Published
2024-11-29
Section
Review Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Priti Singh, Badri Bajaj

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Mapping the research landscape of employee well-being: A bibliometric review of three decades
Priti Singh
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Jaypee University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201309, India
Badri Bajaj
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Jaypee University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201309, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3225
Keywords: employee well-being, bibliometric analysis, co-citation, conceptual, intellectual and social structure
Abstract
The importance of promoting employee well-being in the workplace has gained significant attention. To explore this growing field, a bibliometric study was conducted to examine the research landscape through a systematic analysis of 1284 publications from the Web of Science database, covering the period from 1990 to 2021. Using Bibliometrix and Vosviewer software, this study addressed five research questions focusing on the major contributors, conceptual, intellectual, and social structure of the field, as well as significant research gaps. The findings suggest that employee well-being is an interdisciplinary field drawing particularly on management and applied psychology. Through citation analysis, this study identified the most cited authors, institutions, and most productive countries. To understand the conceptual underpinning of this research field and trace its chronological evolution, co-occurrence analysis of the authors' keywords was performed. Document co-citation analysis identified four research clusters that constituted the intellectual base of this research area. Furthermore, social network analysis highlighted patterns in author, institution, and country contributions and collaboration. The study concludes by exploring future research directions in the field of employee well-being.
References
[1]. Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139
[2]. Yang, X., Feng, Y., Meng, Y., & Qiu, Y. (2019). Career adaptability, work engagement, and employee well-being among chinese employees: The role of Guanxi. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01029
[3]. Meyer, J. P., & Maltin, E. R. (2010). Employee commitment and well-being: A critical review, theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2010.04.007
[4]. Aboobaker, N., Edward, M., & Zakkariya, K. A. (2021). Workplace spirituality, well-being at work and employee loyalty in a gig economy: multi-group analysis across temporary vs permanent employment status. Personnel Review, 51(9), 2162–2180. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2021-0002
[5]. Khoreva, V., & Wechtler, H. (2018). HR practices and employee performance: the mediating role of well-being. Employee Relations, 40(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2017-0191
[6]. Kim, S., Chai, D. S., Kim, J., Kim, S., & Song, Y. (2021). Between Work Conditions and Job Outcomes: Testing a Nomological Network of Life Satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09971-1
[7]. Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and Well-Being in the Workplace: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500305
[8]. Liu, J., Siu, O. L., & Shi, K. (2010). Transformational leadership and employee well-being: The mediating role of trust in the leader and self-efficacy. Applied Psychology, 59(3), 454–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00407.x
[9]. Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H., & Zhang, C. (2015). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1990
[10]. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1
[11]. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Personal Expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic Enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
[12]. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
[13]. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719
[14]. Warr, P. (1990). The measurement of well‐being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00521.x
[15]. Voorde, K. Van De, Paauwe, J., & Veldhoven, M. Van. (2012). Employee Well‐Being and the HRM - Organizational Performance Relationship: A Review of Quantitative Studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2370.2011.00322.X
[16]. Nielsen, K., Nielsen, M. B., Ogbonnaya, C., Känsälä, M., Saari, E., & Isaksson, K. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work and Stress, 31(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463
[17]. Arnold, K. A. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000062
[18]. Mäkikangas, A., Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., & Schaufeli, W. (2016). The longitudinal development of employee well-being: a systematic review. Work and Stress, 30(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1126870
[19]. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
[20]. Dominko, M., & Verbič, M. (2019). The Economics of Subjective Well-Being: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1973–1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0022-z
[21]. Goel, R., Singla, J., Mittal, A., & Arora, M. (2024). A decade analysis of employees’ well-being and performance while working from home: a bibliometric approach. Information Discovery and Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-03-2023-0030
[22]. Shi, J., & Antwi-Afari, M. F. (2023). Organizational leadership and employee well-being in the construction industry: a bibliometric and scientometric review. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2023-0174
[23]. Ambhore, S., & Ofori, E. K. (2023). Exploring psychological well-being in business and economics arena: A bibliometric analysis. Health Science Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1044
[24]. Elsamani, Y., Mejia, C., & Kajikawa, Y. (2023). Employee well-being and innovativeness: A multi-level conceptual framework based on citation network analysis and data mining techniques. PLoS ONE, 18(1), e 0280005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280005
[25]. Khan, A., & Nasim, S. (2024). Mapping research on the subjective well-being of knowledge workers: a systematic enquiry deploying bibliometrics. Management Review Quarterly , 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00399-5
[26]. Guerci, M., Hauff, S., & Gilardi, S. (2019). High performance work practices and their associations with health, happiness and relational well-being: Are there any tradeoffs. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(2), 329–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1695647
[27]. Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
[28]. Khanra, S., Dhir, A., Parida, V., & Kohtamäki, M. (2021). Servitization research: A review and bibliometric analysis of past achievements and future promises. Journal of Business Research, 131, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.056
[29]. Perez-vega, R., Hopkinson, P., Singhal, A., & Mariani, M. M. (2022). From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research. Journal of Business Research, 151, 1–16.
