Open Journal Systems

Culture and social well-being value cognition, a comparative study of social preference from movie reviews

Dachen Sheng, Junyi Shen, Wenbo Zheng

Article ID: 1689
Vol 8, Issue 2, 2023, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 319 (Abstract) 433 (PDF)

Abstract

Analyzing the Japanese movie reviews given by both Chinese and Japanese movie followers, this research provides empirical evidence to explore the cultural and social well-being diversified preference. The results show that cultural inspiration and social well-being have a significant influence on movie reviews and preferences. The more collectivist Chinese followers prefer starring and giving their comments to the movies. Whereas even Japanese reviewers give their review scores, but they are more uncertain to share their feelings to praise or blame the high and low-score movies. The findings reflect the culture and social value and provide considerable social policy decision-making significance to increase social well-being sustainability.


Keywords

movie review; social well-being; Chinese collectivism; Japanese individualism; uncertainty; starring effect; shame culture

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Morais EM, Moreira PR, Winkelmann ER. Movie watching during dialysis sessions reduces depression and anxiety and improves quality of life: A randomized clinical trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2020; 52: 102488. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102488

2. Marttila E, Koivula A, Räsänen P. Does excessive social media use decrease subjective well-being? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between problematic use, loneliness and life satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics 2021; 59: 101556. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101556

3. Ladhari R. The movie experience: A revised approach to determinants of satisfaction. Journal of Business Research 2007; 60(5): 454–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.007

4. Finn ES, Bandettini PA. Movie-watching outperforms rest for functional connectivity-based prediction of behavior. NeuroImage 2021; 235: 117963. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117963

5. Castillo A, Benitez J, Llorens J, Luo XR. Social media-driven customer engagement and movie performance: Theory and empirical evidence. Decision Support Systems 2021; 145: 113516. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113516

6. Legoux R, Larocque D, Laporte S, et al. The effect of critical reviews on exhibitors’ decisions: Do reviews affect the survival of a movie on screen? International Journal of Research in Marketing 2016; 33(2): 357–374. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.07.003

7. Feng N, Feng H, Li D, Li M. Online media coverage, consumer engagement and movie sales: A PVAR approach. Decision Support Systems 2020; 131: 113267. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113267

8. Karniouchina EV. Impact of star and movie buzz on motion picture distribution and box office revenue. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2011; 28(1): 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.10.001

9. Sharma M, Basu S, Chakraborty S, Bose I. Determining the optimal release time of movies: A study of movie and market characteristics. Decision Support Systems 2023; 165: 113893. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2022.113893

10. Koh NS, Hu N, Clemons EK. Do online reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2010; 9(5): 374–385. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2010.04.001

11. Ho DYF, Fu W, Ng SM. Guilt, shame and embarrassment: Revelations of face and self. Culture & Psychology 2004; 10(1): 64–84. doi: 10.1177/1354067X04044166

12. Ren W, Fukushima S. Perception and evaluation of requests on social media in Chinese and Japanese. Language & Communication 2022; 87: 231–243. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.09.002

13. Cupach WR, Imahori TT. Managing social predicaments created by others: A comparison of Japanese and American facework. Western Journal of Communication 1993; 57(4): 431–444. doi: 10.1080/10570319309374466

14. Peltokorpi V, Zhang LE. Host country culture and language identification, and their workplace manifestations: A study on corporate expatriates in China and Japan. Journal of International Management 2022; 28(3): 100926. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2022.100926

15. Barza S, Memari M. Movie genre preference and culture. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 98: 363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.427

16. Palomba A. Consumer personality and lifestyles at the box office and beyond: How demographics, lifestyles and personalities predict movie consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020; 55: 102083. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102083

17. Geerligs L, Cam-CAN, Campbell KL. Age-related differences in information processing during movie watching. Neurobiology of Aging 2018; 72: 106–120. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.07.025

18. Kirk PA, Robinson OJ, Skipper JI. Anxiety and amygdala connectivity during movie-watching. Neuropsychologia 2022; 169: 108194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108194

