Open Journal Systems

Destination psychological ownership, environmental awareness and sustainable practices: A study among inbound UK and Chinese adults of Generation Zs

Fangfang Liu, Anees Janee bin Ali, Qaisar Iqbal

Article ID: 1802
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 659 (Abstract) 263 (PDF)

Abstract

Sketching on psychological ownership-attitude-behavior theory, the present study examines the effect of destination psychological ownership on Generation Z’s tourist environmental attitude, which in turn influences their sustainable behavior. This study also investigates the conditional impact of environmental awareness on the ecological attitude sustainable behavior relationship. Using a purposive sampling approach, the authors collected data from inbound Generation Z tourists in the UK and China through a survey. The findings concluded with a significant positive impact of destination psychological ownership on Generation Z’s environmental attitude. The current evidence also supports the positive effect of ecological attitude on Generation Z’s sustainable behavior. The present work offered robust evidence that environmental awareness moderates the environmental attitude-sustainable behavior relationship in Generation Z. Concerning UK and Chinese cultural differences, the findings concluded with variations among their Generation Z tourist destination psychological ownership, ecological attitude and sustainable practices. Implications and limitations have also been elaborated on at the end.


Keywords

destination psychological ownership; environmental awareness; positive environmental attitude; sustainable behavior

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Iqbal Q, Piwowar-Sulej K. Frugal innovation embedded in business and political ties: Transformational versus sustainable leadership. Asian Business & Management 2023; doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00248-z

2. Loureiro SMC, Guerreiro J, Han H. Past, present, and future of pro-environmental behavior in tourism and hospitality: A text-mining approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2021; 30(1): 258–278. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2021.1875477

3. Awedyk M, Niezgoda A. Resilience planning as an opportunity for future sustainable development in tourism. Operations Research and Decisions 2018; 28(2): 23–40. doi: 10.5277/ord180202

4. Nowacki M, Kowalczyk-Anioł J, Chawla Y. Gen Z’s attitude towards green image destinations, green tourism and behavioural intention regarding green holiday destination choice: A study in poland and india. Sustainability 2023; 15(10): 7860. doi: 10.3390/su15107860

5. Liu Z, Li W, Hao C, Liu H. Corporate environmental performance and financing constraints: An empirical study in the Chinese context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2020; 28(2): 616–629. doi: 10.1002/csr.2073

6. Seyfi S, Sharifi-Tehrani M, Hall CM, Vo-Thanh T. Exploring the drivers of Gen Z tourists’ buycott behaviour: A lifestyle politics perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2023: 1–19. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2023.2166517

7. Ardoin NM, Wheaton M, Bowers AW, et al. Nature-based tourism’s impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: A review and analysis of the literature and potential future research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2015; 23(6): 838–858. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2015.1024258

8. Ballantyne R, Packer J, Falk J. Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling. Tourism Management 2011; 32(6): 1243–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.11.003

9. Kowalczyk-Anioł J. Tourism trends among Generation Y in Poland. Tourism 2012; 22(2): 15–20. doi: 10.2478/v10106-012-0007-y

10. Landon AC, Woosnam KM, Boley BB. Modeling the psychological antecedents to tourists’ pro-sustainable behaviors: An application of the value-belief-norm model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2018; 26(6): 957–972. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1423320

11. Stylos N, Rahimi R, Okumus B, Williams S. Generation Z Marketing and Management in Tourism and Hospitality. Palgrave Macmillan Cham; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-70695-1

12. Li W, Zhang Q, Liu C, Xue Q. Tourism’s impacts on natural resources: A positive case from China. Environmental Management 2006; 38(4): 572–579. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0299-z

13. Patterson IR. Growing Older: Tourism and Leisure Behaviour of Older Adults. Cabi; 2006. doi: 10.1079/9781845930653.0000

14. Sharmin F, Sultan MT, Badulescu A, et al. Millennial tourists’ environmentally sustainable behavior towards a natural protected area: An integrative framework. Sustainability 2020; 12(20): 8545. doi: 10.3390/su12208545

15. Han H. Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management 2015; 47: 164–177. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014

16. Panda TK, Kumar A, Jakhar S, et al. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 243: 118575. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575

17. Yamane T, Kaneko S. Is the younger generation a driving force toward achieving the sustainable development goals? Survey experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 292: 125932. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125932

18. Schwartz SH. Normative influences on altruism. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Elsevier; 1977. pp. 221–279.

19. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991; 50(2): 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

20. Dabija DC, Bejan BM, Dinu V. How sustainability-oriented is Generation Z in retail? A literature review. Transformations in Business & Economics 2019; 18(2): 140–155.

21. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, et al. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. The Human Ecology Review 1999; 6(2): 81–97.

22. Higham J, Carr A. Ecotourism visitor experiences in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Challenging the environmental values of visitors in pursuit of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2002; 10(4): 277–294. doi: 10.1080/09669580208667168

23. Qiu H, Wang X, Morrison AM, et al. From ownership to responsibility: Extending the theory of planned behavior to predict tourist environmentally responsible behavioral intentions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2022: 1–24. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2022.2116643

24. Han H, Meng B, Kim W. Emerging bicycle tourism and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2016; 25(2): 292–309. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1202955

25. Pierce JL, Rubenfeld SA, Morgan S. Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. The Academy of Management Review 1991; 16(1): 121. doi: 10.2307/258609

26. Zhang H, Xu H. Impact of destination psychological ownership on residents’ “place citizenship behavior.” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 2019; 14: 100391. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.100391

27. Benckendorff P, Moscardo G, Murphy L. Environmental attitudes of Generation Y students: Foundations for sustainability education in tourism. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism 2012; 12(1): 44–69. doi: 10.1080/15313220.2012.650063

28. Sánchez-Fernández R, Iniesta-Bonillo MÁ, Cervera-Taulet A. Exploring the concept of perceived sustainability at tourist destinations: A market segmentation approach. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 2018; 36(2): 176–190. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2018.1505579

29. Kumar J, Nayak JK. Exploring destination psychological ownership among tourists: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2019; 39: 30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.01.006

30. Van Dyne L, Pierce JL. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2004; 25(4): 439–459. doi: 10.1002/job.249

31. Li S, Wei M, Qu H, Qiu S. How does self-image congruity affect tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior? Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2020; 28(12): 2156–2174. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1800717

32. Weaver DB, Lawton LJ. A new visitation paradigm for protected areas. Tourism Management 2017; 60: 140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.11.018

33. Chen SC, Shoemaker S. Age and cohort effects: The American senior tourism market. Annals of Tourism Research 2014; 48: 58–75. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.05.007

34. Gómez-Román C, Lima ML, Seoane G, et al. Testing common knowledge: Are Northern Europeans and Millennials more concerned about the environment? Sustainability 2020; 13(1): 45. doi: 10.3390/su13010045

35. Filimonau V, Matute J, Mika M, Faracik R. National culture as a driver of pro-environmental attitudes and behavioural intentions in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2018; 26(10): 1804–1825. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1511722

36. Cramer R. Millennials rising: Coming of age in the wake of the great recession. New America 2014; 11–16.

37. Qiu H, Fan J, Zhao L. Development of the academic study of tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior: A literature review. Tourism Tribune. 2018; 33(11): 122–138.

38. Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology 2003; 7(1): 84–107. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84

39. Iqbal Q, Piwowar-Sulej K. Organizational citizenship behavior for the environment decoded: Sustainable leaders, green organizational climate and person-organization fit. Baltic Journal of Management 2023; 18(3): 300–316. doi: 10.1108/bjm-09-2021-0347

40. Piwowar-Sulej K, Austen A, Iqbal Q. Fostering three types of green behavior through green HRM in the energy sector: The conditional role of environmental managerial support. Baltic Journal of Management 2023; 18(7): 509–524. doi: 10.1108/bjm-03-2023-0089

41. Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH, Li Y. Sustainable leadership in frontier Asia region: Managerial discretion and environmental innovation. Sustainability 2021; 13(9): 5002. doi: 10.3390/su13095002

42. Prayag G, Aquino RS, Hall CM, et al. Is Gen Z really that different? Environmental attitudes, travel behaviours and sustainability practices of international tourists to Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2022: 1–22. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2022.2131795

43. Wang P, Chen S. Psychological ownership in organizations and its relationship to employee’s working attitudes and behavior. Advances in Psychological Sciences. 2005; 13(6): 774.

