PDF

Published

2024-08-15

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 7 (2024): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Sarabi, A. A., & Ututalum, C. S. (2024). Effectiveness of English language teaching methods and language learning skills among college students in public higher education institutions in Sulu. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2684

Effectiveness of English language teaching methods and language learning skills among college students in public higher education institutions in Sulu

Alnakier A. Sarabi

Graduate Studies, Sulu State College

Charisma S. Ututalum

Graduate Studies, Sulu State College


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2684


Keywords: competence, effectiveness, English language, language learning skills, teaching methods

Abstract

English is the most widely spoken language in the world, serving as a common medium for people from different linguistic backgrounds. It is the primary or secondary language in many countries and is often used as the international language of business, diplomacy, science, and technology. Hence, there was a need for effective teaching and instructional strategy to enhance the competence of the college students. This study investigated the effectiveness of various English language teaching methods and assessed the language learning skills of college students in public higher education institutions (HEIs) in Sulu, Philippines. Quota sampling (n=200) was carried out to sample the college students from four (4) different public HEIs in Sulu. Close-ended questionnaires were administered to determine the effectiveness of three different English language teaching methods—(i) Grammar-Translation Method, (ii) Direct Method, and (iii) Audio-Lingual Method. This study also analyzed the level of English language learning competence of college students based on their (i) listening skills, (ii) speaking skills, (iii) reading skills, and (iv) writing skills. Key findings indicated that different teaching methods, namely the Grammar-Translation Method, the Direct Method, and the Audio-Lingual Method, each offered distinct advantages for language learning. In assessing the language learning skills of the students, the study found high competence across all four key areas: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Inferential analysis indicated that the effectiveness of English language teaching methods can be correlated to the language competence of college students. Further studies shall be done to determine whether the teaching methods could directly influence the language skills of students.

References

[1]. McKay, S. L., Hu, G., & Renandya, W. A. (2012). Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (Vol. 711). L. Alsagoff (Ed.). New York: Routledge.

[2]. Mulatu, E., & Regassa, T. (2022). Teaching reading skills in EFL classes: Practice and procedures teachers use to help learners with low reading skills. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2093493.

[3]. Blasi, D. E., Henrich, J., Adamou, E., Kemmerer, D., & Majid, A. (2022). Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science. Trends in cognitive sciences, 26(12), 1153-1170.

[4]. Chavez, J. V. (2020). The effects of English as a second language on bilingual parents’ English language dispositions. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 7(1), 12-25.

[5]. Chavez, J. V. (2021). Bilingual parents’ dispositions: Precursor to developing the English language teaching curriculum. Psychology and Education, 58(5), 161-166.

[6]. Chavez, J. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).

[7]. Chowdhury, R., & Kabir, A. H. (2014). Language wars: English education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Multilingual education, 4, 1-16.

[8]. Hamid, M. O. (2016). The linguistic market for English in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 36-55.

[9]. Yoshino, K. (2014). Englishizing Asia. The Transnationalization of Malaysia’s Higher Education and Its Impact.

[10]. Majhanovich, S. (2013). English as a tool of neo-colonialism and globalization in Asian contexts. In Critical perspectives on international education (pp. 249-261). Brill.

[11]. Chavez, J. V. (2021). Bilingual parents’ dispositions: Precursor to developing the English language teaching curriculum. Psychology and Education, 58(5), 161-166.

[12]. Quijano, Y. (2012). Technical working group on curriculum. Orientation for K to 12.

[13]. Phillipson, R. (2008). The linguistic imperialism of neoliberal empire. Critical inquiry in language studies, 5(1), 1-43.

[14]. Suzuki, N. (2022). A return to English for global competitiveness: Monolingualizing the bilingual nation in the postcolonial Philippines. People and Culture in Oceania, 37, 51-61.

[15]. Kilag, O. K., Uy, F., Tiu, J., Dacanay, L., Vestal, P., & Zamora, M. (2024). Empowering Learners: Addressing Linguistic Hurdles in English Education for Senior High School Students in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(5), 121-127.

