Published
2024-11-29
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Mechanisms of teacher-student interaction and music teaching climate: A moderated analysis based on different social factors
Jiawen Liu
R1Liuzhou Railway Vocational and Technical College, No. 2 Wenyuan Road, Yufeng District, Liuzhou City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 545000, China Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Nyabau Road, Bintulu, Sarawak, 97008, Malaysia
Mohamad Ibrani Shahrimin Adam Assim
Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Nyabau Road, Bintulu, Sarawak, 97008, Malaysia
Shairil Izwan bin Taasim
Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Nyabau Road, Bintulu, Sarawak, 97008, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3208
Keywords: Teacher-student interaction relationship, Music classroom atmosphere, External factors, Music education, Moderated analysis
Abstract
Creating a positive classroom atmosphere through teacher-student interaction is crucial for effective teaching in art disciplines, enabling students to experience the joy of learning in a relaxed and engaging environment. While existing research highlights the significant role of teacher-student interaction in shaping the classroom climate, particularly in music education, the current music teaching landscape in China faces unique challenges. Exam-oriented education continues to dominate, leaving limited emphasis on fostering a quality-driven, enjoyable learning experience, inhibiting the development of a harmonious and engaging teaching environment. This study investigates the mechanisms of teacher-student interaction and their impact on the music teaching atmosphere, focusing on external moderating factors. Using a sample of 110 music teachers and 390 primary music students from universities in Guangxi, the research employs quantitative analysis to explore the relationships between teacher-student interaction, classroom climate, and various moderating social factors. The findings reveal that teacher-student interaction positively correlates with the music-teaching atmosphere. Furthermore, family, technological, and school factors significantly moderate this relationship, either enhancing or constraining the overall classroom climate. This study contributes to the field of music education by identifying fundamental mechanisms and moderators influencing the classroom atmosphere. The findings provide actionable insights for improving teacher-student interactions and creating a more inclusive and enjoyable music-teaching environment, addressing the challenges posed by exam-oriented education in China. Future efforts should focus on integrating these findings into practical strategies for fostering a harmonious and engaging classroom climate in music education.
References
[1]. Yang Y & Welch G. A systematic literature review of Chinese music education studies during 2007 to 2019. International Journal of Music Education 2022; 41(2): 025576142210961. doi: 10.1177/02557614221096150
[2]. Wan W. Digital Technologies in Music Education: The Case of Chinese Students. Musica Hodie 2022; 22. doi: 10.5216/mh.v22.70752
[3]. Law W & Ho W. Globalization, values education, and school music education in China. Journal of Curriculum Studies 2009; 41(4): 501–520. doi: 10.1080/00220270802372329
[4]. Wang K & Webb M. Seeking best practice: A systematic review of literature on Chinese music teaching and learning in Western classroom contexts. International Journal of Music Education 2023, 42(3): 442–460. doi: 10.1177/02557614231175988
[5]. Huang Y. Teacher-Student Interactive Creation Strategies in Music Teaching Assisted by Computer Information Technology. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022; 2022(1): 5443729. doi: 10.1155/2022/5443729
[6]. Li S & Timmers R. Teaching and Learning of Piano Timbre Through Teacher–Student Interactions in Lessons. Frontiers in Psychology 2021; 12: 215–230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.576056
[7]. Yuting F. Design and Evaluation of Interactive Teaching Mode in Music Education. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology 2024; 7(1): 125–130. doi: 10.23977/curtm.2024.070719
[8]. Kupers E & Van Dijk M. Creativity in interaction: the dynamics of teacher-student interactions during a musical composition task. Thinking Skills and Creativity 2020; 36: 100648. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100648
[9]. Kupers E, Van DM, Van GP. Within-teacher differences in one-to-one teacher–student interactions in instrumental music lessons. Learning and Individual Differences 2015; 37: 283–289. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.012
[10]. Dong C. Music Education and Teaching Reform in Colleges and Universities Based on Teacher-student Interaction. International Journal of New Developments in Education 2023; 5(2). doi: 10.25236/ijnde.2023.050213
[11]. Conway C, Eros J, Pellegrino K, West C. (2010). The Role of Graduate and Undergraduate Interactions in the Development of Preservice Music Teachers and Music Teacher Educators: A Self-Study in Music Teacher Education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 2010; 183(183): 49–64. doi: 10.2307/27861472
