Open Journal Systems

Creating an environment for the restoration of dignity to disadvantaged mathematics foundation classrooms

Zingiswa Jojo

Article ID: 695
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2019, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 566 (Abstract) 388 (PDF)

Abstract

This article chronicles how aconducive environment creates arestoration of dignity to disadvantaged mathematics foundation learners. The variation theory was used to provide the sequential building blocks required to learn foundation mathematics to grade 1- 5 learners in a district in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. A sample of 23 learners participated in this study. Structured worksheets covering mathematics content for grade 1-5 were prepared for the learners to practice after school in a homework club on their own, in rural settings in a study that followed qualitative methods. Results indicated how the creation of a supportive and caring environment developed the learners’ resilience, restored their dignity and increased their competence in understanding of basic mathematics concepts. The learners also developed good relationships with each other while they shared information and helped others to restore their dignity and led them ultimately to independence of acquiring other mathematical skills and ownership of the learning experiences. The intervention with the after school programme may serve as a suitable environment for the disadvantaged learners and restore their competence in understanding mathematics concepts while providing a platform for learners to share knowledge gained with the underprivileged ones.

Keywords

Mathematics; Environment; Dignity; Learning; Concepts

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Ary D, Jacobs LC, Razavieh A. Introduction to research in education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2002.

2. Brownell WA. Psychological considerations in the learning and teaching of arithmetic. In the teaching of arithmetic: Tenth yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1935.

3. Bruner JS. The process of education Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.

4. D'Ambrosio U. What is ethnomathematics, and how can it help children in schools? Teaching Children Mathematics, 2001; 7 (6) 308, Reston.

5. Dewey J. How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to theeducative process. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath and Company, 1933.

6. Dienes ZP. Mathematics in the primary school. London: Macmillan, 1966.

7. Edwards S. The Effects of Poverty on Achievement Gap: A Quantitative Analysis Using Stratification Theory. Proceedings of the National Conference On Undergraduate Research (NCUR) Weber State University, Ogden 2012; 29-31.

8. Gardiner M. Education in rural areas. Issues in Education Policy Number 4. Centre for Education Policy Development (CEPD), Braamfontein, South Africa, 2017.

9. Gubrium E, Pellissery S &Lødemel I. The shame of it: global perspectives on anti-poverty policies. Bristol: Policy Press, 2014.

10. Jeanty J. The effects of poverty: Classroom. Purdue University. Leaf Group Ltd, 2008.

11. Gu L, Huang R, Marton F. Teaching with variation: A Chinese way of promoting effective mathematics learning. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2004.

12. Hawthorne L. Constitution and Contract: Human Dignity, the Theory of Capabilities and Existenzgrundlage in South Africa, 2011. StudiaUniversitatis Babes-BolyaiJurisprudentia 27.

13. Kim P, Evans GW, Angstadt M, et al. Effects of childhood poverty and chronic stress on emotion regulatory brain function in adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013.

14. Koichu B, Zaslavsky O, Dolev L. Effects of variations in task design using different representations of mathematical objects on learning: A case of a sorting task. In C. Margolinas, J. Ainley, J. B. Frant, M. Doorman, C. Kieran, A. Leung, M. Ohtani, P. Sullivan, D. Thompson, A. Watson, & Y. Yang (Eds.), Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 Task Design in Mathematics Education (pp. 463–472). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

15. Lebech M. What is Human Dignity? Faculty of Philosophy, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, 2009.

16. Leibovich T, Katzin N, Harel M, et al. From ‘sense of number’ to ‘sense of magnitude’ :The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2016.

17. Leung A. Dynamic geometry and the theory of variation. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 joint meeting of PME and PMENA (3): 197-204. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 2003.

18. Ling LM, Marton F. Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2012; 1(1): 7–22.

19. Luby J L. JAMA Pediatrics. Science News, July Edition, MD, at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 2015.

20. Marton F, Booth S. Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997.

21. Mullis I V S, Martin M O, Foy P, et al. TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics, 2016. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/

22. Murayama K, Pekrun R, Lichtenfeld S, et al. Predicting Long-Term Growth in Students' Mathematics Achievement: The Unique Contributions of Motivation and Cognitive Strategies, 2012.

23. O’Connor EE, Cappella E, McCormick MP, et al. Enhancing the academic development of shy children: A test of the efficacy of INSIGHTS. School Psychology Review 2014; 43(3): 239-259.

24. Phan KL. University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine and senior author of the study, 2013.

25. Piaget J. The child’s conception of physical causality. (M. Gabain, Trans). Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, 1972. (Original work published 1927).

26. Reay D. ‘‘We never get a fair chance”: working class experiences of education in the twenty-first century’. In: W. Atkinson, S. Roberts and M. Savage (eds) Class inequality in austerity Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012.

27. Runesson U. Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. The Cambridge Journal of Education, 2005; 35(1): 69–87.

28. Spaull N. South Africa’s Education Crisis: The quality of education in South Africa 1994-2011: Report Commissioned by CDE October 2013, 2013.

29. Timaeus I, Simelane S, Letsoalo T. Poverty, race, and children’s progress at school in South Africa. Policy Brief: School of Development Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2011.

30. Usiskin Z. Van Hiele levels of achievement in secondary school geometry: CDASSG Project, Chicago University, 1982.

31. Vygotsky LS. Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1: Problems of General Psychology, trans. Norris Minick. New York: Plenum, 1987.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v3.i2.695
(566 Abstract Views, 388 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Zingiswa Jojo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.