Published
2025-04-24
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Feifei Chen, Jianpeng Li, Hsin-Chang Yu, Pengfei Chen, Yingying Xia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
The impact of fluency in college students’ leisure sports on happiness: The moderating role of leisure satisfaction
Feifei Chen
1 Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, 10210, Thailand 2 Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China
Jianpeng Li
Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China
Hsin-Chang Yu
Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, 10210, Thailand
Pengfei Chen
Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, 10210, Thailand
Yingying Xia
Ningbo City College of Vocational Technology, Ningbo, 315194, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i4.3594
Keywords: college students; leisure sports activities; fluency; leisure satisfaction; happiness
Abstract
Background: As a key way to promote the physical and mental health of college students, the relationship between leisure sports and happiness has become the focus of social attention.
Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of college students' fluency in leisure sports activities on their happiness, and explore the moderating effect of leisure satisfaction.
Results: The questionnaire survey method was adopted to select 589 college students by stratified sampling. The data were collected using the fluency scale, happiness scale and leisure satisfaction scale of leisure sports activities, and statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS software. The results show that fluency positively predicted happiness (β=.510, p<.001). Furthermore, leisure satisfaction significantly moderates this relationship, with higher leisure satisfaction amplifying the positive effect of fluency on happiness (ΔR² =.117, p < .01).
Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of fostering fluency states in leisure sports to enhance college students' happiness, particularly when coupled with high leisure satisfaction. Universities and sports organizers should create a positive sports culture atmosphere and build a social psychological environment supporting college students to participate in sports activities, so as to help college students gain a sense of fluency in leisure sports activities, improve their happiness, and promote their physical and mental health. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
References
[1]. 1.Limone, P., & Toto, G. A. (2022). Factors that predispose undergraduates to mental issues:A cumulative literature review for future research perspectives. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article e831349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.831349
[2]. 2.Kim, J., Kim, J., Han, A., & Nguyen, M. C. (2021). Leisure time physical activity, social support, health perception,a nd mental health among women with breast cancer. Leisure Studies, 40(3), 352-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2020.1869290
[3]. 3.Rechter, E., & Sverdlik, N. (2016). Adolescents'and teachers'outlook on leisure activities: Personal values as a unifying framework. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.095
[4]. 4.Spracklen, K. (2014). Leisure studies education: Historical trends and pedagogical futures in the United Kingdom and beyond. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 15, 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2014.03.002
[5]. 5.Goldstein, J. D., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (2006). Promoting sportsmanship in youth sports: Perspectives from sport psychology. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 77(7), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2006.10597902
[6]. 6.Leech, T., & Marston, R. (2016). Promoting physical activity beyond physical education by facilitating student-designed games. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 87(9), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2016.1226218
[7]. 7.Scrabis-Fletcher, K., Rasmussen, J., & Silverman, S. (2016). The relationship of practice, attitude, and perception of competence in middle school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(3), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2015-0129
[8]. 8.Tomlinson, M., & Jackson, D. (2021). Professional identity formation in contemporary higher education students. Studies in Higher Education, 46(4), 885-900. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1659763
[9]. 9.Pat-Horenczyk, R., Bergman, Y. S., Schiff, M., Goldberg, A., Cohen, A., Leshem, B.,... & Benbenishty, R. (2021). COVID-19 related difficulties and perceived coping among university and college students: The moderating role of media-related exposure and stress. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), Article e1929029. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1929029
[10]. 10.Pišot, R., Plevnik, M., & Štemberger, V. (2014). Effective teaching in physical education: Slovenian perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(2), 153-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.904715
[11]. 11.Bae, M. H. (2022). Happiness levels and leisure life satisfaction for sports leisure activities participation: Implication for physical education in Korea. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 51(9), Article e2007. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10555
[12]. 12.Brajssa, Z. A., Merkas, M., & Sverko, I. (2011). Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9724-2.
