Open Journal Systems

Qualitative exploration in mainstreaming classroom inclusivity through the lenses of anti-bias education (ABE)

Mary Joy B. Gelizon

Article ID: 3233
Vol 9, Issue 11, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 70 (Abstract) 48 (PDF)

Abstract

Inclusive education ensures that every learner has access to a supportive and responsive learning environment, where their unique needs are recognized and addressed. By embracing diversity, inclusive education encourages a sense of belonging, self-worth, and social cohesion among the stakeholders. However, Philippine basic education is lagging when it comes to implementing inclusive education. Hence, this paper explored the context of mainstreaming classroom inclusivity through the lenses of Anti-bias Education (ABE). Elementary teachers (n=16) were purposively sampled to be interviewed about their experiences in mainstreaming inclusive classrooms. Narratives were extracted from transcripts and labeled as reflexive themes. Findings indicated that a strong professional identity rooted in care, empathy, and respect for diversity enables teachers to advocate for inclusive practices. Teachers with a well-defined sense of identity are more likely to challenge biases, encourage respect for differences, and create positive learning experiences for students with special needs. Instructional strategies used by teachers in inclusive settings are shaped by their identity and perceptions of what works best for students. These strategies include differentiated instruction, individualized support, and the use of adaptive teaching methods to meet different learning needs, including personalized learning plans, flexible grouping, and project-based learning to ensure all students can engage meaningfully with the learning content. Teachers who perceive inclusive education positively tend to be more open to embracing new teaching strategies, seek additional resources, and actively engage with students with special needs. However, challenges such as inadequate training, limited resources, and large class sizes can lead to feelings of frustration among teachers, especially if they feel unsupported. Conversely, when teachers perceive institutional support, such as ongoing professional development and encouragement from school leadership, they are more likely to adopt inclusive practices and feel empowered to support their students effectively. Nurturing a teacher’s identity, equipping them with effective strategies, providing strong support, and shaping their perceptions of inclusion are profound for policymakers and school administrators. From the core of ABE, these elements contribute to a more inclusive, equitable, and supportive educational environment for students with special needs.


Keywords

anti-bias education; inclusive education; institutional support; student-centered learning

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Khakimov, S., & Choriyeva, V. (2023). THE PLACE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN MODERN EDUCATIONAL PROCESSES.Евразийский журнал предпринимательства и педагогики, 1(1), 116-118.

2. Halawa, Y., & Salmi, H. (2024). INCLUSIVE EDUCATION STRATEGIES IN IMPROVING ACCESS AND QUALITY OF LEARNING FOR STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Kearifan Lokal, 4(3), 174-189.

3. Dewi, A. E. R. (2024). Effectiveness of Implementing Inclusive Education: Challenges and Opportunities in Culturally Diverse Classrooms. Journal of Pedagogi, 1(3), 1-7.

4. Imaniah, I., & Fitria, N. (2018). Inclusive education for students with disability. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 42, p. 00039). EDP Sciences.

5. United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund. (2022). UNICEF annual report 2022. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/reports/unicef-annual-report-2022

6. Ludovico, C., Robinson, A. & Hakeem, B. (2022). Cost of Raising Children with Disabilities in the Philippines. United Nations Children’s Fund, Mandaluyong.

7. Arzadon, M., Asis, R., Salao, V., Tolentino, J., A. (2022). A Beacon of Hope for Filipino Public School Children: RA 11650. Philippine Association of Speech-Language Pathologists [Online]. https://pasp.org.ph/Articles/12759986

8. Cordero Jr, D. A. (2024). Children With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in the Philippines: Challenges and Interventions. Global Pediatric Health, 11, 2333794X241240955.

9. Paunan, J. C. (2023). Gatchalian: Inclusive education law for learners with disabilities must be fully enforced. Philippine Information Agency [Online]. https://mirror.pia.gov.ph/news/2023/04/03/gatchalian-inclusive-education-law-for-learners-with-disabilities-must-be-fully-enforced.

10. Bajenio, D. R. G., Cagape, W. E., Caduyac, J. M., Gallego, N. D., & Gadingan, R. F. (2023). Teaching Accommodations: The Experiences of Teachers Handling Learners with Hearing Impairment, 126(1), 17-17.

11. Macabenta, J. M., Manubag, C. V., Tabañag, J. C., Villegas, N. B., Villegas, T. M., & Cabanilla Jr, A. (2023). Inclusive education: Lived experiences of 21st century teachers in the Philippines. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 11(4).

12. Abina, I. L. S., Loquinario, E. M., Malaya, L. J. P., Belano, J., & Cagape, W. E. (2022). Special Education Teachers' Job Satisfaction and Employee Retention. International Journal of Research Publications, 115(1).

