Open Journal Systems

Ecological discourse analysis of COVID-19 news reports in CNN Philippines and Rappler

Marhada H. Paraman

Article ID: 3083
Vol 9, Issue 11, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 120 (Abstract) 30 (PDF)

Abstract

Ecological Discourse Analysis (EDA) examines the relationship between language and the environment, focusing on how discourse shapes and reflects ecological and social behaviors. By analyzing linguistic patterns, EDA seeks to uncover how language conveys ideologies, values, and attitudes towards ecological issues, such as sustainability, environmental justice, and human-nature relationships. This paper was positioned to analyze the appraisal characteristics of COVID-19 news reports in CNN and Rappler from January 2020 to November 2021. A total of 28 news articles, evenly sourced from the two outlets, were analyzed. AntConc 4.0.2 identified the use of appraisal resources, including attitude, engagement, and graduation. The findings revealed that CNN Philippines adopted a more balanced tone, characterized by 32.67 percent attitude, 38.07 percent engagement, and 29.26 percent graduation resources. In contrast, Rappler demonstrated a more critical stance, with 36.46 percent attitude, 36.94 percent engagement, and 26.6 percent graduation resources. The engagement system showed that both outlets favored heteroglossic expressions, incorporating multiple perspectives to enrich their reporting. The graduation system, focusing on force, highlighted how both news organizations used intensity in their language to emphasize the significance of COVID-19-related issues. These linguistic patterns reveal distinct ideological orientations and strategies for engaging audiences, highlighting the media’s role in shaping public understanding and response during a global health crisis. The study underscores the significant impact of linguistic choices in news reporting, offering insights into how media narratives influence public discourse in times of uncertainty.


Keywords

appraisal framework, COVID-19, ecological discourse analysis, journalism

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Chavez, J., & Lamorinas, D. D. (2023). Reconfiguring assessment practices and strategies in online education during the pandemic.International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education,10(1), 160-174.

2. Yu, H., Lu, H., & Hu, J. (2021). A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of news reports on the COVID-19 pandemic in China and the UK.International Journal of English Linguistics,11(2), 36-45.

3. Mach, K. J., Salas Reyes, R., Pentz, B., Taylor, J., Costa, C. A., Cruz, S. G., ... & Klenk, N. (2021). News media coverage of COVID-19 public health and policy information. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,8(1).

4. Hoffman, S. J., & Justicz, V. (2016). Automatically quantifying the scientific quality and sensationalism of news records mentioning pandemics: validating a maximum entropy machine-learning model.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,75, 47-55.

5. Chavez, J. V. (2021). Bilingual parents’ dispositions: Precursor to developing the English language teaching curriculum.Psychology and Education,58(5), 161-166.

6. Chavez, J. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum.Arab World English Journals,13(3).

7. Mohammadpanah, H., Hamzehei, S., & Massiha, L. (2018). Towards Non-Spontaneity in Interpretation of Implicature Serving Implicit Characterization: The Case of Subsidiary Trait Precipitation in Arthur C. Doyle’s ‘A Study in Scarlet’.International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature,7(7), 209-221.

8. Mohammadpanah, H., & Hamzehei, S. (2020). Interrelation of Character-Generated Implicature and Inter-Character Sentimentality: A Comparison of of Stephenie Meyer’s ‘Twilight’and Veronica Roth’s ‘Divergent’.Advances in Language and Literary Studies,11(4), 37-47.

9. Wadi, S. I., & Ahmed, A. A. (2015). Language manipulation in media.International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature,3(7), 16-26.

10. Dezhkameh, A., Layegh, N., & Hadidi, Y. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Covid-19 in Iranian and American Newspapers.GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies,21(3).

11. Thetela, P. (2001). Critique discourses and ideology in newspaper reports: A discourse analysis of the South African press reports on the 1998 SADC's military intervention in Lesotho. Discourse & Society,12(3), 347-370.

12. Hadidi, Y., Kohneh Poushi, M., & Dezhkameh, A. (2019). A Psycholinguistic Analysis of content or form retention in the Reading Comprehension of Intermediate to advanced students: the effects of text length on subsequent form/meaning retention. In17th International TELLSI Conference: New Horizons in Language Studies. Tabriz, Iran.

