Published
2024-08-15
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Unfolding the consequences of customer satisfaction: Information from social media as a moderator
Thanuja Villalan
Department of Commerce, S.K.S.S Arts College, Tiruppanandal, Affiliated to Bharathidasan University
Mohan Subramaniyan
S.K.S.S Arts College, Tiruppanandal, Affiliated to Bharathidasan University
Rajesh Elangovan
Department of Commerce, Bishop Heber College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University
Satyanarayana Parayitam
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2821
Keywords: eWOM, value co-creation, repurchase intention, social media
Abstract
The present study examines the relationship between customer satisfaction and eWOM, value co-creation, and repurchase intentions. It also tested the moderating effect of information from social media. A conceptual model was developed, and hypotheses were tested using hierarchical regression. The sample of participants in the present study was limited to those who had extensive experience with online shopping, read product or service reviews frequently, and shared them online. We have received data from 455 respondents. The study's empirical findings expose that customer satisfaction is positively and significantly related to eWOM, value co-creation, and repurchase intention. The study also revealed that social media information moderates the relationship between customer satisfaction, value co-creation, and repurchase intention.
Author Biography
Satyanarayana Parayitam, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Satyanarayana Parayitam is a Professor of Strategic Management in Charlton College of Business, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. His research focuses on cognitive, affective conflict and interpersonal trust in strategic decision-making processes.References
[1]. Abdul, S. B., Soundararajan, V., & Parayitam, S. (2022). The Relationship between Social Media Influence, EWOM, and E-satisfaction of Consumers in India: A Moderated Moderated-mediation Conditional Model. Global Business Review, 097215092211301. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221130153
[2]. Kuo, H. C., & Nakhata, C. (2019). The impact of electronic Word-of-Mouth on customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 27(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2019.1615840
[3]. Nugroho, A. A., Siagian, H., Oktavio, A., & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2023). The effect of e-WOM on customer satisfaction through ease of use, perceived usefulness and e-wallet payment. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.11.007
[4]. Wang, J., & Xie, J. (2022). Exploring the factors influencing users’ learning and sharing behaviour on social media platforms. Library Hi Tech, 41(5), 1436–1455. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-01-2022-0033
[5]. Kwon, J., Han, I., & Kim, B. (2017). Effects of source influence and peer referrals on information diffusion in Twitter. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(5), 896–909. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-07-2016-0290
[6]. Vasil, M, M., Chopdar, P.K., Buhalis, D., & Das, S.S. (2024).Value co-creation in the sharing economy: Revisiting the past to inform future, Psychology & Marketing, Ahead of print, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21990
[7]. Akter, S., Babu, M. M., Hossain, M. A., & Hani, U. (2022). Value co-creation on a shared healthcare platform: Impact on service innovation, perceived value and patient welfare. Journal of Business Research, 140(November 2021), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.077
[8]. Kim, J. (2019). Customers’ value co-creation with healthcare service network partners. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 29(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-08-2018-0178
[9]. Purba, F. R., & Paramita, E. L. (2021). The influence of eWOM and customer satisfaction on purchasing decisions. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 5(4), 578. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v5i4.40447
[10]. Quach, S., Shao, W., Ross, M., & Thaichon, P. (2019). Customer engagement and co-created value in social media. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(6), 730–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-04-2019-0218
[11]. Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2010). The Effectiveness of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Literature analysis. Bled eConference, 329–345. http://ecenter.fov.uni-mb.si/proceedings.nsf/0/7d01f166eebae8e3c1257757003c5e98/$FILE/24_Cheung.pdf
[12]. Charlton, G. (2012). Ecommerce consumer reviews: why you need them and how to use them. Econsultancy.com, 30.
[13]. Febrian, A., & Fadly, M. (2021). The Impact of Customer Satisfaction with EWOM and Brand Equity on E-Commerce Purchase Intention in Indonesia Moderated by Culture. Binus Business Review : Management, Accounting and Hospitality Management, 12(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v12i1.6419.
[14]. Serra-Cantallops, A., Ramón-Cardona, J., & Salvi, F. (2018). The impact of positive emotional experiences on eWOM generation and loyalty. Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, 22(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-03-2018-0009
[15]. Tandon, A., Aakash, A., & Aggarwal, A. G. (2020). Impact of EWOM, website quality, and product satisfaction on customer satisfaction and repurchase intention: moderating role of shipping and handling. International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management, 11(S2), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00954-3
[16]. Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L., (2009). Marketing management (13th ed). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River: NJ.
