Published
2025-04-27
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Magna Anissa A. Hayudini, Shernahar K. Tahil, Jeanor M. Marsin, Datu Al-Mujiv A. Kiram, Alnahar A. Amirul, Angela Joy Alegado Jimpoy, Fahra B. Sahibad, Adzlan P. Hamsaji, Abdulkamal H. Abduljalil, Hermie V. Inoferio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Learning activities in STEM to sustain curiosity of Gen-Z in an AI-dependent college setting
Magna Anissa A. Hayudini
College Of Health Sciences, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Shernahar K. Tahil
College Of Computer Studies, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Jeanor M. Marsin
College Of Computer Studies, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Datu Al-Mujiv A. Kiram
College Of Computer Studies, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Alnahar A. Amirul
College Of Computing Studies and Engineering, Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Angela Joy Alegado Jimpoy
College Of Computer Studies, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Fahra B. Sahibad
College Of Computer Studies, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Adzlan P. Hamsaji
College Of Computer Studies, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Abdulkamal H. Abduljalil
College Of Computer Studies, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Jolo, Sulu, 7400, Philippines
Hermie V. Inoferio
College of Teacher Education, Jose Rizal Memorial State University-Katipunan Campus, Katipunan, Zamboanga del Norte, 7109, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i4.3215
Keywords: curiosity; GenAI; inquiry-based learning; STEM education
Abstract
The emergence of Generative AI (GenAI) programs marks a significant shift in the educational landscape, prompting a re-evaluation of traditional teaching methodologies and curricular frameworks. As education evolves, there is growing emphasis on inquiry-based learning, which prioritizes skills such as questioning, critical thinking, and problem-solving. This article discusses how GenAI sparks curiosity among Gen Z college students, with emphasis on different learning activities applicable in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs. College students (n=16) were purposively sampled to be interviewed about their experiences using GenAI and how it impacted their learning processes in STEM classrooms. Findings indicated that curiosity was notable in the educational experiences of STEM college students in GenAI-dependent classrooms, as it drives their exploration, creativity, and motivation to learn. Students exhibited strong curiosity by engaging with real-world challenges and using GenAI tools to seek answers and deepen their understanding of topics. Active learning strategies, including project-based and inquiry-based approaches, remarkably enhance students’ curiosity and engagement, allowing them to apply theoretical knowledge to hands-on activities and stimulate higher-order thinking. Through experiences like lab experiments and discussions about career applications of STEM knowledge, students found abstract concepts more relatable and meaningful, reinforcing their motivation. This paper highlights the need for an active, inquiry-driven learning environment that connects academic pursuits with practical applications, cultivating curiosity and enriching students’ educational experiences.
References
[1]. 1.Banh, L., & Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 63.
[2]. 2.Moundridou, M., Matzakos, N., & Doukakis, S. (2024). Generative AI tools as educators’ assistants: Designing and implementing inquiry-based lesson plans. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100277.
[3]. 3.Mittal, U., Sai, S., & Chamola, V. (2024). A comprehensive review on generative ai for education. IEEE Access.
[4]. 4.Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355-366.
[5]. 5.Zhou, E., & Lee, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nexus, 3(3), 1–8.
[6]. 6.Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62.
[7]. 7.Abdelghani, R., Wang, Y. H., Yuan, X., Wang, T., Lucas, P., Sauzéon, H., & Oudeyer, P. Y. (2024). GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents to train children’s curious question-asking skills. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(2), 483-518.
[8]. 8.Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024). A systematic review of generative AI for teaching and learning practice. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09520
[9]. 9.Cavicchi, E. (2024). Curiosity Opens Relationships of the World and with Others: Narratives from Doing Teaching and Learning Through Curiosity. Interchange, 55(3), 261-301.
[10]. 10.Lindholm, M. (2018). Promoting curiosity? Possibilities and pitfalls in science education. Science & Education, 27, 987-1002.
