Two-way asymmetrical communication mediating internal communication and employee engagement
Vol 9, Issue 2, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 603 (Abstract) 435 (PDF)
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between employee engagement with internal communication factors in the context of a prominent e-commerce company in Malaysia. The study employed a quantitative data approach, utilising a simple random sampling method. Data collection was conducted through structured questionnaires were administered to 255 respondents representing various departments within the e-commerce company, including finance, sales and marketing, operations management, human resources, and IT. The study’s outcomes demonstrated a significantly positive relationship between communication climate and employee engagement, which is critical for retaining employee commitment. The study’s findings confirmed a positive relationship between organisation communication and employee engagement, which promotes engagement. However, two-way asymmetrical communication showed negative effects when analysed for the mediating role. These findings underscore the importance of effective internal communication in organisations, especially within the context of a leading e-commerce company. Additionally, they should be aware of the potential negative consequences of asymmetrical communication and strive for more balanced and ethical communication practices. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by bridging the gap in scientific research on the relationship between internal communication and employee engagement, particularly in the Malaysian context. By drawing on stakeholders’ and relationship management theories, this research provides valuable insights into the theoretical foundations of this relationship, confirming the relevance of these theories in the organisational setting.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Department of Statistics, Malaysia. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=394&bul_id=em1vRTNvcWVqcVQwTXd6dk5Dc2kwdz09&menu_id=b0pIV1E3RW40VWRTUkZocEhyZ1pLUT09 (accessed on 30 November 2023).
2. Madan S, Pérez-Morón J, Chua XN, et al. Analysis of the Shopee’s Strategies to Succeed in the Global E-commerce Market: Malaysia Case. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in Asia Pasific. 2022, 5(1). doi: 10.32535/ijthap.v5i1.1400
3. Malaysia eCommerce: Most popular international e-commerce sites 2022. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1012711/malaysia-leading-b2c-ecommerce-sites-international/ (accessed on 7 June 2023).
4. Krywalski Santiago J. The influence of internal communication satisfaction on employees’ organisational identification: Effect of perceived organisational support. Journal of Economics and Management. 2020, 42: 70-98. doi: 10.22367/jem.2020.42.04
5. Men LR, Neill M, Yue CA. Examining the effects of symmetrical internal communication and employee engagement on organizational change outcomes. Public Relations Journal. 2020, 13(4), 1-19.
6. Bao LH, Mohd Arif LS, Omar R, Shaari R. The relationship between internal communication and employee engagement at favourite design. Jurnal Kemanusiaan. 2020, 18(1).
7. Sun R, Li JYQ, Lee Y, et al. The Role of Symmetrical Internal Communication in Improving Employee Experiences and Organizational Identification During COVID-19 Pandemic-Induced Organizational Change. International Journal of Business Communication. 2021, 60(4): 1398-1426. doi: 10.1177/23294884211050628
8. Špoljarić A, Tkalac Verčič A. Internal communication satisfaction and employee engagement as determinants of the employer brand. Journal of Communication Management. 2021, 26(1): 130-148. doi: 10.1108/jcom-01-2021-0011
9. Markos S, Gossaye B. The effect of internal communication on employee engagement: Empirical evidence from commercial Bank of Ethiopia. International Journal of information, Business and management. 2021, 13(2), 47-71.
10. Shaheen S, Zulfiqar S, Saleem S, et al. Does Organizational Cronyism Lead to Lower Employee Performance? Examining the Mediating Role of Employee Engagement and Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579560
11. Mbhele S. Internal communication in achieving employee engagement within a South African government department [PhD thesis]. University of Pretoria; 2016.
12. Chanana N, Sangeeta. Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Public Affairs. 2020, 21(4). doi: 10.1002/pa.2508
13. Sutton LBM, Le Roux T, Fourie LM. Internal communication in a diverse and developing world context: Challenges for corporate South Africa. Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa. 2022, 41(2): 90-102. doi: 10.36615/jcsa.v41i2.1452
14. Balakrishnan K, Harji MB, Angusamy A. Determinants of Multicultural Identity for Well-Being and Performance. Asian Journal of Social Science. 2020, 48(5-6): 488-512. doi: 10.1163/15685314-04805015
15. Balakrishnan K, Harji MB, Angusamy A. Intercultural Communication Competence: Well-being and Performance of Multicultural Teams. Journal of Intercultural Communication. 2022, 21(2): 82-96. doi: 10.36923/jicc.v21i2.16
16. Chmielecki M. Factors Influencing Effectiveness of Internal Communication. Management and Business Administration, Central Europe. 2015, 23(2): 24-38. doi: 10.7206/mba.ce.2084-3356.139
17. Ellenkamp JJH, Brouwers EPM, Embregts PJCM, et al. Work Environment-Related Factors in Obtaining and Maintaining Work in a Competitive Employment Setting for Employees with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2015, 26(1): 56-69. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9586-1
