Investigating the psychological and social influences on leadership formation in educational settings
Vol 10, Issue 1, 2025, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 31 (Abstract) 12 (PDF)
Abstract
This study employs qualitative research methods to explore the factors influencing the development of student leadership among university students. Through the use of open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, we obtained in-depth insights into participants’ experiences and perspectives. This qualitative approach facilitates a comprehensive examination of key influences, including emotional intelligence, family support, educational environments, and hands-on leadership experiences. Thematic analysis identified four major themes: pathways to acquiring leadership experience, essential leadership competencies, external influences on leadership development, and areas for improvement in leadership training programs. The findings highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of leadership growth, emphasizing the critical roles of emotional intelligence and practical opportunities in cultivating effective leadership among students. This research offers valuable insights to inform leadership development initiatives in higher education contexts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Schwab, K., & Zahidi, S., The future of jobs report 2020. 2020.
2. Leal Filho, W., et al., Sustainability leadership in higher education institutions: An overview of challenges. Sustainability, 2020. 12(9): p. 3761.
3. Johnson, D., R. Johnson, and K. Smith, Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 1998. 47.
4. Creswell, J.W. and C.N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2016: SAGE Publications.
5. Day, C., Q. Gu, and P. Sammons, The impact of leadership on student outcomes:How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2016. 52(2): p. 221-258.
6. Bronfenbrenner, U., Ecological systems theory, in Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 3. 2000, American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, US. p. 129-133.
7. Kiersch, C. and J. Peters, Leadership from the inside out: student leadership development within authentic leadership and servant leadership frameworks. Journal of Leadership Education, 2017. 16: p. 148-168.
8. Franco, P.F. and D.A. DeLuca, Learning through action: creating and implementing a strategy game to foster innovative thinking in higher education. Simulation and Gaming, 2019. 50(1): p. 23–43.
9. Mendo-Lázaro, S., et al., Cooperative team learning and the development of social skills in higher education: the variables involved. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018. 9.
10. Virtanen, A. and P. Tynjälä, Factors explaining the learning of generic skills: a study of university students’ experiences. Teaching in Higher Education, 2019. 24(7): p. 880-894.
11. Day, C., Q. Gu, and P. Sammons, The impact of leadership on student outcomes: how successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2016. 52(2): p. 221-258.
12. Mok, K.H. and J. Jiang, Massification of higher education and challenges for graduate employment and social mobility: East Asian experiences and sociological reflections. International Journal of Educational Development, 2018. 63: p. 44-51.
13. Fusarelli, B.C., L.D. Fusarelli, and F. Riddick, Planning for the future: leadership development and succession planning in education. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2018. 13(3): p. 286-313.
14. Karakose, T., et al., Evaluating the intellectual structure of the knowledge base on transformational school leadership: A bibliometric and science mapping analysis. Education Sciences, 2023. 13(7): p. 708.
15. Karakose, T., et al., Understanding the intellectual structure and evolution of distributed leadership in schools: A science mapping-based bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 2022. 14(24): p. 16779.
16. Karakose, T., et al., The development and evolution of digital leadership: A bibliometric mapping approach-based study. Sustainability, 2022. 14(23): p. 16171.
17. Yirci, R., et al., A bibliometric review of the knowledge base on mentoring for the professional development of school administrators. Sustainability, 2023. 15(4): p. 3027.
18. Özbağ, G.K., The role of personality in leadership: five factor personality traits and ethical leadership. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016. 235: p. 235-242.
19. Van Vugt, M. and C.R. von Rueden, From genes to minds to cultures: Evolutionary approaches to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 2020. 31(2): p. 101404.
20. Gilar-Corbí, R., et al., Can emotional competence be taught in higher education? A randomized experimental study of an emotional intelligence training program using a multimethodological approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018. 9.
21. Flores, H.R., X. Jiang, and C.C. Manz, Intra-team conflict: the moderating effect of emotional self-leadership. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2018. 29(3): p. 424-444.
22. Ang, W.H.D., et al., The role of resilience in higher education: A meta-ethnographic analysis of students' experiences. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2021. 37(6): p. 1092-1109.
23. Douglass, R.P. and R.D. Duffy, Calling and career adaptability among undergraduate students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2015. 86: p. 58-65.
24. Skalicky, J., et al., A framework for developing and supporting student leadership in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 2020. 45(1): p. 100-116.
25. Neck, C.P. and J.D. Houghton, Two decades of self‐leadership theory and research. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2006. 21(4): p. 270-295.
26. Wang, L., et al., Assessing teamwork and collaboration in high school students:A multimethod approach. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2009. 24(2): p. 108-124.
27. Oni, A.A. and J.A. Adetoro, The effectiveness of student involvement in decisionmaking and university leadership: A comparative analysis of 12 universities in South-west Nigeria. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 2015. 3(1): p. 65-81.
28. Astin, A.W., Diversity and multiculturalism on the campus. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 1993. 25(2): p. 44-49.
29. Shertzer, J.E. and J.H. Schuh, College student perceptions of leadership: Empowering and constraining beliefs. NASPA Journal, 2004. 42(1): p. 111-131.
30. Cáceres-Reche, M.P., et al., Student leadership at the university: An explanatory model. Education Sciences, 2021. 11(11): p. 703.
31. Moore, R.J. and D.B. Ginsburg, A qualitative study of motivating factors for pharmacy student leadership. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2017. 81(6): p. 114.
32. Mozhgan, A., et al., Student leadership competencies development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011. 15: p. 1616-1620.
33. Urdan, T. and F. Pajares, Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. 2006: Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.
34. Salovey, P. and J.D. Mayer, Emotional intelligence. Imagination, cognition and personality, 1990. 9(3): p. 185-211.
35. Komives, S.R., et al., Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory. Journal of college student development, 2005. 46(6): p. 593-611.
36. Komives, S.R., et al., The Handbook for Student Leadership Development. 2011: Wiley.
37. Kezar, A., Redesigning for Collaboration within Higher Education Institutions: An Exploration into the Developmental Process. Research in Higher Education, 2005. 46: p. 831-860.
38. Astin, A., Student involvement: A development theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 1984. 40: p. 518-529.
39. Komives, S.R., et al., The handbook for student leadership development. 2011: John Wiley & Sons.
40. Fowler, F.J., Survey Research Methods. 2014: SAGE Publications.
41. Kish, L., sampling organizations and groups of unequal sizes. American Sociological Review, 1965. 30(4): p. 564-572.
42. Comrey, A.L. and H.B. Lee, A First Course in Factor Analysis. 2013: Taylor & Francis.
43. MacCallum, R.C., et al., Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1999. 4(1): p. 84-99.
44. Levitt, H.M., et al., Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 2018. 73(1): p. 26-46.
45. Braun, V. and V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006. 3(2): p. 77-101.
46. Finlay, L., “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 2002. 12(4): p. 531-545.
47. Bourke, B., Positionality: Reflecting on the research process. The Qualitative Report, 2014. 19(33): p. 1-9.
48. Larkin, M. and P. Flowers, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis : Theory, Method and Research. 2021, SAGE Publications Ltd: London.
49. Bandura, A., The self system in reciprocal determinism. American psychologist, 1978. 33(4): p. 344.
50. Bronfenbrenner, U., Ecological systems theory. 2000: American Psychological Association.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i1.3368
(31 Abstract Views, 12 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yukun Li, Ampapan Tuntinakhongul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.