Environment and Social Psychology

Enhancing waste classification behavior: A psychological perspective

Mengmeng Ren

Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University; Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan Normal University

Wei Fan

Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University; Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan Normal University

Yiping Zhong

Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University; Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan Normal University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1767

Keywords: waste classification behavior, influencing factors, a psychological perspective

---

Abstract

In our rapidly evolving world, propelled by technological advancements and societal progress, the pace of life has accelerated significantly. However, this relentless pursuit of speed has also given birth to pressing ecological challenges, with waste accumulation being a conspicuous concern. Despite concerted efforts to promote waste classification practices through policies and initiatives, the adoption of such behavior remains disappointingly limited. Consequently, the exploration of waste classification behavior has garnered attention in the field of environmental psychology. This paper synthesizes years of domestic and international research to comprehensively review the current state, definition, influencing factors, and potential benefits of waste classification behavior. By adopting a multidimensional approach, it aims to unveil the role of psychology in shaping such behavior, while also addressing the persisting ecological dilemmas that continue to confound contemporary efforts.

---

References

[1]. Valavanidis A. Global Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Crisis.

[2]. Jekria N, Daud S. Environmental concern and recycling behaviour. Procedia Economics and Finance 2016; 35: 667–673. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00082-4

[3]. Meng X, Tan X, Wang Y, et al. Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents’ household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2019; 140: 224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021

[4]. Goh E, Esfandiar K, Jie F, et al. Please sort out your rubbish! An integrated structural model approach to examine antecedents of residential households’ waste separation behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022; 355: 131789. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131789

[5]. Wang F, Cheng Z, Reisner A, Liu Y. Compliance with household solid waste management in rural villages in developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 202: 293–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.135

[6]. Agovino M, Garofalo A, Mariani A. Institutional quality effects on separate waste collection: some evidence from Italian provinces. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2017; 61(9): 1487–1510. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1353958

[7]. Zhang S, Hu D, Lin T, et al. Determinants affecting residents’ waste classification intention and behavior: A study based on TPB and A-B-C methodology. Journal of Environmental Management 2021; 290: 112591. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591

[8]. Matiiuk Y, Liobikienė G. The impact of informational, social, convenience and financial tools on waste sorting behavior: Assumptions and reflections of the real situation. Journal of Environmental Management 2021; 297: 113323. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113323

[9]. Stoeva K, Alriksson S. Influence of recycling programmes on waste separation behaviour. Waste Management 2017; 68: 732–741. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.005

[10]. Arkorful VE, Shuliang Z, Lugu BK. Investigating household waste separation behavior: the salience of an integrated norm activation model and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2022; 66(10): 2195–2221. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2063112

[11]. Tian J, Gong Y, Li Y, et al. Can policy implementation increase public waste sorting behavior? The comparison between regions with and without waste sorting policy implementation in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022; 363: 132401. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132401

[12]. Wang C, Zhang X, Sun Q. The influence of economic incentives on residents’ intention to participate in online recycling: An experimental study from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2021; 169: 105497. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105497

[13]. Lu B, Wang J. How can residents be motivated to participate in waste recycling? An analysis based on two survey experiments in China. Waste Management 2022; 143: 206–214. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.034

[14]. Pu M, Yu X. The research on the regulation mechanism of garbage classification and recycling based on the analysis of subject game. Open Access Library Journal 2021; 8(6): 1–20. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1107536

[15]. Timlett RE, Williams ID. The impact of transient populations on recycling behaviour in a densely populated urban environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2009; 53(9): 498–506. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.010

[16]. Ando AW, Gosselin AY. Recycling in multifamily dwellings: Does convenience matter? Economic Inquiry 2005; 43(2): 426–438. doi: 10.1093/ei/cbi029

[17]. Miafodzyeva S, Brandt N, Andersson M. Recycling behaviour of householders living in multicultural urban area: A case study of Järva, Stockholm, Sweden. Waste Management & Research 2013; 31(5): 447–457. doi: 10.1177/0734242x13476746

[18]. Zhang B, Lai K, Wang B, Wang Z. From intention to action: How do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting? Journal of Environmental Management 2019; 233: 447–458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.059

[19]. Shaw PJ, Maynard SJ. The potential of financial incentives to enhance householders’ kerbside recycling behaviour. Waste Management 2008; 28(10): 1732–1741. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.08.008

[20]. Liu Y, Sheng H, Mundorf N, et al. Integrating norm activation model and theory of planned behavior to understand sustainable transport behavior: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2017; 14(12): 1593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121593

[21]. Bueno M, Valente M. The effects of pricing waste generation: A synthetic control approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2019; 96: 274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.06.004

[22]. Wang Y, Long X, Li L, et al. Extending theory of planned behavior in household waste sorting in China: The moderating effect of knowledge, personal involvement, and moral responsibility. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2020; 23(5): 7230–7250. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00913-9

[23]. Alhassan H, Kwakwa PA, Owusu-Sekyere E. Households’ source separation behaviour and solid waste disposal options in Ghana’s Millennium City. Journal of Environmental Management 2020; 259: 110055. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110055

[24]. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 1999; 125(6): 627–668. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627

[25]. Deci EL, Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Ryan RM. Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist 1991; 26(3–4): 325–346. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137

[26]. Hafner D, Lillicrap T, Fischer I, et al. Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels. arXiv 2019; arXiv:1811.04551. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1811.04551

[27]. Keuschnigg M, Kratz F. Thou shalt recycle: How social norms of environmental protection narrow the scope of the low-cost hypothesis. Environment and Behavior 2017; 50(10): 1059–1091. doi: 10.1177/0013916517726569

[28]. Keizer K, Schultz PW. Social norms and pro-environmental behaviour. In: Steg L, de Groot JIM (editors). Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2018. pp. 179–188.

