Published
2023-11-27
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Informal workplace learning and employability: The mediating role of competency development among financial sector employees in Bhutan
Manju Shree Pradhan
Faculty of Business, Economics and Communications, Naresuan University
Vichayanan Rattanawiboonsom
Faculty of Business, Economics and Communications, Naresuan University
Fuangfa Panya
Faculty of Business, Economics and Communications, Naresuan University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1845
Keywords: informal workplace learning, competency development, learning goal orientation, self-directed learning orientation, employability, financial institutions, banks, Bhutan, SEM
Abstract
Amidst the rapid changes of this era, time constraints act as impediments to employees’ skill acquisition. However, a promising solution emerges in the form of informal workplace learning (IWL). Despite its potential, the precise impact of IWL on employability and competency development has remained an enigma. To unravel this, the present study draws upon the insights of the social learning theory. It delves deep into the impact of IWL on employability, incorporating competency development as a mediating element. The research also examines the potential moderating roles of learning goal orientation (LGO) and self-directed learning orientation (SDLO) in the IWL-competency development relationship. Leveraging data from 512 banking sector participants, the study employs a rigorous deductive design, administering a structured questionnaire through stratified random sampling. Analytical rigor is upheld via Confirmatory Factor Analysis, revealing squared multiple correlations (0.331 to 0.94) and affirming the CFA model’s validity and reliability through indices like average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR). The hypotheses are subsequently evaluated through structural equation modelling (SEM). Findings reveal a substantial impact of IWL on employability (β = 0.13), with competency development effectively mediating this relationship (β = 0.30). While the anticipated moderating roles of LGO and SDLO do not manifest, this research furnishes valuable insights for organizations aiming to bolster their workforce’s proficiency and employability via IWL. The study contributes to the discourse on learning strategies amidst the contemporary professional landscape, urging organizations to harness the potential of IWL to foster adaptability and growth.
References
[1]. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; 1991.
[2]. Boyatzis RE. 2008. Competencies in the 21st century. Journal of Management Development 2008; 27(1): 5–12. doi: 10.1108/02621710810840730
[3]. Wenger E. Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker 2008; 9(5): 2–3.
[4]. Watkins KE, Marsick VJ. Towards a theory of informal and incidental learning in organizations. International Journal of Lifelong Education 1992; 11(4): 287–300. doi: 10.1080/0260137920110403
[5]. Dale M, Bell J. Informal Learning in the Workplace. Department for Education and Employment London; 1999.
[6]. Van Der Heijden B, Boon J, Van der Klink M, Meijs E. Employability enhancement through formal and informal learning: an empirical study among Dutch non‐academic university staff members. International journal of training and development 2009; 13(1): 19–37.
[7]. van der Rijt J, van de Wiel MWJ, Van Den Bossche P, et al. Contextual Antecedents of Informal Feedback in The Workplace. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2012; 23(2): 233.
[8]. Cortellazzo L, Bonesso S, Gerli F, Batista-Foguet J. Protean career orientation: Behavioral antecedents and employability outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2020; 116: 103343.
[9]. Froehlich DE, Segers M, Beausaert S, Kremer M. On the Relation between Task-Variety, Social Informal Learning, and Employability. Vocations and Learning 2019; 12(1): 113–127.
[10]. Decius J, Knappstein M, Klug K. Which way of learning benefits your career? The role of different forms of work-related learning for different types of perceived employability. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 2023: 1–16. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2023.2191846
[11]. Castellanos IV, Sahoo P. Performance of financial institutions in Bhutan. 2010.
[12]. Otoo FNK. Human resource development (HRD) practices and banking industry effectiveness. European Journal of Training and Development 2019.
[13]. Sadeghi T. Associations between workplace learning patterns, social support and perceived competency. Human Resource Development International 2019; 23(1): 5–24. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2019.1627512
[14]. Visser M, Van der Togt K. Learning in public sector organizations: A theory of action approach. Public Organization Review 2016; 16(2): 235–249.
[15]. Illeris K. Workplace learning and learning theory. Journal of Workplace Learning 2003.
[16]. Eraut M. Informal Learning in the Workplace. Studies in Continuing Education 2010; 26(2): 247–273. doi: 10.1080/158037042000225245
[17]. Forrier A, Sels L. The concept employability: A complex mosaic. International Journal Of Human Resources Development And Management 2003; 3: 102–124.
