Open Journal Systems

Digital transformation and employee involvement: Employees’ perspective in Saudi Arabia’s public sector

Saleh M Kadi

Article ID: 3042
Vol 9, Issue 11, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 21 (Abstract) 19 (PDF)

Abstract

DT initiatives have a high failure rate. Thus, this research intends to explore the DT initiatives with specific focus on employee involvement, taking into account that this is Information System (IS) research. Organizations seek to maximize their efficiency and performance. One way of gaining such advantages is through Digital Transformation (DT). However, DT brings with it challenges and complexity. In respect of people, challenges include resistance to change, skills gap, and employee divide. The role of employees must be engaged in order to gain their support and overcome any challenges that arise as a consequence of the transformation. However, current research shows that little is known about this practice. Thus, this research aims to investigate the following research question: How does the current practice of DT initiatives enable employee involvement in Saudi Arabia’s public sector? The research utilized the use of qualitative approach due to the exploratory nature of the study. A total of twenty interviews were conducted that included employees from different public sectors in Saudi Arabia. The research was motivated to study the public sector due to the fact the initiatives are led and funded by the government where there is a need to explore how it is managed by different entities especially when it comes to employee involvement. This research found that the implementation of DT is substandard when employee involvement is not at the required level. The data revealed that employees’ participation in this process was limited to surveys at certain stages, with managers only being consulted, and this is reflected by some of the challenges faced by organizations, such as resistance to change and skills gap. This emphasizes the importance of employee involvement at all stages alongside further research and practice development to enable good practice, increase the success of DT and reduce the cost of DT initiatives failure.


Keywords

Digital Transformation; Users; Information System; Employees; Technology

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Palmié, M., Miehé, L., Oghazi, P., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2022). The evolution of the digital service ecosystem and digital business model innovation in retail: The emergence of meta-ecosystems and the value of physical interactions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121496.

2. Pansara, R. (2023). Digital Disruption in Transforming AgTech Business Models for a Sustainable Future. Transactions on Latest Trends in IoT, 6(6), 67–76.

3. Oseremi Onesi-Ozigagun, Yinka James Ololade, Nsisong Louis Eyo-Udo, & Damilola Oluwaseun Ogundipe. (2024). Leading Digital Transformation in Non-Digital Sectors: a Strategic Review. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(4), 1157–1175. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i4.1005

4. Oludapo, S., Carroll, N., & Helfert, M. (2024). Why do so many digital transformations fail? A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 174(January), 114528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114528

5. Carroll, N. (2020). Association for Information Systems Association for Information Systems THEORIZING ON THE NORMALIZATION OF DIGITAL THEORIZING ON THE NORMALIZATION OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATIONS TRANSFORMATIONS. 6–15. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp

6. Tabrizi, B., Lam, E., Girard, K., & Irvin, V. (2019). Digital transformation is not about technology. Harvard Business Review, 13(March), 1–6.

7. Wade, M., & Shan, J. (2020). Covid-19 Has accelerated digital transformation, but may have made it harder not easier. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(3).

8. Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open, 11(3), 21582440211047576.

9. Van Veldhoven, Z., & Vanthienen, J. (2022). Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 629–644.

10. Kutzner, K., Schoormann, T., & Knackstedt, R. (2018). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH: A TAXONOMY-BASED APPROACH TO STRUCTURE THE FIELD Research.

11. Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation. Managing Digital Transformation, 13–66. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008637-4

12. Klein, S. P., Spieth, P., & Söllner, M. (2024). Employee acceptance of digital transformation strategies: A paradox perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, October 2022, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12722

13. Naimi-Sadigh, A., Asgari, T., & Rabiei, M. (2022). Digital transformation in the value chain disruption of banking services. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 1212–1242.

14. Atadoga, A., Awonuga, K. F., Ibeh, C. V., Ike, C. U., Olu-lawal, K. A., & Usman, F. O. (2024). Harnessing data analytics for sustainable business growth in the us renewable energy sector. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(2), 460–470.

15. Odeyemi, O., Mhlongo, N. Z., Nwankwo, E. E., Scholatica, U. C., & Okoye, C. C. (2024). Big data applications in portfolio management: A review of techniques and strategies. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(1), 1984–1999.

16. Joel, O. S., Oyewole, A. T., Odunaiya, O. G., & Soyombo, O. T. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on business development strategies: Trends, challenges, and opportunities analyzed. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 617–624.

17. Tomat, L., & Trkman, P. (2019). Digital Transformation – The Hype and Conceptual Changes. Economic and Business Review, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.15458/ebr.90

18. Adama, H. E., & Okeke, C. D. (2024). Digital transformation as a catalyst for business model innovation: A critical review of impact and implementation strategies. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(02), 256–264.

19. Princes, E., Hidayat, D., Eni, Y., & Kesuma, A. E. (2024). Navigating Digital Transformation Challenges: An Exploration of Employee Attitudes, Expectations, and Support. Proceedings of the 2024 18th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, IMCOM 2024, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM60618.2024.10418275

20. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. v. (2013). Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 471–482.

21. Groenewald, C. A., Groenewald, E., Uy, F., Kilag, O. K., Echavez, R., & Bangoy, R. (2024). The Digital Tapestry: A Systematic Review of Insights, Challenges, and Strategic Implications for Organizations. 1(3), 18–24.

