Environment and Social Psychology

Increasing the interest of students in problem-solving through authentic learning experiences: Lens from non-math enthusiast learners

Mailen A. Antao

School of Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines

Ricky S. Morales, Jr.

School of Graduate Studies, Sulu State College, Capitol Site, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3175

---

Abstract

Authentic learning is an educational approach that emphasizes real-world relevance and active engagement, allowing students to apply their knowledge and skills to meaningful, practical situations. It involves tasks that mirror real-life challenges, collaborative problem-solving, and critical thinking, enabling learners to connect theoretical concepts with practical applications. This qualitative study explored the experiences of non-mathematics major college students in problem-solving and how authentic learning experiences develop their interest in the subject. Non-mathematics major college students (n=16) were purposively sampled to be interviewed in this study. The findings indicated that contextualized approaches, such as integrating real-life applications like budgeting or life management, could develop students’ intrinsic motivation by demonstrating the practical relevance of mathematical concepts. Student engagement and sustained effort depend on their perceived likelihood of success and the value they assign to the task. Collaborative problem-solving activities also developed engagement by encouraging peer interaction, building confidence, and developing critical thinking skills. Active and hands-on learning experiences bridge the gap between academic concepts and their real-world applications. With participatory methods, such as financial literacy tasks or structural engineering challenges, students develop higher-order thinking and systematic problem-solving abilities. They also confirmed the positive impact of dynamic teaching strategies, such as group discussions and collaborative tasks, in reducing disengagement and promoting sustained interest in mathematics. Essentially, integrating these approaches into mathematics curricula not only improves academic performance but also equips students with critical life skills and encourage positive attitude toward the subject.

---

References

[1]. 1. Purnomo, Eko & Adnan, Aryadie & Purnama, Jeki & Prahani, Binar & Cahyani, Firunika & Haris, Fahmil. (2022). Personal Meaning Approach: Alternative for Increasing Students’ Interest in Learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. 17. 4658-4671. 10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7501.

[2]. 2. Abanikannda, M. O., & Ezechinyere, C. I. (2021). Interest of undergraduate students in virtual learning Modes occasioned by the new normal. Zambia Journal of Education, 6(1), 99–108

[3]. 3. Wawan, W., & Pamungkas, T. (2021). ARIAS (assurance, relevance, interest, assessment, and Satisfaction) learning model and learning interest : How does it affect critical thinking ? Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 21–25

[4]. 4. Malabar, S., & Dali, M. W. (2021). The Effect of investigation multiliteracy method and prior ability on Learning outcomes of constructing explanatory texts among eleventh-grade students at SMA Posigadan State Senior High School. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies (JHSSS), 3(5), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss

[5]. 5. Wilkins, B. (2021). Harnessing learner interest : Integrating interactive online learning in the foreign Language classroom. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 138–147.

[6]. 6. Roche, Anne & Gervasoni, Ann & Kalogeropoulos, Penelope. (2021). Factors that promote interest and engagement in learning mathematics for low-achieving primary students across three learning settings. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 35. 1-32. 10.1007/s13394-021-00402-w.

[7]. 7. Abramovich, S. (2022). Technology-Immune/Technology-Enabled Problem Solving as Agency of Design-Based Mathematics Education. Education Sciences, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080514

[8]. 8. Shimizu, Y. (2022). Learning Engagement as a Moderator between SelfEfficacy, Math Anxiety, Problem-Solving Strategy, and Vector Problem-Solving Performance. Psych, 4(4), 816–832. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4040060

[9]. 9. Nancy Joseph (2023)EMPOWERING STUDENTS THROUGH PROBLEMSOLVING LEARNING: A PATHWAY TO HEIGHTENED PARTICIPATION AND ENGAGEMENT. International Collaboration Book Chapter ISBN : 978-623-09-3868-9

[10]. 10. Rahmah, A. S. D., Mardi, M., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Does learning interest mediate computer self-efficacy and internet use on learning achievement ? (accounting class student overview). International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 2021(2), 469–484

[11]. 11. Síveres, L., das Neves Júnior, I. J., & de Lucena, J. I. A. (2021). Dialog — A meaning for education. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 6(2), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels

[12]. 12. Ijeoma, E. C., & Rita, L. (2021). Discovery learning and problem-based instructional approaches : Effect of secondary school students ’ interest in biology. International Journal of Research and ScientificbInnovation (IJRSI), VIII(V), 1–7

[13]. 13. Ebrahim Karan and Lisa Brown (2022) Enhancing Student’s Problem-solving Skills through Project-based Learning. VOL. 10, No. 1, 2022 – Page 74-87. 10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v10i1.6887

[14]. 14. Gokbulut, Y., & Kus, S. (2019). Cartoon to solve teaching problem on mathematics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.17609

