Published
2023-11-15
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Consumer adjustment spending habits due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand
Adisak Suvittawat
School of Management Technology, Suranaree University of Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.2051
Keywords: consumer behavior, consumer spending, COVID-19 impact, COVID-19 pandemic, purchasing goods, government relief program
Abstract
Consumer spending fell drastically during the crisis of COVID-19 spreading. Fear of social distancing practices and outright closures for many industries led to a reduction of overtime, and unemployment and resulted in less income but higher prices. Consumer spending is the total money spent on foods and services by individuals for personal use and enjoyment. The research objective was to explore the variables of consumer adjustment in spending habits and saving patterns due to the COVID-19 crisis and to find out the associated consumer behavior patterns in the Nakhon Ratchasima Province of Thailand. The research design is quantitative method by using questionnaire as a tool. The four hundred participants provided valuable insights in consumer spending patterns. The research finding are the consumers in our research strongly agreed on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy and consumer spending. Consumer goods were still purchased as usual but some time at a lower volume but certainly at lower quality. Hording reminded them of war time situations. The government relief program has positive effect on consumer spending by cost-of-living reduction. The only way out for low-income earners was an adjustment in spending. Due to crisis, consumers managed expenses by spending as needed.
References
[1]. Andreasen AR. The future of the association for consumer research: Backward to the past. European Advances in Consumer Research 1993; 1: 1–4.
[2]. Walsh PA, Spiggle S. Consumer spending patterns: Dimensions and dichotomies. NA-Advances in Consumer Research 1994; 21(1): 35–40.
[3]. Thompson CJ, Locander WB, Pollio HR. Putting consumer experiences back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research 1989; 16(2): 133–146. doi: 10.1086/209203
[4]. Aziz S, Waseem B, Binesh S, et al. Investigating the role of demographic characteristics on consumer ethnocentrism and buying behavior. International Review of Management and Business Research 2014; 3(2): 885–893.
[5]. Farah MF, Mehdi NI. Consumer ethnocentrism and consumer animosity: A literature review. Strategic Change 2021; 30(1): 19–28. doi: 10.1002/jsc.2384
[6]. Olafson A, Pagel M. The liquid hand-to-mouth: Evidence from personal finance management software. The Review of Financial Studies 2018; 31(11): 4398–4446. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhy055
[7]. Baker SR, Yannelis C. Income changes and consumption: Evidence from the 2013 federal government shutdown. Review of Economic Dynamics 2017; 23: 99–124. doi: 10.1016/j.red.2016.09.005
[8]. Adda J. Economic activity and the spread of viral diseases: Evidence from high frequency data. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2016; 131(2): 891–894. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw005
[9]. Smaldone F, D’Arco M, Marino V. I am free to be in a grocery store: Profiling consumers’ spending during Covid-19 pandemic via gig data market basket analysis. In: Martínez-López FJ, Gázquez-Abad JC. (editors). Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing, Proceedings of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics.
[10]. Migliore G, Rizzo G, Schifani G, et al. Ethnocentrism effects on consumers’ behavior during COVID-19 pandemic. Economies 2021; 9(4): 160. doi: 10.3390/economies9040160
[11]. Belot M, Choi S, Tripodi E, et al. Unequal consequences of COVID-19: Representative evidence from six countries. Review of Economics of the Household 2021; 19(3): 769–783. doi: 10.1007/s11150-021-09560-z
[12]. Di Renzo L, Gualtieri P, Cinelli G, et al. Psychological aspects and eating habits during COVID-19 home confinement: Results of EHLC-COVID-19 Italian online survey. Nutrients 2020; 12(7): 2152. doi: 10.3390/nu12072152
[13]. Goddard E. The impact of COVID-19 on food retail and food service in Canada: Preliminary assessment. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 2020; 68(2): 157–161. doi: 10.1111/cjag.12243
[14]. Hamadani JD, Hasan MI, Baldi AJ, et al. Immediate impact of stay-at-home orders to control COVID-19 transmission on socioeconomic conditions, food insecurity, mental health, and intimate partner violence in Bangladeshi women and their families: An interrupted time series. The Lancet Global Health 2020; 8(11): E1380–1389. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30366-1
[15]. Končar J, Marić R, Vukmirović G, Vučenović S. Sustainability of food placement in retailing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability 2021; 13(11): 5956. doi: 10.3390/su13115956
[16]. Insch GS, McBride JB. The impact of country-of-origin cues on consumer perceptions of product quality: A binational test of the decomposed country-of-origin construct. Journal of Business Research 2004; 57(3): 256–265. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00323-5
[17]. Power M, Doherty B, Pybus K, Pickett K. How COVID-19 has exposed inequalities in the UK food system: The case of UK food and poverty. Emerald Open Research 2020; 2: 11. doi: 10.35241/emeraldopenres.13539.2
[18]. Savarese M, Castellini G, Morelli L, Graffigna G. COVID-19 disease and nutritional choices: How will the pandemic reconfigure our food psychology and habits? A case study of the Italian population. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 2021; 31(2): 399–402. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.10.013
[19]. Stamu-O’Brien C, Carniciu S, Halvorsen E, Jafferany M. Psychological aspects of COVID-19. Cosmet Dermatol 2020; 19(9): 2169–2173. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13601
[20]. Aladangady A, Aron-Dine S, Dunn W, et al. From transactions data to economic statistics: Constructing real-time, high-frequency, geographic measures of consumer spending. In: Proceedings of the CRIW Conference: Big Data for 21st Century Economic Statistics; 15–16 March 2019; Washington, DC, USA.
