Published
2018-07-12
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Restore: An R of sustainability that can tame the “Conundrum”
Eckart Bindewald
1 Department of Biology, Hood College, Frederick, Maryland 2 Department of Mathematics, Frederick Community College, Frederick, Maryland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v3.i2.619
Keywords: rebound, donation, voluntary efforts, carbon offset, restore
Abstract
The environmental benefits of sustainability efforts can be rendered less effective due to economic feedback mechanisms. As a remedy against such rebound effects, a reinvestment strategy towards environmental causes has been suggested. Here, a practical implementation of such a reinvestment strategy is presented. It involves a) estimating the financial savings resulting from sustainability efforts, b) informing the participants that the environmental benefit of the efforts is reduced by economic feedback mechanisms and c) asking them to donate a fraction of the expected savings towards environmental causes. An easy-to-use methodology for estimating rebound effects of sustainability efforts is presented in order to quantify the efficacy of this approach. CO2 emission offsets are used as an example of donations towards environmental causes. It is shown, that donating even a small amount (less than 1% of financial savings obtained from conservation or engineering savings) of donated carbon offsets can more than eliminate the estimated rebound effects. This then leads to the restore principle, that states that the environmental benefit of reducing activities with average environmental impact is dramatically improved if a fraction of the resulting financial savings is applied towards environmental causes. This approach is made practical by augmenting the common reduce, reuse, recycle motto with a fourth component: reduce, reuse, recycle and restore.
References
[1]. Ryan L. and Campbell N. Spreading the net: The multiple benefits of energy efficiency improvements. OECD Publishing No. 2012/8, International Energy Agency 2012
[2]. Alcott B. The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics 2008; 64(4): 770–786
[3]. Herring H. and Roy R.. Sustainable services, electronic education and the rebound effect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2002; 22(5): 525–542
[4]. Hertwich E.G.. Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2005; 9(1-2): 85–98
[5]. Takase K., Kondo Y., and Washizu A. . An Analysis of Sustainable Consumption by the Waste Input-Output Model. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2005; 9(1-2): 201–219
[6]. Owen D. . The Conundrum. Riverhead Trade 2012
[7]. F¨olster S. andNystr¨om J.. Climate policy to defeat the green paradox Ambio 2010; 39(3): 223–235
[8]. Alcott B.. Jevons’ paradox. Ecological Economics 2005; 54: 9–21
[9]. Jevons W.S.. The Coal Question. An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-mines. Macmillan and Co., 1865
[10]. Brookes L. . Energy policy, the energy price fallacy and the role of nuclear energy in the UK. Energy Policy, 6(2):94–106, 1978
[11]. Brookes L. . Energy efficiency fallacies revisited. Energy Policy 2000; 28(6-7): 355–366
[12]. Chitnis M. , Sorrell S. , Druckman A. et al. Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy 2013;55: 234–250
[13]. Dimitropoulos J. . Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: An overview of the state of knowledge. Energy Policy 2007; 35(12): 6354–6363
[14]. Gillingham K., Kotchen M.J. , Rapson D.S., et al. Energy policy: The rebound effect is overplayed. Nature 2013; 493(7433): 475–476
[15]. Greening L.A., Greene D.L. and Difiglio C.. Energy efficiency and consumption - the rebound effect - a survey. Energy Policy 2000; 28(6-7): 389–401
[16]. Jenkins T. , Nordhaus T. and Shellenberger M. . Energy Emergence: Rebound & Backfire as Emergent Phenomena. Technical report, The Breakthrough Institute 2011
[17]. Khazzoom J.D. . Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances. The Energy Journal1980 ;1(4): 21–40
[18]. Saunders H.D. . Historical Evidence for Energy Consumption Rebound in 30 US Sectors and a Toolkit for Rebound Analysts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, page (in press), 2013.
[19]. Schipper L. and Grubb M.J.. On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy 2000; 28(6-7): 367–388
[20]. Sorrell S and Dimitropoulos J . The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics 2008; 65(3): 636–649
[21]. Murray CK . What if consumers decided to all ‘go green’? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. (MPRA paper no. 40405) 2012
[22]. Wackernagel M. and Rees M. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint
[23]. perspective. Ecological Economics 1997; 20(3): 3– 24
[24]. Waggoner PE and Ausubel JH . A renovated framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity. PNAS 2002; 99(12): 7860–7865
[25]. Hansen J. Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity. Bloomsbury
[26]. USA, 2009.
[27]. Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P , et al. Climate change and trace gases. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2007; 365: 1925–1954
[28]. Maynard L and Mupandawana M. Tipping behavior in Canadian restaurants International Journal of Hospitality Management2009; 28(4): 597–603
[29]. Electric Power Monthly. Technical Report DOE/EIA-0226 (2012/05). Energy Information Administration 2012