Published
2025-02-18
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Froilyn S. Jamawadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Pro-student governance in academic institutions: Behavior shift from students' expectation versus reality on academic institution services
Froilyn S. Jamawadi
College of Computing Studies and Engineering, Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3273
Keywords: Pro-Student Governance, Academic Institutions, Behavior Shift, Students’ Expectation, Reality, Academic Institution Services
Abstract
This research explores the psychological dimensions of governance in higher education institutions, focusing on how students’ perceptions and experiences shape their behavior and engagement. Through a qualitative exploratory design, the study investigates the impact of governance practices on student trust, motivation, and participation, drawing on Social Comparison Theory, Reactance Theory, and Attribution Theory. The study, conducted with 40 students in the Philippines, reveals that students perceive governance as effective when it is transparent, inclusive, and responsive to their needs. Conversely, rigid and unresponsive governance leads to frustration, disengagement, and a sense of alienation. The findings highlight the importance of aligning governance practices with student expectations to foster a supportive and thriving academic environment. Future research could expand on these findings by incorporating perspectives from other stakeholders, such as faculty and administrators, to further refine and enrich our understanding of effective governance in higher education.
References
[1]. 1.Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/9781009024563
[2]. 2.Amerstorfer CM and Freiin von Münster-Kistner C (2021) Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Front. Psychol. 12:713057. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
[3]. 3.Lizzio, Alfred & Wilson, Keithia. (2009). Student Participation in University Governance: the Role Conceptions and Sense of Efficacy of Student Representatives on Departmental Committees. Studies in Higher Education. 34. 10.1080/03075070802602000.
[4]. 4.Caliskan, Ferhat & Idug, Yavuz & Uvet, Hasan & Gligor, Nichole & Kayaalp, Alper. (2024). Social comparison theory: A review and future directions. Psychology & Marketing. 41. 2823-2840. 10.1002/mar.22087.
[5]. 5.Hameduddin, T., & Engbers, T. (2022). Leadership and public service motivation: a systematic synthesis International Public Management Journal, 25(1), 86-119.
[6]. 6.Chavez JV, Garil BA,Padirque CB, et al. Assessing innovative and responsive young leaders in public service: lens from community clientele. Environment and Social Psychology 2024; 9(9): 2876. Doi: 10.59429/esp.v9i9.2876 innovative leadership; public service; responsive leadership; youth leadership
[7]. 7.Steindl C, Jonas E, Sittenthaler S, Traut-Mattausch E, Greenberg J. Understanding Psychological Reactance: New Developments and Findings. Z Psychol. 2015;223(4):205-214. Doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000222. PMID: 27453805; PMCID: PMC4675534.
[8]. 8.Peter, E. R., Laura, A., & Zoltán, R. (2024). Participation of Students in all Areas of Governance in Higher Education Institutions in the Light of the Literature – A Systematic Review, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 12(2), 437-449.
[9]. 9.Weiner, Bernard. (2010). Attribution Theory. 10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0098.
[10]. 10.H. Sulaiman, Aryan & Abdullah, Saman. (2024). The Use of Active Learning Strategies to Foster Effective Teaching in Higher Education Institutions. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences. 10.21271/zjhs.28.2.11.
[11]. 11.Chanda, Thelma & Madoda, Derick & Sain, Zohaib & Chisebe, Sylvester. (2024). Good Governance: A Pillar to National Development. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. 5. 6215-6223.
[12]. 12.Rosenbaum, James & Becker, Kelly & Cepa, Kennan & Gietl, Claudia. (2016). Turning the Question Around: Do Colleges Fail to Meet Students’ Expectations?. Research in Higher Education. 57. 10.1007/s11162-015-9398-3.
[13]. 13.Duffy, Gavin & Elwood, Jannette. (2013). The perspectives of ‘disengaged’ students in the 14–19 phase on motivations and barriers to learning within the contexts of institutions and classrooms. London Review of Education. 11. 112-126. 10.1080/14748460.2013.799808.
[14]. 14.Chavez, J.V. (2020). Academic and Health Insecurities of Indigent Students during Pandemic: Study on Adaptive Strategies under Learning Constraints. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences. 16(3): 74-81 Health, Education COVID-19 pandemic, Indigent students, Academic-health insecurities, Adaptive strategies
[15]. 15.Kendra Cherry (2024) How Social Comparison Theory Influences Our Views on Ourselves To compare or not to compare? Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-social-comparison-process-2795872
[16]. 16.Ruijs, Nienke & Peetsma, Thea. (2009). Effects of inclusion on students with and without special educational needs reviewed. Educational Research Review. 4. 67-79. 10.1016/j.edurev.2009.02.002.
