PDF

Published

2024-01-03

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Uwen, G. O., Melefa, O. M., & O’Neill, M. E. (2024). Language use as stancetaking on motivations for romantic relationships among female undergraduates. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i3.1851

Language use as stancetaking on motivations for romantic relationships among female undergraduates

God'sgift Ogban Uwen

Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Calabar

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-9110

Omotosho Moses Melefa

Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Nigeria

Mary Emmanuel O’Neill

College of Health Technology


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i3.1851


Keywords: language use, stancetaking, romantic relationships, sexual motivations, female undergraduates

Abstract

This paper explores motivations for love as stancetaking in the discourse on romantic relationships among female undergraduates in two Universities in Southern Nigeria. Insights from Community of Practice and Appraisal Theory were used to instantiate the use of situated linguistic choices to establish the different impulses for female undergraduates’ engagement in heterosexual relationships. Data for the study were generated through (non)participant observation, informal interactions and semi-structured interviews involving a representative sample of 44 female undergraduates. The findings show that the participants utilised youth culture of sexual expressiveness to establish their motivations for love, cognitively construed as stancetaking on romantic relationships with their male sexual partners. Participants’ language use shows that the female students’ motivations for loving their male sexual partners include: high sexual performance, good academic performance, financial benefits, intention to get married in future, access to power and security, and physical attractiveness. This study, aside from establishing the increasing practice of heterosexual relationships among Nigerian university undergraduates, has also presented participants’ motivations for sexual practices as the girls’ peculiar sexual narrations of their worldview. This also shows the creation of situated linguistic choices as outcome of ‘new’ youth expressive culture as demonstrated in the discourse of their sexual relationships and experience within the liberal university environment.

References

[1]. Burunat E. Love is a physiological motivation (like hunger, thirst, sleep or sex). Medical Hypotheses. 2019, 129: 109225. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.05.011

[2]. Sternberg RJ. A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review. 1986, 93(2): 119-135. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.119

[3]. Gulia E. Eight different types of love explained. Available online: https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/love-sex/relationships/a34896557/types-of-love/ (accessed on 22 February 2023).

[4]. de Almeida T, Lomônaco JFB. The concept of love: an exploratory study with a sample of young Brazilians. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science. 2020, 7(3): 239-259. doi: 10.22161/ijaers.73.38

[5]. Bode A, Kushnick G. Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573123

[6]. Smith DJ. These girls today are war-o: Premarital sexuality and modern identity in Southeastern Nigeria. Africa Today. 2000, 47(3-4): 98-120. doi: 10.2979/aft.2000.47.3-4.98

[7]. Bogle KA. The Shift from Dating to Hooking up in College: What Scholars Have Missed. Sociology Compass. 2007, 1(2): 775-788. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00031.x

[8]. Wade L. American Hookup: The New Culture of Sex on Campus. W.W Norton & Company; 2017.

[9]. Helle-Valle J. Understanding sexuality in Africa: Diversity and contextualised individuality. In: Arafred S (editor). Re-Thinking Sexualities in Africa. Nordic African Institute; 2004. pp. 195–210.

[10]. Cole J, Thomas LM. Love in Africa. 2009. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226113555.001.0001

[11]. Johnson B. What easy sex? Sexplosion on campuses. Available online: http://www.imoonline.org/news-page3.htm (25 March 2022).

[12]. Onyeoku EO. Sociocultural and Economics Correlate of Prostitution Tendencies Among University Undergraduates in South East, Nigeria [PhD thesis]. University of Nigeria; 2012.

[13]. Tade O, Adekoya A. Transactional sex and the ‘aristo’ phenomenon in Nigerian universities. Human Affairs. 2012, 22: 239-255.

[14]. Odu BK, Akanle FF. Knowledge of HIV/AIDS and sexual behavior among the youth in Southwestern Nigeria. Humanities and Social sciences Journal. 2008, 3(1): 81-88.

