Published
2023-11-15
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Unveiling the power of social interactions: A systematic review of student experiences in informal learning space
Ziqing Liu
School of Education, City University of Macau
Wei Xu
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, City University of Macau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1867
Keywords: engagement, informal learning space, self-study, social interaction, students’ experiences, systematic review
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the role that social interaction plays in informal learning environments on the part of students, it provides implications for understanding student experiences in informal learning spaces and for policymakers to incorporate more opportunities for social interaction in informal learning spaces. The PRISMA statement was followed when conducting a systematic search of Scopus and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to identify relevant studies published within the past decade. Search strategies for informal learning spaces and social interactions included a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary. On the basis of predefined inclusion criteria, twelve studies were selected for analysis, including articles published in English and Chinese, scientific articles published in peer-reviewed journals, and studies that examined student experiences in informal learning spaces and social interaction. Among the findings of this study are a description of informal learning spaces, a conceptualization of social interaction, as well as the positive impact of social interaction on student learning and engagement. Based on the results of the study, educators and policymakers need to create environments that foster social interactions that are inclusive and engaging. The study identifies gaps in the literature and suggests directions for future research, including the exploration of a broader range of informal learning spaces and the investigation of specific design elements that optimize student experiences.
References
[1]. Xu Y, Wu F, Shi L, et al. Comparative study of informal learning spaces in colleges based on the occurrence probability of informal learning. In: Proceedings of SPIE 12590, Third International Conference on Computer Vision and Information Technology (CVIT 2022); 19–21 Feb 2023; Beijing, China.
[2]. Ramsay CM, Robert J, Sparrow J. Promoting pedagogical agility in learning spaces: Toward a comprehensive framework of faculty support and innovation. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology 2019; 8(1): 60–75. doi: 10.14434/jotlt.v8i1.26747
[3]. Hassinger-Das B, Zosh JM, Hansen N, et al. Play-and-learn spaces: Leveraging library spaces to promote caregiver and child interaction. Library & Information Science Research 2020; 42(1): 101002. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2020.10100
[4]. Berman N. A critical examination of informal learning spaces. Higher Education Research & Development 2020; 39(1): 127–140. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1670147
[5]. Quinnell KO. Student Perception of Informal Learning Spaces Using Gibson’s Theory of Affordances [PhD thesis]. Mercer University; 2015.
[6]. Vanichvatana S. Informal learning spaces for undergraduate business school: A Bangkok private university case study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2018; 71–79.
[7]. Wu X, Kou Z, Oldfield P, et al. Informal learning spaces in higher education: Student preferences and activities. Buildings 2021; 11(6): 252. doi: 10.3390/buildings11060252
[8]. Schweer T, DeFrain E. The heart and living room of campus: A mixed-methods comparison of two informal learning spaces at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities 2020; 12(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.7710/2168-0620.0272
[9]. Orr M, Poitras E, Butcher KR. Informal learning with extended reality environments: Current trends in museums, heritage, and tourism. In: Geroimenko V (editor). Augmented Reality in Tourism, Museums and Heritage. Springer; 2021. pp. 3–26.
[10]. Chang-Tik C, Goh JN. Social and cognitive dimensions of collaboration in informal learning spaces: Malaysian social science students’ perspectives. Interactive Learning Environments 2023; 31(2): 609–623. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799029
[11]. Degner, M, Moser S, Lewalter D. Digital media in institutional informal learning places: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Open 2022; 3: 100068. doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100068
[12]. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
[13]. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 2021; 372: n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
[14]. Zhou J, Lam E, Au CH, et al. Library café or elsewhere: Usage of study space by different majors under contemporary technological environment. Library Hi Tech 2022; 40(6): 1567–1581. doi: 10.1108/lht-03-2021-0103
[15]. Hong S, Kim Y, Yang E. Indoor environment and student productivity for individual and collaborative work in learning commons: A case study. Library Management 2022; 43(1/2): 15–34. doi: 10.1108/lm-06-2021-0055
[16]. Molloy CB. O’Donnell and Tuomey’s University Architecture: Informal learning spaces that enhance user engagement. Architecture and Culture 2021; 9(1):98–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2020.1794711
[17]. He T, Tu L. Campus public space: From the flow corridor to the deep social practice field (Chinese). Shanghai Education 2021; 16: p. 34–37. doi: CNKI:SUN:SHJZ.0.2021-16-011
[18]. DeFrain E, Hong M. Interiors, affect, and use: How does an academic library’s learning commons support students’ needs? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 2020; 15(2): 42–68. doi: 10.18438/eblip29677
[19]. Matthews KE, Andrews V, Adams P. Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development 2011; 30(2): 105–120. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.512629
[20]. Zhang J, Ding D, Liu C, et al. Privacy and interaction preferences of students in informal learning spaces on university campus. Facilities 2022; 40(9/10): 638–655. doi: 10.1108/f-11-2021-0119
[21]. Cheng Q, Peng L. The future development trend of learning commons. New Building 2020; (1): 93–97. doi: 10.12069/j.na.202001093
[22]. Liu Y, Li Y. Research on the design of shared study room space based on non-interactive relationship (Chinese). Art Education Research 2022; 22: 96–98. doi: CNKI:SUN:MSJY.0.2022-22-033
[23]. Sheng Q, Liu N, Lu Y. Social analysis and enlightenment of learning space in foreign university libraries. Library 2020; (11): 88–94.
[24]. Xu W, Zhang H, Sukjairungwattana P, Wang T. The roles of motivation, anxiety and learning strategies in online Chinese learning among Thai learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology 2022; 13: 962492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962492
[25]. Yu Z, Xu W, Sukjairungwattana P. A meta-analysis of eight factors influencing MOOC-based learning outcomes across the world. Interactive Learning Environments 2022; 1–20. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2096641
[26]. Du Y, Grace TD, Jagannath K, Salen-Tekinbas K. Connected play in virtual worlds: communication and control mechanisms in virtual worlds for children and adolescents. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2021; 5(5): 27. doi: 10.3390/mti5050027
[27]. Yu Z, Sukjairungwattana P, Xu W. Bibliometric analyses of social media for educational purposes over four decades. Frontiers in Psychology 2023; 13: 1061989. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061989
[28]. Adams Becker S, Cummins M, Davis A, et al. NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. New Media Consortium; 2017.