[17]. 17.Allen, Kelly-Ann & Boyle, Christopher. (2023). School Belonging and Student Engagement: The Critical Overlaps, Similarities, and Implications for Student Outcomes. 10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_7.
[18]. 18.Zhang, Qin & Sapp, David. (2013). Psychological Reactance and Resistance Intention in the Classroom: Effects of Perceived Request Politeness and Legitimacy, Relationship Distance, and Teacher Credibility. Communication Education. 62. 10.1080/03634523.2012.727008.
[19]. 19.Vinokur E, Yomtovian A, Marom MS, Itzchakov G and Baron L (2024) Social-based learning and leadership in school: conflict management training for holistic, relational conflict resolution. Front. Soc. Psychol. 2:1412968. Doi: 10.3389/frsps.2024.1412968
[20]. 20.Burde, D., Kapit, A., Wahl, R. L., Guven, O., and Skarpeteig, M. I. (2017). Education in emergencies: a review of theory and research. Rev. Educ. Res. 87, 619–658. Doi: 10.3102/0034654316671594
[21]. 21.Ertürk, R. (2022). Conflict in schools: a qualitative study. Particip. Educ. Res. 9, 251–270. Doi: 10.17275/per.22.14.9.1
[22]. 22.Marengo, D., Jungert, T., Iotti, N. O., Settanni, M., Thornberg, R., and Longobardi, C. (2018). Conflictual student–teacher relationship, emotional and behavioral problems, prosocial behavior, and their associations with bullies, victims, and bullies/victims. Educ. Psychol. 38, 1201–1217. Doi: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1481199
[23]. 23.Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. J. Sustain. Dev. Educ. Res. 2, 9–20. Doi: 10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12266
[24]. 24.Blank, S. (2020). Managing Organizational Conflict. Jefferson: McFarland
[25]. 25.Paul Main (2023) Attribution Theory . Retrieved from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/attribution-theory
[26]. 26.Supriadi, D., Usman, H., Jabar, A., & Widyastuti, I. (2021). Good school governance: An approach to principal’s decision-making quality in Indonesian vocational school. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 6(4), 796-831. DOI: 10.30828/real/2021.4.2
[27]. 27.Culduz, Murat. (2023). The Impact of Educational Leadership in Improving the Learning Experience. 10.4018/978-1-6684-8332-9.ch008.
[28]. 28.Cheong BC (2024) Transparency and accountability in AI systems: safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making. Front. Hum. Dyn. 6:1421273. Doi: 10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273
[29]. 29.Kahu, Ella & Nelson, Karen. (2017). Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development. 37. 1-14. 10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
[30]. 30.Castro FLT, Ventura BLO, Estajal, RS, et al. 2024.Teachers handling multiple subject areas: difficulties and adaptive attributes in the delivery of instructions. Environment and Social Psychology 2024; 9(9): 2520. Doi: 10.59429/esp.v9i9.2520 emotional adaptation; instructional mastery; instructional preparation; K-12 program; out-of-field teaching
[31]. 31.Velasco, C. (2020). Senior high school teachers toward handling multiple subject matter. Northern Naguilian National High School
[32]. 32.Ruslin, et. Al. “Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies.” IOSR Journal of Research &Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(01), (2022): pp. 22-29
[33]. 33.Savellon KIS, Asiri MS, Chavez JV. 2024. Public speaking woes of academic leaders: resources and alternative ways to improve speaking with audience. Environment and Social Psychology 2024; 9(9): 2871. Doi: 10.59429/esp.v9i9.2871 academic leaders; comping mechanism; professional resource; public speaking anxiety
[34]. 34.Trowler, Vicki. (2010). Student Engagement Literature Review.
[35]. 35.Mat, Norliana & Jamaludin, Khairul. (2024). Effectiveness of Practices and Applications of Student-Centered Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 13. 10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/21733.
[36]. 36.Zitha, Innocent & Mokganya, Georgina & Sinthumule, Orifha. (2023). Innovative Strategies for Fostering Student Engagement and Collaborative Learning among Extended Curriculum Programme Students. Education Sciences. 13. 1196. 10.3390/educsci13121196.
[37]. 37.Elise Ameloot, Tijs Rotsaert, Thomas Ameloot, Bart Rienties, Tammy Schellens, Supporting students’ basic psychological needs and satisfaction in a blended learning environment through learning analytics, Computers & Education, Volume 209, 2024,104949, ISSN 0360-1315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104949