[21]. Andersen AL, Hansen ET, Johannesen N, Sheridan A. Consumer reponses to the COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from bank account transaction data. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2022; 124(4): 905-929. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12512
[22]. Baker SR, Farrokhnia RA, Meyer S, et al. How does household spending respond to an epidemic? Consumption during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2020; 10(4): 834–862. doi: 10.3386/w26949
[23]. Bounie D, Camara Y, Galbraith JW. Consumers’ mobility, expenditure and online-offline substitution response to COVID-19: Evidence from French transaction data. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3588373 (accessed on 30 October 2023).
[24]. Carvalho BP, Peralta S, Pereira dos Santos J. What and How Did People Buy During the Great Lockdown? Evidence from Electronic Payments. European Center for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES); 2020.
[25]. Armantier O, Koşar G, Pomerantz R, et al. Coronavirus outbreak sends consumer expectations plummeting. Available online: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2020/04/coronavirus-outbreak-sends-consumer-expectations-plummeting (accessed on 30 October 2023).
[26]. Almagro M, Orane-Hutchinson A. The differential impact of COVID-19 across demographic groups: Evidence from NYC. SSRN Electronic Journal 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3573619
[27]. Omar NA, Nazri MA, Ali MH, Alam SS. The panic buying behavior of consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining the influences of uncertainty, perceptions of severity, perceptions of scarcity, and anxiety. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2021; 62: 102600. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102600
[28]. Cappelli A, Cini E. Will the COVID-19 pandemic make us reconsider the relevance of short food supply chains and local productions? Trends Food Science Technology 2020; 99: 566–567. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.041
[29]. Bartik AW, Bertrand M, Cullen ZB, et al. How are small businesses adjusting to COVID-19? Early evidence from a survey. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3574741 (accessed on 30 October 2023).
[30]. Campello M, Kankanhalli G, Muthukrishnan P. Corporate hiring under COVID-19: Labor market concentration, downskilling, and income inequality. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3609661 (accessed on 30 October 2023).
[31]. Dingel JI, Neiman B. How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics 2020; 189: 104235. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235
[32]. Joyce R, Xu X. Sector Shutdowns during the Coronavirus Crisis: Which Workers are most Exposed? Institute for Fiscal Studies; 2020.
[33]. Chetty R, Friedman JN, Hendren N, Stepner M. How Did COVID-19 and Stabilization Policies Affect Spending and Employment? A New Real-Time Economic Tracker Based on Private Sector Data. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2020.
[34]. Elgin C, Yalaman A, Basbug G. Economic policy responses to a pandemic: Developing the COVID-19 economic stimulus index. Available online: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/economic-policy-responses-pandemic-developing-COVID-19-economic-stimulus-index (accessed on 30 October 2023).
[35]. Crawford R, Davenport A, Joyce R, Levell P. Household Spending and coronavirus. Available online: https://www. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp2643~3c6b864dcf.en.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2023).
[36]. De Vito A, Gómez JP. Estimating the COVID-19 cash crunch: Global evidence and policy. Journal of Accounting and Publica Policy 2020; 39(2): 106741. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106741
[37]. Fernandes N. Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3557504 (accessed on 30 October 2023).
[38]. Decrop A. Trustworthiness in qualitative tourism research. In: Phillimore J, Goodson L (editors). Qualitative Research in Tourism: Ontologies, Epistemologies, and Methodologies, 1st ed. Routledge; 2004. pp. 165–196.