[18]. Nyhan B. Competence development as a key organisational strategy-experiences of European companies. Industrial and Commercial Training 1998; 30(7): 267–273. doi: 10.1108/00197859810242897
[19]. Hashim J. Competencies acquisition through self‐directed learning among Malaysian managers. Journal of Workplace Learning 2008; 20(4): 259–271. doi: 10.1108/13665620810871114
[20]. Rowold J, Kauffeld S. Effects of career‐related continuous learning on competencies. Personnel Review 2008; 38(1): 90–101. doi: 10.1108/00483480910920732
[21]. Crouse P, Doyle W, Young JD. Workplace learning strategies, barriers, facilitators and outcomes: a qualitative study among human resource management practitioners. Human Resource Development International 2011; 14(1): 39–55. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2011.542897
[22]. Pylväs L, Li J, Nokelainen P. Professional Growth and Workplace Learning. In: Harteis C, Gijbels D, Kyndt E (editors). Research Approaches on Workplace Learning: Insights from a Growing Field. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 137–155. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-89582-2_6
[23]. Takase M, Yamamoto M, Sato Y, et al. The relationship between workplace learning and midwives’ and nurses’ self-reported competence: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2015; 52(12): 1804–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.06.016
[24]. Haemer HD, Borges-Andrade JE, Cassiano SK. Learning strategies at work and professional development. Journal of Workplace Learning 2017; 29(6): 490–506. doi: 10.1108/JWL-05-2016-0037
[25]. Moore AL, Klein JD. Facilitating informal learning at work. Tech Trends 2020; 64: 219–228. doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00458-3
[26]. Mulder RH. Exploring feedback incidents, their characteristics and the informal learning activities that emanate from them. European Journal of Training and Development 2013; 37(1): 49–71. doi: 10.1108/03090591311293284
[27]. De Vos A, De Hauw S, Willemse I. An integrative model for competency development in organizations: The Flemish case. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2015; 26(20): 2543–2568. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2014.1003078
[28]. 28. van der Heijden BI, Notelaers G, Peters P, et al. Development and validation of the short-form employability five-factor instrument. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2018; 106: 236–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.02.003
[29]. Billett S. Developing domains of occupational competence: workplaces and learner agency. In: Mulder M (editor). Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education. Springer Cham; 2017. Volume 23. pp. 47–66.
[30]. Vos AD, Hauw SD, Willemes I. Competency Developement in Organisaations: Building An Integrative Model Through A Qualitative Study. 2011.
[31]. Serim H, Demirbağ O, Yozgat U. The effects of employees’ perceptions of competency models on employability outcomes and organizational citizenship behavior and the moderating role of social exchange in this effect. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 150(15): 1101–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.125
[32]. Froehlich DE, Beausaert SAJ, Segers MSR. Age, employability and the role of learning activities and their motivational antecedents: A conceptual model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 2015; 26(16): 2087–2101. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2014.971846
[33]. Downs C, Mughal F, Shah U, Ryder M. Are undergraduate internships worth the effort? Time to reconceptualize work-based learning for building protean meta-competencies. Studies in Higher Education 2023: 1–14. doi 10.1080/03075079.2023.2222147
[34]. Gerken M, Beausaert S, Segers M. Working on professional development of faculty staff in higher education: Investigating the relationship between social informal learning activities and employability. Human Resource Development International 2016; 19(2): 135–151. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2015.1116241
[35]. Lecat A, Beausaert S, Raemdonck I. On the relation between teachers’(in) formal learning and innovative working behavior: the mediating role of employability. Vocations and Learning 2018; 11(3): 529–554.
[36]. Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist 1989; 44(9): 1175.
[37]. Cerasoli CP, Alliger GM, Donsbach JS, et al. Antecedents and outcomes of informal learning behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology 2018; 33(2): 203–230.
[38]. Locke EA, Latham GP. New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions In Psychological Science 2006; 15(5): 265–268.
[39]. Dweck CS, Leggett EL. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 1988; 95(2): 256.
[40]. Choi W. Influences Of Formal Learning, Personal Characteristics, And Work Environment Characteristics On Informal Learning Among Middle Managers In The Korean Banking Sector. The Ohio State University; 2009.
[41]. Raemdonck I, Tillema H, de Grip A, et al. Does self-directedness in learning and careers predict the employability of low-qualified employees? Vocations and Learning 2012; 5(2): 137–151.
[42]. Raemdonck I, van der Leeden R, Valcke M, et al. Predictors of self‐directed learning for low‐qualified employees: a multi‐level analysis. European Journal of Training and Development 2012.
[43]. Raemdonck I, Gijbels D, Van Groen W. The influence of job characteristics and self‐directed learning orientation on workplace learning. International Journal of Training and Development 2014; 18(3): 188–203.
[44]. Decius J, Schaper N, Seifert A. Work characteristics or workers’ characteristics? An input-process-output perspective on informal workplace learning of blue-collar workers. Vocations and Learning 2021; 14: 285–326. doi: 10.1007/s12186-021-09265-5
[45]. Decius J, Schaper N, Seifert A. Informal workplace learning: Development and validation of a measure. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2019; 30(4): 495–535. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21368
[46]. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage publications; 2017.
[47]. Kothari CR. Research Methodology, Methods and Tecniques. New Delhi-110002: New Age International (P)Limited; 2004.
[48]. Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research 1987; 16(1): 78–117. doi: 10.1177/0049124187016001004
[49]. Naim MF, Lenka U. Linking knowledge sharing, competency development, and affective commitment: Evidence from Indian Gen Y employees. Journal of Knowledge Management 2017; 21(4): 885–906. doi: 10.1108/JKM-08-2016-0334
[50]. Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2013; 38(1): 52–54. doi: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
[51]. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. Routledge; 2002.
