ESP-3113

Published

2025-02-14

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Publishing

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Neña Vanessa A. Cabiles, Pearly Jade E. Samilo, Ma. Sharmain Jane S. Magallanes, Haydee G. Adalia, Jason V. Chavez

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

A. Cabiles, N. V., E. Samilo, P. J., Jane S. Magallanes, M. S., G. Adalia, H., & V. Chavez, J. (2025). Qualitative exploration on the prevalence of swear words in MLBB among Filipino online players. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3113

Qualitative exploration on the prevalence of swear words in MLBB among Filipino online players

Neña Vanessa A. Cabiles

Filipino Language Teaching Division - College of Education, West Visayas State University, Iloilo City 5000, Philippines

Pearly Jade E. Samilo

Filipino Language Teaching Division - College of Education, West Visayas State University, Iloilo City 5000, Philippines

Ma. Sharmain Jane S. Magallanes

College of Education, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, San Enrique, Iloilo 5036, Philippines

Haydee G. Adalia

College of Liberal Arts, Western Mindanao State University, Zamboanga City 7000, Philippines

Jason V. Chavez

School of Business Administration, Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University, Zamboanga City 7000, Philippines


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3113


Abstract

Filipinos have become deeply engaged in the Mobile Legends: Bang Bang (MLBB) scene, positioning the Philippines as a dominant force in the global esports arena. Its popularity, especially among younger Filipinos aged 19 to 22, has led to widespread participation, with many playing for entertainment, stress relief, or as a social activity. However, Filipino players contribute to the emergence of profanity within the MLBB community, with common use of swear words like “gago” and “bobo” as expressions of frustration and competition. This paper analyzed the linguistic patterns and effect of the proliferation of swear words in the platform. MLBB players (n=16) in Iloilo City were purposively sampled to be interviewed in this study. The findings revealed diverse linguistic behaviors among MLBB players, which involved frequent codeswitching between languages, often based on social context, and swearing as a form of humor, using profanity creatively to circumvent community guidelines. Swear words also served specific roles in gameplay, reflecting frustration and intensifying aggression, especially when players felt their team was underperforming. While some players viewed profanity as a motivational tool or emotional outlet, others identified it as a source of tension that negatively impacted communication, teamwork, and overall gaming experience. The impact of swearing on team dynamics remained mixed, with both positive and negative effects observed, suggesting a need for further exploration of its influence on team cohesion.

References

[1]. 1.Pujante Jr., N. T. (2021). Speech for fun, fury, and freedom: Exploring trash talk in gaming stations. Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 4(1), 1-11.

[2]. 2.Maharani, A., Puspita, V., Aurora, R. A., & Wiranito, N. (2024). Understanding Toxicity in Online Gaming: A Focus on Communication-Based Behaviours towards Female Players in Valorant. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(5), 1559-1567.

[3]. 3.Kordyaka, B., Park, S., Krath, J., & Laato, S. (2023). Exploring the relationship between offline cultural environments and toxic behavior tendencies in multiplayer online games. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 6(1-2), 1-20.

[4]. 4.Kwak, H., Blackburn, J., & Han, S. (2015). Exploring cyberbullying and other toxic behavior in team competition online games. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3739-3748).

[5]. 5.Cavanna, A. E., & Rickards, H. (2013). The psychopathological spectrum of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(6), 1008-1015.

[6]. 6.McGarrity, L. W. (2017). What the F: What swearing reveals about our language, our brains, and ourselves by Benjamin K. Bergen. Language, 93(4), e372-e374.

[7]. 7.Fast, L. A., & Funder, D. C. (2008). Personality as manifest in word use: correlations with self-report, acquaintance report, and behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(2), 334.

[8]. 8.Jay, T. (2009). Do offensive words harm people?. Psychology, public policy, and law, 15(2), 81.

[9]. 9.Husain, W., Wasif, S., & Fatima, I. (2023). Profanity as a Self‐Defense Mechanism and an Outlet for Emotional Catharsis in Stress, Anxiety, and Depression. Depression Research and Treatment, 2023(1), 8821517.

