Published
2025-02-14
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ammar Alomair, Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Influences of effective communication and stakeholders’ preferences on successful project delivery: Evidence from the Saudi Arabian construction sector
Ammar Alomair
Management Department, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia
Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih
Management Department, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3447
Abstract
The current study builds on Social Exchange Theory to examines the impact of communication and consideration of stakeholders’ preferences on achieving project scope in the Saudi Arabian construction sector. The research adopted a descriptive approach to investigate the relationship between effective communication practices, stakeholder engagement and achievement of project scope. A pre-tested questionnaire was successfully collected from 256 senior engineers in the private construction sector in Saudi Arabia. The findings showed that effective communication between stakeholders positively and significantly influences project delivery. Furthermore, changing project’s scope based on stakeholders’ involvement and preferences is also a key predictor of successful project delivery. The results confirm that social exchange should consider technical economic analysis as it is critical for managing communication and stakeholders’ preferences to achieve project scope. The study offers valuable insights for practitioners and policymakers regarding effective communication management. The results confirmed the value of thorough assessment of the communication climate, identification of barriers, and managing communication channels, as well as managing stakeholders’ preferences for successful project delivery.
References
[1]. 1.Ismaeil EMH, Alshamayleh H.Z., Sobaih AEE. Effective Communication Management for Mitigating Potential Risk in Construction Projects. Environment and Social Psychology 2025; 10(1):3282. doi:10.59429/esp.v10i1.3282
[2]. 2.Chassiakos, A. P., & Sakellaropoulos, S. P. (2008). A web-based system for managing construction information. Advances in Engineering Software, 39(11), 865-876.
[3]. 3.Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and management in engineering, 11(3), 241-252.
[4]. 4.Sarhan, J. G., Xia, B., Fawzia, S., & Karim, A. (2017). Lean construction implementation in the Saudi Arabian construction industry. Construction economics and building, 17(1), 46-69.
[5]. 5.Galli, B. J. (2021). Effective Strategies for Communicating and Managing Communication in a Project Team: My Perspective. International Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering, 8(1).
[6]. 6.Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Ho, M., Drew, D. S., & Chan, A. P. (2009). Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects. Journal of civil engineering and management, 15(4), 337-348.
[7]. 7.Mosly, I., & Makki, A. A. (2021). The effects of multi-sociodemographic characteristics of construction sites personnel on perceptions of safety climate-influencing factors: The construction industry in Saudi Arabia. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(4), 1674.
[8]. 8.Ismaeil, E. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2024). A Proposed Model for Variation Order Management in Construction Projects. Buildings, 14(3), 726.
[9]. 9.Aljobaly, O., & Banawi, A. (2020). Evaluation of the Saudi construction industry for adoption of building information modelling. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Human Factors in Artificial Intelligence and Social Computing, the AHFE International Conference on Human Factors, Software, Service and Systems Engineering, and the AHFE International Conference of Human Factors in Energy, July 24-28, 2019, Washington DC, USA 10 (pp. 488-498). Springer International Publishing.
[10]. 10.Gopang, R. K. M., alias Imran, Q. B., & Nagapan, S. (2020). Assessment of delay factors in Saudi Arabia railway/metro construction projects. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 11(2), 225-233.
[11]. 11.Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., & Kamalirad, S. (2021). Analysis of effective project-based communication components within primary stakeholders in construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 157-173.
[12]. 12.Alshihri, S., Al-Gahtani, K., & Almohsen, A. (2022). Risk factors that lead to time and cost overruns of building projects in Saudi Arabia. Buildings, 12(7), 902.
[13]. 13.Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological inquiry, 34(2).
[14]. 14.Affare, M. A. W. (2012). An assessment of project communication management on construction projects in Ghana (Doctoral dissertation).
[15]. 15.Jacisa, S. (2022). Stakeholder management in construction projects in the Western Cape, South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology).
[16]. 16.Cheng, E. W., Li, H., & Love, P. E. D. (2000). Establishment of critical success factors for construction partnering. Journal of management in engineering, 16(2), 84-92.
[17]. 17.Loosemore, M., & Lee, P. (2002). Communication problems with ethnic minorities in the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 20(7), 517-524.
[18]. 18.Alami, A. (2016). Why do information technology projects fail?. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 62-71.
[19]. 19.Emmitt, S., & Gorse, C. (2006). Communication in construction teams. Routledge.
[20]. 20.Newcombe, R. (2003). From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Construction management and economics, 21(8), 841-848.
[21]. 21.Chinyio, E. A., & Akintoye, A. (2008). Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK. Construction management and economics, 26(6), 591-599.
[22]. 22.Jepsen, A. L., & Eskerod, P. (2009). Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International journal of project management, 27(4), 335-343.
[23]. 23.Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE transactions on engineering management, (1), 22-27.
[24]. 24.Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management decision, 43(5), 649-660.
[25]. 25.Xue, J., Shen, G. Q., Yang, R. J., Wu, H., Li, X., Lin, X., & Xue, F. (2020). Mapping the knowledge domain of stakeholder perspective studies in construction projects: A bibliometric approach. International journal of project management, 38(6), 313-326.
[26]. 26.Srinivasan, N. P., & Dhivya, S. (2020). An empirical study on stakeholder management in construction projects. Materials Today: Proceedings, 21, 60-62.
[27]. 27.Al-Surf, M., Balabel, A., Alwetaishi, M., Abdelhafiz, A., Issa, U., Sharaky, I., ... & Al-Harthi, M. (2021). Stakeholder’s perspective on green building rating systems in Saudi Arabia: The case of LEED, Mostadam, and the SDGs. Sustainability, 13(15), 8463.
[28]. 28.Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., & Kamalirad, S. (2021). Analysis of effective project-based communication components within primary stakeholders in construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 157-173.
[29]. 29.Suleiman, A. (2022). Causes and effects of poor communication in the construction industry in the MENA region. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 28(5), 365-376.
[30]. 30.Taofeeq, D. M., Adeleke, A. Q., & Hassan, A. K. (2019). Factors Affecting Contractors risk attitude from Malaysia construction industry perspective: Factors Affecting Contractors risk attitude from Malaysia construction industries perspective. Social Science and Humanities Journal (SSHJ), 1281-1298.
[31]. 31.Ling, F. Y. Y., & Ma, Y. (2014). Effect of competency and communication on project outcomes in cities in China. Habitat International, 44, 324-331.
[32]. 32.Mesa, H. A., Molenaar, K. R., & Alarcón, L. F. (2016). Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1089-1101.
[33]. 33.Harjono, R., Gusfa, H., & Bintoro, B. P. K (2021). Effect of IPD Implementation and Communication between Contractor and Owner on the Success of a Building Project in Jakarta Barat. vol, 8, 51-57.
[34]. 34.Tipili, L. G., Ojeba, P. O., & Ilyasu, M. S. (2014, July). Evaluating the effects of communication in construction project delivery in Nigeria. In Proceedings of the multi-disciplinary academic conference on sustainable development (Vol. 2, pp. 10-11). Bauchi: Multi-disciplinary Academic Conference on Sustainable Development, Federal Polytechnic.
[35]. 35.Fathalizadeh, A., Hosseini, M. R., Vaezzadeh, S. S., Edwards, D. J., Martek, I., & Shooshtarian, S. (2022). Barriers to sustainable construction project management: the case of Iran. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(3), 717-739.
[36]. 36.Oke, A., & Idiagbon-Oke, M. (2010). Communication channels, innovation tasks and NPD project outcomes in innovation-driven horizontal networks. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 442-453.
[37]. 37.Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International journal of project management, 23(4), 321-328.