[16]. Menozo, P. (2020). Reality Bites: A Systematic Literature Review of K to 12 English Language Teaching in the Philippines. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(12), 80-86.

[17]. Manuel, J. B. (2022). English language proficiency of senior high school students. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 9(1), 71-86.

[18]. Ignacio, L. B., Cristobal, A. G. A., & David, P. C. (2022). Impact of Policy Implementation on Education Quality: A Case Study on Philippines’ Low Ranking in International and Local Assessment Programs. Asian Journal on Perspectives in Education, 3, 41-54.

[19]. Mora, J. C., Mora‐Plaza, I., & Bermejo Miranda, G. (2023). Speaking anxiety and task complexity effects on second language speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.

[20]. Noviyanti, S. D. (2022). Speaking anxiety in online english class: causes and effects. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), 2(1), 112-117.

[21]. Tran, T. T. L. (2022). An Investigation into the Causes of Students' Anxiety in Learning English Speaking Skills. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(3), 183-196.

[22]. Wahyuni, M. E., & Inayati, N. (2022). The Strategies in Learning English Listening Skills Used by the Eighth-Graders. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 160-177.

[23]. Inayati, N., & Waloyo, A. A. (2022). The influence of Quizziz-online gamification on learning engagement and outcomes in online English language teaching. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 12(2), 249-271.

[24]. Chavez, J., & Lamorinas, D. D. (2023). Reconfiguring assessment practices and strategies in online education during the pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(1), 160-174.

[25]. Hernández García de Velazco, J. J., Ravina Ripoll, R., Chumaceiro Hernandez, A. C., & Tobar Pesantez, L. B. (2021). Knowledge management and key factors for organizational success in the perspective of the 21st Century. Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 26(6), 65-81.

[26]. Huang, J., Li, J., Shu, T., & Zhang, Y. (2022). A mixed-methods national study investigating key challenges in learning English as a foreign language: A Chinese college student perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1035819.

[27]. Paschal, M. J. (2022). Integrating global citizenship education in higher education in Tanzania: lessons from the literature. Global Research in Higher Education, 5(2), 24-43.

[28]. Al-Ghasab, G. B. (2022). Reality of using modern teaching methods in teaching English language among teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(2), 512-527.

[29]. Izhar, F., & Hashim, M. A. (2022). Comparative analysis of Direct method and Grammar translation method on student learning in English among secondary school. Global Educational Studies Review, VII.

[30]. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.

[31]. Akramy, S. A., Habibzada, S. A., & Hashemi, A. (2022). Afghan EFL teachers’ perceptions towards Grammar-Translation Method (GTM). Cogent Education, 9(1), 2127503.

[32]. Sittirak, N. (2015). Grammar-Translation Method in an EFL Class in Thailand: A Glance at an English Song’s Lyrics. Journal of Education, 15(2), 30-47.

[33]. Elmayantie, C. (2015). The use of grammar translation method in teaching English. Journal on English as a foreign language, 5(2), 125-132.

[34]. Mondal, K. N. (2012). English language learning through the combination of grammar translation method and communicative language teaching. Academia Arena, 4(6), 20-24.

[35]. Sitorus, N., & Silitonga, H. (2018). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECT METHOD TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN SPEAKING. Eltin Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 6(2), 79-84.

[36]. Batool, N., Anosh, M., Batool, A., & Iqbal, N. (2017). The direct method: A good start to teach oral language. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 37-40.

[37]. Mahmud, M., & Ulya, S. (2021). The Effect of Direct Method in Teaching Speaking Skill: Quantitative Method. JOURNEY (Journal of English Language and Pedagogy), 1(1), 88-102.

[38]. Yuliani, S. (2020). Teaching Reading Comprehension through Direct Method to the Eighth Grade Students of the State Junior High School 44 of Palembang. Jurnal Smart, 6(2), 98-107.