[10]. 10.Lim, E. H., Vungthong, S., & Trakulkasemsuk, W. (2024). Trash-Talking versus Toxicity: An Analysis of/All Chat Exchanges between Southeast Asian Players of an Online Competitive Game. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 816-856.

[11]. 11.McLean, L., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Female gamers’ experience of online harassment and social support in online gaming: A qualitative study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 970-994.

[12]. 12.Barr, M., & Copeland-Stewart, A. (2022). Playing video games during the COVID-19 pandemic and effects on players’ well-being. Games and Culture, 17(1), 122-139.

[13]. 13.Kordyaka, B., Jahn, K., & Niehaves, B. (2020). Towards a unified theory of toxic behavior in video games. Internet Research, 30(4), 1081-1102.

[14]. 14.Jumanto, J., & Sulistyorini, H. (2021). The pragmatics of swearing: How it contextually counts. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 3, pp. 324-333).

[15]. 15.Amin, N. M., & Salehhuddin Sharipudin, M. N. (2021). English Profanity on Social Media: Linguistic Preferences and Reasons for Use. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences.

[16]. 16.Jay, T. (2018). Swearing, moral order, and online communication. Journal of language aggression and conflict, 6(1), 107-126.

[17]. 17.Mejia, G. E. A., & Ngo, C. G. A. (2024). Profanity in Social Media: An Analysis of Pragmatic Functions and Politeness Maxims Violation. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(1), 92-117.

[18]. 18.Pamungkas, E. W., Basile, V., & Patti, V. (2020). Do you really want to hurt me? predicting abusive swearing in social media. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 6237-6246.

[19]. 19.The Manila Times. (2022). A game well - played. https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/04/30/entertainment-lifestyle/life-times/a-game-well-played/1841858

[20]. 20.Business World. (2020). Pacquiao is now Mobile Legends: Bang Bang PH ambassador. Business World [Online]. https://www.bworldonline.com/editors-picks/2020/11/22/330133/pacquiao-is-now-mobile-legends-bang-bang-ph-ambassador/

[21]. 21.Alamo, E., Benosa, J. A., Fernandez, C., & Paderan, M. P. (2023). Linguistic Swearing of Mobile Legend Players: A Pragmatic Study. Journal of English Education and Linguistics, 4(1), 43-56.

[22]. 22.Elona, J. (2024). Full list of MPL PH winners throughout the years. One Esports [Online]. https://www.oneesports.gg/mobile-legends/full-list-mpl-ph-winners/

[23]. 23.Lojo, M. (2023). Sibol extends SEA Games Mobile Legends reign with 3rd straight gold. PhilStar Global [Online]. https://www.philstar.com/sports/2023/05/15/2266469/sibol-extends-sea-games-mobile-legends-reign-3rd-straight-gold

[24]. 24.Elona, J. (2024). Full list of all Mobile Legends MSC winners throughout the years. One Esports [Online]. https://www.oneesports.gg/mobile-legends/full-list-mlbb-msc-winners/

[25]. 25.Delos Santos, J. R. N., Cornillez, E. E., Carillo, V. D., & de los Santos, G. N. (2020). Mobile games and academic performance of university students. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN, 2278-3075.

[26]. 26.Gabrito, R. C., Ibañez Jr, R. Y., & Velza, J. F. P. (2023). Impact of Online Gaming on the Academic Performance of DEBESMSCAT-Cawayan Campus Students. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 10(4), 423-434.

[27]. 27.Rodica, P. D., & Talania, H. A. (2020). Effects of Online Games in Academic Performance among Senior High School in Mount Carmel School of Maria Aurora, Inc. Unpublished Thesis]. Mount Carmel School of Maria Aurora.

[28]. 28.Alarde, C. C., Antolihao, R., Bagares, K. B., Calunsag, P. J., Libres, D., Molina, J., & Villamor, C. (2017). Determining the benefits of using profanity in expressing emotions of grade 12 Students in FCIC. In 10th International Conference on Arts, Social Sciences, Humanities and Interdisciplinary Studies (ASSHIS-17), Manila (Philippines).

[29]. 29.Goddard, C. (2015). “Swear words” and “curse words” in Australian (and American) English. At the crossroads of pragmatics, semantics and sociolinguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(2), 189-218.