[15]. Okonkwo AD. Gender and sexual risks-taking among selected Nigerian university students. Sexuality and Culture. 2010, 30(3): 306-317. doi: 10.1007/s12119-010-9074-x

[16]. Olugbile A, Abu F, Adelakan A. Prostitution Takes on New Garbs on Campuses. The punch newspaper; 2008.

[17]. Uwen GO. Mbari and uncle Nicodemus: Male representations in the heterosexual discourse among female undergraduates in Nigeria. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2023; 1-20. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2023.2258079

[18]. Butler I. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge; 1997.

[19]. Butler J. Performative acts and gender constitution, an essay on phenomenology and feminist theory. In: Conboy K (editor). Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory. Columbia University Press; 1997. pp. 409-420.

[20]. Babatunde EB, Ake M. The relativity of heterosexual norms and gender power on young people’s sexuality in Africa. Journal of African Studies and Development. 2015, 7(2): 52-63.

[21]. Ashcraft C. Ready or Not …? Teen Sexuality and the Troubling Discourse of Readiness. Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 2006, 37(4): 328-346. doi: 10.1525/aeq.2006.37.4.328

[22]. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press; 1991.

[23]. Eckert P, McConnell-Ginet S. Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1992, 21(1): 461-488. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333

[24]. Holmes J, Meyerhoff M. The Community of Practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society. 1999, 28(2): 173-183. doi: 10.1017/s004740459900202x

[25]. Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press; 1998.

[26]. Bucholtz M. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society. 1999, 28(2). doi: 10.1017/s0047404599002043

[27]. Garrett PB. Language Contact and Contact Languages. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. 2005; 46-72. doi: 10.1002/9780470996522.ch3

[28]. Eckert P. Variation and the indexical field1. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2008, 12(4): 453-476. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x

[29]. Eckert P, Wenger É. Communities of practice in sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2005, 9(4): 582-589. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00307.x

[30]. King BW. Tracing the emergence of a community of practice: Beyond presupposition in sociolinguistic research. Language in Society. 2014, 43(1): 61-81. doi: 10.1017/s0047404513000870

[31]. Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press; 1988.

[32]. Roseman IJ, Smith CA. Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties and controversies. In: Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T (editors). Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods and Research. Oxford University Press; 2001. pp. 3–19.

[33]. Martin JR, Rose D. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Equinox; 2003.

[34]. White PR. Appraisal. In: Zienkowski J, Ostman J, Verschueren J (editors). Discursive Pragmatics. John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2011.

[35]. Smith CA. Dimensions of appraisal and physiological response in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989, 56(3): 339-353. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.339

[36]. Moors A. Appraisal theory of emotion. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shakelford TK (editors). Encyclopedia of Personality, and Individual Differences. Guilford Press; 2017. pp. 1–10.

[37]. Martin JR, White PRR. The Language of Evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.

[38]. Pascual M, Unger L. Appraisal in the research genres: An analysis of grant proposals by Argentinean researchers. Revista signos. 2010, 43(73). doi: 10.4067/s0718-09342010000200004

[39]. Roseman IJ. Appraisal in the Emotion System: Coherence in Strategies for Coping. Emotion Review. 2013, 5(2): 141-149. doi: 10.1177/1754073912469591

[40]. Du Bois JW. The stance triangle. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. 2007, 139-182. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164.07du

[41]. Hanks WF. Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. University of Chicago Press; 1990.

[42]. Goodwin C. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society. 2007, 18(1): 53-73. doi: 10.1177/0957926507069457

[43]. Uwen GO, Ekpenyong BA, Onah GA, et al. Emotional women and promiscuous men: Language use as discursive stances of wives on cheating husbands. Environment and Social Psychology. 2023, 8(3). doi: 10.54517/esp.v8i3.1848

[44]. Sacks H. Notes on police assessment of moral character. In: Sudnow D (editor). Studies in Social Interaction. The Free Press; 1972. pp. 280–293.

