| Environment and Social Psychology
PDF

Published

2023-10-16

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Mendoza Velazco, D. J., Flores Hinostroza, E. M., & Rua Sanchez, L. E. (2023). University faculty perceptions of online education: A systemic review of leadership and educational innovation. Environment and Social Psychology, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i3.1750

University faculty perceptions of online education: A systemic review of leadership and educational innovation

Derling José Mendoza Velazco

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Universidad Técnica de Manabí; Department of Experimental Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Educación

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8275-3687

Elizeth Mayrene Flores Hinostroza

Department of Experimental Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Educación

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2171-8348

Luis Efren Rua Sanchez

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Universidad Técnica de Manabí


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i3.1750


Keywords: university education, training, educational innovation, leadership, online education

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the relationship between leadership and innovation in online education, focusing on the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences of the Universidad Técnica de Manabí (FSBSUTM) during the first semester of 2023. The university is located in the Republic of Ecuador. The research was developed under a quantitative approach, using a Likert-type questionnaire. The population of interest was made up of teachers from the Faculty of Humanistic and Social Sciences of the Technical University of Manabí, with a total of 70 members. To select the sample, non-probabilistic participatory sampling was used. The statistical analysis focused on the study of correlations between variables, using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The results obtained indicate that stronger training and experience in educational innovation are positively related to the ability to overcome difficulties and promote the effective implementation of strategies in virtual education. It is concluded that university leaders face challenges in implementing online educational innovation. However, the importance of implementing effective leadership strategies and fostering a pro-innovation digital culture as a means of overcoming such difficulties is highlighted. These findings have significant implications for university leadership training and development, as well as for the promotion of educational innovation in virtual environments.

References

[1]. Altamirano-Villanueva E, Carrera-Rivas JE, Pila-Martínez JC. Management and faculty: Key factors for leadership and innovation in times of pandemic (Spanish). Technological-Educational Journal Teachers 2021; 10(1): 32–43. doi: 10.37843/rted.v10i1.175

[2]. Contreras TS. Pedagogical leadership, teacher leadership and its role in school improvement: A theoretical approach (Spanish). Propósitos Y Representaciones 2016; 4(2): 231–284. doi: 10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.123

[3]. García J, Martínez M. Methodology of quantitative research in education: Data design and analysis with SPSS and AMOS. Complutense Journal of Education 2021; 32(2): 9–26. doi: 10.5209/rced.69311

[4]. Ruiz Corbella M. Educational leadership and responsibility: The necessary leadership of principals and teachers in education (Spanish). Revista Fuentes 2016; 14: 85–104.

[5]. Real Martínez S, Ramirez Fernández S, Bermudez Martínez M, Pino Rodríguez AM. The methodologies used in educational innovation (Spanish). Aula De Encuentro 2020; 22(1): 57–80. doi: 10.17561/ae.v22n1.3

[6]. Mendoza-Mendoza FR, De la Peña Consuegra G, Zambrano Acosta JM. Digital competencies to improve teaching strategies in social sciences teachers (Spanish). Revista Electrónica de Ciencias de la Educación, Humanidades, Artes y Bellas Artes 2022; 5(1): 1073–1101. doi: 10.35381/e.k.v5i1.2213

[7]. Baldiris Navarro S, Zervas P, Fabregat Gesa R, Sampson DG. Developing teachers’ competences for designing inclusive learning experiences. Educational Technology & Society 2016; 19(1): 17–27.

[8]. Carro G. The educational leader and the challenges of distance education (Spanish). Revista de Educación de Puerto Rico (REduca) 2022; 5(1): 1–5.

[9]. Yao F. The factors that influence the quality of education (Spanish). Educational Itinerary 2016; 30(67): 217–225.

[10]. Crespo M, Crespo E. Methodology of quantitative research applied to social and health sciences (Spanish). Spanish Journal of Scientific Documentation 2021; 44(1): E267. doi: 10.3989/redc.2021.1.1758

[11]. Jiménez-Fontana R, García-González E, Azcárate P, et al. Grounded Theory as a data analysis strategy: Process characterization (Spanish). In: Proceedings of the Atas CIAIQ2016 Investigação Qualitativa em Educação//Investigación Cualitativa en Educación; July 2016; Porto, Portugal. Volume 1, pp. 356–365.

[12]. Pérez OGB, Pino JWF. The role of strategic educational management in knowledge management, science, technology, and innovation in higher education (Spanish). Educación Médica 2018; 19(1): 51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.edumed.2016.12.001

[13]. García L, Martija A. What do we mean by educational innovation? Regarding curriculum development (Spanish). Perspectiva Educacional, Formación de Profesores 2006; 47: 13–23.

[14]. Salem R. The global leadership challenges of the twenty-first century (Spanish). Polémika 2012; 3(9): 1–8.

[15]. Maldonado A, Mayorga-Lascano M. Irrational ideas and their relationship with state-trait anxiety in high-achieving students (Spanish). Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 2023; 2(1): 1–181.

