Published
2018-04-26
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Use of green area of Kastamonu: Case study of Clock Tower
CIGDEM SAKICI
Landscape Architecture Department, Engiinering and Architecture Faculty, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, TURKEY
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v3.i1.734
Keywords: Clock Tower, recreation, use of urban green area, preference, activity
Abstract
The aim of the study is to show which areas mainly prefered when the people want to carry out recreational activities in the Kastamonu city center and determine the appropriateness of this area for recreative activity. A questionnaire study was conducted with 100 randomly selected people in order to determine the most frequently used open green area in terms of recreational activity in Kastamonu and the results showed that 89% of the participants prefer the Clock Tower. Thus Clock Tower was determined as a research area in this study. It is revealed the current state of the Clock Tower in scope of the study, plants are used in this area and the purpose of use of these plants is determined and how frequently users use this area and the reasons for not frequent use. In addition, activities that are effected in the area and changes in mood after using the area. The second survey study was conducted on users of the area consisting of 118 people. It is revealed space features existing at Clock Tower and events area identified after that space features that users want to be in this area and events areas. Thus, the aim of the area is to determine the users' expectations and the deficiencies and problems in this area.Author Biography
CIGDEM SAKICI, Landscape Architecture Department, Engiinering and Architecture Faculty, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, TURKEY
Cigdem Sakıcı is a associate professor in the Landscape Architecture Department, Engineering and Architecture Faculty at Kastamonu University of Kastamonu. Her research interests are situated in the fields of environmental design, quality of urban environments, open green areas healing garden, hospital garden and open space therapy units.
References
[1]. Lu Y, Sarkar C, Xiao Y. The effect of street-level greenery on walking behavior: evidence from Hong Kong. Social Science & Medicine 2018; 208: 41-49.
[2]. Ye C, Hu L, Li M. Urban green space accessibility changes in a high-density city: a case study of Macau from 2010 to 2015. Journal of Transport Geography 2018; 66: 106-115.
[3]. Sakici Ç. The psychological contributions of natural site experiences in Kastamonu, Turkey. Anthropologist 2014; 18(3): 991-1004.
[4]. Lewis CA. The evolutionary importance of people-plant relationships. Eds.: Flagler J, Poincelot RP. People-Plant relationships: setting research priorities. NY: Food Products Press, Binghamton: 1994.
[5]. Smardon RC. Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: review of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning 1990; 15(1-2): 85-106.
[6]. Hillman J. The role of urban parks, the future of our urban parks. Finding of The Symposium Church House Conference Centre, London, 1994: 6-7.
[7]. Seymour V. The human–nature relationship and its ımpact on health, a critical review. Frontiers in Public Health 2016; 4: 260.
[8]. James P, Banay RF, Hart JE et al. A review of the health benefits of greenness. Current Epidemiology Reports 2015; 2(2): 131-142.
[9]. Kondo MC, Fluehr JM, McKeon T, et al. Urban green space and ıts ımpact on human health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018; 15: 445.
[10]. Lee ACK, Maheswaran R. The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health 2011; 33(2): 212–222.
[11]. Chen WY, Jim CY. Resident motivations and willingness-to-pay for urban biodiversity conservation in Guangzhou (China). Environmental Management 2010; 45(5): 1052-1064.
[12]. Rigolon A, Flohr TL. Access to parks for youth as an environmental justice ıssue: access inequalities and possible solutions. Buildings 2014; 4(2): 69-94.
[13]. Herzog TR, Black AM, Fountaine KA, et al. Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1997; 17(2): 165-70.
[14]. Mensah CA, Andres L, Perera U, et al. Enhancing quality of life through the lens of green spaces: a systematic review approach. International Journal of Wellbeing 2016; 6(1): 142-163.
[15]. Pretty J, Peacock J, Sellens M, et al. The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 2005; 15(5): 319-337.
[16]. Whitehouse S, Varni JW, Seid M, et al. Evaluating a children’s hospital garden environment: utilization and consumer satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2001; 21(3): 301-314.
[17]. Kabisch N, Haase D. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 2014; 122: 129-139.
[18]. Kabisch N, Qureshi S, Haase D. Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces — a systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2015; 50: 25-34.
[19]. Sakıcı Ç, Karakaş H, Kesimoğlu MD. An investigation on the usage of plant material in open green spaces in Kastamonu city center, Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty 2013; 13(1): 153-164.