Discursive strategies of motivational speech: A positive discourse analysis of Jay Shetty’s video
Vol 9, Issue 11, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 24 (Abstract) 7 (PDF)
Abstract
Motivational speech has emerged as a significant trend in social media, driven by the increasing demand for personal development content and the accessibility of digital platforms. With the rise of platforms such as YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok, motivational speakers now can reach global audiences instantaneously. This shift has transformed motivational speaking from a niche practice into a widespread cultural phenomenon. Now, this paper was positioned to analyze the presence of discursive strategies—linguistic and rhetorical techniques to convey meanings—within motivational speech videos. Positive discourse analysis was carried out to analyze a viral motivational video from Jay Shetty identifying prevalent discursive strategies. Findings indicated that Jay Shetty perspectivation/framing/discourse representation (39.7%), argumentation (20.7%), referential/nomination (15.5%), predication (13.8%), and intensification/mitigation (10.3%) in his viral video. He used linguistic and rhetorical techniques, like metaphors and analogies, to craft his messages in a way that resonates deeply with his audience, making them relatable and impactful. Through selected words, persuasive structures, and storytelling, he engages listeners emotionally and intellectually, guiding them toward self-reflection and personal growth. His use of rhetorical questions encourages introspection, prompting viewers to think critically about their own lives and decisions. By framing his narratives in ways that connect personal challenges to universal experiences, Shetty had a sense of shared understanding, making his audience feel seen and motivated to take action. Consequently, motivational speech on social media has evolved into a powerful tool for shaping public discourse, promoting mental health, develop resilience, and inspiring positive life changes across societies and culture.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Mubarak, A. S. (2023). Empowerment in TD Jakes’ Motivational Discourse" Courage “: A Positive Discourse Analysis.Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies,17, 80-86.
2. Al-Shboul, O. K., Al-Khawaldeh, N. N., Hamdan, H. J., & Alqbailat, N. (2024). Macro and Micro Analysis of Motivational Speech Acts in Biden’s Political Speech.International Journal of Society, Culture & Language,12(1), 362-373.
3. Elyamany, N. (2023). What Buddhist wisdom is going viral? A multimodal-appraisal analysis of a selection of Jay Shetty’s digital narratives.The Social Science Journal,60(2), 316-333.
4. De Jager, A., Fogarty, A., Tewson, A., Lenette, C., & Boydell, K. M. (2017). Digital storytelling in research: A systematic review.The Qualitative Report,22(10), 2548-2582.
5. Lambert, J. (2017). The central role of practice in digital storytelling.Digital storytelling: Form and content, 21-26.
6. Frazel, M. (2011). Digital Storytelling. International Society for Technology in Education.
7. Raza, S., Imran, S., & Shah, S. A. A. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis of Discursive Strategies Utilized in Donald Trump and Joe Biden's Inaugural Speeches.Al-Mahdi Research Journal (MRJ), 5(4), 245-256.
8. Gervilla, E. F. Q., & Kopylova, T. R. (2023). Discursive Strategies in the Personal Discourse of Ksenia Sobchak, Candidate for the Presidency of the Russian Federation.
9. Horrod, S. (2020). ‘Embedded into the core’: The discursive construction of ‘policy’in higher education learning and teaching documents and its recontextualisation in practices.Discourse & Society,31(5), 478-497.
10. Li, D., & Chow, U. (2023). Discursive strategies in the branding of Fortune Global 500 Chinese manufacturing companies.Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,10(1), 1-12.
11. Tumasang, S. S. (2022). Motivational quotes on social media: A rhetorical appraisal. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 2(1), 08-18.
12. Nazim, H., & Yousaf, M. (2021). Neuro-linguistic programming: a corpus-based critical analysis of motivational speeches.CORPORUM: Journal of Corpus Linguistics,4(1), 45-59.
13. Leon, M. (2023). Persuasive Speeches.Public Speaking as Performance.
14. Dainton, M., & Zelley, E. D. (2022). Applying communication theory for professional life: A practical introduction. Sage publications.
15. Laeli, A. N., & Kusumaningrum, R. D. (2018). Reflection on implementing quotes as attractive media related to student motivation in learning English-Indonesian translation. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings(Vol. 2, pp. 510-514).
