PDF

Published

2023-11-10

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Liu, F., Ali, A. J. bin, & Iqbal, Q. (2023). Destination psychological ownership, environmental awareness and sustainable practices: A study among inbound UK and Chinese adults of Generation Zs. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1802

Destination psychological ownership, environmental awareness and sustainable practices: A study among inbound UK and Chinese adults of Generation Zs

Fangfang Liu

School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Anees Janee bin Ali

School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Qaisar Iqbal

IRC for Finance & Digital Economy, KFUPM Business School, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1802


Keywords: destination psychological ownership, environmental awareness, positive environmental attitude, sustainable behavior

Abstract

Sketching on psychological ownership-attitude-behavior theory, the present study examines the effect of destination psychological ownership on Generation Z’s tourist environmental attitude, which in turn influences their sustainable behavior. This study also investigates the conditional impact of environmental awareness on the ecological attitude sustainable behavior relationship. Using a purposive sampling approach, the authors collected data from inbound Generation Z tourists in the UK and China through a survey. The findings concluded with a significant positive impact of destination psychological ownership on Generation Z’s environmental attitude. The current evidence also supports the positive effect of ecological attitude on Generation Z’s sustainable behavior. The present work offered robust evidence that environmental awareness moderates the environmental attitude-sustainable behavior relationship in Generation Z. Concerning UK and Chinese cultural differences, the findings concluded with variations among their Generation Z tourist destination psychological ownership, ecological attitude and sustainable practices. Implications and limitations have also been elaborated on at the end.

References

[1]. Iqbal Q, Piwowar-Sulej K. Frugal innovation embedded in business and political ties: Transformational versus sustainable leadership. Asian Business & Management 2023; doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00248-z

[2]. Loureiro SMC, Guerreiro J, Han H. Past, present, and future of pro-environmental behavior in tourism and hospitality: A text-mining approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2021; 30(1): 258–278. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2021.1875477

[3]. Awedyk M, Niezgoda A. Resilience planning as an opportunity for future sustainable development in tourism. Operations Research and Decisions 2018; 28(2): 23–40. doi: 10.5277/ord180202

[4]. Nowacki M, Kowalczyk-Anioł J, Chawla Y. Gen Z’s attitude towards green image destinations, green tourism and behavioural intention regarding green holiday destination choice: A study in poland and india. Sustainability 2023; 15(10): 7860. doi: 10.3390/su15107860

[5]. Liu Z, Li W, Hao C, Liu H. Corporate environmental performance and financing constraints: An empirical study in the Chinese context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2020; 28(2): 616–629. doi: 10.1002/csr.2073

[6]. Seyfi S, Sharifi-Tehrani M, Hall CM, Vo-Thanh T. Exploring the drivers of Gen Z tourists’ buycott behaviour: A lifestyle politics perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2023: 1–19. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2023.2166517

[7]. Ardoin NM, Wheaton M, Bowers AW, et al. Nature-based tourism’s impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: A review and analysis of the literature and potential future research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2015; 23(6): 838–858. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2015.1024258

[8]. Ballantyne R, Packer J, Falk J. Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling. Tourism Management 2011; 32(6): 1243–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.11.003

[9]. Kowalczyk-Anioł J. Tourism trends among Generation Y in Poland. Tourism 2012; 22(2): 15–20. doi: 10.2478/v10106-012-0007-y

[10]. Landon AC, Woosnam KM, Boley BB. Modeling the psychological antecedents to tourists’ pro-sustainable behaviors: An application of the value-belief-norm model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2018; 26(6): 957–972. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1423320

[11]. Stylos N, Rahimi R, Okumus B, Williams S. Generation Z Marketing and Management in Tourism and Hospitality. Palgrave Macmillan Cham; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-70695-1

[12]. Li W, Zhang Q, Liu C, Xue Q. Tourism’s impacts on natural resources: A positive case from China. Environmental Management 2006; 38(4): 572–579. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0299-z

[13]. Patterson IR. Growing Older: Tourism and Leisure Behaviour of Older Adults. Cabi; 2006. doi: 10.1079/9781845930653.0000

[14]. Sharmin F, Sultan MT, Badulescu A, et al. Millennial tourists’ environmentally sustainable behavior towards a natural protected area: An integrative framework. Sustainability 2020; 12(20): 8545. doi: 10.3390/su12208545

[15]. Han H. Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management 2015; 47: 164–177. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014

[16]. Panda TK, Kumar A, Jakhar S, et al. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 243: 118575. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575

[17]. Yamane T, Kaneko S. Is the younger generation a driving force toward achieving the sustainable development goals? Survey experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 292: 125932. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125932

[18]. Schwartz SH. Normative influences on altruism. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Elsevier; 1977. pp. 221–279.