[12]. Blackwell J, Miksza P, Evans P, McPherson GE. Student Vitality, Teacher Engagement, and Rapport in Studio Music Instruction. Frontiers in Psychology 2020; 111: 497–521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01007
[13]. Fernández DCGC, Pineda I, Waddell G. Music as a Medium of Instruction (MMI): A new pedagogical approach to English language teaching for students with and without music training. Language Teaching Research 2022; 0(0). doi: 10.1177/13621688221105769
[14]. Aussieker, B. (1975). Student Involvement with Collective Bargaining. The Journal of Higher Education, 46(5), 533. doi: 10.2307/1980685
[15]. Liu H, Liu Q, Du X, Liu J, Hoi C.KW, Schumacker RE. Teacher-student relationship as a protective factor for socioeconomic status, students’ self-efficacy and achievement: a multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Current Psychology 2021; 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01598-7
[16]. Carlisle K. A study of teacher formative influence upon and student experience of social–emotional learning climate in secondary school music settings. British Journal of Music Education 2013; 30(2): 223–243. doi: 10.1017/s0265051713000053
[17]. De SS, López Y, Ortega L. Standardization of activities as a strategy to improve teaching practice in teaching. Revista de Educación Básica 2021. doi: 10.35429/jbe.2021.14.5.28.34
[18]. Driscoll V, Gfeller K, Tan X, See RL, Cheng HY, Kanemitsu M. Family involvement in music impacts participation of children with cochlear implants in music education and music activities. Cochlear Implants International 2014, 16(3), 137–146. doi: 10.1179/1754762814y.0000000103
[19]. Conkling SW. Socialization in the Family: Implications for Music Education. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education 2017; 36(3): 29–37. doi: 10.1177/8755123317732969
[20]. Moos RH. Conceptual and Empirical Approaches to Developing Family-Based Assessment Procedures: Resolving the Case of the Family Environment Scale. Family Process 1990; 29(2): 199–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00199.x
[21]. Szapocznik J, Rio AT, Hervis O, Mitrani VB, Kurtines W, Faraci AM. Assessing Change in Family Functioning as a Result of Treatment: The Structural Family Systems Rating Scale (SFSR). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 2007; 17(3): 295–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1991.tb00897.x
[22]. Harper B. Technology and Teacher–Student Interactions: A Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2018; 50(3): 214–225. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690
[23]. Zhang Y. Influence of Teacher-Student Interaction on Course Learning Effect in Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 2022; 17(10): 215–226. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v17i10.30913
[24]. Aljaloud A, Billingsley W, Kwa P. Factors that influence teachers’ decisions to use smartphone clicker apps to enhance teacher-student interactions in university classrooms in Saudi Arabia. Learning: Research and Practice 2018; 5(1): 67–86. doi: 10.1080/23735082.2018.1459802
[25]. Naci CA & Ferhan OH. Educational Technology Standards Scale (ETSS): A Study of Reliability and Validity for Turkish Preservice Teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 2009; 25(4): 135–142. doi: 10.1080/10402454.2009.10784622
[26]. Englehart, JM. International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching. Springer US 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-73317-3
[27]. Barile, JP, Donohue DK, Anthony ER, Baker AM, Weaver SR, Henrich CC. Teacher–Student Relationship Climate and School Outcomes: Implications for Educational Policy Initiatives. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2012; 41(3): 256–267. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9652-8
[28]. Amanda K. The Construct and Measure of Teacher-Student Relationships From the Student Perspective in Music Education. Dissertations & Theses 2024. https://www.proquest.com/openview/646c9a04815fb0239e68f2945341f02c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
[29]. Abril CR & Bannerman JK. Perceived Factors Impacting School Music Programs. Journal of Research in Music Education 2014; 62(4): 344–361. doi: 10.1177/0022429414554430
[30]. Atmojo AEP. PLEASE Strategy for Teaching Writing Viewed from Students’ Self-Esteem. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching 2021; 2(2): 309–319. doi: 10.24256/foster-jelt.v2i2.39
[31]. Wilson E. “It’s music and we came to play instruments”: teaching for engagement in classroom music. Music Education Research 2022; 24(4): 1–12. doi: 10.1080/14613808.2022.2080811
[32]. Hicks D & Isett KR. Powerful numbers: Exemplary quantitative studies of science that had policy impact. Quantitative Science Studies 2020; 1(3): 969–982. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00060
[33]. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1992; 1(3): 98–101. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
[34]. Kirk J & Miller ML. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park 1986, Calif. Sage.