[29]. Botetzagias I, Dima AF, Malesios C. Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2015; 95: 58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004

[30]. Karim Ghani WAWAb, Rusli IF, Biak DRA, Idris A. An application of the theory of planned behaviour to study the influencing factors of participation in source separation of food waste. Waste Management 2013; 33(5): 1276–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.019

[31]. Zeng Y, Tian Y, He K, Zhang J. Environmental conscience, external incentives and social norms in rice farmers’ adoption of pro-environmental agricultural practices in rural Hubei province, China. Environmental Technology 2019; 41(19): 2518–2532. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2019.1574907

[32]. Wang Z, Dong X. Study on tourists’ waste classification behavior: An extension of the theory of planned behavior model. E3S Web of Conferences 2020; 194: 04053. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202019404053

[33]. Fiorillo D, Senatore L. Pro-social behaviours, waste concern and recycling behaviour in Italy at the end of the 1990s. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 2019; 22(2): 127–151. doi: 10.1007/s10018-019-00251-9

[34]. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990; 58(6): 1015–1026. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015

[35]. Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, et al. Normative social influence is under-detected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008; 34(7): 913–923. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316691

[36]. Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V. A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 2008; 35(3): 472–482. doi: 10.1086/586910.

[37]. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 2002; 8(3): 239–260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401

[38]. Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 2007; 17(3–4): 445–459. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004

[39]. Rousta K, Zisen L, Hellwig C. Household waste sorting participation in developing countries—A meta-analysis. Recycling 2020; 5(1): 6. doi: 10.3390/recycling5010006

[40]. Zhang H, Liu J, Wen Z, Chen YX. College students’ municipal solid waste source separation behavior and its influential factors: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 164: 444–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.224

[41]. Wang S, Wang J, Yang S, et al. From intention to behavior: Comprehending residents’ waste sorting intention and behavior formation process. Waste Management 2020; 113: 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.031

[42]. Oreg S, Katz-Gerro T. Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and Behavior 2006; 38(4): 462–483. doi: 10.1177/0013916505286012

[43]. Steg L, Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009; 29(3): 309–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

[44]. Kaiser FG, Schultz PW. The attitude-behavior relationship: A test of three models of the moderating role of behavioral difficulty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2009; 39(1): 186–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00435.x

[45]. Kormos C, Gifford R. The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2014; 40: 359–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003

[46]. Schwartz SH. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1977; 10: 221–279. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

[47]. Visschers VHM, Wickli N, Siegrist M. Sorting out food waste behaviour: A survey on the motivators and barriers of self-reported amounts of food waste in households. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2016; 45: 66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.007

[48]. Razali F, Daud D, Weng-Wai C, Jiram WRA. Waste separation at source behaviour among Malaysian households: The theory of planned behaviour with moral norm. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 271: 122025. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122025

[49]. Esfandiar K, Dowling R, Pearce J, Goh E. What a load of rubbish! The efficacy of theory of planned behaviour and norm activation model in predicting visitors’ binning behaviour in national parks. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2021; 46: 304–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.01.001

[50]. Osbaldiston R, Schott JP. Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior 2011; 44(2): 257–299. doi: 10.1177/0013916511402673

[51]. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 1999; 125(2): 276–302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

[52]. Helliwell JF, Huang H, Wang S. Social capital and well-being in times of crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies 2014; 15(1), 145–162. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9441-z

[53]. Vesely S, Klöckner CA, Brick C. Pro-environmental behavior as a signal of cooperativeness: Evidence from a social dilemma experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2020; 67: 101362. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101362

[54]. Puska P, Kurki S, Lähdesmäki M, et al. Male-male status signaling through favoring organic foods: Is the signaler perceived and treated as a friend or a foe? Psychology and Marketing 2016; 33(10): 843–855. doi: 10.1002/mar.20922

[55]. Joireman J, Posey DC, Truelove HB, Parks CD. The environmentalist who cried drought: Reactions to repeated warnings about depleting resources under conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009; 29(2): 181–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.003

[56]. Klein SA, Hilbig BE, Heck DW. Which is the greater good? A social dilemma paradigm disentangling environmentalism and cooperation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2017; 53: 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.001

[57]. Vesely S, Klöckner CA. How anonymity and norms influence costly support for environmental causes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2018; 58: 27–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.07.013

[58]. Bertoldo R, Castro P. The outer influence inside us: Exploring the relation between social and personal norms. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2016; 112: 45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.020

[59]. Han H, Hyun SS. Eliciting customer green decisions related to water saving at hotels: impact of customer characteristics. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2018; 26(8): 1437–1452. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1458857

[60]. Sun M, Ma X, Jiang L, Wen N. Framing waste classification among chinese young people: The moderating effect of consideration of future consequences. Environmental Communication 2021; 15(8): 1008–1024. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2021.1941177

[61]. Tong Y, Liu J, Liu S. China is implementing “Garbage Classification” action. Environmental Pollution 2020; 259: 113707. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113707