13. Miña, A. (2024). The Lived Experiences of Special Education Teachers in Teaching Inclusive Education. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(10), 1072-1090.

14. Moses, J. A. (2024). Better Together: Expanding Ideas of Anti-Bias Education Through Early Childhood Educator Professional Development (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University).

15. Vittrup, B. (2016). Early Childhood Teachers' Approaches to Multicultural Education & Perceived Barriers to Disseminating Anti-Bias Messages. Multicultural Education, 23, 37-41.

16. Caine, C. (2023). Empowering Early Learners: An Exploration of Anti-Bias Education in Early Learning Environments. ProQuest LLC.

17. Carnahan, S., Trohn, C., Burkley, C., & Doyle, D. T. (2024). Teaching Fairness in Preschool: Evaluating the Steps in an Anti-Bias Education. Precollege Philosophy and Public Practice.

18. Bennett, C. L. (1999). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

19. Sharek, C. (2023). Inclusive Education for All: Identifying Teacher Beliefs About Working With Students With Disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University).

20. Lorenzo-Lledó, A., Lorenzo Lledó, G., Lledó, A., & Pérez-Vázquez, E. (2024). Inclusive education at university: a scientific mapping analysis. Quality & Quantity, 58(2), 1603-1627.

21. Paseka, A., & Schwab, S. (2020). Parents’ attitudes towards inclusive education and their perceptions of inclusive teaching practices and resources. European journal of special needs education, 35(2), 254-272.

22. Hyassat, M., Al-Bakar, A., Al-Makahleh, A., & al-Zyoud, N. (2024). Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Parental Involvement in Inclusive Education. Education Sciences, 14(3), 294.

23. Ainscow, M., Slee, R., & Best, M. (2019). The Salamanca statement: 25 years on. International Journal of inclusive education, 23(7-8), 671-676.

24. Hernández-Torrano, D., Somerton, M., & Helmer, J. (2022). Mapping research on inclusive education since Salamanca Statement: a bibliometric review of the literature over 25 years. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(9), 893-912.

25. Adjei, E. S., Osei, E., Edusei, A. K., & Nakua, E. K. (2024). A systematic review of academic performance of Children with Disabilities (CWDs) in inclusive education schools in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Heliyon.

26. Dell’Anna, S., Pellegrini, M., Ianes, D., & Vivanet, G. (2022). Learning, social, and psychological outcomes of students with moderate, severe, and complex disabilities in inclusive education: A systematic review. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(6), 2025-2041.

27. Justice, L. M., Logan, J. A., Lin, T. J., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2014). Peer effects in early childhood education: Testing the assumptions of special-education inclusion. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1722-1729.

28. Nilholm, C. (2021). Research about inclusive education in 2020–How can we improve our theories in order to change practice?. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(3), 358-370.

29. Van Hove, G. (2015). Learning to read in regular and special schools: A follow up study of students with Down Syndrome. Life Span and Disability, 18(1), 7-39.

30. Somad, A., Haryanto, S., & Darsinah, D. (2024). Inclusive Education for Special Needs Students in Indonesia: A Review of Policies, Practices and Challenges. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 9(2), 1024-1035.

31. Prathama, S. K., Kusumaningrum, S. R., & Dewi, R. S. I. (2022). Problems With The Implementation Of Inclusive Education Policies For Students With Special Needs In Public Schools. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(4), 986-995.

32. Cologon, K. (2014). Preventing inclusion? Inclusive early childhood education and the option to exclude. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15(4), 378-381.

33. Jusni, E., Fonsén, E., & Ahtiainen, R. (2023). An Inclusive Early Childhood Education Setting According to Practitioners’ Experiences in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1043.

34. Hikmat, H. (2022). Implementation of inclusive education for children with special needs in Indonesia. EDUKATIF: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(2), 1888-1896.

35. Maguvhe, M. O., & Masuku, M. M. (Eds.). (2023). Using African Epistemologies in Shaping Inclusive Education Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan.

36. Florian, L. (2019). On the necessary co-existence of special and inclusive education. International journal of inclusive education, 23(7-8), 691-704.

37. Pit-ten Cate, I. M., Markova, M., Krischler, M., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2018). Promoting Inclusive Education: The Role of Teachers' Competence and Attitudes. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 15(1), 49-63.

38. Allam, F. C., & Martin, M. M. (2021). Issues and Challenges in Special Education: A Qualitative Analysis from Teacher's Perspective. Southeast Asia Early Childhood, 10(1), 37-49.

39. Jugan, M. B., Reyes, N. R. T. D., Pepito Jr, J. C., Capuno, R. G., Pinili, L. C., Cabigon, A. F. P., ... & Mamites, I. O. (2024). Attitudes of Elementary Teachers towards Inclusive Education of Learners with Special Education Needs in a Public School. Online Submission, 48(1), 2173-2202.

