Published
2024-08-15
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Assessing learning strategies among Indigenous University researchers: A comparative analysis of the brief ACRA scale
Muhammad Kamran
Department of Education, University of Loralai
Warda Saleh
Government Associate College for Women Dhamyal
Iqra Ameer
National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-I-Azam University
Sarfraz Aslam
Faculty of Education and Humanities, UNITAR International University
Sharareh Shahidi Hamedani
Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2872
Keywords: learning strategies, indigenous, university researchers, brief ACRA scale
Abstract
Learning strategies have been critical due to a large body of evidence verifying their association with various outcomes such as academic success, creativity, critical thinking, life satisfaction, self-efficacy, metacognitive awareness, emotional intelligence, and student motivation. Therefore, identifying better learning strategies can benefit students and teachers. Learning strategies have been widely examined on several scales, among which the ACRA brief scale for university students is the most popular, especially in Spain. In Pakistan, validation of the ACRA scale is important so that indigenous researchers can use it according to their context and culture. The present study examined the factor structure of the ACRA brief scale using a cross-validation approach that involves an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 951(M = 533, F = 417) students from Pakistani Universities. The results proposed a 17-item version with three factors: micro-strategies, keys for memory and metacognition, and emotional-social support with satisfactory psychometric properties. Furthermore, the key for memory and metacognition factors is significantly associated with the CGPA of students and is higher in women than in men; however, the effect sizes of these findings are small. The validated version of the brief ACRA scale can be used to assess the learning strategies. In addition, it is suggested that national researchers and MS and Ph.D. students can use the validated scale version in their research studies, including project papers, theses, and dissertations. Directly teaching students about the techniques and benefits of learning strategies can help them overcome their hesitation.
References
[1]. Bank, W. (2017). Pakistan Tertiary Education: SABER Country Report 2017. World Bank. http://wbgfiles.worldbank.org/documents/hdn/ed/saber/supporting_doc/CountryReports/TED/SABER_Tertiary_Education_Pakistan_Country_Report_2017.pdf
[2]. Iqbal, Z., Hussain, I. A., Wadood, A., Khan, R., & Mufti, F. N. (2021). Status of Higher Education in Pakistan: Underlying Issues and Prospective Strategies for Improvement. Multicultural Education, 7(6).
[3]. Murtaza, K. G., & Hui, L. (2021). Higher Education in Pakistan: Challenges, Opportunities, Suggestions. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(2).
[4]. Aslam, S., Hali, A. U., Zhang, B., & Saleem, A. (2021). The teacher education program’s impact on preservice teachers’ reflective thinking in Pakistan. SAGE open, 11(4), 21582440211055724.
[5]. Bashir, A., Amir, A., & Bajwa, K. M. (2019). An investigation of stressors among university students: A qualitative approach. UCP Management Review (UCPMR, 3(1), 5–24.
[6]. Haq, A. U., Mahmood, S., Shabbir, M., & Batool, Z. (2020). Assessing the academic integrity among university students in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 6(3), 1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v6i3.1359
[7]. Schafersman, S. D. (1991). An introduction to critical thinking. http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html
[8]. Tempelaar, D. T. (2006). The role of metacognition in business education. Industry and Higher Education, 20(5), 291–297.
[9]. https://doi.org/10.5367/0000000067787022
[10]. Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
[11]. Facione, A. P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. California Press.
[12]. Paul, R. W. (1984). Critical thinking: Fundamental to education for a free society. Educational Leadership, 42(1), 4–14.
[13]. Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. Routledge.
[14]. Sadler, D. R. (2017). Academic achievement standards and quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 23(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2017.1356614
[15]. Vermunt, J. D., & Donche, V. (2017). A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: State of the art and moving forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6
[16]. Ali, A., & Ali, U. (2010). Predictability of engineering students’ performance at the University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar from admission test conducted by educational testing and evaluation agency (ETEA), NWFP, Pakistan. Innovation and Creativity in Education, 2(2), 976–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.137
[17]. Guapacha Chamorro, M. E., & Benavidez Paz, L. H. (2017). Improving language learning strategies and performance of pre-service language teachers through a calla-tblt model. Profile, 19(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n2.57581
[18]. Mall-Amiri, B., & Fekrazad, S. A. (2015). The relationship among Iranian EFL learners’ creativity, emotional intelligence, and language learning strategies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(9), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0509.14
[19]. Olivares, S. L., & Heredia Escorza, Y. (2012). Desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en ambientes de aprendizaje basado en problemas en estudiantes de educación superior. Revista mexicana de investigacióneducativa, 17(54), 759–778.