16. Warsi, A. Z., Mushtaq, R., & Sikapuria, Z. K. (2023). Motivational Speeches Impact on Undergraduate Students Intrinsic Motivation and Psychological Need Satisfaction. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(4), 137-145.
17. Sharndama, E. (2016). Discursive strategies in political speech: A critical discourse analysis of selected Inaugural speeches of the 2015 Nigeria's Gubernatorial inaugurals.European Journal of English Language, Linguistics and Literature, 3(2), 15-28.
18. Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & society, 22(6), 781-807.
19. Sultan, S., & Rapi, M. (2020). positive discourse analysis of the Indonesian government spokesperson's discursive strategies during the Covid-19 pandemic. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(4), 251-272.
20. Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change.
21. Fani, F. H. (2021).A POSITIVE DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF DISCURSIVE STRATEGY IN “FRONT OF THE CLASS” MOVIE(Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).
22. Sherwani, K. A. (2020). A cognitive positive discourse analysis of English motivational speeches. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9), 4078-4091.
23. Atkins, S., Clear, J., & Ostler, N. (1992). Corpus design criteria. Literary and linguistic computing, 7(1), 1-16.
24. Ortikov, U. (2023). Practical uses of corpus analysis in designing language teaching materials. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 3(7), 304-309.
25. Pérez-Paredes, P., & Curry, N. (2024). Epistemologies of corpus linguistics across disciplines. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 100141.
26. Mathur, A., & Shapiro, B. R. (2022). Interactive Transcription Techniques for Interaction Analysis. Learning Sciences Faculty Publications. 46.
27. Wodak, R. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse‐historical approach. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1-14.
28. Hussain, R., Alam, Y., & Zahid, M. S. (2022). ‘Awaken the Giant Within’: Linguistic Explorations into the Art of Delivering Motivational Talks. Jahan-e-Tahqeeq,5(1), 60-70.
29. Chang, P. L. (2021). Identity/ideology matters in cross-Strait translation: A case of Mandarin Chinese versions of Peter Hessler’s River Town 1. InTaiwan(pp. 140-156). Routledge.
30. Srour, I. (2023). Leadership Through Discursive Strategies in Abiy Ahmed’s Welcoming Speech at the 35th Ordinary Session of the African Union Assembly. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 115-123.
31. Lock, I., & Davidson, S. (2024). Argumentation strategies in lobbying: toward a typology.Journal of Communication Management,28(2), 345-364.
32. Fiorin, J. L. (2014). Argumentation and discourse.Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, 9, 53-70.
33. Hussain, Z., van Schalkwyk, M. C., Galea, S., Petticrew, M., & Maani, N. (2023). A qualitative framing analysis of how firearm manufacturers and related bodies communicate to the public on gun-related harms and solutions. Preventive medicine,166, 107346.
34. Farkas, D. F. (2023). Rhetorical questions revisited.Talk at the University of Tübingen.
35. de Borja Navarro, F. (2022). The Dangerous Discourse of “Us” vs.“Them:” Spain’s VOX Discursive Practices.Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics,16(02), 211-233.
36. Osisanwo, A. (2024). Gunmen, Bandits and Ransom Demanders: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Study of the Construction of Abduction in the Nigerian Press.Corpus-based Studies across Humanities.
37. Chavez, J. V., & Del Prado, R. T. (2023). Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality.* Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 55–71.
38. Åhäll, L., & Borg, S. (2013). Predication, presupposition and subject-positioning. In Critical approaches to security(pp. 196-207). Routledge.
39. Dafir, H. M., & Ubeid, A. P. D. N. A. (2022). Discursive Strategies in Ben Ali's Speech: A Critical Discourse Study. Adab Al-Basrah,100(1).
40. Wodak, R. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse‐historical approach. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1-14.
41. Li, R., Yu, Y., & Chan, T. F. (2023). Motivational discourse and campaign-style mobilisation: A positive discourse analysis of language poverty alleviation discourse in China.Plos one,18(10), e0292834.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3084
(24 Abstract Views, 7 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aliya B. Abdul-ajid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.