Published
2024-11-29
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Analysis of portfolio for critical thinking and creativity development among education students
Haipa Abdurahim-Salain
College of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Communication, Basilan State College, Isabela City, Basilan Province, 7300, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3199
Keywords: creativity, critical thinking, innovation, organization, portfolio-based assessment, problem-solving
Abstract
Portfolio-based assessment is increasingly recognized as a valuable approach in educational contexts due to its multifaceted benefits. This method shifts the focus from traditional, standardized assessments to a more holistic evaluation of student learning. Unlike conventional assessments that often measure rote memorization and short-term recall, portfolio-based assessment provides a comprehensive view of a student’s progress over time, capturing their evolving competencies, skills, and understandings. This paper explored the experiences of education students about portfolio-based assessment and how this developed their critical thinking and creativity. College students from Basilan, Philippines were purposively sampled through open-ended online survey. Narratives from one-on-one interview were the primary data of this study. The study revealed that the creation of portfolios had a profound impact on the critical thinking and creative development of education students. Participants noted that the process of constructing instructional materials and meeting academic requirements necessitated a thoughtful and analytical approach, requiring problem-solving and critical thinking skills. They emphasized the importance of observation and reflection, which allowed them to critically assess their teaching methods and make informed adjustments. The experience required creativity in structuring ideas, managing tasks, and developing innovative solutions, which not only enhanced their ability to teach effectively but also encourage thinking and a higher level of cognitive engagement. This process values portfolio creation as a tool for developing essential skills in education, particularly in enhancing both critical thinking and creativity among future educators.
References
[1]. Chavez, J., & Lamorinas, D. D. (2023). Reconfiguring assessment practices and strategies in online education during the pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(1), 160-174.
[2]. Aysu, S. (2021). The role of portfolio assessment and quizzes on class attendance and language achievement. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 6(11), 1-10.
[3]. Pitri, A. W. (2021). The Correlation between Portfolio Assessment and Students’ Motivation in Learning English. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 11(4), 56-59.
[4]. Pangkey, R. D. H., Syahrial, Z., & Solihatin, E. (2019). The effect of portfolio assessments on student learning outcomes in learning for civic education in primary school. In International Conference Primary Education Research Pivotal Literature and Research UNNES 2018 (IC PEOPLE UNNES 2018) (pp. 248-251). Atlantis Press.
[5]. Shirvan, M. E., & Golparvar, S. E. (2016). The effect of portfolio assessment on general English learners’ locus of control and achievement. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(1), 70-87.
[6]. Farooq, M. (2013). The use of portfolio in assessing students’ English writing skills (Unpublished master's dissertation). Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
[7]. Atadil-Kuzucu, E., & Kartal, G. (2020). Technology and content integration for English language learners in a vocational high school. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(15), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.656133.
[8]. Evans, M., & Tragant, E. (2020). Demotivation and dropout in adult ELF learners, The Electronic Journal of English as Second Language, 23(4).
[9]. Muin, C. F., & Hafidah, H. (2021). Students' Perceptions on the Use of E-Portfolio for Learning Assessment: A Case Study. Elite Journal, 3(1), 13-20.
[10]. Suwaed, H. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions of using portfolio assessments in the writing classroom: The case of Libyan undergraduate second year students. Journal of Studies in Education, 8(2), 144-156.
[11]. Yazici, Y., & Uçar, S. (2021). LEARNERS’ATTITUDES TOWARDS PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT: A STUDY ON ELT AND ELL STUDENTS. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(12).
[12]. Apeadido, S., Dzomeku, D., & Nanor, E. (2024). Navigating the Portfolio Landscape: Examining Lecturers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Portfolio Assessment Practices. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(5), 563-582.
[13]. Ghoorchaei, B., & Tavakoli, M. (2020). Students’ perceptions about writing portfolios: A case of Iranian EFL students. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 8(1), 21-42.