[17]. Saleem, U., Yi, S. J., Bilal, M., Topor, D. I., & Căpușneanu, S. (2022). The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and eWOM in online purchase intention: The moderating role of gender in risk-taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945707
[18]. Oliver, R. L. (2010). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[19]. Ruiz-Alba, J., Abou-Foul, M., Nazarian, A., & Foroudi, P. (2021). Digital platforms: customer satisfaction, eWOM and the moderating role of perceived technological innovativeness. Information Technology & People, 35(7), 2470–2499. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-07-2021-0572
[20]. Hennig‐Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
[21]. Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.90
[22]. Babic-Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., & De Valck, K. (2019). Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00706-1
[23]. Almohaimmeed, B. (2020). The impacts of brand experiences on customer satisfaction and electronic word of mouth. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11965
[24]. Lii, Y., & Lee, M. (2012). The joint effects of compensation frames and price levels on service recovery of online pricing error. Managing Service Quality, 22(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521211198083
[25]. Chen, T., Dodds, S., Finsterwalder, J., Witell, L., Cheung, L., Falter, M., Garry, T., Snyder, H., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2021). Dynamics of wellbeing co-creation: A psychological ownership perspective. Journal of Service Management, 32(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-09-2019-0297
[26]. Choi, L., Lawry, C. A., & Kimm M. (2019). Contextualizing customer organizational citizenship behaviors: The changing nature of value cocreation and customer satisfaction across service settings, Psychology & Marketing, 36(5), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21190.
[27]. Alalwan, A. A., Algharabat, R.S., Baabdullah, A.M., P. Rana, N.P., Raman, R., Dwivedi, R., & Aljafari, A. (2019). Examining the impact of social commerce dimensions on customers’ value cocreation: The mediating effect of social trust, Journal of Consumer Behavior, 18(6), 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1782
[28]. Janamian, T., Crossland, L., & Wells, L. (2016). On the road to value co-creation: A methodology to drive primary health care reform on the road to value co-creation in health care: The role of consumers in defining the destination, planning the journey and sharing the drive. Medical Journal of Australia, 204(7), S12–S14. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00123
[29]. Kim, J. (2019). Customers’ value co-creation with healthcare service network partners. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 29(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-08-2018-0178
[30]. Mai, S., & Wang, D. (2019). Relationship between patient value co-creation behaviour and quality of medical care: A cross-sectional survey. The Lancet, 394, S45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32381-5
[31]. Pham, T. A. N., Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2019). Customer value cocreation activities: An exploration of psychological drivers and quality of life outcomes. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 29(3), 282–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-07-2018-0163
[32]. Copeland, M. T. (1923). Relation of consumers’ buying habits to marketing methods. Harvard Business Review, 1(2), 282–289. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10013454657/
[33]. Ibzan, E., Balarabe, F., & Jakada, B. A. (2016). Consumer satisfaction and repurchase intentions. Developing Country Studies, 6(2), 96–100. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/DCS/article/download/28624/29386
[34]. Nguyen, L. T. M., Nguyễn, T. H., & Tan, T. K. P. (2021). An empirical study of customers’ satisfaction and repurchase intention on online shopping in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.971
[35]. Nikbin, D., Ismail, I., Marimuthu, M., & Abu-Jarad, I. (2011). The impact of firm reputation on customers’ responses to service failure: the role of failure attributions. Business Strategy Series, 12(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/17515631111106849
[36]. Ashfaq, M., Jiang, Y., Waheed, A., Khan, M. S., & Farrukh, M. (2019). Customers’ expectation, satisfaction, and repurchase intention of used products online: Empirical evidence from China. SAGE Open, 9(2), 215824401984621. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019846212
[37]. Chatzoglou, P. D., Chatzoudes, D., Savvidou, A., Fotiadis, T., & Delias, P. (2022). Factors affecting repurchase intentions in retail shopping: An empirical study. Heliyon, 8(9), e10619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10619
[38]. Curtis, T., Abratt, R., Dion, P. A., & Rhoades, D. L. (2011). Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty and Repurchase: Some Evidence from Apparel Consumers. Review of Business, 32(1), 47–57. https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=db-management
[39]. Lau, H. B., Bunga, M., & Ndoen, W. (2019). The Effect of Consumers Satisfaction on Repurchase Intention. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 143.