[39]. Mulyawan, M. A., Sai'dah, M. A., Al Hasby, D. A., & Dafasyah, M. A. (2024). Direct Method In Learning Arabic at Darussalam Rajapolah Islamic Boarding School. ANCOLT: International Proceeding on Language Teaching, 1(1), 173-183.

[40]. Dal Cin, G. (2022). The use of the Direct Method and of the Communicative Approach in teaching Italian as a L2 in a private school in Venice.

[41]. Hall, G. (2017). Exploring English language teaching: Language in action. Routledge.

[42]. Nathan, L. E., Kurniadi, D., Muhid, A., & Heriyanto, E. (2023). Teaching English vocabulary using the audio-lingual method: A classroom action research conducted in class 3A SD Shalom Semarang in the academic year 2022/2023. Jurnal CULTURE (Culture, Language, and Literature Review), 10(1), 22-29.

[43]. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. oxford University.

[44]. Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher's guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge University Press.

[45]. Suwarno, T. S., Retnowati, N., & Sundari, H. (2023). Exploring Teacher's Implementation of Audio Lingual Method, Challenges, and Techniques for Improving Student's Vocabulary Mastery. English Journal, 17(1), 23-31.

[46]. Prasetya, (2015). Comparative Analysis between Audio-lingual and Total Physical Response Methods in English Language Lerning for Kindergarten

[47]. Robert, R., & Meenakshi, S. (2022). Rereading oral communication skills in English language acquisition: The unspoken spoken English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(11), 2429-2435.

[48]. Ryczek, M. (2013). Ranking the Four Skills: How Asia University Freshmen View Their English Ability. 英語教育センター紀要 (CELE Journal), 21, 53-77.

[49]. Lynch, T., & Mendelsohn, D. (2013). Listening. In An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 190-206). Routledge.

[50]. Maitlo, S. K., Tumrani, G. A., & Ali, S. (2022). Factors Affecting Speaking and Listening Skills of English Language Learners at Secondary School Level in Sindh, Pakistan. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 3(2), 875-884.

[51]. Ria, A., Munaris, M., & Muhammad, F. (2021). The Development of Student Worksheets for Writing Short Stories Based on Local Wisdom Values for Class XI in Senior High School. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 11(5), 7-15.

[52]. Ceneciro, C. C., Estoque, M. R., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). Analysis of debate skills to the learners’ confidence and anxiety in the use of the English language in academic engagements. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 4544-4569.

[53]. Mariyanti, M., Hengki, H., & Aprizani, Y. (2020). VERBAL COMMUNICATION BETWEEN TEACHER AND STUDENT IN ENGLISH SPEAKING AT VACATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BANJARBARU, INDONESIA. Proceeding: Islamic University of Kalimantan, 1(1).

[54]. Al Asmari, A. (2015). A comparative determination of barriers of oral English learning faced by preparatory year students. European Scientific Journal, 11(35).

[55]. Beatrice, S., & Mikulecky, E. D. (2008). Teaching reading in a second Language.

[56]. Sutherland, A., & Incera, S. (2021). Critical Reading: What Do Faculty Think Students Should Do?. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(4), 267-290.

[57]. Afanasieva, O., Fedotova, M., & Smirnova, M. (2020). Coherence of critical reading skills and teacher training development. Revista Espacios, 41(46), 92-101.

[58]. Larking, M. (2017). Critical reading strategies in the advanced English classroom. APU journal of language research, 2, 50.

[59]. Chavez, J. V., Anuddin, F. O., Mansul, H. H., Hawari, N. A., Irilis, F. B., Umaron, A. A., ... & Albani, S. E. (2024). Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(7).

[60]. Siregar, S. P. E., Sari, F., Sudjoko, S., & Yundayani, A. (2022). Dealing with english writing skills: Through the eyes of vocational students. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 18-28.

[61]. Nasser, A. N. A. (2016). Teaching the writing skill to Yemeni EFL learners: The importance and challenge. South-Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (SAJMS), 3(6), 191-203.