[13]. 13.Joseph, R. P., Royse, K. E., Benitez, T. J., & Pekmezi, D. W. (2014). Physical activity and quality of life among university students: Exploring self-efficacy, self-esteem, and affect as potential mediators. Quality of Life Research, 23, 659-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0492-8
[14]. 14.Werneck, A. O., Schuch, F. B., Fernandes, R. A., Stubbs, B., Szwarcwald, C. L., & Silva, D. R. (2021). Different social contexts of leisure-time physical activity: Does the association with depressive symptoms differ?. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 20, Article e100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2021.100390
[15]. 15.Kišjuhas, A. (2024). What holds society together? Emotions, social ties, and group solidarity in leisure interaction rituals. Leisure Studies, 43(3), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2023.2183979
[16]. 16.Tuggle, F. J., Kerpelman, J., & Pittman, J. (2016). Young adolescents'shared leisure activities with close friends and dating partners: Associations with supportive communication and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 48(5), 374-394. https://doi.org/10.18666/JLR-2016-V48-I5-6899
[17]. 17.Jackson, S. A. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding of the flow experience in elite athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607928
[18]. 18.Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., Nakamura, J. (2014). Flow.I n: Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer, 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_15
[19]. 19.Wang, Y., Wang, S., & Meng, X. (2024). The effect of leisure involvement on college students’ subjective well-being in the context of COVID-19: The chain mediating role of fluency experience and leisure satisfaction. Current Psychology, 43(32), 26571-26580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06322-9
[20]. 20.Codina, N., & Freire, T. (2020). Imbalances in the study of the relationship between leisure and self-esteem: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), Article e5555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155555
[21]. 21.Arashi, M., Webster, C. A., Mîndrila, D., Duda, J. L., Stankić, D., Perić, D., ... & Banićević, Ž. (2025). Associations between intrinsic motivation, exercise attitudes, physical activity, and mental health in young adolescents: An integrated motivational perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2446545
[22]. 22.Im, S. H., & Varma, S. (2018). Distorted time perception during flow as revealed by an attention-demanding cognitive task. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488346
[23]. 23.Carr, D. C., Moen, P., Perry Jenkins, M., & Smyer, M. (2020). Postretirement life satisfaction and financial vulnerability: The moderating role of control. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(4), 849-860. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby105
[24]. 24. De Vos, J. (2019). Analysing the effect of trip satisfaction on satisfaction with the leisure activity at the destination of the trip,in relationship with life satisfaction. Transportation, 46, 623-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9812-0
[25]. 25.Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9435-x
[26]. 26.Mutz, M., Reimers, A. K., & Demetriou, Y. (2021). Leisure time sports activities and life satisfaction: Deeper insights based on a representative survey from Germany. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(5), 2155-2171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09866-7
[27]. 27.Siegenthaler, K. L., & O'Dell, I. (2000). Leisure attitude, leisure satisfaction, and perceived freedom in leisure within family dyads. Leisure Sciences, 22(4), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409950202302
[28]. 28.Beard, J. G., & Ragheb, M. G. (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of leisure Research, 12(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1980.11969416
[29]. 29.Bailey, A. W., & Fernando, I. K. (2012). Routine and project-based leisure, happiness, and meaning in life. Journal of Leisure Research, 44(2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2012.11950259
[30]. 30.Bartels, M., Cacioppo, J. T., van Beijsterveldt, T. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2013). Exploring the association between well-being and psychopathology in adolescents. Behavior Genetics, 43, 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-013-9589-7
[31]. 31.Briki, W. (2018). Why do exercisers with a higher trait self-control experience higher subjective well-being? The mediating effects of amount of leisure-time physical activity, perceived goal progress, and self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.020
[32]. 32.Shmotkin, D. (2005). Happiness in the face of adversity: Reformulating the dynamic and modular bases of subjective well-being. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), 291-325. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.291
[33]. 33.Zhuravlev, A. L., & Yurevich, A. V. (2014). Happiness as a scientific category. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84(4), 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331614040091
[34]. 34.Badri, M. A., Alkhaili, M., Aldhaheri, H., Alnahyan, H., Yang, G., Albahar, M., & Alrashdi, A. (2022). Understanding the interactions of happiness, self-rated health, mental feelings, habit of eating healthy and sport/activities: A path model for Abu Dhabi. Nutrients, 14(1), Article e55. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010055
[35]. 35.Bojanowska, A., & Zalewska, A. M. (2016). Lay understanding of happiness and the experience of well-being: Are some conceptions of happiness more beneficial than others?. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 793-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9620-1
[36]. 36.Zheng, Y. (2019). Does physical exercise have an impact on the subjective well-being of the elderly? --An empirical study on Chinese elderly recreational sports participants. Chinese Sports Science and Technology, 55(10), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.16470/j.csst.2019032