40. Nunez, R., & Rosales, S. (2021). Inclusive Education: Perceptions and attitudes among Filipino high school teachers. The Asian ESP, 17(6.1), 151-172.

41. Gonzaga, N. G., Plan, L. D., & Aguipo, M. M. (2024). READINESS AND CHALLENGES OF GENERAL EDUCATION TEACHERS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION. Russian Law Journal, 12(1).

42. Lapeña, G., Balamad, M. S., Dano, C., Villanueva, J., Padillo, A., & Simogan, M. J. A. (2023). Availability of Teaching and learning resources on the implementation of inclusive education. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(2), 85-91.

43. Arias, C. R., Calago, C. N. S., Calungsod, H. F. B., Delica, M. A., Fullo, M. E., & Cabanilla Jr, A. B. (2023). Challenges and Implementation of Inclusive Education in Selected Asian Countries: A Meta-Synthesis. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(2), 512-534.

44. Derman-Sparks, L., Edwards, J. O., & Goins, C. M. (2020). Anti-Bias education for young children & ourselves (Second Ed.). National Association for the Education of Young Children.

45. Bal, Ç. B., & Akman, B. (2024). The impacts of culture and diversity considering anti-bias education: preschool teachers’ views and needs. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1-19.

46. Carter, P. L., & Welner, K. G. (Eds.). (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199982981.001.0001.

47. Woo, A. (2024). The Implementation of Anti-Bias Education in K-12 Public Schools.

48. Carter, P. L. (2013). Student and school cultures and the opportunity gap. Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance, 143-155.

49. Marshall, T. R., & Rodick, W. H. (2023). The Search for More Complex Racial and Ethnic Representation in Grade School Books. Education Trust.

50. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

51. Diamond, L. A. (2021). Implicitly Biased Diversity: An Ideological Aporia in Digital White Space (Master's thesis, San Diego State University).

52. Lewis, A. E., & Diamond, J. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.

53. McKenzie, K. B., & Scheurich, J. J. (2004). Equity traps: A useful construct for preparing principals to lead schools that are successful with racially diverse students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 601-632.

54. Lin, M., Lake, V. E., & Rice, D. (2008). Teaching anti-bias curriculum in teacher education programs: What and how. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(2), 187-200.

55. Margas, N. (2023). Inclusive classroom climate development as the cornerstone of inclusive school building: review and perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1171204.

56. Mastur, M. (2023). Multicultural Classroom Management of Students in Elementary Schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 5131-5139.

57. Naz, F. L., Afzal, A., & Khan, M. H. N. (2023). Challenges and benefits of multicultural education for promoting equality in diverse classrooms. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 511-522.

58. Squire, D. D., Booth, A., & Arnold, B. (2023). Creating Inclusive Classrooms: Toward Collective and Diverse Intersectional Success. In Difficult Subjects (pp. 178-192). Routledge.

59. Plascencia-Carrizosa, B. L. A. (2021). EXPLORING ANTI-BIAS EDUCATION IN ECE CLASSROOMS AND THE BARRIERS AND SUPPORTS TEACHERS EXPERIENCE. Kent State University College.

60. Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).

61. Reyes, R. B. D., Tongkoh, A. L., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). Transitional Challenges And Factors Affecting English-Speaking Learners In Learning The Filipino Language. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 1720-1744.

62. Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2),1541-1541.

63. Chavez, J. V., & Del Prado, R. T. (2023). Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality. In Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 55-71.

64. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). What is exploration. Exploratory research in the social sciences, 48, 2-17.

65. Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.

66. Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science, 2(1), 17-41.

67. Asika, N. (2004). Research methodology: A process approach. Mukugamu & Brothers Enterprises, Lagos.

68. Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of computer information systems, 54(1), 11-22.

69. Subedi, K. R. (2021). Determining the Sample in Qualitative Research. Online Submission, 4, 1-13.

70. Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.

71. Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).

72. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

73. Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8-15.

74. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

75. Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45.

76. Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335.

77. Hardon, A., Hodgkin, C., & Fresle, D. (2004). How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers. In How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers (pp. 89-89).

78. Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001.

79. Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.

80. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (Eds.). (2020). Qualitative research in health care (pp. 111-133). Oxford, UK:: Wiley-Blackwell.

81. Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research Methods in Social Relations. London: Thomson Learning. Inc. UK.

82. Monday, T. U. (2020). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, 1(1), 15-24.

83. Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative report, 21(5).

84. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

85. Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1), 1-7.

86. Miller, L. M., & Carpenter, C. L. (2009). Altruistic leadership strategies in coaching: A case study of Jim Tressel of the Ohio State University. Strategies, 22(4), 9-12.

87. Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Semistructured interviews. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, 232.

88. Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 21(3), 63-64. Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.

89. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.

90. Schensul, S. L., Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires (Vol. 2). Rowman Altamira.

91. Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative research in accounting & management, 8(3), 238-264.

92. Benlahcene, A., & Ramdani, A. (2020). The process of qualitative interview: Practical insights for novice researchers. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 406-413.

93. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and psychotherapy research, 21(1), 37-47.

94. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology, 9(1), 3.

95. Shaw, R. (2010). Embedding reflexivity within experiential qualitative psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 7(3), 233-243.

96. Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2021). Essentials of thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000238-000.

97. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2, 57-71.

98. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

99. Langridge, D. (2004). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Harlow: Pearson.

100. Finlay, L. (2021). Thematic analysis: the ‘good’, the ‘bad’ and the ‘ugly’. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 11, 103-116.

101. Chavez, J. V., Garil, B. A., Padrique, C. B., Askali, S. T., & Indama, A. C. (2024). Assessing innovative and responsive young leaders in public service: lens from community clientele. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9).

102. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L., & Jenkinson, E. (2023). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research (pp. 19-38). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

103. Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Reflexive thematic analysis. In Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 430-441). Edward Elgar Publishing.

104. Cummins, J. (2009). Pedagogies of choice: Challenging coercive relations of power in classrooms and communities. International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism, 12(3), 261-271.

105. Thyness, H. (2024). Teachers’ construction of their roles and responsibilities for inclusive language practices with multilingual parents-a case from Norway. Language and Education, 38(5), 800-817.

106. Britzman, D. P. (2012). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Suny Press.

107. Trede, F., Macklin, R., & Bridges, D. (2012). Professional identity development: A review of the higher education literature. tudies in higher education, 37(3), 365-384.

108. Olsen, A. K. V., Kjær, I. G. H., & Spieler, K. S. (2024). Predictors of Professional Identity among Early Childhood Teacher Students. Education Sciences, 14(6), 589.

109. Harris, S. R., & Shelswell, N. (2001, June). Building bridges across the digital divide: supporting the development of technological fluency in Adult Basic Education learners. In Proceedings of the FACE Annual Conference (pp. 42-51).

110. Chow, W. S. E., de Bruin, K., & Sharma, U. (2023). A scoping review of perceived support needs of teachers for implementing inclusive education. nternational Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-20.

111. Coward, B. E., Feagin, J. R., & Williams Jr, J. A. (1974). The culture of poverty debate: Some additional data. ocial problems, 1(5), 621-634.

112. Gaias, L. M. (2015). ntegrating Anti-Bias Education into the measurement of early childhood education quality. Arizona State University.

113. Goldman, S. E., & Burke, M. M. (2017). The effectiveness of interventions to increase parent involvement in special education: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. xceptionality, 5(2), 97-115.

114. Balli, D. (2016). Importance of parental involvement to meet the special needs of their children with disabilities in regular schools. cademic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 147-152.

115. Wilder, S. (2023). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis. In Mapping the field pp. 137-157). Routledge.

116. Bingman, M. B., & Ebert, O. (2000). " I've Come a Long Way": Learner-Identified Outcomes of Participation in Adult Literacy Programs. NCSALL Reports# 13.

117. Shiffman, C. D. (2011). Making It Visible: An Exploration of How Adult Education Participation Informs Parent Involvement in Education for School-Age Children. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 5(3), 161-170.

118. Shiffman, C. D. (2013). Locating Common Ground: An Exploration of Adult Educator Practices that Support Parent Involvement for School-Age Children. School Community Journal, 23(2), 185-206.

119. Barta, J., & Winn, T. (1996). Involving Parents in Creating Anti-Bias Classrooms. Children Today, 24(1), 28-30.

120. Derman-Sparks, L., & Ramsey, P. (2000). A framework for relevant ‘multicultural’and antibias education in 21st century. Approaches to Early Childhood Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

121. Smith, J. R. (2023). The Impact of Community College Anti-racist Learning Communities on Instructional Pedagogy and Interactions. Fielding Graduate University.

122. Turi, J. A., Sorooshian, S., Muhmad, F. B., & Javed, Y. (2018). Theoretical and historical prospective of organizational learning. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.28), 182-186.

123. Alcosero, A., Carcueva, H., Abasolo, M. C., Arranchado, W. M., & Cabanilla Jr, A. (2023). Preparedness of Regular Teachers in the Implementation of Inclusive Education in the Philippines: A Meta-synthesis. ISSN (Online), 2320-9364.

124. Ainscow, M. (2014). From special education to effective schools for all: Widening the agenda. The Sage handbook of special education, 171-186.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i11.3233
(70 Abstract Views, 48 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Mary Joy B. Gelizon

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.