PDF

Published

2024-01-04

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Wu, Y., Meng, J., Liu, Q., Sheng, D., Wang, X., & Geng, Y. (2024). Does the use of the internet enhance residents’ well-being?—Evidence from China. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i3.1778

Does the use of the internet enhance residents’ well-being?—Evidence from China

Yanbo Wu

School of Public Economics and Administration, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

Jinghan Meng

School of Business, Monash University

Qizhi Liu

School of Business, Monash University

Dachen Sheng

International College of Liberal Arts, Yamanashi Gakuin University

Xiaotong Wang

School of Business, Monash University

Yan Geng

School of Business, Monash University


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i3.1778


Keywords: internet use, resident, well-being, happiness, China

Abstract

Using data from the 2018 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), this study empirically examined the impact of Chinese residents’ Internet use on their subjective well-being. The results show that Internet use significantly increases residents’ subjective well-being; the results of the marginal effect show that the increase in Internet use increases the probability of residents choosing “Relatively happy” and “Extremely happy”; further analysis shows that Internet use increases the probability of residents choosing “Relatively happy” and “Extremely happy” through the marginal effect. “Moreover, in the heterogeneity analysis, Internet use significantly increases the subjective happiness of middle-aged people aged 35–60, and increases the subjective happiness of low-education and low-income groups, while rural residents have higher subjective well-being from Internet use relative to urban residents. This study mitigates the estimation bias that may be caused by the sample self-selection problem through propensity score matching (PSM), and conducts a series of robustness tests on the empirical results. Therefore, the government should emphasize the role of Internet use in enhancing residents’ happiness and promoting the happiness effect of Internet use by further improving Internet infrastructure and upgrading residents’ Internet use skills.

References

[1]. Lu J, Li Q. The Impact of Internet Use on the Life Satisfaction of the Elderly in China: Based on CLASS 2018 Data. Northwest Population Journal. 2022, 43(5). doi: 10.15884/j.cnki.issn.1007-0672.2022.05.001

[2]. Castellacci F, Tveito V. Internet use and well-being: A survey and a theoretical framework. Research Policy. 2018, 47(1): 308-325. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.007

[3]. Sun Y, Gao J, Zhang X, et al. The impact of internet use on residents’ happiness in China. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1188259

[4]. Güzel N, Kahveci İ, Solak N, et al. Internet addiction and its impact on physical health. Turkish Medical Student Journal. 2018, 32-36. doi: 10.4274/tmsj.2018.05.03.0002

[5]. Lachmann B, Sariyska R, Kannen C, et al. Life satisfaction and problematic Internet use: Evidence for gender specific effects. Psychiatry Research. 2016, 238: 363-367. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.017

[6]. McDool E, Powell P, Roberts J, et al. The internet and children’s psychological wellbeing. Journal of Health Economics. 2020, 69: 102274. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102274

[7]. Voukelatou V, Gabrielli L, Miliou I, et al. Measuring objective and subjective well-being: dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics. 2020, 11(4): 279-309. doi: 10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2

[8]. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin. 1984, 95(3): 542-575. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

[9]. Yang H, Wu Y, Lin X, et al. Internet Use, Life Satisfaction, and Subjective Well-Being Among the Elderly: Evidence From 2017 China General Social Survey. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021, 9. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.677643

[10]. EASTERLIN RA. Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth. Published online 1974: 89-125. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7

[11]. Deaton A. The financial crisis and the well-being of Americans: 2011 OEP Hicks Lecture*. Oxford Economic Papers. 2011, 64(1): 1-26. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpr051

[12]. Cuñado J, de Gracia FP. Environment and Happiness: New Evidence for Spain. Social Indicators Research. 2012, 112(3): 549-567. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0038-4

[13]. Childs E. Religious Attendance and Happiness: Examining Gaps in the Current Literature-A Research Note. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2010, 49(3): 550-560. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01528.x

[14]. Dorn D, Fischer JAV, Kirchgässner G, et al. Is It Culture or Democracy? The Impact of Democracy and Culture on Happiness. Social Indicators Research. 2006, 82(3): 505-526. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9048-4

[15]. Bittmann F. Beyond the U-Shape: Mapping the Functional Form Between Age and Life Satisfaction for 81 Countries Utilizing a Cluster Procedure. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2020, 22(5): 2343-2359. doi: 10.1007/s10902-020-00316-7

[16]. Tesch-Römer C, Motel-Klingebiel A, Tomasik MJ. Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being: Comparing Societies with Respect to Gender Equality. Social Indicators Research. 2007, 85(2): 329-349. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9133-3