[19]. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991; 50(2): 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

[20]. Dabija DC, Bejan BM, Dinu V. How sustainability-oriented is Generation Z in retail? A literature review. Transformations in Business & Economics 2019; 18(2): 140–155.

[21]. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, et al. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. The Human Ecology Review 1999; 6(2): 81–97.

[22]. Higham J, Carr A. Ecotourism visitor experiences in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Challenging the environmental values of visitors in pursuit of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2002; 10(4): 277–294. doi: 10.1080/09669580208667168

[23]. Qiu H, Wang X, Morrison AM, et al. From ownership to responsibility: Extending the theory of planned behavior to predict tourist environmentally responsible behavioral intentions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2022: 1–24. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2022.2116643

[24]. Han H, Meng B, Kim W. Emerging bicycle tourism and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2016; 25(2): 292–309. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1202955

[25]. Pierce JL, Rubenfeld SA, Morgan S. Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. The Academy of Management Review 1991; 16(1): 121. doi: 10.2307/258609

[26]. Zhang H, Xu H. Impact of destination psychological ownership on residents’ “place citizenship behavior.” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 2019; 14: 100391. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.100391

[27]. Benckendorff P, Moscardo G, Murphy L. Environmental attitudes of Generation Y students: Foundations for sustainability education in tourism. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism 2012; 12(1): 44–69. doi: 10.1080/15313220.2012.650063

[28]. Sánchez-Fernández R, Iniesta-Bonillo MÁ, Cervera-Taulet A. Exploring the concept of perceived sustainability at tourist destinations: A market segmentation approach. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 2018; 36(2): 176–190. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2018.1505579

[29]. Kumar J, Nayak JK. Exploring destination psychological ownership among tourists: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2019; 39: 30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.01.006

[30]. Van Dyne L, Pierce JL. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2004; 25(4): 439–459. doi: 10.1002/job.249

[31]. Li S, Wei M, Qu H, Qiu S. How does self-image congruity affect tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior? Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2020; 28(12): 2156–2174. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1800717

[32]. Weaver DB, Lawton LJ. A new visitation paradigm for protected areas. Tourism Management 2017; 60: 140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.11.018

[33]. Chen SC, Shoemaker S. Age and cohort effects: The American senior tourism market. Annals of Tourism Research 2014; 48: 58–75. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.05.007

[34]. Gómez-Román C, Lima ML, Seoane G, et al. Testing common knowledge: Are Northern Europeans and Millennials more concerned about the environment? Sustainability 2020; 13(1): 45. doi: 10.3390/su13010045

[35]. Filimonau V, Matute J, Mika M, Faracik R. National culture as a driver of pro-environmental attitudes and behavioural intentions in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2018; 26(10): 1804–1825. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1511722

[36]. Cramer R. Millennials rising: Coming of age in the wake of the great recession. New America 2014; 11–16.

[37]. Qiu H, Fan J, Zhao L. Development of the academic study of tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior: A literature review. Tourism Tribune. 2018; 33(11): 122–138.

[38]. Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology 2003; 7(1): 84–107. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84

[39]. Iqbal Q, Piwowar-Sulej K. Organizational citizenship behavior for the environment decoded: Sustainable leaders, green organizational climate and person-organization fit. Baltic Journal of Management 2023; 18(3): 300–316. doi: 10.1108/bjm-09-2021-0347

[40]. Piwowar-Sulej K, Austen A, Iqbal Q. Fostering three types of green behavior through green HRM in the energy sector: The conditional role of environmental managerial support. Baltic Journal of Management 2023; 18(7): 509–524. doi: 10.1108/bjm-03-2023-0089

[41]. Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH, Li Y. Sustainable leadership in frontier Asia region: Managerial discretion and environmental innovation. Sustainability 2021; 13(9): 5002. doi: 10.3390/su13095002

[42]. Prayag G, Aquino RS, Hall CM, et al. Is Gen Z really that different? Environmental attitudes, travel behaviours and sustainability practices of international tourists to Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2022: 1–22. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2022.2131795

[43]. Wang P, Chen S. Psychological ownership in organizations and its relationship to employee’s working attitudes and behavior. Advances in Psychological Sciences. 2005; 13(6): 774.

