Open Journal Systems

Design and validation of the classroom climate for an inclusive education questionnaire (CCIEQ)

Roberto Sánchez-Cabrero, Marta Sandoval-Mena, Gema Pilar Saez-Suanes, Elena López-de-Arana Prado

Article ID: 1754
Vol 9, Issue 5, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 437 (Abstract) 431 (PDF)

Abstract

This study aims to validate the Classroom Climate for an Inclusive Education Questionnaire (CCIEQ) to assess the quality of the conditions for inclusive teaching performance through three different procedures. Firstly, the study aims to evaluate the questionnaire’s content validity, culminating in the selection of nine theoretically dimensions validated quantitatively by means of an adequate Minimum Discrepancy of the Chi-square Value Divided by Degree of Freedom Index (CMIN/DF). Secondly, it seeks to assess the construct validity of the questionnaire with a Robust Exploratory Factor Analysis Technique and Hull Method to evaluate internal consistency for a final configuration of a single factor to obtain a single final score. Thirdly, the study aims to evaluate the questionnaire’s convergent validity, showing the existing correlations with other instruments previously validated for the same purpose (CEFI-R, UDL-checklist Test) using a common participant sample. To achieve these objectives, a sample of 153 in service teachers was used, recruited for the study sample from four different countries (Spain, Turkey, Latvia and Poland) through cluster sampling. The results show excellent psychometric properties and convergent validity of the CCIEQ, so its use as a scientific tool for samples of European in-service teachers is validated.

Keywords

inclusive education; classroom climate; in service teachers; European sample; factor analysis

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Bureau of Education. Inclusive Education: The Way of the Future. UNESCO/BIE; 2008.

2. UNESCO. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Promote Lifelong Learning. UNESCO; 2016. p. 86.

3. Ainscow M. Understanding the development of inclusive education system. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 2005; 3: 5–20.

4. Stainback S, Stainback W. Inclusive Classrooms: A NEW Way of Approaching and Living the Curriculum (Spanish). Narcea Ediciones; 2007.

5. Lindner KT, Schwab S. Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2020; 1–21. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450

6. Tzivinikou S, Papoutsaki K. Studying teaching methods, strategies and best practices for young children with special educational needs. Early Child Development and Care 2016; 186: 971–980. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2015.1071101

7. Florian L. On the necessary co-existence of special and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2019; 23: 691–704. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2019.1622801

8. Forlin C, Chambers D. Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 2011; 39: 17–32. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2010.540850

9. Sánchez-Cabrero R, Estrada-Chichón JL, Abad-Mancheño A, et al. Models on teaching effectiveness in current scientific literature. Education Sciences 2021; 11(8): 409. doi: 10.3390/educsci11080409

10. Escudero-Muñoz JM, Cutanda-López MT, Trillo-Alonso JF. Teacher learning and teacher professional development (Spanish). Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado 2017; 21(3): 83–102.

11. van Mieghem A, Verschueren K, Petry K, et al. An analysis of research on inclusive education: A systematic search and meta review. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2020; 24(6): 675–689. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012

12. Echevarría-Molina I, Sanchez-Cabrero R. Satisfaction of Secondary Education teacher in Spain through TALIS (Spanish). Revista Fuentes 2021; 23: 341–352. doi: 10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.15176

13. de Boer, A.; Pijl, S.J.; Minnaert, A. Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2011; 15(3): 331–353. doi: 10.1080/13603110903030089

14. Erten O, Savage RS. Moving forward in inclusive education research. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2012; 16(2): 221–233. doi: 10.1080/13603111003777496

15. Sokal L, Sharma U. Canadian in-service teachers’ concerns, efficacy, and attitudes about inclusive teaching. Exceptionality Education International 2014; 23(1). doi: 10.5206/eei.v23i1.7704

16. Booth T, Ainscow M. Guide to Inclusive Education: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools (Spanish). Mineduc Digital Library; 2015.

17. Sandoval M, Muñoz Y, Márquez C. Supporting schools in their journey to inclusive education: Review of guides and tools. Support for Learning 2021; 36(1): 20–42. doi: 10.1111/1467-9604.12337

18. Arnaiz P, Guirao JM. The self-evaluation of centers in Spain for the attention to diversity from an inclusive perspective: ACADI (Spanish). Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado 2015; 18(1): 45–101. doi: 10.6018/reifop.18.1.214341

19. González-Gil F, Martín-Pastor E, Orgaz Baz B. Are prospective teachers trained in inclusion: Validation of an evaluation questionnaire (Spanish). Aula Abierta 2017; 46(2): 33–40. doi: 10.17811/rifie.46.2.2017.33-40

20. Chang WC, Cochran-Smith M. Learning to teach for equity, social justice, and/or diversity: Do the measures measure up? Journal of Teacher Education 2022; 2022: 00224871221075284. doi: 10.1177/00224871221075284