44. Pick M. Psychological ownership in social media influencer marketing. European Business Review 2020; 33(1). doi: 10.1108/ebr-08-2019-0165

45. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Tao W. The influence of tourists’ online value co-creation behavior on consumer-brand relationship quality: The moderating effect of altruism. Frontiers in Psychology 2022; 13: 950546. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950546

46. Wei HL, Hai CY, Zhu SY, Lyu B. The impact of consumers’ choice deferral behavior on their intertemporal choice preference. Frontiers in Psychology 2021; 12: 555150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.555150

47. Calderón-Fajardo V, Molinillo S, Anaya-Sánchez R, Ekinci Y. Brand personality: Current insights and future research directions. Journal of Business Research 2023; 166: 114062. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114062

48. Kiatkawsin K, Han H. Young travelers’ intention to behave pro-environmentally: Merging the value-belief-norm theory and the expectancy theory. Tourism Management 2017; 59: 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.018

49. Zelenika I, Moreau T, Lane O, Zhao J. Sustainability education in a botanical garden promotes environmental knowledge, attitudes and willingness to act. Environmental Education Research 2018; 24(11): 1581–1596. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2018.1492705

50. Erul E, Woosnam KM. Explaining residents’ behavioral support for tourism through two theoretical frameworks. Journal of Travel Research 2021; 61(2): 362–377. doi: 10.1177/0047287520987619

51. Wang X, Fielding KS, Dean AJ. Psychological ownership of nature: A conceptual elaboration and research agenda. Biological Conservation 2022; 267: 109477. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109477

52. Chen A, Peng N. Examining Chinese tourists’ nature-based tourism participation behavior: Incorporating environmental concern into a constraint-negotiation model. Tourism Analysis 2016; 21(2): 189–202. doi: 10.3727/108354216x14559233984737

53. Fang WT, Ng E, Wang CM, Hsu ML. Normative beliefs, attitudes, and social norms: People reduce waste as an index of social relationships when spending leisure time. Sustainability 2017; 9(10): 1696. doi: 10.3390/su9101696

54. Ojea E, Loureiro ML. Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife. Ecological Economics 2007; 63(4): 807–814. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.003

55. de Groot JIM, Steg L. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior. Environment and Behavior 2007; 40(3): 330–354. doi: 10.1177/0013916506297831

56. Jopp R, Mair J, DeLacy T, Fluker M. Climate change adaptation: Destination management and the green tourist. Tourism Planning & Development 2014; 12(3): 300–320. doi: 10.1080/21568316.2014.988879

57. Casidy R, Wymer W, O’Cass A. Enhancing hotel brand performance through fostering brand relationship orientation in the minds of consumers. Tourism Management 2018; 66: 72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.008

58. Junaid M, Hussain K, Akram U, et al. Brand love: The emotional bridge between tourists’ perceived value and well-being. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 2020; 25(12): 1329–1342. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2020.1853577

59. Kil N, Holland SM, Stein TV. Structural relationships between environmental attitudes, recreation motivations, and environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 2014; 7–8: 16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2014.09.010

60. Handl G. Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm Declaration), 1972 and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law; 2012.

61. Bamberg S, Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007; 27(1): 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002

62. Bamberg S. Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2013; 34: 151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.002

63. van Riper CJ, Kyle GT. Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2014; 38: 288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.002

64. Tang M, Zhang X, Wang J, Kim HS. An analysis of online reputation at integrated resort in Macao—Evidence from the survey of customer online review. Environment and Social Psychology 2023; 8(1). doi: 10.18063/esp.v8.i1.1517

65. Ghazvini SAM, Timothy DJ, Sarmento J. Environmental concerns and attitudes of tourists towards national park uses and services. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 2020; 31: 100296. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2020.100296

66. Verma VK, Chandra B, Kumar S. Values and ascribed responsibility to predict consumers’ attitude and concern towards green hotel visit intention. Journal of Business Research 2019; 96: 206–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.021

67. Xu X, Wang S, Yu Y. Consumer’s intention to purchase green furniture: Do health consciousness and environmental awareness matter? Science of The Total Environment 2020; 704: 135275. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135275

68. Niankara I, Zoungrana DT. Interest in the biosphere and students environmental awareness and optimism: A global perspective. Global Ecology and Conservation 2018; 16: e00489. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00489

69. Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, And Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 2003.

