Published
2024-11-29
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Discursive strategies of motivational speech: A positive discourse analysis of Jay Shetty’s video
Aliya B. Abdul-ajid
College of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Communication, Basilan State College, Isabela City, Basilan Province, 7300, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3084
Keywords: discursive strategies, language use, motivational speech, social media
Abstract
Motivational speech has emerged as a significant trend in social media, driven by the increasing demand for personal development content and the accessibility of digital platforms. With the rise of platforms such as YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok, motivational speakers now can reach global audiences instantaneously. This shift has transformed motivational speaking from a niche practice into a widespread cultural phenomenon. Now, this paper was positioned to analyze the presence of discursive strategies—linguistic and rhetorical techniques to convey meanings—within motivational speech videos. Positive discourse analysis was carried out to analyze a viral motivational video from Jay Shetty identifying prevalent discursive strategies. Findings indicated that Jay Shetty perspectivation/framing/discourse representation (39.7%), argumentation (20.7%), referential/nomination (15.5%), predication (13.8%), and intensification/mitigation (10.3%) in his viral video. He used linguistic and rhetorical techniques, like metaphors and analogies, to craft his messages in a way that resonates deeply with his audience, making them relatable and impactful. Through selected words, persuasive structures, and storytelling, he engages listeners emotionally and intellectually, guiding them toward self-reflection and personal growth. His use of rhetorical questions encourages introspection, prompting viewers to think critically about their own lives and decisions. By framing his narratives in ways that connect personal challenges to universal experiences, Shetty had a sense of shared understanding, making his audience feel seen and motivated to take action. Consequently, motivational speech on social media has evolved into a powerful tool for shaping public discourse, promoting mental health, develop resilience, and inspiring positive life changes across societies and culture.
References
[1]. Mubarak, A. S. (2023). Empowerment in TD Jakes’ Motivational Discourse" Courage “: A Positive Discourse Analysis.Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies,17, 80-86.
[2]. Al-Shboul, O. K., Al-Khawaldeh, N. N., Hamdan, H. J., & Alqbailat, N. (2024). Macro and Micro Analysis of Motivational Speech Acts in Biden’s Political Speech.International Journal of Society, Culture & Language,12(1), 362-373.
[3]. Elyamany, N. (2023). What Buddhist wisdom is going viral? A multimodal-appraisal analysis of a selection of Jay Shetty’s digital narratives.The Social Science Journal,60(2), 316-333.
[4]. De Jager, A., Fogarty, A., Tewson, A., Lenette, C., & Boydell, K. M. (2017). Digital storytelling in research: A systematic review.The Qualitative Report,22(10), 2548-2582.
[5]. Lambert, J. (2017). The central role of practice in digital storytelling.Digital storytelling: Form and content, 21-26.
[6]. Frazel, M. (2011). Digital Storytelling. International Society for Technology in Education.
[7]. Raza, S., Imran, S., & Shah, S. A. A. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis of Discursive Strategies Utilized in Donald Trump and Joe Biden's Inaugural Speeches.Al-Mahdi Research Journal (MRJ), 5(4), 245-256.
[8]. Gervilla, E. F. Q., & Kopylova, T. R. (2023). Discursive Strategies in the Personal Discourse of Ksenia Sobchak, Candidate for the Presidency of the Russian Federation.
[9]. Horrod, S. (2020). ‘Embedded into the core’: The discursive construction of ‘policy’in higher education learning and teaching documents and its recontextualisation in practices.Discourse & Society,31(5), 478-497.
[10]. Li, D., & Chow, U. (2023). Discursive strategies in the branding of Fortune Global 500 Chinese manufacturing companies.Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,10(1), 1-12.
[11]. Tumasang, S. S. (2022). Motivational quotes on social media: A rhetorical appraisal. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 2(1), 08-18.
[12]. Nazim, H., & Yousaf, M. (2021). Neuro-linguistic programming: a corpus-based critical analysis of motivational speeches.CORPORUM: Journal of Corpus Linguistics,4(1), 45-59.
[13]. Leon, M. (2023). Persuasive Speeches.Public Speaking as Performance.
[14]. Dainton, M., & Zelley, E. D. (2022). Applying communication theory for professional life: A practical introduction. Sage publications.
