Published
2023-09-14
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Culture and social well-being value cognition, a comparative study of social preference from movie reviews
Dachen Sheng
Department of Business & Economics, International Christian University; International College of Liberal Arts, Yamanashi Gakuin University
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-2214
Junyi Shen
Department of Art and Design, University of Tsukuba
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-867X
Wenbo Zheng
Department of Business & Economics, International Christian University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i2.1689
Keywords: movie review, social well-being, Chinese collectivism, Japanese individualism, uncertainty, starring effect, shame culture
Abstract
Analyzing the Japanese movie reviews given by both Chinese and Japanese movie followers, this research provides empirical evidence to explore the cultural and social well-being diversified preference. The results show that cultural inspiration and social well-being have a significant influence on movie reviews and preferences. The more collectivist Chinese followers prefer starring and giving their comments to the movies. Whereas even Japanese reviewers give their review scores, but they are more uncertain to share their feelings to praise or blame the high and low-score movies. The findings reflect the culture and social value and provide considerable social policy decision-making significance to increase social well-being sustainability.
References
[1]. Morais EM, Moreira PR, Winkelmann ER. Movie watching during dialysis sessions reduces depression and anxiety and improves quality of life: A randomized clinical trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2020; 52: 102488. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102488
[2]. Marttila E, Koivula A, Räsänen P. Does excessive social media use decrease subjective well-being? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between problematic use, loneliness and life satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics 2021; 59: 101556. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101556
[3]. Ladhari R. The movie experience: A revised approach to determinants of satisfaction. Journal of Business Research 2007; 60(5): 454–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.007
[4]. Finn ES, Bandettini PA. Movie-watching outperforms rest for functional connectivity-based prediction of behavior. NeuroImage 2021; 235: 117963. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117963
[5]. Castillo A, Benitez J, Llorens J, Luo XR. Social media-driven customer engagement and movie performance: Theory and empirical evidence. Decision Support Systems 2021; 145: 113516. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113516
[6]. Legoux R, Larocque D, Laporte S, et al. The effect of critical reviews on exhibitors’ decisions: Do reviews affect the survival of a movie on screen? International Journal of Research in Marketing 2016; 33(2): 357–374. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.07.003
[7]. Feng N, Feng H, Li D, Li M. Online media coverage, consumer engagement and movie sales: A PVAR approach. Decision Support Systems 2020; 131: 113267. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113267
[8]. Karniouchina EV. Impact of star and movie buzz on motion picture distribution and box office revenue. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2011; 28(1): 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.10.001
[9]. Sharma M, Basu S, Chakraborty S, Bose I. Determining the optimal release time of movies: A study of movie and market characteristics. Decision Support Systems 2023; 165: 113893. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2022.113893
[10]. Koh NS, Hu N, Clemons EK. Do online reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2010; 9(5): 374–385. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2010.04.001
[11]. Ho DYF, Fu W, Ng SM. Guilt, shame and embarrassment: Revelations of face and self. Culture & Psychology 2004; 10(1): 64–84. doi: 10.1177/1354067X04044166
[12]. Ren W, Fukushima S. Perception and evaluation of requests on social media in Chinese and Japanese. Language & Communication 2022; 87: 231–243. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.09.002
[13]. Cupach WR, Imahori TT. Managing social predicaments created by others: A comparison of Japanese and American facework. Western Journal of Communication 1993; 57(4): 431–444. doi: 10.1080/10570319309374466
[14]. Peltokorpi V, Zhang LE. Host country culture and language identification, and their workplace manifestations: A study on corporate expatriates in China and Japan. Journal of International Management 2022; 28(3): 100926. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2022.100926
[15]. Barza S, Memari M. Movie genre preference and culture. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 98: 363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.427
[16]. Palomba A. Consumer personality and lifestyles at the box office and beyond: How demographics, lifestyles and personalities predict movie consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020; 55: 102083. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102083