70. Monaco S. Tourism and the new generations: Emerging trends and social implications in Italy. Journal of Tourism Futures 2018; 4(1): 7–15. doi: 10.1108/jtf-12-2017-0053

71. Chawla VK, Chanda AK, Angra S, Chawla GR. The sustainable project management: A review and future possibilities. Journal of Project Management 2018; 3(3): 157–170. doi: 10.5267/j.jpm.2018.2.001

72. Hofstede Insights. Compare countries. Available online: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/ product/compare-countries/ (accessed on 14 October 2023).

73. Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH. Workplace spirituality and nepotism-favouritism in selected ASEAN countries: The role of gender as moderator. Journal of Asia Business Studies 2020; 14(1): 31–49. doi: 10.1108/jabs-01-2018-0019

74. Hair JF Jr, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research 2020; 109: 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

75. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2014; 43(1): 115–135. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

76. Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research 2014; 44(3): 486–507. doi: 10.1177/0049124114543236

77. Zhang X, Ma L, Xu B, Xu F. How social media usage affects employees’ job satisfaction and turnover intention: An empirical study in China. Information & Management 2019; 56(6): 103136. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2018.12.004

78. Agyeiwaah E, Pratt S, Iaquinto BL, Suntikul W. Social identity positively impacts sustainable behaviors of backpackers. Tourism Geographies 2020; 25(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2020.1819401

79. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD. The “new environmental paradigm.” The Journal of Environmental Education 1978; 9(4): 10–19. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875

80. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011; 19(2): 139–152. doi: 10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202

81. Sekaran U, Bougie R. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

82. Mardia KV. Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics 1974; 36(2): 115–128.

83. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 2008; 6(1): 53–60.

84. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999; 6(1): 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118

85. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981; 18(1): 39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104

86. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.

87. Ruiz-Equihua D, Romero J, Loureiro SMC, Ali M. Human-robot interactions in the restaurant setting: The role of social cognition, psychological ownership and anthropomorphism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2022; 35(6): 1966–1985. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-05-2022-0597

88. Hur S, Ha S. Would luxury brands benefit from empowering consumers in product decision-making? Journal of Brand Management 2023. doi: 10.1057/s41262-023-00327-8

89. Xiong L, So KKF, Wu L, King C. Speaking up because it’s my brand: Examining employee brand psychological ownership and voice behavior in hospitality organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2019; 83: 274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.11.006

90. Wagner SH, Parker CP, Christiansen ND. Employees that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology 2003; 56(4): 847–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00242.x

91. Ainsworth J. Feelings of ownership and volunteering: Examining psychological ownership as a volunteering motivation for nonprofit service organisations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020; 52: 101931. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101931

92. Mayhew MG, Ashkanasy NM, Bramble T, Gardner J. A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. The Journal of Social Psychology 2007; 147(5): 477–500. doi: 10.3200/socp.147.5.477-500

93. Meng B, Lee MJ, Chua BL, Han H. An integrated framework of behavioral reasoning theory, theory of planned behavior, moral norm and emotions for fostering hospitality/tourism employees’ sustainable behaviors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2022; 34(12): 4516–4538. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-02-2022-0151

94. Koch J, Gerdt SO, Schewe G. Determinants of sustainable behavior of firms and the consequences for customer satisfaction in hospitality. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2020; 89: 102515. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102515

95. Fritsche I, Jonas E, Kayser DN, Koranyi N. Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010; 30(1): 67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.007

96. Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH, Li Z, Li Y. To walk in beauty: Sustainable leadership, frugal innovation and environmental performance. Managerial and Decision Economics 2021; 43(3): 738–750. doi: 10.1002/mde.3415