[37]. 37.Liu, Y., Hu, J., Yang, W., & Luo, C. (2022). Effects of urban park environment on recreational jogging activity based on trajectory data: A case of Chongqing, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 67, Article e127443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127443
[38]. 38.Chen, L. H., Ye, Y. C., Chen, M. Y., & Tung, I. W. (2010). Alegría! Flow in leisure and life satisfaction: The mediating role of event satisfaction using data from an acrobatics show. Social Indicators Research, 99, 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9581-z
[39]. 39.Choi, H., & Park, C. (2021). Relationship between participant’s selection attributes, satisfaction, and continued participation according to safety awareness of water leisure sports. International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 6(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22471/crisis.2021.6.2.01
[40]. 40.ombo, A., Cordovil, R., Rodrigues, L. P., Moreira, A. C., Borrego, R., Machado, M., ... & Luz, C. (2024). Effect of motor competence and health-related fitness in the prevention of metabolic syndrome risk factors. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 95(1), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2158998
[41]. 41.Pavković, V., Karabašević, D., Jević, J., & Jević, G. (2021). The relationship between cities’cultural strength, reputation,and tourism intensity: Empirical evidence on a sample of the best-reputable european cities. Sustainability, 13(16), Article e8806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168806
[42]. 42.Walker, G. J., & Ito, E. (2017). Mainland Chinese Canadian immigrants' leisure satisfaction and subjective well-being: Results of a two-year longitudinal study. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1156040
[43]. 43.Yoo, J. (2022). Attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and happiness are mediated by satisfaction with leisure activities. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article e11723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16012-w
[44]. 44.Kaya, S. (2016). The relationship between leisure satisfaction and happiness among college students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 622-631. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040322
[45]. 45.Collins, A. L., Sarkisian, N., & Winner, E. (2009). Flow and happiness in later life: An investigation into the role of daily and weekly flow experiences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 703-719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9116-3
[46]. 46.Duan, X., Wang, X., Li, X., Li, S., Zhong, Y., & Bu, T. (2022). Effect of mass sports activity on prosocial behavior: A sequential mediation model of flow trait and subjective wellbeing. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article e960870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.960870
[47]. 47.Acosta-González, H. N., & Marcenaro-Gutiérrez, O. D. (2021). The relationship between subjective well-being and self-reported health: Evidence from Ecuador. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(5), 1961-1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09852-z
[48]. 48.Zhao, R., & Wei, M. (2017). Academic impact evaluation of Wechat in view of social media perspective. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1777-1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2439-2
[49]. 49.Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
[50]. 50.Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2251-2264.h ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2
[51]. 51.Af Wåhlberg, A. E., & Poom, L. (2015). An empirical test of nonresponse bias in internet surveys. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1111212
[52]. 52.Sun, F., Norman, I. J., & While, A. E. (2013). Physical activity in older people: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 13, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-449
[53]. 53.Howard, M. C., Boudreaux, M., & Oglesby, M. (2024). Can Harman’s single-factor test reliably distinguish between research designs? Not in published management studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33(6), 790-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2024.2393462
[54]. 54.Jiang, G, Tan, X, Wang, H, Xu M, Wu X. (2023). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identify three structural dimensions for measuring physical function in community-dwelling older adults. PeerJ, 11, Article e15182. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15182
[55]. 55.Ravlić-Gulan, J., & Žauhar, G. (2020). The correlation between enrolment criteria and students’ success in the study of medicine: A five-year retrospective study. Acta Medica Academica, 49(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.280
[56]. 56.Bishara, A. J., & Hittner, J. B. (2012). Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: Comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches. Psychological Methods, 17(3), Article e399. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028087
[57]. 57.Tornwall, J., Lu, L., & Xie, K. (2020). Frequency of participation in student response system activities as a predictor of final grade: An observational study. Nurse Education Today, 87, Article e104342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104342
[58]. 58.Tsuruta, H., & Bax, L. (2006). Polychotomization of continuous variables in regression models based on the overall C index. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-6-41
[59]. 59.Er, Y., Koç, M. C., Demirel, M., & Çuhadar, A. (2019). The meaning of leisure and life satisfaction: The sample of university students. International Journal of Culture and History, 6(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijch.v6i2.14923
[60]. 60.Vella-Brodrick, D. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning—Findings from Australian and US samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9251-6