[30]. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
[31]. Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 149(3), 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3
[32]. Wang, Z., Glänzel, W., & Chen, Y. (2020). The impact of preprints in Library and Information Science: an analysis of citations, usage and social attention indicators. Scientometrics, 125(2), 1403–1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03612-4
[33]. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
[34]. Di Vaio, A., Hasan, S., Palladino, R., Profita, F., & Mejri, I. (2021). Understanding knowledge hiding in business organizations: A bibliometric analysis of research trends, 1988–2020. Journal of Business Research, 134, 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.040
[35]. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands-Resources Theory : Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
[36]. Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
[37]. Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Rhenen, W. Van. (2008). Workaholism, Burnout, and Work Engagement: Three of a Kind or Three Different Kinds of Employee Well‐being? Applied Psychology, 57(2), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1464-0597.2007.00285.X
[38]. De Jonge, J., Bosma, H., Peter, R., & Siegrist, J. (2000). Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 50(9), 1317–1327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00388-3
[39]. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141
[40]. Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J. (2006). Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.100
[41]. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Bulters, A. J. (2004). The loss spiral of work pressure, work-home interference and exhaustion: Reciprocal relations in a three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00030-7
[42]. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M., & Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0016998
[43]. Hakanen, J. J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141(2), 415–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.043
[44]. Eck, N. J. Van, & Waltman, L. (2014). Measuring Scholarly Impact. In Measuring Scholarly Impact. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8
[45]. Carnevale, J. B., & Hatak, I. (2020). Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 183–187.
[46]. Demerouti, E., Nachreiner, F., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
[47]. Slaughter, J. E., Gabriel, A. S., Ganster, M. L., Vaziri, H., & MacGowan, R. L. (2021). Getting Worse or Getting Better? Understanding the Antecedents and Consequences of Emotion Profile Transitions During COVID-19-Induced Organizational Crisis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8), 1118–1136. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000947
[48]. Andel, S. A., Shen, W., & Arvan, M. L. (2021). Depending on your own kindness: The moderating role of self-compassion on the within-person consequences of work loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(4), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/OCP0000271
[49]. Juchnowicz, M., & Kinowska, H. (2021). Employee well-being and digitalwork during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information, 12(8), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12080293
[50]. Wood, S. J., Michaelides, G., Inceoglu, I., Hurren, E. T., Daniels, K., & Niven, K. (2021). Homeworking, well-being and the COVID-19 pandemic: A diary study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147575
[51]. Yu, J., Park, J., & Hyun, S. S. (2021). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on employees’ work stress, well-being, mental health, organizational citizenship behavior, and employee-customer identification. Journal Of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(5), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1867283
[52]. Paredes, M. R., Apaolaza, V., Fernandez-Robin, C., Hartmann, P., & Yañez-Martinez, D. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on subjective mental well-being: The interplay of perceived threat, future anxiety and resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110455
[53]. Qin, Y. S., & Men, L. R. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Internal Communication on Employee Psychological Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of Employee Organizational Trust. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(4), 1197–1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884221081838
[54]. Kubilienė, L., Griciūtė, A., Miglinė, V., Kukulskienė, M., Stankūnienė, A., & Žemaitienė, N. (2021). How does the assessment of work organization during the COVID-19 pandemic relate to changes in the well-being of health system workers? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 8202.
[55]. Lamprinou, V. D. I., Tasoulis, K., & Kravariti, F. (2021). The impact of servant leadership and perceived organisational and supervisor support on job burnout and work–life balance in the era of teleworking and COVID-19. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42(7), 1071–1088. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2020-0526
[56]. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[57]. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
[58]. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
[59]. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2021.114662
[60]. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
[61]. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512353
[62]. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
[63]. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the facilitation of Intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
[64]. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. (Vol. 55, Issue 1). American Psychological Association.
[65]. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.
[66]. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
[67]. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1109/NETWKS.2008.4763690
[68]. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901
[69]. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An Interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
[70]. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
[71]. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
[72]. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
[73]. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308.
[74]. Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.81.2.123
[75]. Kaushal, N., Kaurav, R. P. S., Sivathanu, B., & Kaushik, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence and HRM: identifying future research Agenda using systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), 455–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00249-2
[76]. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
[77]. Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2019). Daily strengths use and employee well‐being: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 144–168.
[78]. Ilies, R., Aw, S. S. Y., & Pluut, H. (2015). Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1071422
[79]. Holman, D. J., Axtell, C. M., Sprigg, C. A., Totterdell, P., & Wall, T. D. (2010). The mediating role of job characteristics in job redesign interventions: A serendipitous quasi-experiment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.631
[80]. Noblet, A. J., & Rodwell, J. J. (2009). Integrating job stress and social exchange theories to predict employee strain in reformed public sector contexts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun019
[81]. Lapierre, L. M., & Allen, T. D. (2006). Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.169
[82]. Diefendorff, J. M., Greguras, G. J., & Fleenor, J. (2016). Perceived Emotional Demands-Abilities Fit. Applied Psychology, 65(1), 2–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12034
[83]. Peng, K. Z., Wong, C. S., & Che, H. S. (2010). The missing link between emotional demands and exhaustion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(7), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011075300
[84]. Pagán-Castaño, E., Maseda-Moreno, A., & Santos-Rojo, C. (2020). Wellbeing in work environments. Journal of Business Research, 115, 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.007
[85]. Sonnentag, S. (2015). Dynamics of Well-Being. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111347
[86]. Hauff, S., Felfe, J., & Klug, K. (2020). High-performance work practices, employee well-being, and supportive leadership: spillover mechanisms and boundary conditions between HRM and leadership behavior. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(10), 2109–2137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1841819
[87]. Adams, B. G., Meyers, M. C., & Sekaja, L. (2020). Positive leadership: Relationships with Employee Inclusion, Discrimination, and Well‐being. Applied Psychology, 69(4), 1145–1173.
[88]. Keller, A. C., Meier, L. L., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2020). Please wait until I am done! Longitudinal effects of work interruptions on employee well-being. Work and Stress, 34(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1579266