[44]. Pick M. Psychological ownership in social media influencer marketing. European Business Review 2020; 33(1). doi: 10.1108/ebr-08-2019-0165

[45]. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Tao W. The influence of tourists’ online value co-creation behavior on consumer-brand relationship quality: The moderating effect of altruism. Frontiers in Psychology 2022; 13: 950546. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950546

[46]. Wei HL, Hai CY, Zhu SY, Lyu B. The impact of consumers’ choice deferral behavior on their intertemporal choice preference. Frontiers in Psychology 2021; 12: 555150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.555150

[47]. Calderón-Fajardo V, Molinillo S, Anaya-Sánchez R, Ekinci Y. Brand personality: Current insights and future research directions. Journal of Business Research 2023; 166: 114062. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114062

[48]. Kiatkawsin K, Han H. Young travelers’ intention to behave pro-environmentally: Merging the value-belief-norm theory and the expectancy theory. Tourism Management 2017; 59: 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.018

[49]. Zelenika I, Moreau T, Lane O, Zhao J. Sustainability education in a botanical garden promotes environmental knowledge, attitudes and willingness to act. Environmental Education Research 2018; 24(11): 1581–1596. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2018.1492705

[50]. Erul E, Woosnam KM. Explaining residents’ behavioral support for tourism through two theoretical frameworks. Journal of Travel Research 2021; 61(2): 362–377. doi: 10.1177/0047287520987619

[51]. Wang X, Fielding KS, Dean AJ. Psychological ownership of nature: A conceptual elaboration and research agenda. Biological Conservation 2022; 267: 109477. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109477

[52]. Chen A, Peng N. Examining Chinese tourists’ nature-based tourism participation behavior: Incorporating environmental concern into a constraint-negotiation model. Tourism Analysis 2016; 21(2): 189–202. doi: 10.3727/108354216x14559233984737

[53]. Fang WT, Ng E, Wang CM, Hsu ML. Normative beliefs, attitudes, and social norms: People reduce waste as an index of social relationships when spending leisure time. Sustainability 2017; 9(10): 1696. doi: 10.3390/su9101696

[54]. Ojea E, Loureiro ML. Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife. Ecological Economics 2007; 63(4): 807–814. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.003

[55]. de Groot JIM, Steg L. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior. Environment and Behavior 2007; 40(3): 330–354. doi: 10.1177/0013916506297831

[56]. Jopp R, Mair J, DeLacy T, Fluker M. Climate change adaptation: Destination management and the green tourist. Tourism Planning & Development 2014; 12(3): 300–320. doi: 10.1080/21568316.2014.988879

[57]. Casidy R, Wymer W, O’Cass A. Enhancing hotel brand performance through fostering brand relationship orientation in the minds of consumers. Tourism Management 2018; 66: 72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.11.008

[58]. Junaid M, Hussain K, Akram U, et al. Brand love: The emotional bridge between tourists’ perceived value and well-being. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 2020; 25(12): 1329–1342. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2020.1853577

[59]. Kil N, Holland SM, Stein TV. Structural relationships between environmental attitudes, recreation motivations, and environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 2014; 7–8: 16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2014.09.010

[60]. Handl G. Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm Declaration), 1972 and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law; 2012.