18. Freeman RE. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984.
19. de Beer E, Rensburg R. Towards a theoretical framework for the governing of stakeholder relationships: a perspective from South Africa. Journal of Public Affairs. 2011, 11(4): 208-225. doi: 10.1002/pa.414
20. Harley MB. An Investigation Exploring the Drivers of Employee Engagement: A United States Customs and Border Protection Perspective [PhD thesis]. Dublin, National College of Ireland; 2019.
21. Cropanzano R, Anthony EL, Daniels SR, et al. Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies. Academy of Management Annals. 2017, 11(1): 479-516. doi: 10.5465/annals.2015.0099
22. Karanges E, Johnston K, Beatson A, et al. The influence of internal communication on employee engagement: A pilot study. Public Relations Review. 2015, 41(1): 129-131. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.003
23. Iddagoda YA, Opatha HHDNP. Identified Research Gaps in Employee Engagement. International Business Research. 2016, 10(2): 63. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v10n2p63
24. Manoli AE, Hodgkinson IR. Exploring internal organisational communication dynamics in the professional football industry. European Journal of Marketing. 2021, 55(11): 2894-2916. doi: 10.1108/ejm-05-2019-0422
25. Jaupi F, Llaci S. The Impact of Communication Satisfaction and Demographic Variables on Employee Engagement. Journal of Service Science and Management. 2015, 8(2): 191-200. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2015.82021
26. Nguyen CMA, Ha MT. The interplay between internal communication, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and employee loyalty in higher education institutions in Vietnam. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023, 10(1). doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01806-8
27. Willacy M. Two-Way Symmetric Communication Between Public Utilities and the Public. Available online: https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/td/1234 (accessed on 30 November 2023).
28. Scherrer L. Leadership communication and employee engagement. Gonzaga University; 2016.
29. Babbie E, Mouton J. The Practice of Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015
30. Queirós A, Faria D, Almeida F. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies. 2017.
31. Sharma G. Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research. 2017, 3(7), 749-752.
32. Fugard AJB, Potts HWW. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2015, 18(6): 669-684. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453
33. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods. 2007, 39(2): 175-191.
34. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus. Routledge; 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203807644
35. Hair JF, Hauff S, Hult GTM, et al. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM): Sage Publications. 2017. doi: 10.15358/9783800653614
36. Urbach N, Ahlemann F. Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application. 2010, 11(2): 5-40.
37. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981, 18(1): 39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
38. Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In: Marcoulides G (editor). Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998. pp.295-336.
39. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Assessing mediation in communication research. London: The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research; 2008.
40. Markos S, Gossaye B. The effect of internal communication on employee engagement: Empirical evidence from commercial Bank of Ethiopia. International Journal of information, Business and management. 2021, 13(2): 47-71.
41. Holá J, Pikhart M. The implementation of internal communication system as a way to company efficiency. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2014, XVII(2): 161-169. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-012
42. Osborne S, Hammoud MS. Effective employee engagement in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology. 2017,16(1): 4. doi: 10.5590/IJAMT.2017.16.1.04
43. Southwick SM, Southwick FS. The Loss of Social Connectedness as a Major Contributor to Physician Burnout. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020, 77(5): 449. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4800
44. Muhamedi M, Ariffin MYM. Importance of communication channels between managers and employees’ in management communication. The Social Sciences. 2017. doi: 10.36478/sscience.2017.1541.1552
45. Kang M, Sung M. How symmetrical employee communication leads to employee engagement and positive employee communication behaviors: The mediation of employee-organization relationships. Journal of Communication Management. 2017, 21(1): 82-102. doi: 10.1108/JCOM-04-2016-0026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i2.2074
(603 Abstract Views, 435 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Kavitha Balakrishnan, Ajitha Angusamy, Muhammad Danial Rezza Rosli
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/