[16]. Suasnabas-Pacheco LS, Juárez JF. Quality of education in Ecuador: Myth or reality (Spanish)? Dominio de las Ciencias 2020; 6(2): 133–157. doi: 10.23857/dc.v6i2.1160

[17]. Sierra Villamil GM. Educational leadership in the XXI century, from the perspective of sustainable entrepreneurship (Spanish). Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios 2016; 81: 111–129. doi: 10.21158/01208160.n81.2016.1562

[18]. Ortega Cuenca P, Ramirez Solís ME, Torres Guerrero JL, et al. Educational innovation model. A framework for training and developing a culture of innovation (Spanish). Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia 2007; 10(1): 145–173. doi: 10.5944/ried.1.10.1023

[19]. Imbernón Muñoz F, Bartolome L, García RF, et al. Education in the XXI Century: The Challenges of the Immediate Future (Spanish). Editorial Graó; 2000.

[20]. Vargas GMG, Delgado VHO. Leadership for a modern management of educational processes education (Spanish). Revista Educacion 2010; 34(1): 15–29. doi: 10.15517/revedu.v34i1.495

[21]. Cejas MN, Martinez MFC, Aldáz SHM, Velazco DJM. The right to gender equality in tourism in the context of pandemic COVID-19 in the Canton Riobamba, Ecuador. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 2021; 12(6): 1495–1503. doi: 10.14505//jemt.v12.6(54).06

[22]. López-Gonzalez H, Sosa L, Sánchez L, Faure-Carvallo A. Media and informational education and critical thinking: A systematic review (Spanish). Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 2023; 81: 399–422. doi: 10.4185/RLCS-2023-1939

[23]. Pinos KMC, Robles DMA, Agila LEV, et al. Importance of reflective practice in the teaching profession during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Educational and Social Research 2023; 13(2): 1. doi: 10.36941/jesr-2023-0027

[24]. Mendoza Velazco DJ, Flores Hinostroza EM, Salvador Moreno JE, et al. Attitudes of Ecuadorian secondary school teaching staff towards online STEM development in 2022. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 2022; 21(7): 59–81. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.21.7.4

[25]. Pujol-Cols L, Lazzaro-Salazar M. Career vocation in academics of a public university in Argentina (Spanish). Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior 2021; 12(34): 72–86. doi: 10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2021.34.979

[26]. Bolivar A. Educational leadership and its role in improvement: A current review of its possibilities and limitations (Spanish). Psychoperspectives 2010; 9(2): 9–33. doi: 10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol9-Issue2-fulltext-112

[27]. Toomela A. Quantitative methods in psychology: Inevitable and useless. Frontiers in Psychology 2010; 1: 29. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00029

[28]. Leal Afanador JA. Education, Virtuality and Innovation, Case Study for the Consolidation of a Leadership Model in Inclusive and Quality Education, 1st ed (Spanish). Sello Editorial UNAD; 2021.

[29]. Díaz Domínguez T, Alemán PA. Education as a factor of development (Spanish). Virtual Magazine Universidad Católica Del Norte 2011; 1(23).

[30]. Mena KMA, Espinoza SR. Education in the knowledge society. Revista Torreón Universitario 2019; 8(22): 156–160. doi: 10.5377/torreon.v8i22.9032

[31]. Palacios Núñez M, Toribio López A, Deroncele Acosta A. Educational innovation in the development of relevant learning: A systematic literature review. Revista Universidad y Sociedad 2021; 13(5): 134–145.

[32]. Molero M, Barragán A, Del Mar M. Teaching innovation and research in education: Experiences of change in the teaching methodology. Available online: https://www.google.com.ec/books/edition/_/i_5pEAAAQBAJ?hl=es&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjsyfOn5ff9AhV2QzABHekCB6wQre8FegQIEBAD (accessed on 3 August 2023).

[33]. Mendoza-Velazco DJ, Navarro-Cejas M, Morales-Intriago JC, Cejas-Martínez MF. The ethnomethodological analysis in the humanistic and social sciences of Ecuadorian education: The ethnomethodological analysis (Spanish). AiBi Revista De Investigación, Administración E Ingeniería 2023; 11(1): 58–65. doi: 10.15649/2346030X.3078

[34]. Cejas MN, Gutiérrez FC, Gustavo MMJ, et al. Attitudinal analysis of women’s political participation in Ecuador: Social and legal perspectives. Journal of Educational and Social Research 2022; 12(6): 12. doi: 10.36941/jesr-2022-0141

[35]. Mendoza Velazco DJ, Cejas MN, Cejas Martínez MF, et al. Digital andragogical competences of Ecuadorian higher education teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research 2021; 10(3): 1341–1358. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1341

[36]. Cejas M, Velazco DM, Cejas MN, Corozo JPM. Pedagogical leadership within the framework of human talent management: A comprehensive approach from the perspective of higher education in Ecuador. Integration of Education 2021; 25(1): 8–21. doi: 10.15507/1991-9468.102.025.202101.008-021



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com