[30]. 30.Finn, E. (2017). Swearing: The Good, the Bad & the Ugly. Ortesol journal, 34, 17-26.

[31]. 31.Debray, C. (2023). Swearing, identity and power in professional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 215, 145-158.

[32]. 32.Jay, T., Caldwell-Harris, C., & King, K. (2008). Recalling taboo and nontaboo words. The American journal of psychology, 121(1), 83-103.

[33]. 33.Vingerhoets, A. J., Bylsma, L. M., & De Vlam, C. (2013). Swearing: A biopsychosocial perspective. Psihologijske teme, 22(2), 287-304.

[34]. 34.Patton, C. L., Asken, M., Fremouw, W. J., & Bemis, R. (2017). The influence of police profanity on public perception of excessive force. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32, 340-357.

[35]. 35.Pluszczyk, A. (2015). An analysis of swearing from a positive perspective.

[36]. 36.Setiawan, S., & Fatimatuzzahroh, (2018). Swear Words among Males: The Social Functions and Pragmatic Meanings. In 2nd Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Conference: Establishing Identities through Language, Culture, and Education (SOSHEC 2018) (pp. 330-335). Atlantis Press.

[37]. 37.Halonen, M. (2024). The Use of Taboo Language in a Corpus of Chat Messages of Defence of the Ancients 2 (Master's thesis, Itä-Suomen yliopisto).

[38]. 38.Abd Moen, N., & Ahsan, S. (2023). PROFANITY WORDS USED IN ONLINE MOBILE GAMES AMONG YOUNG ADULTS DURING COVID19. Jurnal Al-Sirat, 23(2), 105-113.

[39]. 39.Lutfiwati, S. (2018). Memahami kecanduan game online melalui pendekatan neurobiologi. ANFUSINA: Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 1-16.

[40]. 40.Nurdiansyah, Y., & Darma, V. P. (2024). Harsh Words in Mobile Legends Online Game: Influences in Real Life. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 18(2), 310-316.

[41]. 41.Fandi, J., & Mardijono, J. J. (2022). Swear Words Used by The Mobile Legends Game Players. Kata Kita: Journal of Language, Literature, and Teaching, 10(3), 539-549.

[42]. 42.Mahbubah, I. A. (2023). Impoliteness in YouTube live streaming's comments of Mobile Legends: Bang Bang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).

[43]. 43.Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2003). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Social psychology, 4, 73-98.

[44]. 44.Zeigler, B. (2023). Understanding Harassment Inside Online Communities: The Role of Social Identity Threat (Master's thesis, Harvard University).

[45]. 45.Calder, J. (2020). Language and sexuality: Language and LGBTQ+ communities. The international encyclopedia of linguistic anthropology, 1-7.

[46]. 46.Daniele, M., Fasoli, F., Antonio, R., Sulpizio, S., & Maass, A. (2020). Gay voice: Stable marker of sexual orientation or flexible communication device?. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 2585-2600.

[47]. 47.Fasoli, F., Hegarty, P., & Frost, D. M. (2021). Stigmatization of ‘gay‐sounding’voices: The role of heterosexual, lesbian, and gay individuals’ essentialist beliefs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 826-850.

[48]. 48.Beattie, H., Robertson, O., Horlin, C., Spaeth, E., & Nordmann, E. (2022). Gendered attitudes towards swearing: a trans-inclusive mixed methods study of social identity, swearing norms, and behaviour.

[49]. 49.Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(3), 321-326.

[50]. 50.Antoniadou, N., Kokkinos, C. M., & Fanti, K. A. (2019). Traditional and cyber bullying/victimization among adolescents: Examining their psychosocial profile through latent profile analysis. International journal of bullying prevention, 1, 85-98.

[51]. 51.Wang, L., Jiang, S., Zhou, Z., Fei, W., & Wang, W. (2023). Online disinhibition and adolescent cyberbullying: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 107352.

[52]. 52.Soares, F. B., Gruzd, A., Jacobson, J., & Hodson, J. (2023). To troll or not to troll: Young adults’ anti-social behaviour on social media. PLoS one, 18(5), e0284374.

