PDF

Published

2024-11-29

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 11 (2024): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Dimitrova, E. (2024). Social differences in the attitudes towards the timing of parenthood in Bulgaria. Results from the European Social Survey. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.2570

Social differences in the attitudes towards the timing of parenthood in Bulgaria. Results from the European Social Survey

Elitsa Dimitrova

Institute for Population and Human Studies – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 1000, Bulgaria & Plovdiv University Paisii Hilendarski, Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.2570


Keywords: parenthood, timing of motherhood, timing of fatherhood, young adults, life course, European Social Survey, Bulgaria

Abstract

The study focuses on the gendered nature and the influence of social positioning on of the attitudes towards the timing of motherhood and fatherhood among young adults in Bulgaria. The European Social Survey (ESS), conducted in 2018 with a sub-sample of respondents at age 15-45 years, was used in the analysis. We first studied the perceptions about the timing of motherhood and fatherhood in an international comparative perspective. Next, we ran multiple linear regression models on the ages, considered ideal, too young or old to become a mother/father. The international comparisons reveal the gendered nature of the attitudes of the timing of parenthood. The reproductive "youthfulness" of a woman is more strongly emphasised and shapes the attitudes towards the timing of motherhood in Eastern and Central European countries. The socioeconomic “maturity” of a man shapes the attitudes and the social expectations about the timing of fatherhood in Southern and Western European countries. The social positioning (social status) is associated with the differences in the attitudes towards the timing of motherhood and fatherhood. The attitudes supporting the model of “younger” parenthood prevail among the respondents with low education, living in small residential areas, and belonging to ethnic minorities. Highly educated respondents, the individuals, living in big cities and those from Bulgarian ethnicity have stronger preferences towards motherhood and fatherhood at later ages.

Author Biography

Elitsa Dimitrova, Institute for Population and Human Studies – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 1000, Bulgaria & Plovdiv University Paisii Hilendarski, Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elitsa Dimitrova is a sociologist by education, with a specialization in the field of demographic research. She is a researcher at the Institute for Population and Human Studies – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and a leturer at Plovdiv University Paisii Hilendarski. Her research interests focus on fertility and family study, life course transitions among young people, adolescent health behaviors, family policies and work-life balance, social science research methods, etc.

References

[1]. Katz-Wise SL, Priess HA, Hyde JS. Gender-role attitudes and behavior across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology 2010; 46(1): 18–28. doi: 10.1037/a0017820

[2]. Guzzo KB, Hayford SR. Pathways to Parenthood in Social and Family Context: Decade in Review. Journal of Marriage and Family 2020; 82(1): 117-144. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12618.

[3]. Blackstone A. Gender Roles and Society. In: Miller JR, Lerner RM, Schiamberg LB (editors). Human Ecology: An Encyclopaedia of Children, Families, Communities, and Environments. Santa Barbara, CA; 2003, pp. 335-338.

[4]. Elder G. Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1994; 57(1); 4–15. doi: 10.2307/2786971

[5]. Kan MY, Kolpashnikova K. Three-Stage Transitional Theory: Egalitarian Gender Attitudes and Housework Share in 24 Countries. Frontiers in Sociology 2021; 6, 700301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.700301

[6]. Preisner K, Neuberger F, Bertogg A, Schaub JM. Closing the Happiness Gap: The Decline of Gendered Parenthood Norms and the Increase in Parental Life Satisfaction. Gender & Society 2020; 34(1): 31-55. doi: 10.1177/0891243219869365

[7]. Datta J, Maxwell KJ, Mitchell KR, Lewis R, Wellings K. Factors shaping the timing of later entry into parenthood: narratives of choice and constraint. Social Sciences and Humanities Open 2003; 8, 100700. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100700

[8]. Beaujouan E. Latest-Late Fertility? Decline and Resurgence of Late Parenthood Across the Low-Fertility Countries. Population and Development Review 2020; 46(2), 219–247. doi: 10.1111/padr.12334

[9]. Brückner H, Mayer KU. De-Standardization of the Life Course: What it Might Mean? And if it Means Anything, Whether it Actually Took Place? Advances in Life Course Research 2005; 9, 27-53. doi: 10.1016/S1040-2608(04)09002-1

[10]. Macmillan R. The Structure of the Life Course: Classic Issues and Current Controversies. Advances in Life Course Research 2005; 9, 3-24. doi: 10.1016/S1040-2608(04)09001-X

