Published
2023-07-20
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Motivation and attitudes of college varsity players towards community-based sports initiatives: Precursor to grassroots sports program
Roberto S. Bondoc Jr.
Western Mindanao State University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i2.1702
Keywords: attitudes, community-based sports, motivation, varsity players
Abstract
The Philippine sports culture is embedded in its communities as they are aggressively engaging in sports initiatives involving the youth from grade school to college levels capturing the passion of the sport’s participants at the grassroots level. Varsity players were exposed to such passion which shaped their competence in sports and physical activity later in life. This research analyzed the motivation and attitudes of the varsity athletes in higher education who have been participating in community sports in their growing years. Ninety (n = 90) varsity players from three state universities and colleges in Zamboanga City, Philippines participated in a Likert-scale survey to determine their level of motivation and attitudes towards community sports initiatives in relation to their athletic participation in the university. Findings revealed that the level of motivation among varsity students for the benefits of sports was very high and their gender and years of being a varsity player. Attitude indicators also revealed that varsity players pursue sports because it develops their competence and social skills. Community sports initiatives promoted a competitive mindset, as well as boosted confidence as players were able to prepare for competitions. This study is important for government and universities to consider the role of community sports initiatives in developing their long-term grassroots sports programs.
References
[1]. Lyras A. Measuring success: Sport for development and peace monitoring and evaluation. Presented at the Power of Sport Summit, International Association of Sport for Development and Peace; 10–12 June 2010; Northeastern University, USA.
[2]. Camiré M, Trudel P, Forneris T. Coaching and transferring life skills: Philosophies and strategies used by model high school coaches. The Sport Psychologist 2012; 26(2): 243–260. doi: 10.1123/tsp.26.2.243
[3]. Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political Psychology. Psychology Press; 2004. pp. 276–293.
[4]. Clancy RB, Herring MP, Campbell MJ. Motivation measures in sport: A critical review and bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 2017; 8: 348. doi: 10.3389/Ffpsyg.2017.00348
[5]. Gould D, Carson S. Life skills development through sport: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2008; 1(1): 58–78. doi: 10.1080/17509840701834573
[6]. Coalter F. Sport-for-development: Going beyond the boundary? Sport in Society 2010; 13(9): 1374–1391. doi: 10.1080/17430437.2010.510675
[7]. Kidd SA. Youth homelessness and social stigma. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2007; 36: 291–299. doi: 10.1007/s10964-006-9100-3
[8]. Levermore R. Sport in international development: Time to treat it seriously? The Brown Journal of World Affairs 2008; 14(2): 55–66.
[9]. Lyras A. Characteristics and psycho-social impacts of an inter-ethnic educational sport initiative on Greek and Turkish Cypriot youth. University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA; 2007; Unpublished work.
[10]. Lyras A. Sport for peace and development theory. European Association for Sport Management; in press.
[11]. Coalter F. Sports clubs, social capital and social regeneration: ‘Ill-defined interventions with hard to follow outcomes’? Sport in Society 2007; 10(4): 537–559. doi: 10.1080/17430430701388723
[12]. Jarvie G. Communitarianism, sport and social capital: Neighbourly insights into Scottish sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 2003; 38(2): 139–153. doi: 10.1177/1012690203038002001
[13]. Lyras A, Peachey JW. Integrating sport-for-development theory and praxis. Sport Management Review 2011; 14(4): 311–326. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2011.05.006
[14]. Beedy JP. Sports plus: Positive learning using sports: Developing youth sports programs that teach positive values. Project Adventure 1997.
[15]. Bredemeier BJ, Shields DL. Moral growth among athletes and nonathletes: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Genetic Psychology 1986; 147(1): 7–18. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1986.9914475
[16]. Super S, Verkooijen K, Koelen M. The role of community sports coaches in creating optimal social conditions for life skill development and transferability—A salutogenic perspective. Sport, Education and Society 2018; 23(2): 173–185. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2016.1145109
[17]. Collins MF, Buller JR. Bridging the post-school institutional gap in sport: Evaluating champion coaching in Nottinghamshire. Managing Leisure 2000; 5(4): 200–221. doi: 10.1080/13606710010010167
[18]. Eime RM, Payne WR. Linking participants in school-based sports programs to community clubs. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2009; 12(2): 293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.11.003
[19]. Wright SC, Aron A, Tropp LR. Including others (and groups) in the self. In: The Social Self, Cognitive, Interpersonal, and Intergroup Perspectives, 1st ed. Psychology Press; 2002. pp. 343–364.