21. Ewing DL, Monsen JJ, Kielblock S. Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A critical review of published questionnaires. Educational Psychology in Practice 2018; 34(2): 150–165. doi: 10.1080/02667363.2017.1417822

22. Biencinto-López C, González-Barbera C, García-García M, et al. Design and psychometric properties of the AVACO-EVADIE. Questionnaire for the evaluation of attention to diversity as an educational dimension in schools (Spanish). RELIEVE—Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa 2014; 15(1). doi: 10.7203/relieve.15.1.4184

23. González-Gil F, Martín-Pastor E, Orgaz Baz B, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate teacher training for inclusion: The CEFI-R. Aula Abierta 2019; 48(2): 229–238. doi: 10.17811/rifie.48.2.2019.229-238

24. CAST UDL: The UDL guidelines. Available online: https://udlguidelines.cast.org/ (accessed on 27 January 2023).

25. Sánchez Fuentes S, Castro Durán L, Casas Bolaños JA, et al. Factor analysis of teacher perceptions of universal learning design. Revista latinoamericana de educación inclusiva 2016; 10(2): 135–149. doi: 10.4067/s0718-73782016000200009

26. Echeita Sarrionandia G. Inclusive education. Smiles and tears (Spanish). Aula Abierta 2017; 46(2): 17–24. doi: 10.17811/rifie.46.2.2017.17-24

27. Razer M, Friedman VJ, Warshofsky B. Schools as agents of social exclusion and inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2013; 17(11): 1152–1170. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.742145

28. Tyagi G. Role of Teacher in Inclusive Education Gunjan Tyagi. 2016.

29. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA 2013; 310(20): 2191. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053

30. Jefatura del Estado. Organic Law 7/2021, of May 26, on the protection of personal data processed for the purposes of prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offenses and enforcement of criminal sanctions. Available online: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2021/05/26/7/con (accessed on 23 November 2023).

31. Rojo-Ramos J, Manzano-Redondo F, Adsuar JC, et al. Spanish physical education teachers’ perceptions about their preparation for inclusive education. Children 2022; 9(1): 108. doi: 10.3390/children9010108

32. Griful-Freixenet J, Struyven K, Vantieghem W, et al. Exploring the interrelationship between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI): A systematic review. Educational Research Review 2020; 29: 100306. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100306

33. Booth T, Ainscow M. Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools. Bristol; 2000.

34. Fullan M. Leadership for change. In: Proceedings of the International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration: Part1–2; In: Leithwood K, Chapman J, Corson D, et al. (editors). Kluwer International Handbooks of Education. Springer Netherlands; 1996. pp. 701–722.

35. Fullan M. The nature of leadership is changing. European Journal of Education 2020; 55(2): 139–142. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12388

36. Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. Robust Promin: A method for diagonally weighted factor rotation. Liberabit: Revista Peruana de Psicología 2019; 25(1): 99–106. doi: 10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.08

37. Lorenzo-Seva U, Timmerman ME, Kiers HAL. The hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2011; 46(2): 340–364. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.564527

38. Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. MSA: The forgotten index for identifying inappropriate items before computing exploratory item factor analysis. Methodology 2021; 17(4): 296–306. doi: 10.5964/meth.7185

39. Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U. Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema 2017; 236–240, doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.304

40. López-Aguado M, Gutiérrez-Provecho L. How to perform and interpret an exploratory factor analysis using SPSS (Spanish). REIRE Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació 2019; 12(2): 1–14. doi: 10.1344/reire2019.12.227057

41. Akbarovna AS. Inclusive education and its essence. IJSSIR 2022; 11: 248–254.

42. Krischler M, Powell JJW, Pit-Ten Cate IM. What is meant by inclusion? On the effects of different definitions on attitudes toward inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education 2019; 34(5): 632–648. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2019.1580837

43. Graham L. Inclusive Education for the 21st Century: Theory, Policy and Practice. Routledge; 2019.

44. Azorín-Abellán C, Palomera-Sáiz M. Guidelines to guide schools on the road to inclusion (Spanish). Revista de Educación Inclusiva 2020; 13: 100–117.

45. Elton EJ, Gruber MJ. Homogeneous groups and the testing of economic hypotheses. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 2009; 4(5): 581. doi: 10.2307/2330115

46. Sánchez-Cabrero R, Carranza-Herrezuelo N, Novillo-López MÁ, et al. The importance of physical appearance during the ageing process in Spain. Interrelation between body and life satisfaction during maturity and the old age. Activities, Adaptation & Aging 2019; 44(3): 210–224. doi: 10.1080/01924788.2019.1651187


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.1754
(437 Abstract Views, 431 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Roberto Sánchez-Cabrero, Marta Sandoval-Mena, Gema Pilar Saez-Suanes, Elena López-de-Arana Prado

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/