PDF

Published

2023-12-28

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Mu, R., & Liu, D. (2023). Effects of college students’ perceptions of Orff Schulwerk on their music learning performances: The mediating effect of music learning interest. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i3.2204

Effects of college students’ perceptions of Orff Schulwerk on their music learning performances: The mediating effect of music learning interest

Rui Mu

Thailand Krirk University

Dongxing Liu

Thailand Krirk University


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i3.2204


Keywords: technology acceptance model, college students, Orff Schulwerk, music learning interest, music learning performance

Abstract

Many scholars have focused on the advantages and characteristics of Orff Schulwerk in improving students’ music learning performance; however, the effects of students’ perceptions of Orff Schulwerk on their learning performance remain unexplored. Based on the technology acceptance model (TAM), this study explored the differences among college students of different grades in terms of Orff Schulwerk perception, music learning interests, and learning performance; the effects of students’ perceptions of Orff Schulwerk on their music learning performances and the mediating effect of music learning interest, with 433 Chinese college students majoring in preschool education as the samples. The results showed that college students of different grades show no significant differences in Orff Schulwerk perception, music learning interests, and learning performance; college students’ perceptions of Orff Schulwerk had a significant positive effect on their music learning performances, and their music learning interest had a partial mediating effect. Supplementing the theoretical literature on Orff Schulwerk, this study fills the gap in literature, extends the application of the TAM to the field of education, and provides a practical reference for colleges and universities to use Orff Schulwerk for provoking college students’ learning interest and improving their performances.

References

[1]. Sang F, Xu Y. Research on the Current Situation and Improvement Strategies of Aesthetic Education in Music Classrooms in Primary and Secondary Schools in China. Modern Economics & Management Forum. 2022, 3(1): 14. doi: 10.32629/memf.v3i1.648

[2]. Váradi J. A Review of the Literature on the Relationship of Music Education to the Development of Socio-Emotional Learning. SAGE Open. 2022, 12(1): 215824402110685. doi: 10.1177/21582440211068501

[3]. Bautista A, Yeung J, Mclaren ML, et al. Music in early childhood teacher education: raising awareness of a worrisome reality and proposing strategies to move forward. Arts Education Policy Review. Published online February 28, 2022: 1-11. doi: 10.1080/10632913.2022.2043969

[4]. Song R. Research on the Application of Computer Multimedia Music System in College Music Teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021, 1744(3): 032214. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1744/3/032214

[5]. Beckstead D. Will Technology Transform Music Education? Music Educators Journal. 2001, 87(6): 44-49. doi: 10.2307/3399692

[6]. Yu Z, Leung BW. Music teachers and their implementation of the new Music Curriculum Standards in China. International Journal of Music Education. 2019, 37(2): 178-197. doi: 10.1177/0255761418820647

[7]. Sun H. Study on Orff’s Music Teaching Method. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Economic Management and Social Science (IEMSS 2017). 2017. doi: 10.2991/iemss-17.2017.251

[8]. Elkoshi R. A study of rhythmic emergent literacy within an Orff-based program implemented in Israel. International Journal of Music Education. 2023, 025576142211446. doi: 10.1177/02557614221144685

[9]. Tabuena AC. Carabo-Cone, Dalcroze, Kodály, and Orff Schulwerk Methods. International Journal of Asian Education. 2021, 2(1): 9-16. doi: 10.46966/ijae.v2i1.88

[10]. Costanza P, Russell T. Methodologies in Music Education. Critical Essays in Music Education. 2017, 255-266. doi: 10.4324/9781315095257-14

[11]. Di R, Charoennit E. An experimental study on the influence of Orff’s music teaching activities on children’s sense of rhythm. Resmilitaris. 2022, 12(4): 1987-1998.

[12]. MacIntyre PD, Baker SC, Clément R, et al. Sex and Age Effects on Willingness to Communicate, Anxiety, Perceived Competence, and L2 Motivation Among Junior High School French Immersion Students. Language Learning. 2003, 53(S1): 137-166. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00226

[13]. Greene BA, Miller RB, Crowson HM, et al. Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2004, 29(4): 462-482. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006

[14]. Abrantes JL, Seabra C, Lages LF. Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. Journal of Business Research. 2007, 60(9): 960-964. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.026

[15]. Yu SJ, Sun JCY, Chen OTC. Effect of AR-based online wearable guides on university students’ situational interest and learning performance. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2017, 18(2): 287-299. doi: 10.1007/s10209-017-0591-3

[16]. Ucar H, Kumtepe AT. Effects of the ARCS-V-based motivational strategies on online learners’ academic performance, motivation, volition, and course interest. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2019, 36(3): 335-349. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12404

[17]. Pollatou E, Karadimou K, Gerodimos V. Gender differences in musical aptitude, rhythmic ability and motor performance in preschool children. Early Child Development and Care. 2005, 175(4): 361-369. doi: 10.1080/0300443042000270786

[18]. Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989, 13(3): 319. doi: 10.2307/249008

[19]. Salmon S. Inclusion and Orff schulwerk. Musicworks: Journal of the Australian Council of Orff Schulwerk. 2010, 15(1): 27-32.

[20]. Cary DG. Kodály and Orff: A comparison of two approaches in early music education. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi. 2012, 8(15): 179-194.