[20]. Edwards P, Tsouros A. Promoting physical activity and active living in urban environments: The role of local governments. World Health Organization; 2006.
[21]. Koronios K, Psiloutsikou M, Kriemadis A. What motivates repeated participation in ultra-endurance events? A comparison between runners and cyclists. Business Entrepreneurship Journal 2016; 5(2): 17–34.
[22]. Chavez J, Lamorinas DD. Reconfiguring assessment practices and strategies in online education during the pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 2023; 10(1): 160–174. doi: 10.21449/ijate.1094589
[23]. Stevens CJ, Baldwin AS, Bryan AD, et al. Affective determinants of physical activity: A conceptual framework and narrative review. Frontiers in Psychology 2020; 11: 3366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568331
[24]. Kniffin KM, Wansink B, Shimizu M. Sports at work: Anticipated and persistent correlates of participation in high school athletics. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 2015; 22(2): 217–230. doi: 10.1177/1548051814538099
[25]. Koronios K, Psiloutsikou M, Kriemadis A. Motives and constraints of participants in running events. Education + Training 2018; 60(5): 443–457. doi: 10.1108/ET-05-2017-0059
[26]. Battaly H. A pluralist theory of virtue. In: Current Controversies in Virtue Theory. Routledge; 2015. pp. 7–22.
[27]. Austin MW. Is humility a virtue in the context of sport? Journal of Applied Philosophy 2014; 31(2): 203–214. doi: 10.1111/japp.12049
[28]. Chavez, JV, Del Prado RT. Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality. Forum for Linguistic Studies 2023; 5(1): 55–71. doi: 10.18063/fls.v5i1.1530
[29]. Rasulovna SN. The place of physical training and sports in the life of school students. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal 2021; 2(4).
[30]. Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K. Competitiveness and the process of co-adaptation in team sport performance. Frontiers in Psychology 2016; 7: 1562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01562
[31]. Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K. Self-organization processes in field-invasion team sports. Sports Medicine 2013; 43(1): 1–7. doi: 10.1007/s40279-012-0001-1
[32]. Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. Interpersonal pattern dynamics and adaptive behavior in multiagent neurobiological systems: Conceptual model and data. Journal of Motor Behavior 2009; 41(5): 445–459. doi: 10.3200/35-08-061
[33]. Snellman K, Silva JM, Frederick CB, Putnam RD. The engagement gap: Social mobility and extracurricular participation among American youth. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2015; 657(1): 194–207. doi: 10.1177/0002716214548398
[34]. Sugden J. Sport intervention in divided societies: Pragmatic realism and a human rights approach. Presented at the 14th European Fair Play Congress; 4 October 2008; Nicosia, Cyprus; pp. 6–8.
[35]. Csikszentmihalyi M. Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation. In: The Hidden Costs of Reward. Psychology Press; 1978. pp. 205–216.
[36]. Wolman LY. Exploring the Continuity of Sports Participation: The Role of Community Sport Clubs in the Sport Development Process [Master’s thesis]. Yorks University; 2014.
[37]. Kirk D, Macphail A. Social positioning and the construction of a youth sports club. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 2003; 38(1): 23–44. doi: 10.1177/1012690203038001726
[38]. Shafizadeh M, Davids K, Correia V, Informational constraints on interceptive actions of elite football goalkeepers in 1v1 dyads during competitive performance. Journal of Sports Sciences 2016; 34(17): 1596–1601. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1125011
[39]. Koronios K, Psiloutsikou M, Kriemadis A, et al. Motivation and high performance sports events: An exploratory investigation of the motives underlying repeated participation. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing 2019; 19(1/2): 35–55. doi: 10.1504/IJSMM.2019.10018016
[40]. Vallerand RJ, Verner-Filion J. Theory and research in passion for sport and exercise. In: Handbook of Sport Psychology. Wiley; 2020. pp. 206–229.
[41]. Yang J, Ju F, Tian Z. Sports and social interaction: Sports experiences and attitudes of the urban running community. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022; 19(21): 14412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114412