[11]. Choudhry MT and Pastore F. Determinants of school-to-work transition: global outlook. International Journal of Manpower 2023; 6, 989-999. doi: 10.1108/IJM-07-2023-0365

[12]. Rouvroye L, van Dalen HP, Henkens K, Schippers J. A distaste for insecurity: job preferences of young people in the transition to adulthood. European Sociological Review 2023; jcad041. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcad041

[13]. Efimova GZ, Kuvaldina, SY. Family or career? Happiness and success of youth through orientation towards professional and family values. Social, Economic, and Law Research 2023, 9(2), 33–57. doi: 10.21684/2411-7897-2023-9-2-33-57

[14]. Roberts K. The leisure of young people in contemporary society. Arbor-Ciencia Pensamiento Y Cultura 2021; 188, 327-337. doi: 10.3989/arbor.2012.754n200

[15]. Blom N, Perelli-Harris, B, Wiik KA. Relationship quality and family formation in Europe. Advances in life course research 2023; 55, 100527. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100527

[16]. Hutchison ED. Life Course Theory. In: Levesque, RJR (editor). Encyclopaedia of Adolescence. Springer, New York; 2011, pp. 1586–1594. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1695-2_13

[17]. Benson JE, Furstenberg F. Entry into Adulthood: Are Adult Role Transitions Meaningful Markers of Adult Identity? Advances in Life Course Research, 2006; 11: 199-224. doi: 10.1016/S1040-2608(06)11008-4

[18]. Elder G, Giele, J. Life course studies: An evolving field. In: Edler, G, Giele, J (editors). The craft of life course research. New York: Guilford; 2009, pp. 1–24.

[19]. Liefbroer, AC. From Youth to Adulthood: Understanding Changing Patterns of Family Formation from a Life Course Perspective. In: van Wissen LJG, Dykstra PA (editors). Population Issues. The Plenum Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis. Springer, Dordrecht; 1999, pp. 53–85. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4389-9_3

[20]. Culatta ET. Identity processes during the transition to adulthood: the effect of self-views and reflected appraisals on health risk behaviors and mental health [PhD thesis]. University of Georgia - USA; 2012. Available online: https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/culatta_elizabeth_t_201805_phd.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[21]. Eurostat database. Estimated average age of young people leaving the parental household by sex. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/yth_demo_030/default/table?lang=en (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[22]. Eurostat database. Marriage indicators. Mean age at first marriage - females/males. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_nind/default/table?lang=en&category=demo.demo_nup (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[23]. Imdorf C, Ilieva-Trichkova P, Stoilova R, Boyadjieva P, Gerganov A. Regional and Ethnic Disparities of School-to-Work Transitions in Bulgaria. Education Sciences 2022; 12(4):233. doi: 10.3390/educsci12040233

[24]. Eurostat database. Young people neither in employment nor in education and training by sex, age and labour status (NEET rates). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/EDAT_LFSE_20__custom_9823834/default/table?lang=en (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[25]. Eurostat database. Unemployment by sex and age – annual data. International migration by age and sex. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/UNE_RT_A__custom_9823949/default/table?lang=en (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[26]. National Statistical Institute - Bulgaria. International migration by age and sex. Available online: https://nsi.bg/en/content/3072/international-migration-age-and-sex (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[27]. National Statistical Institute - Bulgaria. Monitorstat. Share of early school leavers and share of the 30-34 years old generation of university graduates. Available online: https://monitorstat.nsi.bg/en/StrategyFirstLevel/LevelInfo?StrategyId=4c04a325-d38d-4740-9f37-20ddca2b2b16&levelId=fd509ca7-e005-4395-a2ff-ff19a058b202 (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[28]. Eurostat database. Fertility indicators. Mean age of women at birth of first child. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_find/default/table?lang=en&category=demo.demo_fer (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[29]. Billari F et al. The Timing of Life. Topline results from Round 9 of the European Social Survey; 2021. Issue 11. Available online: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/sites/default/files/2023-06/TL11_Timing_of_Life-English.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[30]. Martín-García T., Seiz M., Castro-Martín T. (2023). Ideals and norms related to fatherhood in Europe: A comparative perspective from the European Social Survey. Journal of Family Research 2023; 35: 17–36. doi: 10.20377/jfr-795

[31]. Bellieni C. The Best Age for Pregnancy and Undue Pressures. Journal of family & reproductive health 2016; 10(3): 104–107. PMID: 28101110; PMCID: PMC5241353.