[40]. Lee, Y., & Kim, M. S. (2008). The effect of logistics service quality on customer satisfaction and repurchase intention: focusing on company size as a moderator. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2008.6.1.55
[41]. Pappas, I. O., Pateli, A. G., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2014). Moderating effects of online shopping experience on customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42(3), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-03-2012-0034
[42]. Kusumo, M., & Vidyanata, D. (2022). The mediation effect of customer satisfaction on the relationship between service quality on repurchase intention: an evidence from the service industry. Journal Entrepreneur Dan Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.37715/jee.v11i1.3120
[43]. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
[44]. Carter, J., & Shields, B. (2021). Social Media Debate Position 3: Social media as a credible source of information. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 25(1–2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2021.1940411
[45]. Kim, K., Yoo‐Lee, E., & Sin, S. J. (2011). Social media as information source: Undergraduates’ use and evaluation behaviour. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801283
[46]. Kabata, P., Winniczuk-Kabata, D., Kabata, P. M., Jaśkiewicz, J., & Połom, K. (2022). Can social media profiles be a reliable source of information on nutrition and dietetics? Healthcare, 10(2), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020397
[47]. Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2019). Value co-creation through social media: a case study of a start-up company. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.6262
[48]. Yadav, M., Kamboj, S., & Rahman, Z. (2016). Customer co-creation through social media: The case of ‘Crash the Pepsi IPL 2015.’ Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 17(4), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2016.4
[49]. Zhou, R. (2023). Does social media marketing affect online repurchase intention? The mediating role of guanxi. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 51(12), 12826E-12833E.
[50]. Istanbulluoglu, D., & Sakman, E. (2022). Successful complaint handling on social media predicts increased repurchase intention: The roles of trust in company and propensity to trust. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.06.004
[51]. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
[52]. Shin, J. I., Chung, K. H., Oh, J. S., & Lee, C. W. (2013). The effect of site quality on repurchase intention in Internet shopping through mediating variables: The case of university students in South Korea. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.02.003
[53]. Fang, Y., Tang, K., Li, C., & Wu, C. (2016). On electronic word-of-mouth diffusion in social networks: curiosity and influence. International Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1256014
[54]. Syamsoeyadi, H., & Tjokrosaputro, M. (2022). The Role of e-WOM towards Value Co-Creation on Sharing Economy Platform in Indonesia. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220501.076
[55]. Fang, Y., Chiu, C., & Wang, E. T. G. (2011). Understanding customers’ satisfaction and repurchase intentions. Internet Research, 21(4), 479–503. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111158335
[56]. Amaro, S., Duarte, P., & Henriques, C. (2016). Travelers’ use of information from social media: A clustering approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 59, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2016.03.007
[57]. Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009, April). Predicting tie strength with information from social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 211-220)
[58]. Norman, A. T., & Russell, C. A. (2006). The Pass-Along Effect: Investigating Word-of-Mouth effects on online survey procedures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1085–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00309.x
[59]. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation odelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
[60]. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[61]. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
[62]. Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Hite, J. P. (1995). Choice of employee-organization relationship: Influence of external and internal organizational factors, In: Ferris G R (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (pp. 117–151). JAI Pres.
[63]. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1992). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Choice Reviews Online, 29(06), 29–3352. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-3352
[64]. Sumiyati, S., & Zabella, Z. (2023). The effect of customer satisfaction on repurchase Intention E-Money in Pontianak City. International Journal Papier Public Review, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i1.186
[65]. Tufahati, N., Barkah, C. S., Tresna, P. W., & Chan, A. (2021). The impact of customer satisfaction on Repurchase intention (Surveys on customer of BloomyThings). Journal of Business and Applied Management, 14(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.30813/jbam.v14i2.3098
[66]. Jin, R., & Chen, K. (2020). Impact of value cocreation on customer satisfaction and loyalty of online Car-Hailing services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(3), 432–444. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16030027
[67]. Bueno, S., & Gallego, M.D. (2021). eWOM in C2C Platforms: Combining IAM and Customer Satisfaction to Examine the Impact on Purchase Intention. Journal of Theoretical Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 1612–1630.https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050091
[68]. Nájera-Sánchez, J.-J., Martinez-Cañas, R., García-Haro, M.-Á., & Martínez-Ruiz, M.P. (2022), Exploring the knowledge structure of the relationship between value co-creation and customer satisfaction, Management Decision, 60(12), 3366-3387. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2021-0930
[69]. Saleem, U., yi, S., Bilal, M,, Topor, D,I., & Capusneanu, S. (2022). The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and eWOM in online purchase intention: The moderating role of gender in risk-taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:945707.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945707
[70]. Seifert, C., & Kwon, W.-S. (2020), SNS eWOM sentiment: impacts on brand value co-creation and trust, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2018-0533