[17]. Binder M, Coad A. Heterogeneity in the Relationship Between Unemployment and Subjective Wellbeing: A Quantile Approach. Economica. 2015, 82(328): 865-891. doi: 10.1111/ecca.12150

[18]. Herman KM, Hopman WM, Rosenberg MW. Self-rated health and life satisfaction among Canadian adults: associations of perceived weight status versus BMI. Quality of Life Research. 2013, 22(10): 2693-2705. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0394-9

[19]. Haller M, Hadler M. How Social Relations and Structures can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: An International Comparative Analysis. Social Indicators Research. 2006, 75(2): 169-216. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-6297-y

[20]. Wu Y, Wu Y, Zhang Y, et al. The Effect of Building Electricity Consumption on Residents’ Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from China. Buildings. 2022, 12(6): 710. doi: 10.3390/buildings12060710

[21]. Alshakhsi S, Chemnad K, Almourad MB, et al. Problematic internet usage: The impact of objectively recorded and categorized usage time, emotional intelligence components and subjective happiness about usage. Heliyon. 2022, 8(10): e11055. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11055

[22]. Nakagomi A, Shiba K, Kawachi I, et al. Internet use and subsequent health and well-being in older adults: An outcome-wide analysis. Computers in Human Behavior. 2022, 130: 107156. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107156

[23]. Shapira N, Barak A, Gal I. Promoting older adults’ well-being through Internet training and use. Aging & Mental Health. 2007, 11(5): 477-484. doi: 10.1080/13607860601086546

[24]. Anderson-Bill ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Social Cognitive Determinants of Nutrition and Physical Activity Among Web-Health Users Enrolling in an Online Intervention: The Influence of Social Support, Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectations, and Self-Regulation. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011, 13(1): e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1551

[25]. Kavetsos G, Koutroumpis P. Technological affluence and subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2011, 32(5): 742-753. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.004

[26]. Sabatini F, Sarracino F. Online Networks and Subjective Well‐Being. Kyklos. 2017, 70(3): 456-480. doi: 10.1111/kykl.12145

[27]. Stead H, Bibby PA. Personality, fear of missing out and problematic internet use and their relationship to subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017, 76: 534-540. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.016

[28]. Kim J, LaRose R, Peng W. Loneliness as the Cause and the Effect of Problematic Internet Use: The Relationship between Internet Use and Psychological Well-Being. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2009, 12(4): 451-455. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0327

[29]. Martin L, Omrani N. An assessment of trends in technology use, innovative work practices and employees’ attitudes in Europe. Applied Economics. 2014, 47(6): 623-638. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2014.978072

[30]. Guo X, Lu Q, Wang J. Internet Use and Young People’s Well-being: An Analysis of the mesmeric effect Based on Social Networks. China Youth Study. 2020, (6). doi: 10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2020.0079

[31]. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, et al. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin. 1999, 125(2): 276-302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

[32]. Sun Z, Wu Y, Sun H, et al. The Impact of Building Clean Energy Consumption on Residents’ Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from China. Buildings. 2022, 12(11): 2037. doi: 10.3390/buildings12112037

[33]. İmrohoroğlu A, Zhao K. Rising wealth inequality: Intergenerational links, entrepreneurship, and the decline in interest rate. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2022, 127: 86-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.02.005

[34]. Ma J, Yue Z. A Study on the Impact of Internet Use on the Happiness of Rural Residents. The World of Survey and Research. 2019, (8). doi: 10.13778/j.cnki.11-3705/c.2019.08.002

[35]. Sønderskov KM, Dinesen PT. Trusting the State, Trusting Each Other? The Effect of Institutional Trust on Social Trust. Political Behavior. 2015, 38(1): 179-202. doi: 10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8

[36]. Jing R, Jin G, Guo Y, et al. The association between constant and new Internet use and depressive symptoms among older adults in China: The role of structural social capital. Computers in Human Behavior. 2023, 138: 107480. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107480

[37]. Xu S, Liu C. Social Network, Internet Use and Rural Residents’ Well-Being. The World of Survey and Research. 2022, (6). doi: 10.13778/j.cnki.11-3705/c.2022.06.006

[38]. Pang Z, Zeng M. Does Internet Use Affect Youth’s Subjective Well-Being ? Based on the Data of 2010–2015 (CGSS). Journal of Xi’an University of Finance and Economics. 2020, 33. doi: 10.19331/j.cnki.jxufe.2020.03.009

[39]. Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Communication Monographs. 2009, 76(4): 408-420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360

[40]. Mehmetoglu M. Medsem: A stata package for statistical mediation analysis. International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics. 2018, 8(1): 63. doi: 10.1504/ijcee.2018.088321



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com