Published
2024-03-12
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
The cognitive and psychological mechanism of Chinese oxymoron “tough women”
ZHENG Jie
Sichuan International Studies University
LUO Rui feng
Chongqing Medical University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i6.2336
Keywords: oxymoron, “tough women”, cognitive linguistics, conceptual integration
Abstract
Oxymoron refers to juxtaposing two words that are semantically contradictory to each other in language communication, which makes them have rhetorical connection, and achieves the modification effect of binary opposition through the antonym relationship in semantic components, and which makes the expression profound and more tense. Based on the theory of cognitive linguistics, this study analyzes the formation mechanism of the oxymoron “tough women” from the perspective of “reality-cognition-language” and discusses the cognitive and psychological mechanism of its formation. Conceptual blending theory is used to form the oxymoron conceptual integration prominent model of “tough women”. It is found that the formation of the word “tough women” has a long historical reasons. From ancient times to modern times, because women’s social status changes with the changes of objective social forms, based on physical experience and psychological perception of different times, people form their concepts about the “tough women”. Dynamic cognitive processing of “female” is carried out to form an abstract image schema of modern “tough women”, which integrates the traditional weak characteristic domain of women and the strong male characteristic domain in psychological space, and a theoretical model of conceptual integration of oxymoron is put forward.
Author Biography
ZHENG Jie, Sichuan International Studies University
School of Bussiness EnglishReferences
[1]. Zhao Y. G. On the Structural Form and Rhetorical Function of English Oxymoron. Journal of Luoyang Normal University. 2002; (6): 120-122.
[2]. Wang S. X. On the Logical Meaning of Oxymoron. Journal of Taizhou University. 2006; (1): 46-49.
[3]. Li S. F. Contrastive Study of Oxymoron between Chinese and English. Journal of Chifeng University. 2007; (3): 21-22.
[4]. Sun Y., Wang J. X. A Brief Discussion on the Philosophical Connotation of Contradictory Rhetoric in the Perspective of Chinese-English Contrast. Foreign Language Studies, 2012; (2): 41-44.
[5]. Zhang X. A Cognitive Semantic Study on the Understanding of Oxymoron. Dissertation. Hebei: Hebei University. 2006.
[6]. Wang W. B. The Tension, Causes and Cognitive Resolution of Contradictory Rhetoric. Foreign Language Teaching, 2010; (5): 7-12.
[7]. Nie Y. Logical Analysis of Oxymoron. Journal of Guyuan Teachers College. 1997; (2): 45-49.
[8]. Shao C. “Little Adults” and “Old Children”-Pragmatic Inference Based on Mental Model. Foreign Language Teaching, 2012; (5): 49-52.
[9]. Liu B. Oxymoron and the Paradox of Civilization. Foreign Literature Review, 2005; (2): 22-33.
[10]. Li S. D. Oxymoron Expression: A Cultural Perspective of Youth Online Buzzwords. China Youth Studies, 2021; (12): 06-112.
[11]. Liao Q. Y., Kong S. J. Generation Mechanism of Oxymoron into the Perspective of Quantum mechanics. Foreign Language Education, 2023; (2): 53-59.
[12]. Liu Y. M. Embodied-Cognitive Mechanism in the Formation of Oxymoron Construction and its Constraints. Modern Foreign Languages, 2024; (2): 185-196.
[13]. Xu G. Women’s Status in China Seen from the Goddess Patching the Sky. Journal of Lianyungang Vocational and Technical College, 2006; 19(4): 20-22.
[14]. Rong G. Tentatively Analyze the Relationship Between Psychology and Poetry. Ye Shuxian. Myth-archetypal criticism. Xi ‘an: Shaanxi Normal University Press, 1987.
[15]. Meng Q., Zhang L. S. From “Three Obedience and Four Virtues” to “Henpecked”. Zhonghua Wenhua Luntan. 2013; (3): 96-99.
[16]. Johnson M., Lakoff G. Why Cognitive Linguistics Requires Embodied Realism. Cognitive Linguistics. 2002; 13(3): 245-263. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2002.016.
[17]. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
[18]. Engels F., Marx C. Marx and Engels’s Selected Work: Volume I [M]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 1972.
[19]. Zhang T., Pan Q. Women’s Social Status Change and Gender Role Reconstruction in Contemporary China. Journal of Shenyang Normal University, 2021; (3): 72-77.
[20]. Shen J. X. Basic Hypothesis of Cognitive Linguistics. Guangming Daily, 2006; (12).