19. Gruskin DC, Rosenberg MD, Holmes AJ. Relationships between depressive symptoms and brain responses during emotional movie viewing emerge in adolescence. NeuroImage 2020; 216: 116217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116217

20. Yesildag AY, Bostan S. Movie analysis as an active learning method: A study with health management student. The International Journal of Management Education 2023; 21(1): 100759. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100759

21. Ullah R, Zeb A, Kim W. The impact of emotions on the helpfulness of movie reviews. Journal of Applied Research and Technology 2015; 13(3): 359–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jart.2015.02.001

22. Zhen X, Cai GG, Song R, Jang S. The effects of herding and word of mouth in a two-period advertising signaling model. European Journal of Operational Research 2019; 275(1): 361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.015

23. Zhang Y, Feng X, Wu Y, Xiao J. The dynamics of online ratings with heterogeneous preferences in online review platform. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2018; 109: 26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.02.003

24. Bi Y, Yin J, Kim I. Fostering a young audience’s media-induced travel intentions: The role of parasocial interactions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2021; 47: 398–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.04.011

25. Li Y, Cao H, Li J, et al. Social effects of topic propagation on Weibo. Journal of Management Science and Engineering 2022; 7(4): 630–648. doi: 10.1016/j.jmse.2022.05.001

26. Li L, Zhou C, He J, et al. Collective semantic behavior extraction in social networks. Journal of Computational Science 2018; 28: 236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.11.003

27. Winfield BH, Mizuno T, Beaudoin CE. Confucianism, collectivism and constitutions: Press systems in China and Japan. Communication Law and Policy 2000; 5(3): 323–347. doi: 10.1207/S15326926CLP0503_2

28. Hamamura T. Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2012; 16(1): 3–24. doi: 10.1177/1088868311411587

29. Hashinaga M, Schenk P, Ishibashi A, Rössel J. Socially responsible crowdfunding across the globe: A comparative analysis of Swiss, Japanese, and Chinese university students. Technology in Society 2023; 73: 102247. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102247

30. Ogihara Y. The rise in individualism in Japan: Temporal changes in family structure, 1947–2015. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2018; 49(8): 1219–1226. doi: 10.1177/0022022118781504

31. Ogihara Y, Uchida Y, Kusumi T. How do Japanese perceive individualism? Examination of the meaning of individualism in Japan. Psychologia 2014; 57(3): 213–223. doi: 10.2117/psysoc.2014.213

32. Ogihara Y, Uchida Y. Does individualism bring happiness? Negative effects of individualism on interpersonal relationships and happiness. Frontiers in Psychology 2014; 5: 135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00135

33. Sueda K, Wiseman RL. Embarrassment remediation in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 1992; 16(2): 159–173. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(92)90016-N

34. Gudykunst WB, Nishida T. Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 2001; 25(1): 55–71. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00042-0

35. Sargent JD, Heatherton TF, Ahrens MB, et al. Adolescent exposure to extremely violent movies. Journal of Adolescent Health 2002; 31(6): 449–454. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00399-3

36. Leenders MAAM, Eliashberg J. The antecedents and consequences of restrictive age-based ratings in the global motion picture industry. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2011; 28(4): 367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.06.001

37. Infortuna C, Battaglia F, Freedberg D, et al. The inner muses: How affective temperament traits, gender and age predict film genre preference. Personality and Individual Differences 2021; 178: 110877. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110877

38. Karniouchina EV. Impact of star and movie buzz on motion picture distribution and box office revenue. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2011; 28(1): 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.10.001

39. Hur M, Kang P, Cho S. Box-office forecasting based on sentiments of movie reviews and independent subspace method. Information Sciences 2016; 372: 608–624. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.027

40. Kim MS, Lim BY, Shin HS, Kwon HY. Historical credibility for movie reviews and its application to weakly supervised classification. Information Sciences 2023; 630: 325–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.01.138


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i2.1689
(319 Abstract Views, 433 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Dachen Sheng, Junyi Shen, Wenbo Zheng

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/