[45]. Mason MF, Cloutier J, Macrae CN. On Construing Others: Category and Stereotype Activation from Facial Cues. Social Cognition. 2006, 24(5): 540-562. doi: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.540

[46]. Stokoe E. Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies. 2012, 14(3): 277-303. doi: 10.1177/1461445612441534

[47]. Fitzgerald R, Housley W. Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2015. doi: 10.4135/9781473917873

[48]. Tanner D. Opening communicative space: what do co-researchers contribute? Qualitative Research. 2018, 19(3): 292-310. doi: 10.1177/1468794118770076

[49]. Conaglen HM, Conaglen JV. Drug-induced sexual dysfunction in men and women. Australian Prescriber. 2013, 36(2): 42-45. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2013.021

[50]. Hrzenjak M. Marking Her Up, Women’s Magazines in Slovenia. Mirovni Institut: Peace Institute; 2002.

[51]. Khan SI, Hudson-Rodd N, Saggers S, et al. Phallus, performance and power: Crisis of masculinity. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2008, 23(1): 37-49. doi: 10.1080/14681990701790635

[52]. Khan SI, Hudson-Rodd N, Saggers S, et al. Phallus, performance and power: Crisis of masculinity. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2008, 23(1): 37-49. doi: 10.1080/14681990701790635

[53]. Hunter M. The Materiality of Everyday Sex: Thinking beyond “prostitution.” African Studies. 2002, 61(1): 99-120. doi: 10.1080/00020180220140091

[54]. Cole J. Fresh contact in Tamatave, Madagascar: Sex, money, and intergenerational transformation. American Ethnologist. 2004, 31(4): 573-588. doi: 10.1525/ae.2004.31.4.573

[55]. Cole J, Thomas L. Love in Africa. University of Chicago Press; 2009.

[56]. Uwen GO. Every corona is not a virus. The European Journal of Humour Research. 2023, 11(1): 117-142. doi: 10.7592/ejhr.2023.11.1.678

[57]. Cornwall A. Spending Power: Love, Money, and the Reconfiguration of Gender Relations in Ado‐Odo, Southwestern Nigeria. American Ethnologist. 2002, 29(4): 963-980. doi: 10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.963

[58]. Chukwuemeka ES. How to become an indifferent student in school: Six smart tips you need. 2020. Available online: https://-bscholarly.com (12 February 2021).

[59]. Uwen GO, Ekpenyong BA. “Esprit de Corps”: Ingroup Identity Construction and Contextual Conceptualisations Among the (Para)military Discourse Community. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. 2022, 1-16. doi: 10.1080/15348458.2022.2054419

[60]. Uwen G, Mensah E. Tomorrow May Not Be Yours: Military Slang and Jargon as Linguistic Performance in Nigeria. Language Matters. 2022, 53(3): 91-111. doi: 10.1080/10228195.2022.2122540

[61]. McCabe J, Tanner AE, Heiman JR. The impact of gender expectations on meanings of sex and sexuality: Results from a cognitive interview study. Sex Roles.2010, 62(3-4): 352-263. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9723-4.

[62]. Uwen GO, Oko Ushie G. “Happy wives” and “sad husbands.” The European Journal of Humour Research. 2022, 10(1): 147-167. doi: 10.7592/ejhr2022.10.1.612

[63]. Uwen GO, Eyang AE. Officers and men, and fallen heroes: The discursive construction of regimented masculinity in the Nigerian Army. Forum for Linguistics Studies 2023; 5(3): 1761. doi: 10.59400/fls.v5i3.1761

[64]. Mediayanose OE. Cultism and education in Nigerian tertiary institutions: Policy implications. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law. 2016, 10(2): 42-54.

[65]. Janneh C. I joined cultism because of love for my boyfriend-14-year-old-old girl. Available online: https://dailypodt.ng/2019/06/11/joined-cultism-love-boyfriend-14-year-old-girl/ (24 January 2023).

[66]. Kearney-Cooke A, Steicken-Asch P. Men, body image, and eating disorders. In: Anderson AE (editor). Males with Eating Disorders. Brunuer/Mazel; 1990. pp. 54–74.

[67]. Singh D. Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995, 69(6): 1089-1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1089



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com