[11]. 11.Zhang, J., Fan, S., & Huang, Z. (2024). How Do Students Develop Creativity and Curiosity? The Role of Out-of-School Activities. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311241228282.
[12]. 12.Pasaribu, A. R., Siregar, L. Y. S., & Hasibuan, N. A. P. (2024). Integrating Problem-Based Learning and Visual Media to Spark Science Curiosity in Fifth Graders. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 2(2), 57-63.
[13]. 13.Weiss, J. (2024). Learning to Learn: Fostering Intellectual Curiosity in Health Care Education.
[14]. 14.Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., ... & Rienties, B. (2024). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-27.
[15]. 15.Mavrikis, M., Rummel, N., Wiedmann, M., Loibl, K., & Holmes, W. (2022). Combining exploratory learning with structured practice educational technologies to foster both conceptual and procedural fractions knowledge. Educational technology research and development, 70(3), 691-712.
[16]. 16.Singh, A., & Manjaly, J. A. (2022). Using curiosity to improve learning outcomes in schools. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440211069392.
[17]. 17.Hunaepi, H., Suma, I. K., & Subagia, I. W. (2024). Curiosity in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(1), 77-105.
[18]. 18.Mahama, I., Asamoah-Gyimah, K., & Dramanu, B. Y. (2024). Examining the Interrelationships Among Curiosity, Creativity, and Academic Motivation Using Students in High Schools: A Multivariate Analysis Approach. Open Education Studies, 6(1), 20240001.
[19]. 19.Mussel, P. (2022). Processes underlying the relation between cognitive ability and curiosity with academic performance: A mediation analysis for epistemic behavior in a five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2), 23.
[20]. 20.Shah, P. E., Weeks, H. M., Richards, B., & Kaciroti, N. (2018). Early childhood curiosity and kindergarten reading and math academic achievement. Pediatric research, 84(3), 380-386.
[21]. 21.Rees, C., Allen, H., Whitehouse, M., Harrison, M., DeVries, E., Sjokvist, G., & Miller, C. (2023). Curiosity-Driven, Inquiry-Based Science Projects Bridge Face-to-Face and Online Learning Formats During COVID-19: A Teacher's Community of Inquiry. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 23(3), 27-57.
[22]. 22.Hagtvedt, L. P., Dossinger, K., Harrison, S. H., & Huang, L. (2019). Curiosity made the cat more creative: Specific curiosity as a driver of creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 1-13.
[23]. 23.Steinert, S., Avila, K. E., Kuhn, J., & Küchemann, S. (2024). Using GPT-4 as a guide during inquiry-based learning. The Physics Teacher, 62(7), 618-619.
[24]. 24.Iyamuremye, A., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2024). Exploring secondary school students’ interest and mastery of atomic structure and chemical bonding through ChatGPT. Educational Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 1(1), 1-13.
[25]. 25.Kotsis, K. T. (2024b). ChatGPT Develops Physics Experiment Worksheets for Primary Education Teachers. European Journal of Education Studies, 11(5).
[26]. 26.Kotsis, K. T. (2024a). ChatGPT as Teacher Assistant for Physics Teaching. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(4).
[27]. 27.Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. Tesl-Ej, 27(3), n3.
[28]. 28.Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 110-121.
[29]. 29.Mai, D. T. T., Da, C. V., & Hanh, N. V. (2024, February). The use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning: a systematic review through SWOT analysis approach. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1328769). Frontiers Media SA.
[30]. 30.Wang, W., Chen, Y., & Heffernan, N. (2020). A Generative Model-Based Tutoring System for Math Word Problems. arXiv, 1-20.
[31]. 31.Söderström, U., Hedström, E., Lambertsson, K., & Mejtoft, T. (2024, October). ChatGPT in education: Teachers’ and Students’ views. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2024 (pp. 1-10).
[32]. 32.Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 100174.