[61]. Bamberg S, Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007; 27(1): 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002

[62]. Bamberg S. Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2013; 34: 151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.002

[63]. van Riper CJ, Kyle GT. Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2014; 38: 288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.002

[64]. Tang M, Zhang X, Wang J, Kim HS. An analysis of online reputation at integrated resort in Macao—Evidence from the survey of customer online review. Environment and Social Psychology 2023; 8(1). doi: 10.18063/esp.v8.i1.1517

[65]. Ghazvini SAM, Timothy DJ, Sarmento J. Environmental concerns and attitudes of tourists towards national park uses and services. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 2020; 31: 100296. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2020.100296

[66]. Verma VK, Chandra B, Kumar S. Values and ascribed responsibility to predict consumers’ attitude and concern towards green hotel visit intention. Journal of Business Research 2019; 96: 206–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.021

[67]. Xu X, Wang S, Yu Y. Consumer’s intention to purchase green furniture: Do health consciousness and environmental awareness matter? Science of The Total Environment 2020; 704: 135275. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135275

[68]. Niankara I, Zoungrana DT. Interest in the biosphere and students environmental awareness and optimism: A global perspective. Global Ecology and Conservation 2018; 16: e00489. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00489

[69]. Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, And Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 2003.

[70]. Monaco S. Tourism and the new generations: Emerging trends and social implications in Italy. Journal of Tourism Futures 2018; 4(1): 7–15. doi: 10.1108/jtf-12-2017-0053

[71]. Chawla VK, Chanda AK, Angra S, Chawla GR. The sustainable project management: A review and future possibilities. Journal of Project Management 2018; 3(3): 157–170. doi: 10.5267/j.jpm.2018.2.001

[72]. Hofstede Insights. Compare countries. Available online: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/ product/compare-countries/ (accessed on 14 October 2023).

[73]. Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH. Workplace spirituality and nepotism-favouritism in selected ASEAN countries: The role of gender as moderator. Journal of Asia Business Studies 2020; 14(1): 31–49. doi: 10.1108/jabs-01-2018-0019

[74]. Hair JF Jr, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research 2020; 109: 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

[75]. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2014; 43(1): 115–135. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

[76]. Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research 2014; 44(3): 486–507. doi: 10.1177/0049124114543236

[77]. Zhang X, Ma L, Xu B, Xu F. How social media usage affects employees’ job satisfaction and turnover intention: An empirical study in China. Information & Management 2019; 56(6): 103136. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2018.12.004

[78]. Agyeiwaah E, Pratt S, Iaquinto BL, Suntikul W. Social identity positively impacts sustainable behaviors of backpackers. Tourism Geographies 2020; 25(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2020.1819401

[79]. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD. The “new environmental paradigm.” The Journal of Environmental Education 1978; 9(4): 10–19. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875

[80]. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011; 19(2): 139–152. doi: 10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202

[81]. Sekaran U, Bougie R. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

[82]. Mardia KV. Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics 1974; 36(2): 115–128.

[83]. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 2008; 6(1): 53–60.

[84]. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999; 6(1): 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118

[85]. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981; 18(1): 39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104

[86]. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.

[87]. Ruiz-Equihua D, Romero J, Loureiro SMC, Ali M. Human-robot interactions in the restaurant setting: The role of social cognition, psychological ownership and anthropomorphism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2022; 35(6): 1966–1985. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-05-2022-0597

[88]. Hur S, Ha S. Would luxury brands benefit from empowering consumers in product decision-making? Journal of Brand Management 2023. doi: 10.1057/s41262-023-00327-8

[89]. Xiong L, So KKF, Wu L, King C. Speaking up because it’s my brand: Examining employee brand psychological ownership and voice behavior in hospitality organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2019; 83: 274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.11.006

[90]. Wagner SH, Parker CP, Christiansen ND. Employees that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology 2003; 56(4): 847–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00242.x

[91]. Ainsworth J. Feelings of ownership and volunteering: Examining psychological ownership as a volunteering motivation for nonprofit service organisations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020; 52: 101931. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101931

[92]. Mayhew MG, Ashkanasy NM, Bramble T, Gardner J. A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. The Journal of Social Psychology 2007; 147(5): 477–500. doi: 10.3200/socp.147.5.477-500

[93]. Meng B, Lee MJ, Chua BL, Han H. An integrated framework of behavioral reasoning theory, theory of planned behavior, moral norm and emotions for fostering hospitality/tourism employees’ sustainable behaviors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2022; 34(12): 4516–4538. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-02-2022-0151

[94]. Koch J, Gerdt SO, Schewe G. Determinants of sustainable behavior of firms and the consequences for customer satisfaction in hospitality. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2020; 89: 102515. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102515

[95]. Fritsche I, Jonas E, Kayser DN, Koranyi N. Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010; 30(1): 67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.007

