Open Journal Systems

Attractive appearance, future wealth! How exposure to visual wealth on social media contributes to female self-objectification

Man Luo, Feng Yang

Article ID: 2868
Vol 9, Issue 7, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 0 (Abstract) 0 (PDF)

Abstract

Exposure to visual wealth on social media is a common phenomenon in daily life, but little research has been conducted to examine how this phenomenon affects individuals’ self-concept. By employing the social adaptation hypothesis of female self-objectification as a theoretical framework, the present research firstly investigated how visual wealth exposure on social media contributed to the self-objectification of women, and the downstream consequences linked to the self-objectification. To this end, three preregistered online studies were conducted. By adopting an online questionnaire survey, Study 1 found that there was a significantly positive relationship between visual wealth exposure and self-objectification, and economic inequality perception and competence perception played a chain-mediating role between them. By randomly assigning participants to the wealth-relevant image exposure condition or the natural scenery image exposure condition, Study 2 conceptually replicated the findings of Study 1. The following Study 3 further found that, participants exposed to wealth-relevant images displayed more preferences for an appearance-dominated job (working as a network entertainment-anchor) than those exposed to natural scenery images, and self-objectification mediated the effect of exposure condition on career choice. The current research provided additional empirical supports for the social adaptation hypothesis of female self-objectification, and also deepened our understanding of the relationship between social media use and the self-objectification of women.


Keywords

social media; visual wealth exposure; economic inequality; objectification theory; female psychology

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA. Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly 1997; 21(2): 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x

2. Daniels EA, Zurbriggen EL, Ward LM. Becoming an object: A review of self-objectification in girls. Body Image 2020; 33: 278-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.016

3. Perloff RM. Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles 2014; 71(11-12): 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0384-6

4. Prichard I, McLachlan AC, Lavis T, Tiggemann M. The impact of different forms of# fitspiration imagery on body image, mood, and self-objectification among young women. Sex Roles 2018;78:789-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0830-3

5. Yao L, Niu G, Sun X, Duan C, Zheng Y. Selfie-posting on social networking sites, body surveillance, and exercise for weight control among Chinese young women with low body mass index. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2020;51: 101767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101767

6. Davis AC, Arnocky S. An evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2022; 51(1): 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4

7. Wang X, Chen H, Chen Z. Women’s self-objectification under competition when they believe sex is power. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2022; 51(6): 2837-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02335-2

8. Wang X, Chen H, Chen Z, Yang Y. Women’s intrasexual competition results in beautification. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2021; 12(5): 648-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620933403

9. Busetta G, Fiorillo F, Visalli E. Searching for a job is a beauty contest. In: Munich Personal RePEc Archive (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2331921

10. Hosoda M, Stone‐Romero EF, Coats G. The effects of physical attractiveness on job‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology 2003; 56(2): 431-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x

11. Melita D, Willis GB, Rodríguez-Bailón R. Economic inequality increases status anxiety through perceived contextual competitiveness. Frontiers in Psychology 2021; 12: 637365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637365

12. Nishi A, Shirado H, Rand DG, Christakis NA. Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature 2015; 526(7573): 426-429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15392

13. Sommet N, Elliot AJ, Jamieson JP, Butera F. Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach‐avoidance motivation. Journal of Personality 2019; 87(4): 767-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12432

14. Swim JK, Hyers LL, Cohen LL, Ferguson MJ. Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues 2001; 57(1): 31-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200

15. Holland E, Koval P, Stratemeyer M, Thomson F, Haslam N. Sexual objectification in women's daily lives: A smartphone ecological momentary assessment study. British Journal of Social Psychology 2017; 56(2): 314-33.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12152

16. McKinley NM, Hyde JS. The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly 1996; 20(2): 181-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x

17. Noll SM, Fredrickson BL. A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly 1998; 22(4): 623-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x

18. Donovan CL, Uhlmann L. Looking at me, looking at you: The mediating roles of body surveillance and social comparison in the relationship between fit ideal internalisation and body dissatisfaction. Eating Behaviors 2022; 47: 101678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2022.101678

19. Monro F, Huon G. Media‐portrayed idealized images, body shame, and appearance anxiety. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2005; 38(1): 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20153