[33]. 33.Lai, R. P. Y. (2023). Harnessing pedagogical innovation and educational technology to revolutionize STEM beyond the classroom: Future directions. STEM Education Review, 1.
[34]. 34.Dare, E. A., Hiwatig, B., Keratithamkul, K., Ellis, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., Ring-Whalen, E. A., ... & Crotty, E. A. (2021, January). Improving integrated STEM education: The design and development of a K-12 STEM observation protocol (STEM-OP)(RTP). In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.
[35]. 35.Siregar, N. C., Warsito, W., Gumilar, A., Amarullah, A., & Rosli, R. (2024). STEM IN ACTION: REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATH. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 493-507.
[36]. 36.Maspul, K. A. (2024). Exploring STEM Education for Real-World Climate Change Concerns to Empower Students as Change Agents. Journal of Physics Education and Science, 1(2), 12-12.
[37]. 37.Rehman, S. U. (2024). Fostering Innovation in STEM Education through Multidisciplinary Collaboration. Multidisciplinary Journal of Emerging Needs of Curriculum, 1(1), 39-48.
[38]. 38.Yang, Y., Sun, W., Sun, D., & Salas-Pilco, S. Z. (2024). Navigating the AI-Enhanced STEM education landscape: a decade of insights, trends, and opportunities. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-25.
[39]. 39.Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gašević, D. (2023). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.13379
[40]. 40.Akhtar, F., Khan, H., & Rasheed, M. (2019). The power of positive psychological capital: An Exploratory study. Arabian J Bus Manag Review, 9(387), 2.
[41]. 41.Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science, 2(1), 17-41.
[42]. 42.Hunter, D., McCallum, J., & Howes, D. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1).
[43]. 43.Singh, A. (2021). An introduction to experimental and exploratory research. Available at SSRN 3789360.
[44]. 44.Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).
[45]. 45.Duhaylungsod, A. V., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). ChatGPT and other AI users: Innovative and creative utilitarian value and mindset shift. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 4367-4378.
[46]. 46.Polit, D. F. (2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippin cott.
[47]. 47.Szabelska, A., Pollet, T. V., Dujols, O., Klein, R. A., & IJzerman, H. (2021). A tutorial for exploratory research: An eight-step approach.
[48]. 48.Asika, N. (2004). Research methodology: A process approach. Mukugamu & Brothers Enterprises, Lagos.
[49]. 49.Subedi, K. R. (2021). Determining the Sample in Qualitative Research. Online Submission, 4, 1-13.
[50]. 50.Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.
[51]. 51.Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8-15.
[52]. 52.Chavez, J. V. (2020). The effects of English as a second language on bilingual parents’ English language dispositions. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 7(1), 12-25.
[53]. 53.Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
[54]. 54.Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023a). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. In Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1541-1541.
[55]. 55.Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.
[56]. 56.Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).
[57]. 57.Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
[58]. 58.Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335.
[59]. 59.Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45.
[60]. 60.Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.
[61]. 61.Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
[62]. 62.Hardon, A., Hodgkin, C., & Fresle, D. (2004). How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers. In How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers (pp. 89-89).
[63]. 63.Pope, C., & Mays, N. (Eds.). (2020). Qualitative research in health care (pp. 111-133). Oxford, UK:: Wiley-Blackwell.
[64]. 64.Monday, T. U. (2020). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, 1(1), 15-24.
[65]. 65.Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research Methods in Social Relations. London: Thomson Learning. Inc. UK.
[66]. 66.Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.
[67]. 67.Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
[68]. 68.Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).
[69]. 69.Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1).
[70]. 70.Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Semistructured interviews. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, 232.
[71]. 71.Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 21(3), 63-64.
[72]. 72.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2, 57-71.
[73]. 73.Langridge, D. (2004). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Harlow: Pearson.
[74]. 74.Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2(17-37), 25.