[96]. Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH, Li Z, Li Y. To walk in beauty: Sustainable leadership, frugal innovation and environmental performance. Managerial and Decision Economics 2021; 43(3): 738–750. doi: 10.1002/mde.3415

[97]. Iqbal Q, Piwowar-Sulej K. Sustainable leadership, justice climate and organizational citizenship behavior towards environment. Academy of Management 2022; 2022(1). doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2022.12797abstract

[98]. Eastman JK, Iyer R, Dekhili S. Can luxury attitudes impact sustainability? The role of desire for unique products, culture, and brand self-congruence. Psychology and Marketing 2021; 38(11): 1881–1894. doi: 10.1002/mar.21546

[99]. Liu CH. Conducting qualitative and quantitative analyses of sustainable behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2021; 60: 102474. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102474

[100]. Pérez-Luño A, Cabello Medina C, Carmona Lavado A, Cuevas Rodríguez G. How social capital and knowledge affect innovation. Journal of Business Research 2011; 64(12): 1369–1376. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.014

[101]. Wasaya A, Saleem MA, Ahmad J, et al. Impact of green trust and green perceived quality on green purchase intentions: A moderation study. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2021; 23(9): 13418–13435. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01219-6

[102]. Iqbal, Q., Piwowar-Sulej, K. Sustainable leadership and heterogeneous knowledge sharing: The model for frugal innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 2023; doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0144

[103]. Rezapouraghdam H, Alipour H, Darvishmotevali M. Employee workplace spirituality and pro-environmental behavior in the hotel industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2017; 26(5): 740–758. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1409229

[104]. Tsai K, Liao Y. Innovation capacity and the implementation of eco-innovation: Toward a contingency perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment 2017; 26(2): 1000–1013. doi: 10.1002/bse.1963

[105]. Aytekin A, Keles H, Uslu F, et al. The effect of responsible tourism perception on place attachment and support for sustainable tourism development: The moderator role of environmental awareness. Sustainability 2023; 15(7): 5865. doi: 10.3390/su15075865

[106]. Han H, Kim W, Kiatkawsin K. Emerging youth tourism: Fostering young travelers’ conservation intentions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 2016; 34(7): 905–918. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2016.1261758

[107]. Foroughi B, Arjuna N, Iranmanesh M, et al. Determinants of hotel guests’ pro-environmental behaviour: Past behaviour as moderator. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2022; 102: 103167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103167

[108]. Skallerud K, Armbrecht J, Tuu HH. Intentions to consume sustainably produced fish: The moderator effects of involvement and environmental awareness. Sustainability 2021; 13(2): 946. doi: 10.3390/su13020946

[109]. Mehta P, Kaur A, Singh S, Mehta MD. “Sustainable attitude”—A modest notion creating a tremendous difference in the glamourous fast fashion world: Investigating moderating effects. Society and Business Review 2022; ahead-of-print. doi: 10.1108/sbr-10-2021-0205

[110]. Dawkins S, Tian AW, Newman A, Martin A. Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2015; 38(2): 163–183. doi: 10.1002/job.2057

[111]. Dunford BB, Schleicher DJ, Zhu L. The relative importance of psychological versus pecuniary approaches to establishing an ownership culture. In: Advances in Industrial & Labor Relations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2009. pp. 1–21.

[112]. Martey EM, Mante GDK, Gligah BK, et al. Environmental concerns, green consumption value and green buying intentions. Environment and Social Psychology 2023; 7(2): 1–18. doi: 10.18063/esp.v7.i2.1508

[113]. Bizarrias FS, Santos JN, Ferreira MCO, et al. Intention to buy sustainable products based on consumer’s information and perceptions about “green”: The mediating role of attitudes. Environment and Social Psychology 2019; 3(1): 1–11. doi: 10.18063/esp.v3.i2.726

[114]. Miao C, Zhou C, Sun H, et al. The role of social support and environment: The mediating effect of college students’ psychology and behavior. Environment and Social Psychology 2020; 5(1): 1–9. doi: 10.18063/esp.v5.i1.1387

[115]. Yan Z, Peng X, Lee S, Fang P. Chasing the light or chasing the dark? Top managers’ political ties and corporate proactive environmental strategy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2021; 35(10): 1341–1354. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2021.2003774



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com