22. Temitayo Oluwaseun Jejeniwa, Noluthando Zamanjomane Mhlongo, & Titilola Olaide Jejeniwa. (2024). Theoretical Perspectives on Digital Transformation in Financial Services: Insights From Case Studies in Africa and the United States. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(4), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v6i4.1068

23. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2).

24. Sciuk, C., Engert, S., Gierlich-Joas, M., Wagner, T., & Hess, T. (2023). A Journey, not a Destination—A Synthesized Process of Digital Transformation. International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2023: “Rising like a Phoenix: Emerging from the Pandemic and Reshaping Human Endeavors with Digital Technologies,” December.

25. Kane, G. C. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press.

26. Lu, Y., Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., & Jribi, S. (2020). Digital transformation and COVID-19: The impact on the marketing capability of small and medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 131, 233–241.

27. Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. In Management Review Quarterly (Vol. 71, Issue 2). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7

28. Alieva, J., & Powell, D. J. (2023). The significance of employee behaviours and soft management practices to avoid digital waste during a digital transformation. In International Journal of Lean Six Sigma (Vol. 14, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2021-0127

29. Ullrich, A., Reißig, M., Niehoff, S., & Beier, G. (2023). Employee involvement and participation in digital transformation: a combined analysis of literature and practitioners’ expertise. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(8), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2022-0302

30. Fadairo, S. A., Williams, R., & Maggio, E. (2020). The Need for New Roles and New Talent. Journal of Government Financial Management, 69(1).

31. Baygi, R. M., Introna, L. D., & Hultin, L. (2021). Everything flows: Studying continuous sociotechnological transformation in a fluid and dynamic digital world. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 45(1), 423–452. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15887

32. Soto-Acosta, P. (2024). Navigating Uncertainty: Post-Pandemic Issues on Digital Transformation. Information Systems Management, 41(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2023.2274531

33. Nadeem, K., Wong, S. I., Za, S., & Venditti, M. (2024). Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations. Technology in Society, 76(October 2023), 102434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102434

34. Issa, H. (2022). Technology Characteristics as Predictors of Psychological Strain. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.297620

35. Schneider, P., & Sting, F. J. (2020). Employees’ perspectives on digitalization-induced change: Exploring frames of industry 4.0. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(3), 406–435.

36. Poláková-Kersten, M., Khanagha, S., van den Hooff, B., & Khapova, S. N. (2023). Digital transformation in high-reliability organizations: A longitudinal study of the micro-foundations of failure. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 32(1), 101756.

37. Peng, G. C. A., Nunes, M. B., & Zheng, L. (2017). Impacts of low citizen awareness and usage in smart city services: the case of London’s smart parking system. Information Systems and E-Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0333-8

38. Ferneley, E. H., & Sobreperez, P. (2006). Resist, comply or workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(4), 345–356.

39. Kappelman, & McLean. (1994). User engagement in the development, implementation, and use of information technologies. 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 512–521.

40. Ismagilova, E. (2021). Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. 2019, 88–100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401218312738

41. Indeje, W. G., & Zheng, Q. (2010). Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Organizational Culture and Information Systems Implementation: A Structuration Theory Perspective. http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-27

42. Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). GIDDENS’S STRUCTURATION THEORY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH1 By: MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127–157. http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol32/iss1/8/

43. Van Veenstra, A. F., Melin, U., & Axelsson, K. (2014). Theoretical and practical implications from the use of structuration theory in public sector information systems research. ECIS 2014 Proceedings - 22nd European Conference on Information Systems, 1–12.

44. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 78–108.

45. Pozzebon, M., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). Challenges in conducting empirical work using structuration theory: Learning from IT research. Organization Studies, 26(9), 1353–1376.

46. Bernardi , R . ( 2017 ). Health Information Systems and Accountability in Kenya : a Structuration Theory Perspective . Journal of the Association for University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. (2017). 18, 931–958.

47. Omar, A., Weerakkody, V., & Millard, J. (2016). Digital-enabled service transformation in public sector: Institutionalization as a product of interplay between actors and structures during organisational change. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 01-03-Marc, 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1145/2910019.2910080

48. Ahmad Wani, T., & Wajid Ali, S. (2015). Innovation Difusion Theory Review & Scope in the Study of Adoption of Smartphones in India. Journal of General Management Research, 3, 101–118.

49. Agarwal, R., Ahuja, M., Carter, P., & Gans, M. (1998). Early and late adopters of IT innovations: extensions to innovation diffusion theory. Proceedings of the DIGIT Conference, August 2015, 1–18. http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/digit98/panel2.pdf

50. Easterby-Smith, M. [VerfasserIn], Thorpe, R. [VerfasserIn], Jackson 1932- [VerfasserIn], P. R., & Jaspersen, L. J. [VerfasserIn]. (2018). Management & business research. In Management and business research (Issue ISBN: 9781526446954). https://permalink.obvsg.at/AC14549294

51. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

52. Peterson, J. S. (2019). Presenting a Qualitative Study : A Reviewer ’ s Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219844789

53. Minhat, H. S. (2015). an Overview on the Methods of Interviews in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences, 2(1), 2289–7577.

54. Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192

55. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

56. Saudi Vision 2030. (2017). Saudi 2030 Vision.

57. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Ormston, R., O’Connor, W. and Barnard, M. (2014). Analysis: principles and processes. In R. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M. and Ormston (Ed.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 269–294). Sage.

58. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298.

59. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3042
(21 Abstract Views, 19 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Saleh M Kadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.