[75]. 75.Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L., & Jenkinson, E. (2023). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research (pp. 19-38). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[76]. 76.Shaw, R. (2010). Embedding reflexivity within experiential qualitative psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 7(3), 233-243.
[77]. 77.Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Reflexive thematic analysis. In Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 430-441). Edward Elgar Publishing.
[78]. 78.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and psychotherapy research, 21(1), 37-47.
[79]. 79.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2, 57-71.
[80]. 80.Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2(17-37), 25.
[81]. 81.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
[82]. 82.Mahama, I., Asamoah-Gyimah, K., & Dramanu, B. Y. (2024). Examining the Interrelationships Among Curiosity, Creativity, and Academic Motivation Using Students in High Schools: A Multivariate Analysis Approach. Open
[83]. 83.Qablan, A., Alkaabi, A. M., Aljanahi, M. H., & Almaamari, S. A. (2024). Inquiry-Based Learning: Encouraging Exploration and Curiosity in the Classroom. In Cutting-Edge Innovations in Teaching, Leadership, Technology, and Assessment (pp. 1-12). IGI Global.
[84]. 84.Coleman, T. C. (2014). Positive emotion in nature as a precursor to learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(3), 175-190.
[85]. 85.Pekrun, R. (2019). The murky distinction between curiosity and interest: State of the art and future prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 905-914.
[86]. 86.Ma, J., & Wei, W. (2023). Curiosity causes creativity? revealing the reinforcement circle between state curiosity and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(4), 488-494.
[87]. 87.Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2009). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. Oxford handbook of positive psychology, 2, 367-374.
[88]. 88.Chen, H., Teng, T., Chen, H., Liu, X., Liu, Z., Li, X., ... & Zhou, X. (2023). Motivation, self‐efficacy, perception, curiosity, and barriers toward medical research among undergraduates in China. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 51(1), 18-28.
[89]. 89.Paradowski, M. B., & Jelińska, M. (2023). The predictors of L2 grit and their complex interactions in online foreign language learning: motivation, self-directed learning, autonomy, curiosity, and language mindsets. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-38.
[90]. 90.Perényi, D. (2023). Examining the Role of Academic Intrinsic Motivation, Need for Cognition and Curiosity in University Students’ Experience of Flow in their Studies (Doctoral dissertation).
[91]. 91.Huang, Q., Cao, S., Zhou, S., Punia, D., Zhu, X., Luo, Y., & Wu, H. (2021). How anxiety predicts interpersonal curiosity during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediation effect of interpersonal distancing and autistic tendency. Personality and individual differences, 180, 110973.
[92]. 92.Ausat, A. M. A., Purnomo, Y. J., Munir, A. R., & Suherlan, S. (2023). Do Motivation Compensation and Work Environment Improve Employee Performance: A Literature Review. International Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6(1.2).
[93]. 93.Oh, J. E., Chan, Y. K., & Kim, K. V. (2020). Social media and e-portfolios: Impacting design students’ motivation through project-based learning. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(3), 41-58.
[94]. 94.Chiu, T. K. (2023). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17.
[95]. 95.Lashari, A. A., & Umrani, S. (2023). REIMAGINING SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING LANGUAGE IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Grassroots (17260396), 57(1).
[96]. 96.Cronin-Golomb, L. M., & Bauer, P. J. (2023). Self-motivated and directed learning across the lifespan. Acta Psychologica, 232, 103816.
[97]. 97.Liu, J., Tahri, D., & Qiang, F. (2024). How Does Active Learning Pedagogy Shape Learner Curiosity? A Multi-Site Mediator Study of Learner Engagement among 45,972 Children. Journal of Intelligence, 12(6), 59.
[98]. 98.Shin, D. D., & Kim, S. I. (2019). Homo curious: Curious or interested?. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 853-874.
[99]. 99.Jensen, J. L., & Lawson, A. (2011). Effects of collaborative group composition and inquiry instruction on reasoning gains and achievement in undergraduate biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 64-73.