[53]. 53.Meriläinen, M., & Ruotsalainen, M. (2024). Online disinhibition, normative hostility, and banal toxicity: Young people’s negative online gaming conduct. Social Media+ Society, 10(3), 20563051241274669.

[54]. 54.Wachs, S., & Wright, M. F. (2018). Associations between bystanders and perpetrators of online hate: The moderating role of toxic online disinhibition. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(9), 2030.

[55]. 55.Wachs, S., Wright, M. F., & Vazsonyi, A. T. (2019). Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29(3), 179-188.

[56]. 56.Franco, L., & Ghanayim, K. (2019). The criminalization of cyberbullying among children and youth. Santa Clara J. Int'l L., 17, i.

[57]. 57.Sherry, J. L. (2001). The effects of violent video games on aggression: A meta-analysis. Human communication research, 27(3), 409-431.

[58]. 58.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2.

[59]. 59.Baranowski, T., Perry, C. L., & Parcel, G. S. (2002). How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 3, 165-184.

[60]. 60.Ivory, A. H. (2010). The Effects of Profanity in Violent Video Game Content on Players' Hostile Expectations, Accessibility of Aggressive Thoughts, Aggressive Feelings, and Other Responses.

[61]. 61.Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Media effects (pp. 110-140). Routledge.

[62]. 62.Chou, S. W., Hsieh, M. C., & Pan, H. C. (2024). Understanding the impact of self-regulation on perceived learning outcomes based on social cognitive theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(6), 1129-1148.

[63]. 63.Islam, K. F., Awal, A., Mazumder, H., Munni, U. R., Majumder, K., Afroz, K., ... & Hossain, M. M. (2023). Social cognitive theory-based health promotion in primary care practice: A scoping review. Heliyon, 9(4).

[64]. 64.Mensah, C., Azila-Gbettor, E. M., Nunyonameh, C. R., Appietu, M. E., & Amedome, S. N. (2023). Research methods anxiety, attitude, self-efficacy and academic effort: A social cognitive theory perspective. Cogent psychology, 10(1), 2167503.

[65]. 65.Hunter, D., McCallum, J., & Howes, D. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1).

[66]. 66.Polit, D. F. (2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippin cott.

[67]. 67.Singh, A. (2021). An introduction to experimental and exploratory research. Available at SSRN 3789360.

[68]. 68.Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).

[69]. 69.Chavez, J. V., & Del Prado, R. T. (2023). Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality. In Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 55-71.

[70]. 70.Stebbins, R. A. (2001). What is exploration. Exploratory research in the social sciences, 48, 2-17.

[71]. 71.Szabelska, A., Pollet, T. V., Dujols, O., Klein, R. A., & IJzerman, H. (2021). A tutorial for exploratory research: An eight-step approach.

[72]. 72.Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of mixed methods research, 14(4), 473-495.

[73]. 73.Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science, 2(1), 17-41.

[74]. 74.Asika, N. (2004). Research methodology: A process approach. Mukugamu & Brothers Enterprises, Lagos.

[75]. 75.Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.

[76]. 76.Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of computer information systems, 54(1), 11-22.

[77]. 77.Chavez, J. V. (2020). The effects of English as a second language on bilingual parents’ English language dispositions. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, (1), 12-25.

[78]. 78.Chavez, J. V., Cuilan, J. T., & Adalia, H. G. (2024). Message patterns through discourse analysis on the concept of apology and forgiveness during Ramadan among college students practicing Islam. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(3).

[79]. 79.Chavez, J. V., Gregorio, A. M. W., Araneta, A. L., & Bihag, C. D. (2023). Magna carta for women health workers, teachers, and minimum-wage earners in the workplace: Policy awareness and organizational compliance. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).

[80]. 80.Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.

[81]. 81.Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.

[82]. 82.Mpofu, S. (2016). Blogging, feminism and the politics of participation: The case of Her Zimbabwe. Digital activism in the social media era: Critical reflections on emerging trends in Sub-Saharan Africa, 271-294.

[83]. 83.Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. In Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1541-1541.

[84]. 84.Chavez, J. V., Libre, J. M., Gregorio, M. W., & Cabral, N. P. (2023). Human resource profiling for post-pandemic curriculum reconfiguration in higher education. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(2), 1975.

