Published
2025-02-10
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Masnona S. Asiri, Tanny T. Lim Jr., Nelson U. Julhamid, Abdel J. Amilhamja, Raugda J. Julhamid, Mailen A. Antao, Ricky S. Morales, Jr., Alnakier A. Sarabi, Jenneth B. Ballesteros, Norenna S. Sarahadil, Valentino B. Ting

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Forced mindset shift and the non-negotiables on the use of AI: Comparative perspectives from public administration, general education, mathematics, and language instructors
Masnona S. Asiri
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Tanny T. Lim Jr.
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Nelson U. Julhamid
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Abdel J. Amilhamja
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Raugda J. Julhamid
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Mailen A. Antao
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Ricky S. Morales, Jr.
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Alnakier A. Sarabi
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Jenneth B. Ballesteros
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Norenna S. Sarahadil
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Valentino B. Ting
Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3111
Keywords: Forced Mindset Shift, Comparative Perspectives, Non-Negotiables, Public Administration, AI (Artificial Intelligence), General Education Mathematics, Language Instructors
Abstract
This study explores the comparative perspectives of instructors in public administration, general education mathematics, and language education on the forced shift in mindset and non-negotiables surrounding AI integration in their fields. The research aims to compare how these instructors perceived AI’s role in education before its widespread adoption and how their views and teaching practices have evolved in response. Through a qualitative design in an exploratory approach utilizing semi-structured interviews with educators in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines, the study reveals that while the acceptance of AI has grown, certain non-negotiable teaching practices remain firmly upheld. These practices reflect the educators’ core beliefs about the irreplaceable human elements in teaching, despite the increasing reliance on AI. The findings provide a nuanced understanding of the balance between embracing AI advancements and maintaining educational values across different academic disciplines.
References
[1]. 1. Karaca, A., & Kilcan, B. (2023). The Adventure of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Education:Comprehensive Scientific Mapping Analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 10(4), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.64.10.4.
[2]. 2. Tajik, E., and F. Tajik. (2023). “A Comprehensive Examination of the Potential Application of Chat GPT in Higher Education Institutions.” TechRxiv. Preprint, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312.
[3]. 3. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report. Technology in Education. A Tool on Whose Terms?. Paris: UNESCO.
[4]. 4. du Boulay, B., Mitrovic, A., & Yacef, K. (Eds.). (2023). Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
[5]. 5. Ouyan, F. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in STEM Education. The Paradigmatic Shifts in Research, Education, and Technology. Florida, USA: CRC Press.
[6]. 6. Selwyn, N. 2020. Deberían los robots sustituir al profesorado. Spain: Ediciones Morata.
[7]. 7. Bernacki, M. L., J. A. Greene, and H. Crompton. (2020). “Mobile Technology, Learning, and Achievement: Advances in Understanding and Measuring the Role of Mobile Technology in Education.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 60: 101827.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827.
[8]. 8. Chen, X., H. Xie, D. Zou, and G. J. Hwang. (2020). “Application and Theory Gaps during the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education.” Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence 1: 100002.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002.
[9]. 9. Zhao, Y., D. Yin, L. Wang, and Y. Yu. (2023). “The Rise of Artificial Intelligence, the Fall of Human Wellbeing?” International Journal of Social Welfare, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12586.
[10]. 10. Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., Zhang, H., et al. (2021). AI and Education: A Guidance for Policymakers. UNESCO Publishing.
[11]. 11. Gentile, Manuel & Città, Giuseppe & Perna, Salvatore & Allegra, Mario. (2023). Do we still need teachers? Navigating the paradigm shift of the teacher’s role in the AI era. Frontiers in Education. 8. 10.3389/feduc.2023.1161777.
[12]. 12. Alam, A. (2021). Possibilities and Apprehensions in the Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccica52458.2021.9697272.
[13]. 13. Chavez, J. V. (2023). Assessing Online Academic Integrity and Humanized Teaching in Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences. 19(1): 9-17.
[14]. 14. Ye, Z. Q. (2021). “Dual logic of teacher role transformation based on artificial intelligence,” in 2021 2nd International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education (ICBDIE) (Hangzhou), 282–286. Doi: 10.1109/ICBDIE52740.2021.00070.
[15]. 15. Li, J. (2021). “Research on intimacy between teachers and students in english classrooms in the context of artificial intelligence,” in 2021 International Conference on Forthcoming Networks and Sustainability in AIoT Era (Nicosia: FoNeS-AIoT), 43–46. Doi: 10.1109 FoNeS-AIoT54873.2021.00019.
[16]. 16. Inoferio HV, Espartero MM, Asiri MS, et al. Coping with math anxiety and lack of confidence through AI-assisted learning. Environment and Social Psychology 2024; 9(5): 2228. doi: 10.54517/esp.v9i5.2228.
[17]. 17. Cummins, T., & Jensen, K. (2024). Friend or foe? Artificial intelligence (AI) and negotiation. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636241256852.
[18]. 18. Wardat, Yousef & Tashtoush, Mohammad & Alali, Rommel & Saleh, Shoeab. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives, Practices and Challenges. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics. 5. 60-77. 10.52866/ijcsm.2024.05.01.004.
[19]. 19. Lamovšek, N. (2023). Analysis of Research on Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration:. Central European Public Administration Review. 21. 77-96. 10.17573/cepar.2023.2.04.
