Transforming Higher Mathematics Teaching Through Computer Technology
Vol 9, Issue 11, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 48 (Abstract) 18 (PDF)
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of computer technology on higher mathematics teaching and learning, focusing on student attitudes and academic performance. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research involved 210 high school students and 15 mathematics teachers. Data were collected through a combination of semi-structured questionnaires, student test scores, interviews, and classroom observations. The findings indicate that the integration of computer technology leads to significant improvements in students' academic performance and fosters positive attitudes towards mathematics. Students using technological tools showed greater engagement, better understanding of complex concepts, and increased confidence in problem-solving. No significant gender differences were observed in attitudes towards technology use. However, challenges such as resource accessibility and the need for teacher training were identified. The study concludes with recommendations for effectively incorporating computer technology into higher mathematics education to enhance learning outcomes and student engagement.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
2. Dick, T., & Hollebrands, K. F. (2011). Focus in high school mathematics: Technology to support reasoning and sense making. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
3. Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Prentice Hall.
4. Jarrah, A. M., Bashatah, M., & Rasheed, F. (2025). Analyzing effective teaching strategies in higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 32(1), 102-117.
5. Alneyadi, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). ChatGPT’s role in quantum theory education: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Learning Technologies, 29(3), 45-63.
6. Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213-234.
7. Fenghan, W., & Fengtong, C. (2019). Interactive learning environments in mathematics education: An analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 22(4), 34-45.
8. Driver, R. (2003). Visualizing mathematics: A theoretical exploration. Mathematics in Education, 19(2), 75-87.
9. Driver, R. (2008). Understanding and Teaching Mathematics. McGraw-Hill.
10. Goos, M. (2012). Using technology to support effective mathematics teaching and learning: A teacher’s guide. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(3), 23-29.
11. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
12. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
13. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
14. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education.
15. Hohenwarter, M., Preiner, J., & Yi, T. (2007). Technology in mathematics education: The case of GeoGebra. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 67-76.
16. Hidayat, M. R., & Wardat, Y. (2023). Augmented reality in STEM education: A comprehensive analysis. Journal of STEM Education and Innovations, 18(2), 120-133.
17. Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction and mathematics learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 243-275.
18. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier.
19. Hudson, B. (2010). ICT and mathematics education: Impact and prospects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 858-869.
20. Jamieson-Proctor, R., Burnett, P. C., Finger, G., & Watson, G. (2006). ICT integration and teachers' confidence in using ICT for teaching and learning in Queensland state schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 511-530.
21. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154.
22. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer.
23. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
24. Leigh-Lancaster, D. (2010). Curriculum, assessment, and ICT integration: Ensuring consistency in mathematics education. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 66(4), 25-30.
25. Saleh, M., Shalaby, S., & Sayed, M. (2023). Teacher training and technology in education: Empirical evidence from Egypt. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 26(1), 35-50.
26. Tashtoush, O., Husein, S., & Nofal, M. (2023). Professional development for ICT integration in higher education: Best practices and lessons learned. International Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 51-67.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.2857
(48 Abstract Views, 18 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rommel AlAli, Yousef Wardat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.