[85]. 85.Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335.

[86]. 86.Denzin, N. K. (2012). The cinematic society and the reflexive interview. Society, 49(4), 339-348.

[87]. 87.Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

[88]. 88.Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45.

[89]. 89.Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.

[90]. 90.Lewis, J., Ritchie, J., Ormston, R., & Morrell, G. (2013). 12 GENERALISING FROM QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers.

[91]. 91.Hardon, A., Hodgkin, C., & Fresle, D. (2004). How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers. In How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers (pp. 89-89).

[92]. 92.Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.

[93]. 93.Monday, T. U. (2020). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, 1(1), 15-24.

[94]. 94.Bolderston, A. (2012). Conducting a research interview. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 43(1), 66-76.

[95]. 95.Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College.

[96]. 96.Ng, C. K., & White, P. (2005). Qualitative research design and approaches in radiography. Radiography, 11(3), 217-225.

[97]. 97.Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1).

[98]. 98.Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

[99]. 99.Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Semistructured interviews. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, 232.

[100]. 100.Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).

[101]. 101.Chavez, J. V., & Cuilan, J. T. (2023). Gender mainstreaming campaign as a casualty of the online gender-based humor: A discourse analysis. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(2).

[102]. 102.Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The journal of positive psychology, 12(3), 297-298.

[103]. 103.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and psychotherapy research, 21(1), 37-47.

[104]. 104.Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Reflexive thematic analysis. In Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 430-441). Edward Elgar Publishing.

[105]. 105.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2, 57-71.

[106]. 106.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

[107]. 107.Ansar, F. A. (2017). Code switching and code mixing in teaching-learning process. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 10(1), 29-45.

[108]. 108.Woolard, K. A. (2004). Codeswitching. A companion to linguistic anthropology, 73-94.

[109]. 109.Ningsih, O. S., & Setiawan, T. (2021). Code mixing and code switching in the “Yowis Ben” movie: Sociolinguistic study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(4), 14-19.

[110]. 110.Kamwangamalu, N. M. (2010). Multilingualism and codeswitching in education. Sociolinguistics and language education, 116.

[111]. 111.Dewaele, J. M., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Web questionnaire bilingualism and emotions. University of London, 2003.

[112]. 112.Pavlenko, A. (2004). 'Stop doing that, ia komu skazala!': language choice and emotions in parent—child communication. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development, 25(2-3), 179-203.

[113]. 113.Dewaele, M. (2020). Research into multilingualism and emotions. Birkbeck, University of London.

[114]. 114.Alruwaili, Y. (2023). Code-Switching in the Emotional Narratives of Bilingual Speakers of English and Arabic. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Mississippi.

[115]. 115.Brzozowska, D., & Chłopicki, W. (2023). When vulgar becomes humorous: the case study of Idi... Osijek : Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2, 297-315.

[116]. 116.Love, R. (2021). Swearing in informal spoken English: 1990s–2010s. Text & Talk, 41(5-6), 739-762.

[117]. 117.Hapsari, N. T., & Pramana, C. C. (2023). SWEAR WORDS IN GITLOST’S TWITTER ACCOUNT: KINDS AND FUNCTION. Conscientia, 19(1), 27-43.

[118]. 118.Baruch, Y., Prouska, R., Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Bunk, J. (2017). Swearing at work: the mixed outcomes of profanity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(2), 149-162.

[119]. 119.Mukuni, D. M., Ireri, A. M., Nthiga, P. M., & Owili, F. A. (2016). The social function of swearing in a miraa market environment. Arts Social Sci J, 7(187), 2.

[120]. 120.Wilson, N., & Wedlock, J. (2023). Swearing as a Leadership Tool: the Sociopragmatics of Swearing in New Zealand English. English World-Wide, 44(3), 323-350.

[121]. 121.Bratan, C. A., Tebeanu, A. V., Bobes, G., Popescu, I., Iorgulescu, G., Neagu, L., ... & Oproiu, A. M. (2023). Using Swear Words Increases the Irritability-a Study Using AI Algorithms. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 26(3-4), 365-374.