97. Iqbal Q, Piwowar-Sulej K. Sustainable leadership, justice climate and organizational citizenship behavior towards environment. Academy of Management 2022; 2022(1). doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2022.12797abstract

98. Eastman JK, Iyer R, Dekhili S. Can luxury attitudes impact sustainability? The role of desire for unique products, culture, and brand self-congruence. Psychology and Marketing 2021; 38(11): 1881–1894. doi: 10.1002/mar.21546

99. Liu CH. Conducting qualitative and quantitative analyses of sustainable behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2021; 60: 102474. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102474

100. Pérez-Luño A, Cabello Medina C, Carmona Lavado A, Cuevas Rodríguez G. How social capital and knowledge affect innovation. Journal of Business Research 2011; 64(12): 1369–1376. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.014

101. Wasaya A, Saleem MA, Ahmad J, et al. Impact of green trust and green perceived quality on green purchase intentions: A moderation study. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2021; 23(9): 13418–13435. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01219-6

102. Iqbal, Q., Piwowar-Sulej, K. Sustainable leadership and heterogeneous knowledge sharing: The model for frugal innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 2023; doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0144

103. Rezapouraghdam H, Alipour H, Darvishmotevali M. Employee workplace spirituality and pro-environmental behavior in the hotel industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2017; 26(5): 740–758. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1409229

104. Tsai K, Liao Y. Innovation capacity and the implementation of eco-innovation: Toward a contingency perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment 2017; 26(2): 1000–1013. doi: 10.1002/bse.1963

105. Aytekin A, Keles H, Uslu F, et al. The effect of responsible tourism perception on place attachment and support for sustainable tourism development: The moderator role of environmental awareness. Sustainability 2023; 15(7): 5865. doi: 10.3390/su15075865

106. Han H, Kim W, Kiatkawsin K. Emerging youth tourism: Fostering young travelers’ conservation intentions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 2016; 34(7): 905–918. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2016.1261758

107. Foroughi B, Arjuna N, Iranmanesh M, et al. Determinants of hotel guests’ pro-environmental behaviour: Past behaviour as moderator. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2022; 102: 103167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103167

108. Skallerud K, Armbrecht J, Tuu HH. Intentions to consume sustainably produced fish: The moderator effects of involvement and environmental awareness. Sustainability 2021; 13(2): 946. doi: 10.3390/su13020946

109. Mehta P, Kaur A, Singh S, Mehta MD. “Sustainable attitude”—A modest notion creating a tremendous difference in the glamourous fast fashion world: Investigating moderating effects. Society and Business Review 2022; ahead-of-print. doi: 10.1108/sbr-10-2021-0205

110. Dawkins S, Tian AW, Newman A, Martin A. Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2015; 38(2): 163–183. doi: 10.1002/job.2057

111. Dunford BB, Schleicher DJ, Zhu L. The relative importance of psychological versus pecuniary approaches to establishing an ownership culture. In: Advances in Industrial & Labor Relations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2009. pp. 1–21.

112. Martey EM, Mante GDK, Gligah BK, et al. Environmental concerns, green consumption value and green buying intentions. Environment and Social Psychology 2023; 7(2): 1–18. doi: 10.18063/esp.v7.i2.1508

113. Bizarrias FS, Santos JN, Ferreira MCO, et al. Intention to buy sustainable products based on consumer’s information and perceptions about “green”: The mediating role of attitudes. Environment and Social Psychology 2019; 3(1): 1–11. doi: 10.18063/esp.v3.i2.726

114. Miao C, Zhou C, Sun H, et al. The role of social support and environment: The mediating effect of college students’ psychology and behavior. Environment and Social Psychology 2020; 5(1): 1–9. doi: 10.18063/esp.v5.i1.1387

115. Yan Z, Peng X, Lee S, Fang P. Chasing the light or chasing the dark? Top managers’ political ties and corporate proactive environmental strategy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2021; 35(10): 1341–1354. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2021.2003774


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1802
(659 Abstract Views, 263 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Fangfang Liu, Anees Janee bin Ali, Qaisar Iqbal

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/