[62]. Salma, U. (2015). Problems and practical needs of writing skill in EFL context: An analysis of Iranian students of Aligarh Muslim University. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(11), 74-76.

[63]. Sincer, G. H. (2017). Inquiring What to Teach and How to Teach in EVP Classes: A General Overview on English Teaching for Vocational Purposes in Turkey. International Journal of Curriculum and instruction, 9(2), 39-48.

[64]. Chavez, J. V. (2020). Impact of Massive Open Online Course on the Teacher-Enrollees’ Personal Growth and Professional Development. Solid State Technology, 63(4), 1575-1590.

[65]. Chavez, J. V., Gregorio, A. M. W., Araneta, A. L., & Bihag, C. D. (2023). Magna carta for women health workers, teachers, and minimum-wage earners in the workplace: Policy awareness and organizational compliance. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).

[66]. Khamkaew, S. (2022). The integration of grammar translation method and individualized instruction method in teaching English for grade 12 students. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 1-12.

[67]. Mart, C. T. (2013). The grammar-translation method and the use of translation to facilitate learning in ESL classes. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 1(4), 103-105.

[68]. Shliakhtina, O., Kyselova, T., Mudra, S., Talalay, Y., & Oleksiienko, A. (2023). The effectiveness of the grammar translation method for learning English in higher education institutions. Revista Eduweb, 17(3), 134-145.

[69]. Suhria, S., & Ilmi, N. (2023). Student Perspectives on the Grammar Translation Method in English Language Learning. Scolae: Journal of Pedagogy, 6(1), 1-6.

[70]. Awan, A. G., & Nawaz, A. (2015). Comparison of GTM and Direct Method of teaching English at Elementary level in Pakistan. Global Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 1(1), 17-30.

[71]. Dewi, R. C., Utami, I. L. P., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2023). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECT METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH FOR 1ST GRADE OF STUDENTS. Lingua Scientia, 30(1), 1-11.

[72]. Schmitt, N. (2010). Key issues in teaching and learning vocabulary. Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning, 28-40.

[73]. Bagheri, M., Hadian, B., & Vaez-Dalili, M. (2019). Effects of the Vaughan Method in Comparison with the Audiolingual Method and the Communicative Language Teaching on Iranian Advanced EFL Learners' Speaking Skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 81-98.

[74]. Lousa, D. P., & Suryaman, M. (2022). Fun Learning to Improve Students’ Speaking Skill through Audio Lingual Method in the Eyl Classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(4), 6466-6472.

[75]. Nshimiyimana, E., & Bazimaziki, G. (2024). Effectiveness of audio-lingual teaching method to enhance students’ English speaking and listening proficiency: The case of selected primary schools in Nyagatare District. Rwandan Journal of Education, 7(2), 32-41.

[76]. Andriani, A., Pertamana, D., & Novianti, L. T. (2024). Exploring Undergraduate Students' Perspectives on the Integration of Podcasts for Enhancing Listening Skills. The Art of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, 5(1), 48-65.

[77]. Lynch, A. (2008). The linguistic similarities of Spanish heritage and second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 252-381.

[78]. Septiani, N., Rizal, S., & Afriani, Z. L. (2022). A Survey Study of Students’ Strategies in Learning Listening Skills during the Covid 19 Pandemic at Uinfas Bengkulu. JPT: Jurnal Pendidikan Tematik, 3(2), 182-191.

[79]. Yıldırım, S., & Yıldırım, Ö. (2016). The importance of listening in language learning and listening comprehension problems experienced by language learners: A literature review. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 2094-2110.

[80]. Santos, A., Fernandez, V., & Ilustre, R. A. M. I. L. (2022). English language proficiency in the Philippines: an overview. International Journal of English Language Studies, 4(3), 46-51.

[81]. Dadulla, J. (2023). Self-esteem and English oral proficiency level of junior high school students in the Philippines. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition-JSMULA, 432-445.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com