[32]. Jema, D-V, David, M. Fertility decline and socio-economic uncertainty in central and eastern European countries after 1990. Applied Economics 2022; 54(29): 3296-3308. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2021.1991564

[33]. van Wijk DC, de Valk, HAG, Liefbroer AC. Economic Precariousness and the Transition to Parenthood: A Dynamic and Multidimensional Approach. European Journal of Population 2022; 38: 457–483. doi: 10.1007/s10680-022-09617-4

[34]. Hviid Malling G.M, Schmidt L, Pitsillos T, Hammarberg K, Tydén, T, Friberg B, Jensen, I, Ziebe, S. (2022). Taking fertility for granted–a qualitative exploration of fertility awareness among young, childless men in Denmark and Sweden. Human Fertility 2022; 25(2): 337-348. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1798516

[35]. Walczak, A. What Does It Mean to be an Adult? Adulthood Markers in the Perspective of Emerging Adults. Emerging Adulthood 2023; 11(6), 1335-1345. doi: 10.1177/21676968231194887

[36]. Settersten RA, Ottusch TM, Schneider B. Becoming adult: Meanings of markers to adulthood. In: Kosslyn S. (editor). Emerging Trends in the social and behavioral Sciences. John Wiley and Sons; 2015, pp. 1-16. doi: 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0021

[37]. Ravanera ZR, Fernando R. Social Status Polarization in the Timing and Trajectories to Motherhood. PSC Discussion Papers Series 2004; 18(6): article 1. Available at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/pscpapers/vol18/iss6/1 (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[38]. Melnikas AJ, Romero, D. Ideal age at first birth and associated factors among young adults in greater New York City: Findings from the social position and family formation study. Journal of Family Issues 2020; 41(3): 288–311. doi: 10.1177/0192513X198757

[39]. Dimitrova E, Nikolova St. Trends in fertility in Bulgaria in the period 1990-2016 (Bulgarian). Population Review 2019; 37(1): 7-61.

[40]. Dimitrova, E. Social differences in the reproductive intentions of the young generations in Bulgaria. Results of the European Social Survey. Population Review 2020; 38(1): 25-54.

[41]. Mitev PE, Popivanov B, Kovatcheva S, Parvanov S. Bulgarian Youth 2018/2019 [Bulgarian]. Sofia: Fridrich Ebert Foundation; 2020. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sofia/15287.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2024).

[42]. Dimitrova E, Kotzeva T. (2022). Contested Parenthood: Attitudes Toward Voluntary Childlessness as a Life Strategy in Post‐Socialist Bulgaria. Social Inclusion 2022; 10(3), 172-183. doi: 10.17645/si.v10i3.5065

[43]. Schoppe-Sullivan SJ, Shafer K, Olofson E, Kamp Dush CM. Fathers’ Parenting and Coparenting Behavior in Dual-Earner Families: Contributions of Traditional Masculinity, Father Nurturing Role Beliefs, and Maternal Gate Closing. Psychology of Men & Masculinities 2021; 22(3): 538-550. doi: 10.1037/men0000336.

[44]. Lawson G, Fletcher R. Delayed fatherhood. The journal of family planning and reproductive health care 2014; 40(4): 283–288. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100866

[45]. Hammarberg K, Collins V, Holden C, Young K, McLachlan R. Men's knowledge, attitudes and behaviours relating to fertility. Human Reproduction Update 2017; 23(4): 458–480. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx005

[46]. Dimitrova, E. Event history analysis of the transition to first and second birth among women in Bulgaria. Population Review 2020; 38(3): 23-40.

[47]. He Y, Xie Y. The shift in ideal family size: Examining the impact of marriage and parenthood. Chinese Journal of Sociology 2023; 9(4), 553-573. doi: 10.1177/2057150X231203836

[48]. Kovacheva S. Managing uncertainty of young people's transitions to adulthood in Bulgaria. Sociologija 2012; 54 (2): 245-262.

[49]. Karamelska T. Believing but not religious: Bulgarian contexts of holistic spirituality [Bulgarian]. New Bulgarian University. Sofia; 2023.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com