13. Aslam, F., Awan, T. M., Syed, J. H., Kashif, A., & Parveen, M. (2020). Sentiments and emotions evoked by news headlines of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak.Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,7(1).

14. Krawczyk, K., Chelkowski, T., Laydon, D. J., Mishra, S., Xifara, D., Gibert, B., ... & Bhatt, S. (2021). Quantifying online news media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic: Text mining study and resource.Journal of medical Internet research,23(6), e28253.

15. Chang-Chen HA & Zhang L. (2018). Ecological Critical Discourse Analysis of Sino-Us News Reports on Climate Variation. Tribune of Education Culture, 2(12), 2.

16. Debnath, R., & Bardhan, R. (2020). India nudges to contain COVID-19 pandemic: A reactive public policy analysis using machine-learning based topic modelling.PloS one,15(9), e0238972.

17. Essam, B. A., & Abdo, M. S. (2021). How do Arab tweeters perceive the COVID-19 pandemic?.Journal of psycholinguistic research,50(3), 507-521.

18. Odlum, M., Cho, H., Broadwell, P., Davis, N., Patrao, M., Schauer, D., ... & Yoon, S. (2020). Application of topic modeling to tweets as the foundation for health disparity research for COVID-19. InThe importance of health informatics in public health during a pandemic(pp. 24-27). IOS Press.

19. Joharry, S. A., & Turiman, S. (2020). Examining Malaysian Public Letters to Editor on COVID-19 Pandemic: A Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis.GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies,20(3).

20. Prieto-Ramos, F., Pei, J., & Cheng, L. (2020). Institutional and news media denominations of COVID-19 and its causative virus: Between naming policies and naming politics.Discourse & Communication,14(6), 635-652.

21. Xue, Y., & Xu, Q. (2021). An ecological discourse analysis of news coverage of COVID-19 in China in The Times and The New York Times.Journal of World Languages,7(1), 80-103.

22. Steffensen, S. V., & Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: the state of the art and future horizons.Language sciences,41, 6-25.

23. Zhang, B., Chandran Sandaran, S., & Feng, J. (2023). The ecological discourse analysis of news discourse based on deep learning from the perspective of ecological philosophy.PloS one,18(1), e0280190.

24. Wu, Y. (2018, September). Ecological discourse analysis. In2018 4th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2018). Atlantis Press.

25. Edoja, E., Ogerugba, I., Etadafe, C. K., Eseimieghan, S., Iloduba, L. N., & Erhenede, A. (2023). Public perception of the role of the mass media in communicating the 2023 electoral process: a study of the gubernatorial elections in Delta State.Journal of Global Social Sciences,4(16), 187-213.

26. Liao, C. H. (2023). Exploring the Influence of Public Perception of Mass Media Usage and Attitudes towards Mass Media News on Altruistic Behavior. Behavioral Sciences,13(8), 621.

27. Pradit, T., & Kanokpermpoon, M. (2023).Analyzing the language and rhetoric of headline news: a comprehensive study on communication strategies and public perception(Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University).

28. Miao, X. W., & Zhao, Y. (2019). The agenda setting of CDA and evolution of research approaches. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages,5, 1-10.

29. Metila, R. A., Morallo, A. B., & Zara, N. O. (2024). Discourse analysis of news frames in Philippine banner stories on COVID-19: implications for media and information literacy during crises.Media Asia,51(1), 81-101.

30. Fill, A., & Muhlhausler, P. (2006). Ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment. A&C Black.

31. Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment, 57-66.

32. Stibbe, A. (2015).Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

33. Alexander, R., & Stibbe, A. (2014). From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language sciences, 41, 104-110.

34. Martin, J.R., & White, P.R.R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

35. Oteíza, T. (2017). The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. InThe Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 481-496). Routledge.

36. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Procedures and procedural recounts. Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: equinox.

37. Namawe, K. (2020). A comparative appraisal analysis of political news in The Namibia and New Era newspapers from 2015 to 2018 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Namibia).

38. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. Evaluation in text, 142-175.

39. Martin, J. R. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause.Continuum.

40. Hood, S. (2012). Voice and stance as APPRAISAL: Persuading and positioning in research writing across intellectual fields. In Stance and voice in written academic genres(pp. 51-68). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

41. Prior, P. (2009). From speech genres to mediated multimodal genre systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the question of writing.Genre in a changing world, 17-34.

42. Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics as a transdisciplinary movement and a way of life. Crossing borders, making connections: Interdisciplinarity in linguistics, 71-88.

43. Bartlett, T. (2017). Positive discourse analysis 1. InThe Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies(pp. 133-147). Routledge.

44. Stibbe, A. (2017). Positive discourse analysis: Rethinking human ecological relationships. In The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics(pp. 165-178). Routledge.

45. Buonvivere, L. (2024). Positive discourse analysis of Aotearoa New Zealand Foreign Minister’s speeches: an ecolinguistic perspective.Journal of World Languages, (0).

46. Manner, A. (2023).The ecological discourse analysis of discourses of energy usage in news articles: The New York Times and The Washington Post as examples(Bachelor's thesis).

47. BBC. (2020). Maria Ressa: Philippine journalist found guilty of cyber libel. BBC [Online]. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-53046052

48. Valenti, D. (2021). Princeton alumna Maria Ressa wins Nobel Peace Prize. Princeton University [Online]. https://www.princeton.edu/news/2021/10/08/princeton-alumna-maria-ressa-wins-nobel-peace-prize

49. He, W., & Wei, R. (2018). Huayu fenxi fanshi yu shengtai huayu fenxi de lilun jichu [The paradigm of discourse analyses and the theoretical foundation of ecological discourse analysis].Dangdai Xiucixue [Contemporary Rhetoric],37(5), 63-73.

50. Garner, M. (2014). Language rules and language ecology.Language Sciences,41, 111-121.

51. Becker, E. A. (2023).Strategic Interpretations of Sustainability-An analysis of the environmental discourse of German governmental parties’ framing on the inclusion of gas and nuclear activities in the EU taxonomy (January-July, 2022)(Master's thesis, NTNU).

52. Istianah, A., & Suhandano, S. (2022). Appraisal patterns used on the kalimantan tourism website: An ecolinguistics perspective. Cogent Arts & Humanities,9(1), 2146928.

53. Alexander, R. J. (2017). Investigating texts about environmental degradation using critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistic techniques. InThe Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics(pp. 196-210). Routledge.

54. Wei, R. R., & Hu, Y. (2024). A comparative corpus-based ecological discourse analysis of Chinese, Indian, and American news reports on the Belt and Road Initiative (2013–2022).Journal of World Languages

55. Lustre, A. Y. (2015). An exploratory study on how UP, UST and PUP journalism students view Rappler as a news source. University of the Philippines Diliman.

56. White, P. R. (2015). Appraisal theory.The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction,3, 1-7.

57. Lanterno, M., Magallanes, M., & Placio, M. (2019). The Credibility of Rappler as Perceived by Communication Students from Selected Universities in Metro Manila: Academic Year 2018-2019.Unpublished thesis). Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila.

58. Yusuf, F. A. M., Abdullah, M. H. T., & Ridzuan, A. R. (2022). Validating media credibility for new media users. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 87-98.

59. Sari, A., & Alyousef, H. (2024). The Use Of Engagement Resources In GCSE EFL And ESL Reading Exams: A Practical Application Of Appraisal Theory [In English]. Journal of Studies in Applied Language (JSAL),7(1), 1-22.

60. Chefor, V. M., Zhiying, X., & Kyaw, M. (2021). Attitude and Graduation: Appraisal Resources in a Decision of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights.Dalam Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics.

61. Xia, M. (2021). An Analysis of Political News from the Perspective of Graduation System within Appraisal Theory.Journal of Sociology and Ethnology,3(8), 23-29.

62. Go, G. M. (2018). “We’re not scared of these things”: Rappler news editor on how the newsroom continues despite the increasing threats, alongside words from their CEO Maria Ressa.Index on Censorship,47(2), 48-51.

63. Herr, O. (2020). New tactics to close down speech: The news editor at Rappler speaks to Index about legal threats against the media outlet’s CEO, Maria Ressa, plus a report on Index’s recent work.Index on Censorship,49(3), 97-100.

64. Pablo, A. M. M., Corpuz, J. L. G., Deypalan, P. C., Musa, H. Z., & Asoy, V. C. (2022). 21st Century watchdogs: The credibility of news media outlets in the Philippines.ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education,1(2), 95-102.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3083
(120 Abstract Views, 30 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Marhada H. Paraman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.