20. Tiggemann M, Kuring JK. The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2004; 43(3): 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144665031752925

21. Tylka TL, Sabik NJ. Integrating social comparison theory and self-esteem within objectification theory to predict women’s disordered eating. Sex Roles 2010; 63: 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9785-3

22. Ching BH, Wu HX, Chen TT. Body weight contingent self-worth predicts depression in adolescent girls: The roles of self-esteem instability and interpersonal sexual objectification. Body Image 2021; 36: 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.10.009

23. Guo Q, Wu M. The relationship between self-objectification and social avoidance among Chinese middle adolescent girls: The mediating role of appearance comparison and self-esteem. Current Psychology 2023; 42(5): 3489-3497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01705-8

24. Blake KR, Brooks R, Arthur LC, Denson TF. In the context of romantic attraction, beautification can increase assertiveness in women. PLoS One 2020; 15(3): e0229162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229162

25. Breines JG, Crocker J, Garcia JA. Self-objectification and well-being in women's daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008; 34(5): 583-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207313727

26. Beard A. Hot or not. Attractive people are more successful at work. Should we do anything about it. Harvard Business Review 2009; 144-145.

27. Hamermesh DS. Beauty pays: Why attractive people are more successful. Princeton University Press; 2011.

28. O'Keeffe GS, Clarke-Pearson K. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics 2011; 127(4): 800-804.. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054

29. Alfasi Y. The grass is always greener on my Friends' profiles: The effect of Facebook social comparison on state self-esteem and depression. Personality and Individual Differences 2019; 147: 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.032

30. Shaw AM, Timpano KR, Tran TB, Joormann J. Correlates of Facebook usage patterns: The relationship between passive Facebook use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. Computers in Human Behavior 2015; 48: 575-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.003

31. Sánchez‐Rodríguez Á, Willis GB, Jetten J, Rodríguez‐Bailón R. Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology 2019; 49(6): 1114-1127.. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.206

32. Fardouly J, Vartanian LR. Negative comparisons about one's appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image 2015; 12: 82-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.004

33. Davis SE. Objectification, sexualization, and misrepresentation: Social media and the college experience. Social Media+ Society 2018; 4(3): 2056305118786727. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118786727

34. Raggatt M, Wright CJ, Carrotte E, Jenkinson R, Mulgrew K, Prichard I, Lim MS. “I aspire to look and feel healthy like the posts convey”: Engagement with fitness inspiration on social media and perceptions of its influence on health and well-being. BMC Public Health 2018; 18: 1002. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5930-7

35. Chang L, Li P, Loh RS, Chua TH. A study of Singapore adolescent girls’ selfie practices, peer appearance comparisons, and body esteem on Instagram. Body Image 2019; 29: https://doi.org/90-99.10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.03.005

36. Prichard I, Kavanagh E, Mulgrew KE, Lim MS, Tiggemann M. The effect of Instagram# fitspiration images on young women’s mood, body image, and exercise behaviour. Body Image 2020; 33: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.002

37. Steers ML, Wickham RE, Acitelli LK. Seeing everyone else's highlight reels: How Facebook usage is linked to depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2014; 33(8): 701-731. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2014.33.8.701

38. Yellowlees R, Dingemans AE, Veldhuis J, de Vaate AB. Face yourself (ie): Investigating selfie-behavior in females with severe eating disorder symptoms. Computers in Human Behavior 2019; 101: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.018

39. De Botton A. Status Anxiety. Penguin; 2004.

40. Peters K, Jetten J, Tanjitpiyanond P, Wang Z, Mols F, Verkuyten M. The language of inequality: Evidence economic inequality increases wealth category salience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2022; 48(8): 1204-1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211036627

41. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002; 82(6): 878-902. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878

42. Wu SJ, Bai X, Fiske ST. Admired rich or resented rich? How two cultures vary in envy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2018; 49(7): 1114-1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118774943

43. Eckes T. Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles 2002; 47: 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021020920715

44. McKay T. Female self-objectification: Causes, consequences and prevention. McNair Scholars Research Journal 2013 ;6(1): Article7. Available at https://commons.emich.edu/mcnair/vol6/iss1/7

45. Frieiro Padin P, González Rodríguez R, Verde Diego MD, Vázquez Pérez R. Social media and eating disorder psychopathology: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 2021; 15(3): Article 6. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-3-6