[35]. Aven T & Heide B. Reliability and validity of risk analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2009; 94(11): 1862–1868. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.06.003
[36]. Liang CTH, Li LC, Kim, BSK. The Asian American Racism-Related Stress Inventory: Development, Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2004; 51(1): 103–114. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.103
[37]. Smagorinsky P. The Reliability and Validity of Protocol Analysis. Written Communication 1989; 6(4): 463–479. doi: 10.1177/0741088389006004003
[38]. Iwata BA, DeLeon IG, Roscoe EM. Reliability and Validity of the Functional Analysis Screening Tool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2013; 46(1): 271–284. doi: 10.1002/jaba.31
[39]. Wainer H & Braun HI. Test Validity 2013. Routledge.
[40]. Ang, RP & Huan VS. Academic Expectations Stress Inventory: Development, Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2006; 66(3): 522–539. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282461
[41]. Stahle L & Wold S. Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1989; 6(4): 259–272. doi: 10.1016/0169-7439(89)80095-4
[42]. Kim HY. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Comparing Means of More than Two Groups. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2014; 39(1): 74. doi: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.74
[43]. Green L. Popular Music Education in and for Itself, and for “Other” Music: Current Research in the Classroom. International Journal of Music Education 2006; 24(2): 101–118. doi: 10.1177/0255761406065471
[44]. Siebenaler DJ. Analysis of Teacher-Student Interactions in the Piano Lessons of Adults and Children. Journal of Research in Music Education 1997; 45(1): 6–20. doi: 10.2307/3345462
[45]. Bruhn S. Re-considering the Teacher — Student Relationship in the Training of the Performing Musician. International Journal of Music Education 1990; 16(1): 13–22. doi: 10.1177/025576149001600102
[46]. Ilari B. Musical Parenting and Music Education: Integrating Research and Practice. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education 2017; 36(2): 45–52. doi: 10.1177/8755123317717053
[47]. Koopman C. Community music as music education: on the educational potential of community music. International Journal of Music Education 2007; 25(2): 151–163. doi: 10.1177/0255761407079951
[48]. Ang K, Panebianco C, Odendaal A. Viewing the Parent-Teacher Relationship in Music Education Through the Lens of Role Theory: A Literature Review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education 2020; 39(2): 25–33. doi: 10.1177/8755123320951994
[49]. Wells B & Humphreys JT. Music Teacher Educators’ Perceptions of the Society for Music Teacher Education. Journal of Music Teacher Education 1991; 1(1): 21–27. doi: 10.1177/105708379100100105
[50]. Burnard P. Reframing creativity and technology: promoting pedagogic change in music education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education 2007; 1(1): 37–55. doi: 10.1386/jmte.1.1.37_1
[51]. Kelly SN. The Influence of Selected Cultural Factors on the Environmental Teaching Preference of Undergraduate Music Education Majors. Journal of Music Teacher Education 2003; 12(2): 40–55. doi: 10.1177/10570837030120020106
[52]. Gavin RB. An Exploration of Potential Factors Affecting Student Withdrawal From an Undergraduate Music Education Program. Journal of Research in Music Education 2012; 60(3): 310–323. doi: 10.1177/0022429412454662