[15]. 15. Rott, B. (2020). Teachers’ Behaviors, Epistemological Beliefs, and Their Interplay in Lessons on the Topic of Problem Solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(5), 903–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09993-0

[16]. 16. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. In School Science and Mathematics

[17]. 17. Li, L., Zhou, X., Gao, X., & Tu, D. (2020). The development and influencing factors of Kindergarteners’ mathematics problem solving based on cognitive diagnosis assessment. ZDM, 52(4), 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01153-x

[18]. 18. Peng, A., Cao, L., & Yu, B. (2020). Reciprocal Learning in Mathematics Problem Posing and Problem Solving: An Interactive Study between Canadian and Chinese Elementary School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1913. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9130

[19]. 19. Wokoma, I. P. (2021). Learning and Problem-Solving : the Use of Problem Solving Method African Social and Educational Journal Faculty of Business Administration. September 2020

[20]. 20. Tóthová, M., & Rusek, M. (2021). Developing Students’ ProblemSolving Skills Using Learning Tasks: An Action Research Project in Secondary School. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 68(4), 1016–1026. https://doi.org/ 10.17344/acsi.2021.7082

[21]. 21. Aynas, N., & Aslan, M. (2021). The effects of authentic learning practices on problem-solving Skills and attitude towards science courses. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(1), 146-161.

[22]. 22. Gürgül, F., (2018). The effect of authentic learning approach in social studies teaching on the academic success. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2061-2068.

[23]. 23. Smith, T. E., & Knapp, C. E. (Eds.). (2011). Sourcebook of experiential education: Key thinkers and their contributions. Routledge.

[24]. 24. Luckner, J. L., & Nadler, R. S. (1992). Processing the experience: Strategies to enhance and generalize learning. True North Leadership

[25]. 25. Roberts, J. (2018). From the editor: The possibilities and limitations of experiential learning research in higher education. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(1), 3-7.

[26]. 26. Harrisberger, L., Heydinger, J., & Talburtt, M. (1976). Experiential learning in engineering education. American Society for Engineering Education, One Dupont Circle, Suite 400, Washington, DC

[27]. 27. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Mcmillan

[28]. 28. Korgel, B. A. (2002). Nurturing Faculty‐Student Dialogue, Deep Learning and Creativity through Journal Writing Exercises. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 143-146.

[29]. 29. Teller, P. J., & Gates, A. Q. (2001). Using the affinity research group model to involve undergraduate students in computer science research. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 549-555.

[30]. 30. Tembrevilla, G., Phillion, A., & Zeadin, M. (2024). Experiential learning in engineering education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(1), 195-218.

[31]. 31. Loh, E. K. (2019). What we know about expectancy-value theory, and how it helps to design a sustained motivating learning environment. System, 86, 102119.

[32]. 32. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 68-81.

[33]. 33. Eccles, J. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195-201.

[34]. 34. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 109-132.

[35]. 35. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 60.

[36]. 36. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101859.

[37]. 37. Putwain, D. W., Nicholson, L. J., Pekrun, R., Becker, S., & Symes, W. (2019). Expectancy of success, attainment value, engagement, and achievement: A moderated mediation analysis. Learning and instruction, 60, 117-125.

[38]. 38. Chen, I. J., & Sheu, S. P. (2005). Applying the Expectancy-Value Theory to foreign language learning motivation: A case study on Takming college students. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 18(1), 201-218.

[39]. 39. Akhtar, F., Khan, H., & Rasheed, M. (2019). The power of positive psychological capital: An Exploratory study. Arabian J Bus Manag Review, 9(387), 2.

[40]. 40. Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science, 2(1), 17-41.

[41]. 41. Velasco, C. (2020). SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS TOWARD HANDLING MULTIPLE SUBJECT MATTER. Northern Naguilian National High School.

[42]. 42. Hunter, D., McCallum, J., & Howes, D. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1).

[43]. 43. Singh, A. (2021). An introduction to experimental and exploratory research. Available at SSRN 3789360.

[44]. 44. Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).

[45]. 45. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). What is exploration. Exploratory research in the social sciences, 48, 2-17.

[46]. 46. Warner, R., & Griffiths, M. D. (2006). A qualitative thematic analysis of exercise addiction: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4, 13-26.

[47]. 47. Lee, S. J., & Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K-12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100211.

[48]. 48. Asika, N. (2004). Research methodology: A process approach. Mukugamu & Brothers Enterprises, Lagos.

[49]. 49. Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.

[50]. 50. Turner, D. (2020). Sampling Methods in Research Design. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 60. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13707.

[51]. 51. Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8-15.

[52]. 52. Chavez, J.V. (2020). Academic and Health Insecurities of Indigent Students during Pandemic: Study on Adaptive Strategies under Learning Constraints. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences. 16(3): 74-81

[53]. 53. Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.