[20]. 20. Xu, Y. et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation, 2(4), 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179.
[21]. 21. Vijayakumar, S. and Sheshadri, K. N. (2019). Applications of artificial intelligence in academic libraries. International Journal of Computer Sciences And Engineering, 7(16), pp. 136–140. https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7si16.136140.
[22]. 22. Ceneciro, C. C. Estoque, M. R., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). Analysis of Debate Skills to the Learners’ Confidence and Anxiety in the Use of the English Language in Academic Engagements. Journal of Namibian Studies, 23, 4544-4569.
[23]. 23. Duhaylungsod, A. V. and Chavez, J. V. (2023) ChatGPT and other AI Users: Innovative and Creative Utilitarian Value and Mindset Shift. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33 (2023): 4367–4378 ISSN: 2197-5523 (online).
[24]. 24. Kuka, L., Hörmann C., and Sabitzer, B. (2022). Teaching and Learning with AI in Higher Education: A Scoping Review. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[25]. 25. Lameras, P., and Arnab, S. (2022). Power to the teachers: an exploratory review on artificial intelligence in education. Information 13, 14. doi: 10.3390/Info13010014.
[26]. 26. Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: Student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(59). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0.
[27]. 27. Dehouche, N. (2021). Plagiarism in the age of massive generative pre-trained transformers (GPT-3). Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 21, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00195.
[28]. 28. Lampropoulos, G., Ferdig, R. E., & Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2023). A social media data analysis of general and educational use of ChatGPT: Understanding emotional educators. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4468181.
[29]. 29. Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17.
[30]. 30. Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) authoring apps. TESOL Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716.
[31]. 31. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C. and Sturm, B. J. (2020). The dark sides of artificial intelligence: An integrated AI governance framework for public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(9), pp.818–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1749851.
[32]. 32. Wirtz, B. W., & Müller, W. M. (2023). An integrative collaborative ecosystem for smart cities: A framework for organizational governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(7), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2001014.
[33]. 33. Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584.https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584.
[34]. 34. Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145.
[35]. 35. Williamson, B. and Eynon, R., (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions In AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), pp. 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
[36]. 36. Samarescu, N., Bumbac, R., Zamfiroiu, A., & Iorgulescu, M.-C. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Next-gen teacher perspectives. Amfiteatru Economic, XXVI, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2024/65/145.
[37]. 37. Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journal, 13(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.21.
[38]. 38. Chavez, J. V., Lamorinas, D. D., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Message patterns of online gender-based humor, discriminatory practices, biases, stereotyping, and disempowering tools through discourse analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1535. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i2.1535.
[39]. 39. Chavez, J., & Lamorinas, D. D. (2023). Reconfiguring assessment practices and strategies in online education during the pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(1), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1094589.
[40]. 40. Ou, S. (2024). Transforming Education: The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in The Students Academic Performance. International Journal of Education and Humanities. 13. 163-173. 10.54097/cc1x7r95.
[41]. 41. Fitria, T. N. (2021a). Grammarly as AI-powered English Writing Assistant: Students’ Alternative for Writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65–78. L https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519.
[42]. 42. Jian, M. (2023). Personalized learning through AI. Advances in Engineering Innovation. 5. None-None. 10.54254/2977-3903/5/2023039.
[43]. 43. Smith, R., & Johnson, L. (2021). Data-driven insights in AI-supported language education. Educational Data Mining, 13(2), 78-92.
[44]. 44. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7.
[45]. 45. Xie, Y., Wang, K., & Kong, Y. (2021). Prevalence of research misconduct and questionable research practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00314-9.
[46]. 46. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I. et al. The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 18, 54 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9.
[47]. 47. Ascione, L. (2024, January 23). Teachers want AI in education—but need more support. eSchool News. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2024/01/23/teachers-ai-in-education-need-support/.
[48]. 48. Nicholas, E. (2022). Building stronger student-teacher relationships through a mentorship program to increase student reading achievement (Master's thesis). Grand Valley State University. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses/1035.
[49]. 49. Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., & Thorne, E. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34(1), 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072.
[50]. 50. Iyer, L. (2019). Critical thinking and its importance in education.
[51]. 51. Chen, X., & Zhang, J. (2021). Personalization in AI-driven language learning platforms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 50-62.
[52]. 52. Kifle, T. (2024). Assessments that maintain fairness and authenticity without AI. The Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/assessments-maintain-fairness-and-authenticity-without-ai.
[53]. 53. Chakraborty, A., Banerjee, J. K., Saha, N., Sarkar, C., & Chakraborty, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the fourth industrial revolution. CRC Press.
[54]. 54. Markauskaite, L., Marrone, R., Poquet, O., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Howard, S., Tondeur, J., De Laat, M., Buckingham Shum, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2022). Rethinking the entwinement between artificial intelligence and human learning: What capabilities do learners need for a world with AI? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100056.
[55]. 55. Shehab, S., & James, C. L. (2024). Teaching about and through human-centered design in higher education classrooms: Exploring instructors’ experiences. Innovative Higher Education, 49, 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09696-z.
[56]. 56. Swiecki, H., Khosravi, G., Chen, R., Martinez-Maldonado, J. M., Lodge, S., Milligan, N., Selwyn, D., & Gašević, D. (2022). Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100075.