[17]. Geerligs L, Cam-CAN, Campbell KL. Age-related differences in information processing during movie watching. Neurobiology of Aging 2018; 72: 106–120. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.07.025
[18]. Kirk PA, Robinson OJ, Skipper JI. Anxiety and amygdala connectivity during movie-watching. Neuropsychologia 2022; 169: 108194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108194
[19]. Gruskin DC, Rosenberg MD, Holmes AJ. Relationships between depressive symptoms and brain responses during emotional movie viewing emerge in adolescence. NeuroImage 2020; 216: 116217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116217
[20]. Yesildag AY, Bostan S. Movie analysis as an active learning method: A study with health management student. The International Journal of Management Education 2023; 21(1): 100759. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100759
[21]. Ullah R, Zeb A, Kim W. The impact of emotions on the helpfulness of movie reviews. Journal of Applied Research and Technology 2015; 13(3): 359–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jart.2015.02.001
[22]. Zhen X, Cai GG, Song R, Jang S. The effects of herding and word of mouth in a two-period advertising signaling model. European Journal of Operational Research 2019; 275(1): 361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.015
[23]. Zhang Y, Feng X, Wu Y, Xiao J. The dynamics of online ratings with heterogeneous preferences in online review platform. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2018; 109: 26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.02.003
[24]. Bi Y, Yin J, Kim I. Fostering a young audience’s media-induced travel intentions: The role of parasocial interactions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2021; 47: 398–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.04.011
[25]. Li Y, Cao H, Li J, et al. Social effects of topic propagation on Weibo. Journal of Management Science and Engineering 2022; 7(4): 630–648. doi: 10.1016/j.jmse.2022.05.001
[26]. Li L, Zhou C, He J, et al. Collective semantic behavior extraction in social networks. Journal of Computational Science 2018; 28: 236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.11.003
[27]. Winfield BH, Mizuno T, Beaudoin CE. Confucianism, collectivism and constitutions: Press systems in China and Japan. Communication Law and Policy 2000; 5(3): 323–347. doi: 10.1207/S15326926CLP0503_2
[28]. Hamamura T. Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2012; 16(1): 3–24. doi: 10.1177/1088868311411587
[29]. Hashinaga M, Schenk P, Ishibashi A, Rössel J. Socially responsible crowdfunding across the globe: A comparative analysis of Swiss, Japanese, and Chinese university students. Technology in Society 2023; 73: 102247. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102247
[30]. Ogihara Y. The rise in individualism in Japan: Temporal changes in family structure, 1947–2015. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2018; 49(8): 1219–1226. doi: 10.1177/0022022118781504
[31]. Ogihara Y, Uchida Y, Kusumi T. How do Japanese perceive individualism? Examination of the meaning of individualism in Japan. Psychologia 2014; 57(3): 213–223. doi: 10.2117/psysoc.2014.213
[32]. Ogihara Y, Uchida Y. Does individualism bring happiness? Negative effects of individualism on interpersonal relationships and happiness. Frontiers in Psychology 2014; 5: 135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00135
[33]. Sueda K, Wiseman RL. Embarrassment remediation in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 1992; 16(2): 159–173. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(92)90016-N
[34]. Gudykunst WB, Nishida T. Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 2001; 25(1): 55–71. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00042-0
[35]. Sargent JD, Heatherton TF, Ahrens MB, et al. Adolescent exposure to extremely violent movies. Journal of Adolescent Health 2002; 31(6): 449–454. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00399-3
[36]. Leenders MAAM, Eliashberg J. The antecedents and consequences of restrictive age-based ratings in the global motion picture industry. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2011; 28(4): 367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.06.001
[37]. Infortuna C, Battaglia F, Freedberg D, et al. The inner muses: How affective temperament traits, gender and age predict film genre preference. Personality and Individual Differences 2021; 178: 110877. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110877
[38]. Karniouchina EV. Impact of star and movie buzz on motion picture distribution and box office revenue. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2011; 28(1): 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.10.001
[39]. Hur M, Kang P, Cho S. Box-office forecasting based on sentiments of movie reviews and independent subspace method. Information Sciences 2016; 372: 608–624. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.027
[40]. Kim MS, Lim BY, Shin HS, Kwon HY. Historical credibility for movie reviews and its application to weakly supervised classification. Information Sciences 2023; 630: 325–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.01.138