[20]. Bustos, V. (2016). Estrategias de aprendizaje, actitudes emprendedoras, autoconcepto, esperanza satisfacción vital e inclinación al autoempleo: Un modelo explicativo en universitarios peruanos. Universidad de Valencia.
[21]. Nosratinia, Saveiy, & Zaker. (2014). EFL learners’ self-efficacy, metacognitive awareness, and use of language learning strategies: How are they associated? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4, 1080–1092. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.5.1080-1092
[22]. Vega-Hernández, M. C., Patino-Alonso, M. C., Cabello, R., Galindo-Villardón, M. P., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2017). Perceived emotional intelligence and learning strategies in Spanish university students: A new perspective from a canonical non-symmetrical correspondence analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01888.eCollection
[23]. Montero, C. R., & Arizmendiarrieta, B. S. Y. (2017). The effectiveness of a learning strategies program.
[24]. McCombs, B. L. (2017). Historical review of learning strategies research: Strategies for the whole learner—A tribute to Claire Ellen Weinstein and early researchers of this topic. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 2, p. 6). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00006
[25]. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3
[26]. Belmont, J. M., & Butterfield, E. C. (1969). The relations of short-term memory to development and intelligence. In L. C. Lipsitt & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 29–82). JAI.
[27]. Corsini, D. A. (1971). Memory: Interaction of stimulus and organismic factors. Human Development, 14(4), 227–235.
[28]. Hagen, J. W., & Kingsley, P. R. (1968). Labeling effects in short-term memory. Child Development, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127363
[29]. Ausubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune & Stratton.
[30]. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[31]. Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046669
[32]. Ausubel, D. P., & Fitzgerald, D. (1962). Organizer, general background, and antecedent learning variables in sequential verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(6), 243. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040210
[33]. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think (D. C. Heath & Co, Eds.). https://doi.org/10.1159/000271217
[34]. Thorndike, E. L. (1912). Education: A first book. MacMillan.
[35]. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
[36]. Ghalebi, R., Sadighi, F., & Bagheri, M. S. (2020). Vocabulary learning strategies: A comparative study of EFL learners. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1824306. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1824306
[37]. Flavell, J. H. (1970). Cognitive changes in adulthood. In Life-span developmental psychology (pp. 247–253). Academic press.
[38]. Zare-ee, A. (2010). Associations between university students’ beliefs and their leaning strategies use. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 882–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.203
[39]. Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(21)01412-2.pdf
[40]. Kirby, J. (1984). Cognitive strategies and educational performance. Academic Press.
[41]. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House Harper Collins.
[42]. Oxford, R. L. (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: Cross cultural perspectives [(Technical Report No 13).]. University of Hawaii Press.
[43]. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of the learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). McMilliam.
[44]. Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527409529129
[45]. Wu, C., Jing, B., Gong, X., Mou, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Student’s learning strategies and academic emotions: Their influence on learning satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 4218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717683
[46]. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
[47]. Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. (2020). Students’ emotions of enjoyment and boredom and their use of cognitive learning strategies–How do they affect one another? Learning and Instruction, 66, 101285.
[48]. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
[49]. Paris, S. G., Newman, R. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1985). The social context and functional of children’s remembering. In M. Pressley & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children (pp. 81–115). Springer-Verlag.
[50]. Jiménez, L., Garcia, A. J., López-Cepero, J., & Saavedra, F. J. (2018). The brief-ACRA scale on learning strategies for university students. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed, 23(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2017.03.001
[51]. Carbonero Martín, M. Á., & Navarro Zavala, J. C. (2006). Entrenamiento de alumnos de Educación Superior en estrategias de aprendizaje en matemáticas. Psicothema, 18, 348–352.
[52]. Rodríguez, S. (2004). Manual de tutoríauniversitaria. Recursos para la acción. ICE-UB.
[53]. Nunez, González-Pienda, García, González-Pumariega, Roces, & Álvarez. (1998). Estrategias de aprendizaje, autoconcepto y rendimientoacadémico. Psicothema, 10, 97–109.
[54]. Pintrich, Smith, García, & Mckeachie. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivational Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
[55]. Roces, C., Tourón, J., & González, M. C. (1995). Validación preliminar del CEAM II (Cuestionario de estrategias de aprendizaje y motivación II. Psicológica.