[15]. Laeli, A. N., & Kusumaningrum, R. D. (2018). Reflection on implementing quotes as attractive media related to student motivation in learning English-Indonesian translation. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings(Vol. 2, pp. 510-514).
[16]. Warsi, A. Z., Mushtaq, R., & Sikapuria, Z. K. (2023). Motivational Speeches Impact on Undergraduate Students Intrinsic Motivation and Psychological Need Satisfaction. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(4), 137-145.
[17]. Sharndama, E. (2016). Discursive strategies in political speech: A critical discourse analysis of selected Inaugural speeches of the 2015 Nigeria's Gubernatorial inaugurals.European Journal of English Language, Linguistics and Literature, 3(2), 15-28.
[18]. Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & society, 22(6), 781-807.
[19]. Sultan, S., & Rapi, M. (2020). positive discourse analysis of the Indonesian government spokesperson's discursive strategies during the Covid-19 pandemic. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(4), 251-272.
[20]. Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change.
[21]. Fani, F. H. (2021).A POSITIVE DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF DISCURSIVE STRATEGY IN “FRONT OF THE CLASS” MOVIE(Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).
[22]. Sherwani, K. A. (2020). A cognitive positive discourse analysis of English motivational speeches. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9), 4078-4091.
[23]. Atkins, S., Clear, J., & Ostler, N. (1992). Corpus design criteria. Literary and linguistic computing, 7(1), 1-16.
[24]. Ortikov, U. (2023). Practical uses of corpus analysis in designing language teaching materials. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 3(7), 304-309.
[25]. Pérez-Paredes, P., & Curry, N. (2024). Epistemologies of corpus linguistics across disciplines. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 100141.
[26]. Mathur, A., & Shapiro, B. R. (2022). Interactive Transcription Techniques for Interaction Analysis. Learning Sciences Faculty Publications. 46.
[27]. Wodak, R. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse‐historical approach. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1-14.
[28]. Hussain, R., Alam, Y., & Zahid, M. S. (2022). ‘Awaken the Giant Within’: Linguistic Explorations into the Art of Delivering Motivational Talks. Jahan-e-Tahqeeq,5(1), 60-70.
[29]. Chang, P. L. (2021). Identity/ideology matters in cross-Strait translation: A case of Mandarin Chinese versions of Peter Hessler’s River Town 1. InTaiwan(pp. 140-156). Routledge.
[30]. Srour, I. (2023). Leadership Through Discursive Strategies in Abiy Ahmed’s Welcoming Speech at the 35th Ordinary Session of the African Union Assembly. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 115-123.
[31]. Lock, I., & Davidson, S. (2024). Argumentation strategies in lobbying: toward a typology.Journal of Communication Management,28(2), 345-364.
[32]. Fiorin, J. L. (2014). Argumentation and discourse.Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, 9, 53-70.
[33]. Hussain, Z., van Schalkwyk, M. C., Galea, S., Petticrew, M., & Maani, N. (2023). A qualitative framing analysis of how firearm manufacturers and related bodies communicate to the public on gun-related harms and solutions. Preventive medicine,166, 107346.
[34]. Farkas, D. F. (2023). Rhetorical questions revisited.Talk at the University of Tübingen.
[35]. de Borja Navarro, F. (2022). The Dangerous Discourse of “Us” vs.“Them:” Spain’s VOX Discursive Practices.Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics,16(02), 211-233.
[36]. Osisanwo, A. (2024). Gunmen, Bandits and Ransom Demanders: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Study of the Construction of Abduction in the Nigerian Press.Corpus-based Studies across Humanities.
[37]. Chavez, J. V., & Del Prado, R. T. (2023). Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality.* Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 55–71.
[38]. Åhäll, L., & Borg, S. (2013). Predication, presupposition and subject-positioning. In Critical approaches to security(pp. 196-207). Routledge.
[39]. Dafir, H. M., & Ubeid, A. P. D. N. A. (2022). Discursive Strategies in Ben Ali's Speech: A Critical Discourse Study. Adab Al-Basrah,100(1).
[40]. Wodak, R. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse‐historical approach. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1-14.
[41]. Li, R., Yu, Y., & Chan, T. F. (2023). Motivational discourse and campaign-style mobilisation: A positive discourse analysis of language poverty alleviation discourse in China.Plos one,18(10), e0292834.