Published
2017-03-15
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Conscious evolution, social development and environmental justice
Luke R Barnesmoore
Founder, Executive Director, Center for Critical Interdisciplinary Studies (CCIS)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/esp.v2.i1.94
Keywords: conscious evolution, social development, environmental justice, Modernism, Postmodernism, hegemony, emotion, truth, order
Abstract
Moving from Barnesmoore’s (2016) theorization of humans as beings with the potential for conscious (epistemological) evolution, this article argues that a revolution in the ideas by which (‘world view’ in which) we conceive of potential practice must necessarily precede a revolution of academic and social practice (that theory necessarily precedes practice). Revolution must be rooted in revolutionary ideas and cannot be facilitated by practices that rise from (are rationalized within) the hegemonic essence (ideas, axioms and logics) of the regime against which revolution is being waged.
Author Biography
Luke R Barnesmoore, Founder, Executive Director, Center for Critical Interdisciplinary Studies (CCIS)
Department of Geography
University of British Columbia
References
[1]. Akkerman , A.(2001). Urban planning in the founding of Cartesian thought. Philosophy & Geography, 4(2), 141–167.
[2]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10903770124810
[3]. Barnesmoore, L. R. & Wyly, E. K. (2016) Media Imaginations of the City. In Press.
[4]. Barnesmoore, L. R. (2015). Datascopes and Dimensional Incommensurability in the History of Assemblages, Association of American Geographers 111th Annual Meeting, Chicago.
[5]. Barnesmoore, L. R. (2016a). Conscious vs. mechanical evolution: transcending biocentrist social ontologies. Environment and Social Psychology, 1(2), 83–93.
[6]. Barnesmoore, L. R. (2016b). Nomad explorations v 2.1 : Genesis, Eden and the grail in modernity (Master’s thesis). University of British Columbia, Canada
[7]. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0308785
[8]. Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: Steps towards an ecology of matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347–372.
[9]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591703260853
[10]. Blake, W. (1790). The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.
[11]. Bourgeault, C. (2009). The Wisdom Way of Knowing: Reclaiming an Ancient Tradition to Awaken the Heart, John Wiley & Sons, June 3rd 2016.
[12]. http://ecumenicus.blogspot.ca/2011/04/acornology.html
[13]. Brenner, N., Peck, J. & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2),182–222.
[14]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
[15]. Burnett, R. E. (2016). Remotely Piloted Airborne Systems (RPAS), Ubiquitous Networks, and New Forms of Command and Control in National Security and Civilian Operational Spaces, ISA Annual Conference 2016, Atlanta.
[17]. Cleary, T. (1991). The Secret of the Golden Flower. Harper: San Francisco.
[18]. De Chardin, P. T. (1965). The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper & Row.
[19]. Descartes, R. (2002). Meditations on First Philosophy, (Bennett, Trans.), viewed July 29th, 2016.
[20]. http://www.vahidnab.com/med.pdf
[21]. Descartes, R. (2010). The Passions of the Soul, (Bennett, Trans.), viewed July 21st, 2016
[22]. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfs/descartes1649.pdf
[23]. Dunaway, F. (2008). Natural Visions: The Power of Images in American Environmental Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[24]. Foucault, M. (2006). The History of Madness. London & New York: Routledge.
[25]. Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things. New York: Vintage.
[26]. Geddes, P. Sir, (1915). Cities in Evolution: an Introduction to the Town Planning Movement and to the Study of Civics. London: Williams & Norgate.
[27]. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci: Ed. and Transl. by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. Nowell-Smith, G. & Hoare, Q. (Eds). International Publishers.
[28]. Hall, S. (1988) The toad in the garden: Thatcher among the theorists. In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, (p.55). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
[29]. Haraway, D. (1989). Primate Visions. New York: Routledge.
[30]. Krieger, M. H. (1995). What does Jerusalem have to do with Athens? Roles for the humanities in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, 217–221.
[31]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400312
[32]. Latour, B. (1993). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[33]. Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press.
[34]. Levit, G. S. (2000). The biosphere and the noosphere theories of VI Vernadsky and P. Teilhard de Chardin: A methodological essay. Archives Internationales d'histoire Des Sciences, 50(144), 160–177.
[35]. Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[36]. Mumford, L. (1926). The Golden Day. W. W. Norton & Company Inc.
[37]. Mumford, L. (1938). The Culture of Cities. New York: Harcourt Brace.
[38]. Nadler, S. (2013). Baruch Spinoza, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2013 Edition, In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.),
[39]. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/spinoza/
[40]. Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the Order of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[41]. Needleman, J. (2003). Lost Christianity. Penguin.
[42]. Nicoll, M. (1998) Living Time. Utretch: Eureka Editions.
[43]. Nietzsche, F. (2009) Basic Writings of Nietzsche, Gay, P. (Ed.), Random House Publishing Group.
[44]. Noys, B. 2011, The Discrete Charm of Bruno Latour, or the Critique of ‘Anti-Critique’, presented at the Center for Critical Theory, University of Nottingham.
[45]. Noys, B. (2014). The discreet charm of Bruno Latour. In (Mis)readings of Marx in Continental Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave, (p.195–210).
[46]. Ong, A.(2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8.
[47]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00234.x
[48]. Ong, A . & Collier, S. J. (Eds.). (2008). Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. John Wiley & Sons.
[49]. Ouspensky, P. D. (2005). Tertium Organum. Cosimo Inc.
[50]. Paden, R. (2001). The two professions of Hippodamus of Miletus. Philosophy & Geography, 4(1), 25–48.
[51]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10903770124644
[52]. Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. OUP Oxford.
[53]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580576.001.0001
[54]. Peck, J. (2016). The Urban Studies Journal Annual Lecture: Transatlantic City, Association of American Geographers Annual Convention 2016, San Francisco.
[55]. Porter, L., Sandercock, L., Umemoto, K., Umemoto, K., Bates, L. K. et al., (2012). What's love got to do with it? Illuminations on loving attachment in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(4), 593–627.
[56]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.731210
[57]. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven: Yale Uni-versity Press.
[58]. Silverman, A. (2014). Plato's middle period metaphysics and epistemology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), viewed August 11th, 2016
[59]. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/plato-metaphysics/
[60]. Stites, R. (1989). Revolutionary Dreams: Utopian Vision and Experimental Life in the Russian Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[61]. Zi, M. (2016). The Meng Zi, (Eno, R., Trans.), viewed August 28th, 2016.
[62]. http://www.indiana.edu/~p374/Mengzi.pdf
[63]. Zi, Z. (1968). The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu, (Watson, B.,Trans.), Columbia University Press.
[64]. Zi, Z. (2004). The Way of Chuang Tzu, trans. (Merton, T.,Trans.), Shambhala Publications.