46. Slater A, Tiggemann M. Body image and disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles 2010; 63: 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9794-2

47. Kwan MY, Haynos AF, Blomquist KK, Roberto CA. Warning labels on fashion images: Short‐and longer‐term effects on body dissatisfaction, eating disorder symptoms, and eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2018; 51(10): 1153-1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22951

48. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 2009; 41(4): 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

49. Yang F, Zhang H, Lin Z, Zhang T, Liu X. Exposure to income inequality on social media and female self-objectification: The mediating role of perceived competitiveness. American Journal of Applied Psychology 2023; 12(6): 136-143. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20231206.11

50. García-Castro JD, Rodríguez-Bailón R, Willis GB. Perceiving economic inequality in everyday life decreases tolerance to inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2020; 90: 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104019

51. García-Sánchez E, Van der Toorn J, Rodríguez-Bailón R, Willis GB. The vicious cycle of economic inequality: The role of ideology in shaping the relationship between “what is” and “what ought to be” in 41 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2019; 10(8): 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618811500

52. Murayama K, Elliot AJ. The competition–performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin 2012; 138(6): 1035–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028324

53. Arroyo A, Brunner SR. Negative body talk as an outcome of friends’ fitness posts on social networking sites: Body surveillance and social comparison as potential moderators. Journal of Applied Communication Research 2016; 44(3): 216-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2016.1192293

54. Kraus MW, Piff PK, Keltner D. Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009; 97(6): 992-1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357

55. Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press; 2013.

56. Sánchez‐Rodríguez Á, Willis GB, Jetten J, Rodríguez‐Bailón R. Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology 2019; 49(6): 1114-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/10.1002/ejsp.2557

57. Suls J, Martin R, Wheeler L. Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002; 11(5): 159-163.. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00191

58. Tylka TL, Rodgers RF, Calogero RM, Thompson JK, Harriger JA. Integrating social media variables as predictors, mediators, and moderators within body image frameworks: Potential mechanisms of action to consider in future research. Body Image 2023; 44: 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.01.004

59. Tiggemann M, Zaccardo M. “Exercise to be fit, not skinny”: The effect of fitspiration imagery on women's body image. Body Image 2015; 15: 61-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.06.003

60. Yang H, Wang JJ, Tng GY, Yang S. Effects of social media and smartphone use on body esteem in female adolescents: Testing a cognitive and affective model. Children 2020; 7(9): 148. Article 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7090148

61. Choma BL, Visser BA, Pozzebon JA, Bogaert AF, Busseri MA, Sadava SW. Self-objectification, self-esteem, and gender: Testing a moderated mediation model. Sex Roles 2010; 63: 645-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9829-8

62. Prichard I, Tiggemann M. Relations among exercise type, self-objectification, and body image in the fitness centre environment: The role of reasons for exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2008; 9(6): 855-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.10.005

63. Barber N. The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology 1995; 16(5): 395-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2

64. Daniels EA, Wartena H. Athlete or sex symbol: What boys think of media representations of female athletes. Sex Roles 2011; 65: 566-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9959-7

65. Fasoli F, Durante F, Mari S, Zogmaister C, Volpato C. Shades of sexualization: When sexualization becomes sexual objectification. Sex Roles 2018; 78: 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0808-1

66. Heflick NA, Goldenberg JL. Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009; 45(3): 598-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008

67. Zhang Y, Rios K. Exploring the effects of promoting feminine leaders on women’s interest in STEM. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2023; 14(1): 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211069808

68. Ward LM. Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015. The Journal of Sex Research. 2016; 53(4-5): 560-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496

69. Harriger JA, Thompson JK, Tiggemann M. TikTok, TikTok, the time is now: Future directions in social media and body image. Body Image 2023; 44: 222-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.01.005

70. Noser A, Zeigler-Hill V. Investing in the ideal: Does objectified body consciousness mediate the association between appearance contingent self-worth and appearance self-esteem in women? Body Image 2014; 11(2): 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.11.006

71. Sanchez DT, Crocker J. How investment in gender ideals affects well-being: The role of external contingencies of self-worth. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2005; 29(1): 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00169.x


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2868
(0 Abstract Views, 0 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Feng Yang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.