[52]. Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology 2003; 88(5): 879–903.
[53]. Kaplan D. Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1989; 24(3): 285–305. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_2
[54]. Hayduk LA. Should model modifications be oriented toward improving data fit or encouraging creative and analytical thinking? Multivariate Behavioral Research 1990; 25(2): 193–196. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_7
[55]. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 1980; 88(3): 588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[56]. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 1990; 107(2): 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[57]. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed. Psychology Press; 2004.
[58]. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999; 6(1): 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
[59]. Newsom J. Psy 523/623 Structural Equation Modelling. Spring; 2023.
[60]. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing 2001; 1(1): 55–86. doi: 10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
[61]. Falk RF, Miller NB. A Primer for Soft Modeling, 1st ed. University of Akron Press; 1992.
[62]. Yamazaki Y, Toyama M, Putranto AJ. Comparing managers’ and non-managers’ learning and competencies. Journal of Workplace Learning 2018; 30(4): 274–290. doi: 10.1108/jwl-08-2017-0074
[63]. Brandao HP, Borges-Andrade JE, Puente-Palacios K, Laros JA. Relationships between learning, context and competency: A multilevel study. BAR—Brazilian Administration Review 2012; 9(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1590/S1807-76922012000100002
[64]. Cheetham G, Chivers G. How professionals learn in practice: An investigation of informal learning amongst people working in professions. Journal of European Industrial Training 2001; 25(5): 247–292. doi: 10.1108/03090590110395870
[65]. Dang VT, Chou Y-C. Extrinsic motivation, workplace learning, employer trust, self-efficacy and cross-cultural adjustment. Personnel Review 2020; 49(6): 1232–1253. doi: 10.1108/PR-10-2018-0427
[66]. Helyer R. Learning through reflection: The critical role of reflection in work-based learning (WBL). Journal of Work-Applied Management 2015; 7(1): 15–27. doi: 10.1108/JWAM-10-2015-003
[67]. Eraut M, Hirsh W. The Significance of Workplace Learning for Individuals, Groups and Organisations. SOKPE; 2010.
[68]. London M, Smither JW. Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review 2002; 12(1): 81–100. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00043-2
[69]. Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Lingard L. Learning from clinical work: The roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Medical Education 2012; 46: 192–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04126.x
[70]. van der Heijden BIJM. Professional competence and its effect upon employability throughout the career: A study of Dutch middle and higher level employees in small businesses. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 2001; 2(3): 171–181. doi: 10.5367/000000001101298918
[71]. Boyatzis RE. Unleashing the power of self-directed learning. Changing The Way We Manage Change 2002; 13–32.
[72]. Deist FDL, Winterton J. What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International 2005; 8(1): 27–46.
[73]. Bandura A, Walters RH. Social learning theory: Prentice-hall Englewood Cliffs; 1977.
[74]. Heijde CMVD, van der Heijden BIJM. A competence‐based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability. Human Resource Management 2006; 45(3): 449–476. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20119
[75]. De Vos A, De Hauw S, Van der Heijden BIJM. Competency development and career success: The mediating role of employability. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2011; 79(2): 438–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.010
[76]. Froehlich D, Segers M, van den Bossche P. Informal workplace learning in Austrian banks: The influence of learning approach, leadership style, and organizational learning culture on managers’ learning outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2014; 25(1): 29–57. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21173
[77]. Noe RA, Tews MJ, Michel JW. Managers’ informal learning: A trait activation theory perspective. International Journal of Training and Development 2017; 21(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12092
[78]. Runhaar P, Sanders K, Yang H. Stimulating teachers’ reflection and feedback asking: An interplay of self-efficacy, learning goal orientation, and transformational leadership. Teaching and Teacher Education 2010; 26(5): 1154–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.011
[79]. Dragoni L, Tesluk PE, Russell JEA, Oh IS. Understanding managerial development: Integrating developmental assignments, learning orientation, and access to developmental opportunities in predicting managerial competencies. Academy of Management Journal 2009; 52(4): 731–743. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669936
[80]. Kabuoh MN, Otsupius IA. The impact of learning-goal orientation on leadership competence in an organisation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Development, Education and Science Research 2015; 3(1): 1–7.
[81]. Vandewalle D, Cron WL, Slocum JW. The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001; 86(4): 629–640. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629
[82]. Pink DH. Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us: Penguin; 2011.
[83]. Paloniemi S, Hager P. Experience, competence and workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning 2006; 18(7/8): 439–450. doi: 10.1108/13665620610693006
[84]. Pb S. Developing human resource competencies: an empirical evidence. Human Resource Development International 2019; 22(4): 343–363. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2019.1605580
[85]. Choden K, Wangchuk D, Smart C. Bhutan-Culture Smart!: The Essential Guide to Customs & Culture: Kuperard; 2018.