[61]. 61.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). Activity and happiness: Towards a science of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 1(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1993.9686377
[62]. 62.Tükel, Y., & Temel, A. S. (2020). Examining the levels of freedom, life satisfaction and happiness perceived by college students in leisure time. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 668-678. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1451
[63]. 63.Paliga, M. (2023). The relationships of human-cobot interaction fluency with job performance and job satisfaction among Cobot operators—the moderating role of workload. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), Article e5111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065111
[64]. 64.Tang, M., Wang, D., & Guerrien, A. (2020). A systematic review and meta‐analysis on basic psychological need satisfaction,motivation, and well‐being in later life: Contributions of self‐determination theory. PsyCh Journal, 9(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.293
[65]. 65.Machul, M., Bieniak, M., Chałdaś-Majdańska, J., Bąk, J., Chrzan-Rodak, A., Mazurek, P., ... & Dobrowolska, B. (2020). Lifestyle practices, satisfaction with life and the level of perceived stress of Polish and foreign medical students studying in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), Article e4445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124445
[66]. 66.Tokay Argan, M., & Mersin, S. (2021). Life satisfaction, life quality, and leisure satisfaction in health professionals. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 57(2), 660-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12592
[67]. 67.Freire, T., & Teixeira, A. (2018). The influence of leisure attitudes and leisure satisfaction on adolescents’ positive functioning: The role of emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article e1349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01349
[68]. 68.Kuykendall, L., Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2015). Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), e364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0134910.1037/a0038508
[69]. 69.Inoue, Y., Wann, D. L., Lock, D., Sato, M., Moore, C., & Funk, D. C. (2020). Enhancing older adults’ sense of belonging and subjective well-being through sport game attendance, team identification,and emotional support. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(7-8), 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319835654
[70]. 70.Arslan, S., & Akkas, O. A. (2014). Quality of college life (QCL) of students in Turkey: Students’ life satisfaction and identification. Social Indicators Research, 115, 869-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0235-9
[71]. 71.Cummins, R. A. (2010). Fluency disorders and life quality: Subjective wellbeing vs. health-related quality of life. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35(3), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.009Get rights and content
[72]. 72.Boudreau, P., Mackenzie, S. H., & Hodge, K. (2020). Flow states in adventure recreation: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 46, Article e101611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101611
[73]. 73.Cheng, T. M., & Lu, C. C. (2015). The causal relationships among recreational involvement, flow experience,and well-being for surfing activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(sup1), 1486-1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2014.999099
[74]. 74.Wang, W., Rezaei, Y. M., & Izadpanah, S. (2024). Speaking accuracy and fluency among EFL learners: The role of creative thinking, emotional intelligence, and academic enthusiasm. Heliyon, 10(18), e37620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37620
[75]. 75.Zhang, H., Dai, Y., & Liu, H. (2021). English proficiency and happiness: The mediation of income satisfaction and leisure satisfaction and the moderation of the national economy. SAGE Open, 11(4), Article e21582440211054482. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054482
[76]. 76.Doğaner, S., & Balcı, V. (2018). Effect of regular physical activity on individuals’ stress, happiness and leisure satisfaction levels. Spormetre, 16(3), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000382
[77]. 77.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row
[78]. 78.Powers, S. L., Barcelona, R. J., Trauntvein, N. E., & McLaughlin, S. (2022). The role of classroom design in facilitating student engagement in recreation and leisure education. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 37(3), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2020.1718042
[79]. 79.Mackenzie, S. H., Son, J. S., & Eitel, K. (2018). Using outdoor adventure to enhance intrinsic motivation and engagement in science and physical activity: An exploratory study. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 21, 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.01.008
[80]. 80.Liu, X., Wang, B., Yin, X., & Bai, B. (2025). Quantitative study of technology integration and professional happiness among special education teachers in smart schools. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 2809-2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12942-2
[81]. 81.Huang, Y., Bu, Y., & Long, Z. (2023). Institutional environment and college students’ entrepreneurial willingness: A comparative study of Chinese provinces based on fsQCA. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), Article e100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100307
[82]. 82.Pekrun, R., & Marsh, H. W. (2022). Research on situated motivation and emotion: Progress and open problems. Learning and Instruction, 81, Article e101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101664
[83]. 83.Goodwin, J. L., Williams, A. L., & Snell Herzog, P. (2020). Cross-cultural values: A meta-analysis of major quantitative studies in the last decade(2010–2020). Religions, 11(8), Article e396. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11080396