[54]. 54. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

[55]. 55. Barratt, M. J., Ferris, J. A., & Lenton, S. (2015). Hidden populations, online purposive sampling, and external validity: Taking off the blindfold. Field methods, 27(1), 3-21.

[56]. 56. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

[57]. 57. Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335.

[58]. 58. Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45.

[59]. 59. Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.

[60]. 60. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.

[61]. 61. Hardon, A., Hodgkin, C., & Fresle, D. (2004). How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers. In How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers (pp. 89-89).

[62]. 62. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (Eds.). (2020). Qualitative research in health care (pp. 111-133). Oxford, UK:: Wiley-Blackwell.

[63]. 63. Monday, T. U. (2020). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, 1(1), 15-24.

[64]. 64. Braaten, B., Kramer, A., Henderson, E., Kajfez, R., & Dringenberg, E. (2020). Accessing complex constructs: Refining an interview protocol. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-3). IEEE.

[65]. 65. Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative report, 21(5).

[66]. 66. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

[67]. 67. Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).

[68]. 68. Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1).

[69]. 69. Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Semistructured interviews. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, 232.

[70]. 70. Miller, L. M., & Carpenter, C. L. (2009). Altruistic leadership strategies in coaching: A case study of Jim Tressel of the Ohio State University. Strategies, 22(4), 9-12.

[71]. 71. Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 21(3), 63-64.

[72]. 72. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2, 57-71.

[73]. 73. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L., & Jenkinson, E. (2023). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research (pp. 19-38). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[74]. 74. Shaw, R. (2010). Embedding reflexivity within experiential qualitative psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 7(3), 233-243.

[75]. 75. Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Reflexive thematic analysis. In Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 430-441). Edward Elgar Publishing.

[76]. 76. Langridge, D. (2004). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Harlow: Pearson.

[77]. 77. Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2(17-37), 25.

[78]. 78. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

[79]. 79. Rocha, H., Viseu, F., & Matos, S. (2024). Problem-solving in a real-life context: An approach during the learning of Inequalities. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13828

[80]. 80. Saini, Shazreen & Rosli, Roslinda. (2021). Financial Elements in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: A Systematic Review. International Research in Education. 9. 1. 10.5296/ire.v9i1.18033.

[81]. 81. Prabawa, Harsa & Rosjanuardi, Rizky & Nurlaelah, Elah. (2023). Problem Decomposition Skills, Mathematical Maturity, and Their Relation to Mathematics Problem-Solving in A Computer Science Learning Class. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. 9. 946. 10.33394/jk.v9i3.8258.

[82]. 82. Kaya, Deniz & Keşan, Cenk. (2023). The Connection of Mathematics with Real-Life Situations: Preservice Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions of Creating and Evaluating Story Problems. 12. 118-135. 10.55020/iojpe.1135191.

[83]. 83. Ainhoa Arranz (2023)Math in the real world: everyday applications and example problems for your class. Retrieved from https://www.sowiso.com/blog/math-in-the-real-world/

[84]. 84. Kusumawati R, Hobri, and Hadi A F 2019 Implementation of integrated inquiry J.Phys.:

[85]. 85. Hobri, R P Murtikusuma,E Oktavianingtyas et al., (2021) The students’ interaction in mathematics collaborative Learning, caring community, and jumping task. Journal of Physics: Conference Seriesm 1832 (2021) 012037. IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012037

[86]. 86. Madrasah Tsanawiyah (2023)Enhancing Students’ Interest in Learning Mathematics through the Use of Information Technology Based Learning Media at MTsN 11 Agam. Retrieved from https://journal.institercom-edu.org/index.php/multiple. Volume 1 Issue 3 (2023) E-ISSN 2988-7828

[87]. 87. Samuelsson, J. (2021). Developing students’ relationships with mathematics. Educational Action Research, 31(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1899012

[88]. 88. Rogers, K. S., Thomas, C., & Holmes, H. (2021). Encouraging student participation in mathematical activities in synchronous online tuition. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 39(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1938523

[89]. 89. Sherwood (2023)Mathematics in Travel: Navigating Budgets, Distances, and Beyond. Retrieved from https://www.mathnasium.com/math-centers/sherwood/news/mathematics-travel-navigating-budgets-distances-and-beyond-sh

[90]. 90. Kihwele, J.E. and Mkomwa, J. (2023), “Promoting students’ interest and achievement in mathematics through “King and Queen of Mathematics” initiative”, Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0083

[91]. 91. Halada, G. P., & Wozniak, N. M. (2014, April). Enhancing assessment of experiential learning in engineering education through electronic portfolios. In Proceedings of the 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

[92]. 92. Roberts, J. W. (2012). Beyond learning by doing: Theoretical currents in experiential education. Routledge.

[93]. 93. Lee, Y., & Song, H. D. (2022). Motivation for MOOC learning persistence: An expectancy–value theory perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 958945.