Published
2024-11-29
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Daiyue Wang, Tao Zou

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Financial literacy, Cognitive bias, And personal investment decisions: A new perspective in behavioral finance
Daiyue Wang
University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
Tao Zou
School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710000, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3050
Keywords: financial literacy, cognitive biases, investment decisions, behavioral finance, mediation analysis, overconfidence bias, availability bias, herding behavior, confirmation bias, financial education
Abstract
This study investigates the complex relationships between financial literacy, cognitive biases, and investment decisions among individual investors. Using a sample of 2,000 participants, we employed multiple regression analyses and mediation tests to examine these relationships. Our findings reveal that financial literacy has a significant positive direct effect on investment decision quality. However, this relationship is partially mediated by various cognitive biases. Higher financial literacy is associated with reduced susceptibility to availability bias and herding behavior, but shows a positive correlation with overconfidence bias. Interestingly, we observed a non-linear relationship between financial literacy and confirmation bias. The mediation analysis indicates that cognitive biases account for 40% of the total effect of financial literacy on investment decisions, with herding behavior and availability bias showing the strongest mediating effects. Our results suggest that while financial literacy is crucial for improving investment outcomes, its effectiveness is moderated by cognitive biases. These findings have important implications for financial education programs and policy initiatives, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive approach that addresses both financial knowledge and cognitive biases. This research contributes to the behavioral finance literature by providing empirical evidence of the intricate interplay between financial literacy, cognitive processes, and investment outcomes, and suggests directions for future research in developing more effective strategies to enhance individual investors' decision-making capabilities.
Author Biography
Daiyue Wang, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
邹涛. 美国西北工业大学管理学院博士,研究领域:组织管理、领导力、战略管理
涂阳敏. 贵州工商职业学院数字经济学院讲师,研究领域:行政与数字化
References
[1]. Ashfaq, M., Shafique, A., & Selezneva, V. (2024). Exploring the missing link: Financial literacy and Cognitive biases in Investment Decisions. Journal of Modelling in Management, 19(3), 871-898.
[2]. Khan, D. (2020). Cognitive driven biases, investment decision making: The moderating role of financial literacy. Investment Decision Making: The Moderating Role of Financial Literacy (January 5, 2020).
[3]. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5-44.
[4]. van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 449-472.
[5]. Fernandes, D., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2014). Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management Science, 60(8), 1861-1883.
[6]. Özen, E., & Ersoy, G. (2019). The impact of financial literacy on cognitive biases of individual investors. In Contemporary issues in behavioral finance (Vol. 101, pp. 77-95). Emerald Publishing Limited.
[7]. Almenberg, J., & Dreber, A. (2015). Gender, stock market participation and financial literacy. Economics Letters, 137, 140-142.
[8]. Huston, S. J. (2010). Measuring financial literacy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 296-316.
[9]. Knoll, M. A., & Houts, C. R. (2012). The financial knowledge scale: An application of item response theory to the assessment of financial literacy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(3), 381-410.
[10]. Kaiser, T., Lusardi, A., Menkhoff, L., & Urban, C. (2022). Financial education affects financial knowledge and downstream behaviors. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 255-272.
[11]. Skagerlund, K., Lind, T., Strömbäck, C., Tinghög, G., & Västfjäll, D. (2018). Financial literacy and the role of numeracy–How individuals' attitude and affinity with numbers influence financial literacy. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 74, 18-25.
[12]. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
[13]. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
[14]. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
[15]. Park, J., Konana, P., Gu, B., Kumar, A., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). Confirmation bias, overconfidence, and investment performance: Evidence from stock message boards. McCombs Research Paper Series No. IROM-07-10.
[16]. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.
[17]. Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502-517.
[18]. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232.
[19]. Kliger, D., & Kudryavtsev, A. (2010). The availability heuristic and investors' reaction to company-specific events. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 11(1), 50-65.
[20]. Morewedge, C. K., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C. W., Korris, J. H., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Debiasing decisions: Improved decision making with a single training intervention. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 129-140.
[21]. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
[22]. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442.
[23]. Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777-790.
[24]. Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775-1798.
[25]. Hirshleifer, D. (2001). The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533-1597.
[26]. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286.
[27]. Lucey, B. M., & Dowling, M. (2005). The role of feelings in investor decision‐making. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(2), 211-237.
[28]. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785-818.
[29]. Kuhnen, C. M., & Knutson, B. (2005). The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron, 47(5), 763-770.
[30]. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. In G.M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 1, pp. 1053-1128). Elsevier.
[31]. Gathergood, J. (2012). Self-control, financial literacy and consumer over-indebtedness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 590-602.
[32]. Xia, T., Wang, Z., & Li, K. (2014). Financial literacy overconfidence and stock market participation. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1233-1245.
[33]. Klapper, L., Lusardi, A., & Panos, G. A. (2013). Financial literacy and its consequences: Evidence from Russia during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(10), 3904-3923.
[34]. Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Goyal, N. (2019). Behavioral biases and investment decision making: A conceptual framework. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 11(4), 413-435.