research (C) 2014; 4: 66–69.

[10]. Van Petegem S, de Ferrerre E, Soenens B, et al. Parents’ degree and style of restrictive mediation of young children’s digital gaming: Associations with parental attitudes and perceived child adjustment. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2019; 28: 1379–1391. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01368-x.

[11]. Zhou L. Investigation and analysis of ten-year-old children’s video game behavior and parents’ attitude [Master’s thesis]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University; 2015.

[12]. Zheng Y, Lu Y. Parasites of the human brain: The evolution of video games. Sports and Science 2021; 42(2): 70–74.

[13]. Hirshleifer D. Presidential address: Social transmission bias in economics and finance. The Journal of Finance 2020; 75(4): 1779–1831. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12906.

[14]. Li G, Song Q. Electronic games as a new art form: Technology, aesthetics, and crossover. Chinese Literature and Art Criticism 2018: 1: 98–106.

[15]. Wang P. Video games and seizures. Journal of International Neurology and Neurosurgery 1985; 1: 34–35. (Chinese). doi: 10.16636/j.cnki.jinn.1985.01.020.

[16]. Hao Y. Preliminary observation of the effect of video game consoles on the visual acuity of primary school students. Chinese Journal of School Health 1993; 5: 280.

[17]. Byrd PR. It’s all fun and games until someone gets hurt: The effectiveness of proposed video game legislation on reducing violence in children. Houston Law Review 2007; 44(2): 401–432.

[18]. Fritz GK. The video game paradox. The Brown University Child and Adolescence Behavior Letter 2008; 24(4).

[19]. Grüsser SM, Thalemann R, Griffiths MD. Excessive computer game playing: Evidence for addiction and aggression? Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2007; 10(2): 290–292. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9956.

[20]. King DL, Delfabbro PH. Video game addiction. 2nd ed. In: Adolescent addiction: Practical resources for the mental health professional. London, Washington D.C.: Academic Press; 2020. p. 185–213.

[21]. Nikken P, Jansz J. Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the report by parents and children. Learning, Media and Technology 2006; 31(2): 181–202. doi: 10.1080/17439880600756803.

[22]. Yin X, Liu Y, Zhang H, Tu W. Parental expectancy deviation and educational anxiety. Youth Studies 2022; 1: 40–48.

[23]. Xia F. Computer games: Target children’s “electronic heroin”—A mother’s complaint leads to an unannounced visit (Chinese). Guangming Daily, 2020 May 9. Available from: https://www.gmw.cn/01gmrb/2000-05/09/GB/05%5E18415%5E0%5EGMA2-013.htm.

[24]. Buckingham D. Epilogue: Rethinking digital literacy: Media education in the age of digital capitalism. Digital Education Review 2020; 37: 230–239. doi: 10.1344/der.2020.37.230-239.

[25]. Liu F, Gao X. The impact of violent video games on individual hostile attribution bias: The role of aggression traits. In: Chinese Psychological Society (editor). Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Psychology—Psychology and Mental Health Abstracts; 2017 Nov 3–5; Chongqing. Beijing: Chinese Psychological Society; 2017. p. 1129–1130.

[26]. Tan X. Practical research on anti-stigma discourse of Chinese game players [Master’s thesis]. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University; 2020.

[27]. Hu Y, Zhang S. The asynchronous dilemma of teenage video game technology governance. Youth Exploration 2022; 5: 38–50.

[28]. Chen Y. A father’s battle with a son addicted to online games: 12 years, failure (Chinese). Beijing Youth Daily, 2022 Jun 16. Available from: https://finance.sina.com.cn/chanjing/cyxw/2022-06-16/doc-imizirau8822544.shtml.

[29]. iResearch. iResearch: White paper on the protection of minors in China’s game field in 2020 [Internet] (Chinese). Shanghai: iResearch; 2020. Available from: https://report.iresearch.cn/report_pdf.aspx?id=3727.

[30]. China Internet Network Information Center. 2021 national research report on Internet use by minors [Internet]. Beijing: China Internet Network Information Center; 2022. Available from: https://www.cnnic.cn/NMediaFile/2022/1201/MAIN1669871621762HOSKOXCEP1.pdf.

[31]. Chen Y, Tian Y, Liu Y. Ethical considerations in game design. Dialectical Study of Nature 2016; 3: 63–67. doi: 10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2016.03.011.

[32]. Leroy R. Immersion, flow and usability in video games. In: Kitamura Y, Quigley A, Isbister K, Igarashi T (editors). Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2021 May 8–13; Yokohama. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. p. 1–7. doi: 10.1145/3411763.3451514.

[33]. Wei S. Toward a convergent Metaverse: Video games and the transformation of the digital body. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art 2023; 43(1): 52–60.

[34]. Yu C, Zhang S. The spirituality and the practice of metagaming under the rule mechanism of video games. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition) 2023; 23(2): 149–156.

[35]. Engelstätter B, Ward MR. Video games become more mainstream. Entertainment Computing 2022; 42: 100494. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2022.100494.

[36]. Zhu D, Wu Z, Huang L. Social interaction and identification in online games. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences) 2013; 41(5): 63–68.

[37]. Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 1995; 117(3): 497–529.

[38]. Wiederhold BK. Kids will find a way: The benefits of social video games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2021; 24(4): 213–214. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.29211.editorial.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com