[14]. Deeba, F., Raza, M. A., Gillani, I. G., & Yousaf, M. (2023). An investigation of role of portfolio assessment on students’ achievement. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(1), 149-161.
[15]. Salah El Din, R. A., Ashry, S., & Seif, A. (2024). Students’ Perception of the Portfolio as a Method of Teaching and learning Assessment in the Newly Established Egyptian Medical Program. Educational Research and Innovation Journal, 4(14), 1-15.
[16]. Caldwell, D. (2007). Teacher perceptions on student portfolio assessment and implementation.
[17]. Lam, R. (2022). E-Portfolios for self-regulated and co-regulated learning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1079385.
[18]. Yastibas, A. E., & Yastibas, G. C. (2015). The use of e-portfolio-based assessment to develop students’ self-regulated learning in English language teaching. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 176, 3-13.
[19]. Goldsmith, D. J. (2007). Enhancing learning and assessment through e-portfolios: A collaborative effort in Connecticut. New Directions for Student Services, 2007(119).
[20]. Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(1), 21-39.
[21]. Seechaliao, T. (2017). Instructional strategies to support creativity and innovation in education. Journal of education and learning, 6(4), 201-208.
[22]. Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Henderson, M., & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: a literature review of the uneasy space of implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-18.
[23]. Suharno, S. (2020). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Flipped classroom Untuk Pembelajaran Daring Sosiologi Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Kelas X. Ips SMA Negeri 1 Juwana Kab. Pati Tahun 2020. IJTIMAIYA: Journal of Social Science Teaching, 4(2), 120-131.
[24]. Siahaan, E. Y. S., Muhammad, I., Dasari, D., & Maharani, S. (2023). Research on critical thinking of pre-service mathematics education teachers in Indonesia (2015-2023): A bibliometric review. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 34-50.
[25]. Cahyono, B., & Waluyo, B. (2019). Analysis critical thinking skills in solving problems algebra in terms of cognitive style and gender. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(2), 022115).
[26]. Susilo, B. E., Darhim, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Critical thinking skills in integral calculus lecture based on mathematical dispositions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032045.
[27]. Firdaus, M. (2020). Critical Thinking Skills of Mathematics Prospective Teachers: An Exploration Study at Medan State University. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462(1), 12005.
[28]. Pisanu, F., & Menapace, P. (2014). Creativity & innovation: Four key issues from a literature review. Creative Education, 5(03), 145.
[29]. Schwartz, D. L., Varma, S., & Martin, L. (2008). Dynamic transfer and innovation. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of re- search on conceptual change (pp. 479-506). New York: Routledge.
[30]. West, M. A., & Rickards, T. (1999). Innovation. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Prentky (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 45-55). San Diego: Academic Press.
[31]. Gardiner, P. (2020). Learning to think together: Creativity, interdisciplinary collaboration and epistemic control. Thinking skills and creativity, 38, 100749.
[32]. Cocu, A., Pecheanu, E., & Susnea, I. (2015). Stimulating creativity through collaboration in an innovation laboratory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 173-178.
[33]. Rees, C., & Sheard, C. (2004). Undergraduate medical students' views about a reflective portfolio assessment of their communication skills learning. Medical education, 38(2), 125-128.
[34]. David, M. F. B., Davis, M. H., Harden, R. M., Howie, P. W., Ker, J., & Pippard, M. J. (2001). AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24: Portfolios as a method of student assessment. Medical teacher, 23(6), 535-551.
[35]. Eve, R. (2003). PUNs and DENs. Discovering Learning Needs in General Practice. Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press.
[36]. Tekian, A., & Yudkowsky, R. (2009). ASSESSMENT P ORTFOLIOS. In Assessment in health professions education (pp. 307-324). Routledge.