[122]. 122.Galinato, V., Amores, L., Magsino, G. B., & Sumawang, D. R. (2023). Context-based profanity detection and censorship using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers. Available at SSRN 4341604.

[123]. 123.Du, H., Dong, W. & Lopez, K. (2018). Detecting the Emotion Dynamics of Profanity Language In Social Media Through Time. Stanford University,1-10.

[124]. 124.Aleksandric, A., Pankaj, H., Wilson, G. M., & Nilizadeh, S. (2023). Sadness, Anger, or Anxiety: Twitter Users' Emotional Responses to Toxicity in Public Conversations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11436.

[125]. 125.Bekiari, A., & Pachi, V. (2017). Insights into bullying and verbal aggressiveness through Social Network Analysis. Journal of Computer and Communications, 5(9), 79-101.

[126]. 126.Nugroho, S., Arezah, E., Ahkam Alwi, M., Napitupulu, L., & Arief, Y. (2023). Why is Generation Z Prone to Swearing? A Psycholinguistic Study on Semantic Shifts in Profanity. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(2), 301-315.

[127]. 127.Stapleton, K., Fägersten, K. B., Stephens, R., & Loveday, C. (2022). The power of swearing: What we know and what we don’t. Lingua, 277, 103406.

[128]. 128.Lafreniere, K. C., Moore, S. G., & Fisher, R. J. (2022). The power of profanity: The meaning and impact of swear words in word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(5), 908-925.

[129]. 129.Infante, D. A., & Wigley III, C. J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communications Monographs, 53(1), 61-69.

[130]. 130.Derin, T., Hamuddin, B., Nursafira, M. S., Yudar, R. S., & Putri, N. S. (2023). Styles and Trends of Online Aggressive Language Among English Students in Their Blogging Activities. Journal homepage: https://cerj. educ. cam. ac. uk/submissions, 10(2023), 32-54.

[131]. 131.Il'ia, A. B., Balakhonskaya, L. V., Gladchenko, I. A., & Balakhonsky, V. V. (2018). Verbal aggression as a communication strategy in digital society. In 2018 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Workshop (ComSDS) (pp. 12-14). IEEE.

[132]. 132.Phan, Q. A., & Tan, V. (2017). Play with bad words: A content analysis of profanity in video games. Acta Ludica-International Journal of Game Studies, 1(1), 7-30.

[133]. 133.Fiore, S. M., Rosen, M. A., Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Salas, E., Letsky, M., & Warner, N. (2010). Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: Predicting processes in complex collaborative contexts. Human factors, 52(2), 203-224.

[134]. 134.Lee, H., Woodward-Kron, R., Merry, A., & Weller, J. (2023). Emotions and team communication in the operating room: a scoping review. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 2194508.

[135]. 135.Armour, T., Ford, R., & Rasmussen, B. (2019). Anaesthetic nurses' perceptions of learning during interprofessional simulation education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 35, 5-9.

[136]. 136.Chrouser, K. L., & Partin, M. R. (2019). Intraoperative disruptive behavior: the medical student's perspective. Journal of surgical education, 76(5), 1231-1240.

[137]. 137.Skråmm, S. H., Smith Jacobsen, I. L., & Hanssen, I. (2021). Communication as a non‐technical skill in the operating room: A qualitative study. Nursing open, 8(4), 1822-1828.

[138]. 138.Baruch, Y., & Jenkins, S. (2007). Swearing at work and permissive leadership culture: When anti‐social becomes social and incivility is acceptable. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(6), 492-507.

[139]. 139.Stapleton, K. (2003). Gender and swearing: A community practice. Women and Language, 26(2), 22.

[140]. 140.Feldman, G., Lian, H., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2017). Frankly, we do give a damn: The relationship between profanity and honesty. Social psychological and personality science, 8(7), 816-826.

[141]. 141.Sood, S., Antin, J., & Churchill, E. (2012). Profanity use in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1481-1490).

[142]. 142.Song, Y., Kwon, K. H., Xu, J., Huang, X., & Li, S. (2021). Curbing profanity online: A network-based diffusion analysis of profane speech on Chinese social media. new media & society, 23(5), 982-1003.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com