[21]. Beegle A, Bond J. Orff Schulwerk. Teaching General Music. 2016, 25-48. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199328093.003.0003

[22]. Skinner EA, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Connell JP, et al. Individual Differences and the Development of Perceived Control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1998, 63(2/3): i. doi: 10.2307/1166220

[23]. Montanay E. A review on the use of Dalcroze, Orff Schulwerk and Kodaly methods in music education (Turkish) [Master’s thesis]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2018.

[24]. Spitz E. From idea to institution: The development and dissemination of the orff-schulwerk from Germany to the United States. Current Musicology. 2019, 104: 7-43. doi: 10.7916/cm.v0i104.5390

[25]. Wang Y, Matvieieva O, Zheng QW. Effectiveness of the Orff and Kodaly methods for the development of musical ability in preschool children compared to a standard curriculum (Spanish). Culture and Education. 2022, 34(1): 14-38. doi: 10.1080/11356405.2021.2006500

[26]. Liu M. RETRACTED: Research on the Application Value of Orff Music Education System in College Music Education Based on Computer New Media Technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021, 1992(3): 032032. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1992/3/032032

[27]. Taylor DM. Orff Ensembles. General Music Today. 2011, 25(3): 31-35. doi: 10.1177/1048371311414879

[28]. Guo W. The Practice and Research of Orff’s Music Teaching Method in Contemporary Chinese Music Teaching. Proceedings of the 2018 3rd International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology (HSMET 2018). 2018. doi: 10.2991/hsmet-18.2018.85

[29]. Song Z, Wu C, Shi R. Government affairs Wechat public number user adoption research. E-government. 2015, (3): 18-25. doi: 10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw.2015.03.004

[30]. Wu Y, Sun Y. The Harvard Case Method in the Chinese context: a comparative study of multiple cases. Management Case Studies and Reviews. 2010, (1): 12-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1692.2010.01.002

[31]. Renninger KA, Hidi S, Krapp A, et al. The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Psychology Press; 2014. doi: 10.4324/9781315807430

[32]. Sutarto S, Sari DP, Fathurrochman I. Teacher strategies in online learning to increase students’ interest in learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan. 2020, 8(3): 129. doi: 10.29210/147800

[33]. Martins M, Neves L, Rodrigues P, et al. Orff-Based Music Training Enhances Children’s Manual Dexterity and Bimanual Coordination. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018, 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02616

[34]. Hao X. The application of Orff teaching method in music teaching of preschool education specialty. Lyceum. 2022, 15(19): 87-89.

[35]. Saputra DN. Effort to improve elementary students interest On music subject With “learning By doing” method class:(case studies of school curriculum in music education). ADI Journal on Recent Innovation. 2021, 2(2): 201-207. doi: 10.34306/ajri.v2i2.74

[36]. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 2000, 55(1): 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68

[37]. Marangunić N, Granić A. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2014, 14(1): 81-95. doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

[38]. Al-Emran M, Mezhuyev V, Kamaludin A. Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 2018, 125: 389-412. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008

[39]. Granić A, Marangunić N. Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019, 50(5): 2572-2593. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12864

[40]. Natasia SR, Wiranti YT, Parastika A. Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science. 2022, 197: 512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168

[41]. Chuttur M. Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. All Sprouts Content. 2009, 290.

[42]. Norwich B, Jaeger M. The predictive relationship between beliefs, attitudes, intentions and secondary school mathematics learning: A theory of reasoned action approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1989, 59(3): 314-325. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1989.tb03106.x

[43]. Zhang H. Research on the application of Orff teaching method in preschool piano courses in vocational colleges [Master’s thesis]. Hebei Normal University; 2018.

[44]. Xu Q. Study on the mediating effect of learning strategies on learning interest and innovation ability of high school students [Master’s thesis]. Qufu Normal University; 2021.

[45]. Wang Z. Research on the influence factors of mobile learning on college students’ learning performance—based on cognitive load theory [Master’s thesis]. Donghua University; 2016.

[46]. Taber KS. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education. 2017, 48(6): 1273-1296. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

[47]. Moss TP, Lawson V, White P. Identification of the underlying factor structure of the Derriford Appearance Scale 24. PeerJ. 2015, 3: e1070. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1070

[48]. Malekpour F, Moeini B, Tapak L, et al. Prediction of Seat Belt Use Behavior among Adolescents Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Health Sciences. 2021, 21(4): e00536-e00536. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2021.71

[49]. Aguirre-Urreta MI, Hu J. Detecting Common Method Bias. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems. 2019, 50(2): 45-70. doi: 10.1145/3330472.3330477

[50]. Malhotra NK, Patil A, Kim SS. Bias breakdown. Marketing Research. 2007, 19(1): 24-29.

[51]. Gunst RF, Webster JT. Regression analysis and problems of multicollinearity. Communications in Statistics. 1975, 4(3): 277-292. doi: 10.1080/03610927308827246

[52]. Benesty J, Chen J, Huang Y, et al. Noise reduction in speech processing. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.

[53]. DiCiccio TJ, Efron B. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Statistical Science. 1996, 11(3). doi: 10.1214/ss/1032280214

[54]. Osman RB, Choo PS, Rahmat MK. Understanding student teachers’ behavioural intention to use technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction. 2013, 6(1).

[55]. Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate ThJ, Vos CMP, et al. How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2012, 18(1): 57-69. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3

[56]. Kline RB. The Mediation Myth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2015, 37(4): 202-213. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2015.1049349

[57]. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, 2nd ed. Guilford Publications; 2018.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com