[37]. Elango, S. R. J. L. L., Jutti, R. C., & Lee, L. K. (2005). Portfolio as a learning tool: students' perspective. Annals-Academy of Medicine Singapore, 34(8), 511.
[38]. Burch, V. C., & Seggie, J. L. (2008). Use of a structured interview to assess portfolio‐based learning. Medical Education, 42(9), 894-900.
[39]. Darmiyati, D., Sunarno, S., & Prihandoko, Y. (2023). The effectiveness of portfolio assessment based problem based learning on mathematical critical thinking skills in elementary schools. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 1(2), 42-51.
[40]. Alrahlah, A. (2016). How effective the problem-based learning (PBL) in dental education. A critical review. The Saudi dental journal, 28(4), 155-161.
[41]. Broadfoot, P., Weeden, P., & Winter, J. (2019). Assessment: What’s in it for Schools? Routledge.
[42]. Talib, A., & Kailani, I. B. (2014). Problem Based Learning in Cooperative Situation (PBLCS) and Its Impact on Development of Personal Intelligence. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 3(4), 236-244.
[43]. Altintas, E., & Ilgün, S. (2017). Exploring the Opinions about the Concepts of" Formula" and" Rule" in Mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(19), 956-966.
[44]. Faravani, A., & Atai, M. R. (2015). Portfolio assessment and the enhancement of higher order thinking through multiple intelligence and dialogic feedback. Issues in Language Teaching, 4(1), 25-1.
[45]. Hunter, D., McCallum, J., & Howes, D. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1).
[46]. Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.
[47]. Singh, A. (2021). An introduction to experimental and exploratory research. Available at SSRN 3789360.
[48]. Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science, 2(1), 17-41.
[49]. Chavez, J. V., Anuddin, F. O., Mansul, H. H., Hawari, N. A., Irilis, F. B., Umaron, A. A., ... & Albani, S. E. (2024). Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(7).
[50]. Akhtar, F., Khan, H., & Rasheed, M. (2019). The power of positive psychological capital: An Exploratory study. Arabian J Bus Manag Review, 9(387), 2.
[51]. Asika, N. (2004). Research methodology: A process approach. Mukugamu & Brothers Enterprises, Lagos.
[52]. Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).
[53]. Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach.
[54]. Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8-15.
[55]. Suen, L. J. W., Huang, H. M., & Lee, H. H. (2014). A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Hu li za zhi, 61(3), 105.
[56]. Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. In Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1541-1541.
[57]. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.
[58]. Subedi, K. R. (2021). Determining the Sample in Qualitative Research. Online Submission, 4, 1-13.
[59]. Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
[60]. Barratt, M. J., Ferris, J. A., & Lenton, S. (2015). Hidden populations, online purposive sampling, and external validity: Taking off the blindfold. Field methods, 27(1), 3-21.
[61]. Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.
[62]. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
[63]. Monday, T. U. (2020). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, 1(1), 15-24.
[64]. Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45.
[65]. Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research Methods in Social Relations. London: Thomson Learning. Inc. UK.
[66]. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
[67]. Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative report, 21(5).
[68]. Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 21(3), 63-64.
[69]. Greenfield, B. H., Greene, B., & Johanson, M. A. (2007). The use of qualitative research techniques in orthopedic and sports physical therapy: Moving toward postpositivism. Physical Therapy in Sport, 8(1), 44-54.
[70]. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College.
[71]. Bolderston, A. (2012). Conducting a research interview. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 43(1), 66-76.
[72]. Ng, C. K., & White, P. (2005). Qualitative research design and approaches in radiography. Radiography, 11(3), 217-225.
[73]. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
[74]. Benlahcene, A., & Ramdani, A. (2020). The process of qualitative interview: Practical insights for novice researchers. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 406-413.
[75]. Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).
[76]. Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1).
[77]. Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Semistructured interviews. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, 232.
[78]. Miller, L. M., & Carpenter, C. L. (2009). Altruistic leadership strategies in coaching: A case study of Jim Tressel of the Ohio State University. Strategies, 22(4), 9-12.