[56]. Bahamón Muñetón, M. J., Vianchá Pinzón, M. A., Alarcón Alarcón, L. L., & Bohórquez Olaya, C. I. (2012). Estilos y estrategias de aprendizaje: Una revisión empírica y conceptual de los últimos diez años [Styles and learning strategies: A conceptual and empirical review of the last ten years. Pensamiento Psicológico, 10(1), 129–144.
[57]. Reyes, B., Georgieva, S., Martínez-Gregorio, S., Santos, S., Galiana, L., & Tomás, J. M. (2021). Assessment of learning strategies with the ACRA and the Brief-ACRA scales: Competitive models, measurement invariance, and prediction of academic achievement in secondary elementary students from the Dominican Republic. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.11.005
[58]. Román, J. M., & Gallego, S. (1994). ACRA: Escalas de estrategias de aprendizaje. Madrid: TEA Ediciones. https://pseaconsultores.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ACRA-Escalas-de-estrategias-de-aprendizaje.pdf
[59]. Fuente, J., & Justicia, F. (2003). Escala de estrategias de aprendizaje ACRA abreviada para alumnus universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Psi-coeducativa y Psicopedagógica, 1, 139–158.
[60]. Juárez-Lugo, C. S., Rodríguez, G., & Luna, E. (2012). El cuestionario de estilos de aprendizaje CHAEA y la escala de estrategias de aprendizaje ACRA como herramienta potencial para la tutoría académica. Revista Estilos de Aprendizaje, 10, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v5i10.965
[61]. Marugán, M., Martín, L. J., Catalina, J., & Román, J. M. (2013). Estrategias cognitivas de elaboración y naturaleza de los contenidos en estudiantes. Psicología Educativa, 19, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.5093/ed2013a3
[62]. Akbar, H. S., Gul, N., Manzoor, M. S., Nadeem, I., & Ranjha, I. (2013). Learning strategies used by Pakistani ESL students in university of Sargodha. Global Journal of HUMAN SOCIAL SCIENCE Linguistics & Education, 13(4).
[63]. Fatima, I., & Pathan, Z. H. (2016). Investigating learning strategies for vocabulary development: A comparative study of two universities of Quetta, Pakistan. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.2p.7
[64]. Kazi, A. S., & Iqbal, H. M. (2011). Use of language learning strategies by students at higher secondary level in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 1(4), 557–574.
[65]. Iqbal, H. M., Shahzad, S., & Sohail, S. (2010). Gender differences in Pakistani high school students’ views about science. Innovation and Creativity in Education, 2(2), 4689–4694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.751
[66]. Hair, J. F. (Ed.). (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7. ed., Pearson new internat. ed). Pearson.
[67]. Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
[68]. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203771587/statistical-power-analysis-behavioral-sciences-jacob-cohen
[69]. Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. A. (Eds.). (2000). Practical approaches to using learning styles in higher education. Greenwood Publishing Group.
[70]. Umer, S., & Siddiqui, J. A. (2013). Improving trends of teaching methods used in the concept schools of Karachi: An Evaluative study. Educational Research International, 2(2), 146–154.
[71]. Ángel-González, M., Pedroza-Cabrera, F. J., Colunga-Rodríguez, C., Vázquez-Colunga, J. C., Vázquez-Juárez, C. L., & Orozco-Solis, M. G. (2017). School wellbeing,learning strategies and expected learning in college students. Open Access LibraryJournal, 4, 3362. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103362
[72]. Camarero Suárez, F. J., Buey, F. D. A., & Herrero Díez, F. J. (2000). Estilos y estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios. Psichotema, 12(4), 615–662.
[73]. Acevedo, G. V. (2008). Relación entre estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de Psicología. Revista docencia universitaria, 9(1), 71–94.
[74]. Manganelli, Cavicchiolo, Mallia, Biasi, Lucidi, & Alivernini. (2019). The interplay between self-determined motivation, self-regulated cognitive strategies, and prior achievement in predicting academic performance. Educational Psychology, 39(4), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1572104
[75]. Mashhady, H., & Fallah, N. (2014). The relationship between language learningstrategies, field of study, gender, and language proficiency. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 2, 46–61.
[76]. Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & López-Pastor, V. (2015). Implicación y regulación del trabajo del alumnadoen los sistemas de evaluación formative en educación superior. RELIEVE-RevistaElectrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 21. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.1.5171
[77]. Biwer, F., Egbrink, M. G., Aalten, P., & Bruin, A. B. (2020). Fostering effective learning strategies in higher education–a mixed-methods study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.03.004