[79]. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
[80]. Finlay, L. (2021). Thematic analysis: the ‘good’, the ‘bad’ and the ‘ugly’. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 11, 103-116.
[81]. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and psychotherapy research, 21(1), 37-47.
[82]. Langridge, D. (2004). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Harlow: Pearson.
[83]. Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 17–37). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2.
[84]. Shaw, R. (2010). Embedding reflexivity within experiential qualitative psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 7(3), 233-243.
[85]. Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Reflexive thematic analysis. In Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 430-441). Edward Elgar Publishing.
[86]. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2, 57-71.
[87]. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597.
[88]. Chavez, J. V., & Cuilan, J. T. (2023). Gender mainstreaming campaign as a casualty of the online gender-based humor: A discourse analysis. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(2).
[89]. Yeung, M. M. Y., Yuen, J. W. M., Chen, J. M. T., & Lam, K. K. L. (2023). The efficacy of team-based learning in developing the generic capability of problem-solving ability and critical thinking skills in nursing education: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 122, 105704.
[90]. Yuan, R., & Liao, W. (2023). Critical thinking in teacher education: where do we stand and where can we go?. Teachers and Teaching, 29(6), 543-552.
[91]. Cui, R., & Teo, P. (2023). Thinking through talk: Using dialogue to develop students’ critical thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104068.
[92]. Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking skills and creativity, 22, 256-265.
[93]. Li, L. (2016). Thinking skills and creativity in second language education: Where are we now?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 267-272.
[94]. Yuan, R., & Stapleton, P. (2020). Student teachers’ perceptions of critical thinking and its teaching. ELT journal, 74(1), 40-48.
[95]. Gebrekidan, H., & Zeru, A. (2023). Effects of portfolio-based assessment on EFL students’ conceptions and approaches to writing. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2195749.
[96]. Hosseini, H., & Ghabanchi, Z. (2014). The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension and Motivation. English Language Teaching, 7(5), 110-119.
[97]. Farahian, M., & Avarzamani, F. (2018). The impact of portfolio on EFL learners’ metacognition and writing performance. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1450918.
[98]. Khodadady, E., & Khodabakhshzade, H. (2012). The effect of portfolio and self assessment on writing ability and autonomy. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(3).
[99]. Boumediene, H., Berrahal, F. K., & Harji, M. B. (2016). The effectiveness of portfolio assessment on EFL students' writing performance: The case of third year secondary students in Algeria. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(3).
[100]. Fahim, M., & Jalili, S. (2013). The Impact of Writing Portfolio Assessment on Developing Editing Ability of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(3).
[101]. Cotter, E. M., & Tally, C. S. (2009). Do critical thinking exercises improve critical thinking skills?. Educational Research Quarterly, 33(2).
[102]. Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in science education, 37, 353-369.
[103]. Nicolasora, B. A. E. (2023). Portfolio-Based Assessment (PBA) on Math Learners: An Exploration of Attitude, Metacognitive Skills, and Learning Outcomes. Mambuaya National High School, 1-31.
[104]. Quinn, D. (2023). It's like you're a detective in your own story. Teacher and student experiences of teaching and learning with e-portfolio based learning in the context of a DEIS Post-Primary school (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland).
[105]. Lam, R. (2023). E-Portfolios: What we know, what we don’t, and what we need to know. RELC Journal, 54(1), 208-215.
[106]. Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2016). The role of e‐portfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1276-1286.
[107]. Butakor, P. K. (2024). The Use of e-Portfolios as a Teaching, Learning and Assessment Tool in Higher Education: Differing Opinions among Ghanaian Pre-Service Teachers and Nurses. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(6), 35-45.
[108]. Mei, D. (2022). What does students’ experience of e-portfolios suggest. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 7(2), 15-20.
[109]. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?. The Internet and higher education, 13(4), 179-187.
[110]. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.