Published
2023-12-21
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Two-way asymmetrical communication mediating internal communication and employee engagement
Kavitha Balakrishnan
Faculty of Applied Communication, Multimedia University
Ajitha Angusamy
Faculty of Business, Multimedia University
Muhammad Danial Rezza Rosli
Faculty of Applied Communication, Multimedia University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i2.2074
Keywords: communication climate, employee engagement, internal communication, leadership communication, performance
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between employee engagement with internal communication factors in the context of a prominent e-commerce company in Malaysia. The study employed a quantitative data approach, utilising a simple random sampling method. Data collection was conducted through structured questionnaires were administered to 255 respondents representing various departments within the e-commerce company, including finance, sales and marketing, operations management, human resources, and IT. The study’s outcomes demonstrated a significantly positive relationship between communication climate and employee engagement, which is critical for retaining employee commitment. The study’s findings confirmed a positive relationship between organisation communication and employee engagement, which promotes engagement. However, two-way asymmetrical communication showed negative effects when analysed for the mediating role. These findings underscore the importance of effective internal communication in organisations, especially within the context of a leading e-commerce company. Additionally, they should be aware of the potential negative consequences of asymmetrical communication and strive for more balanced and ethical communication practices. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by bridging the gap in scientific research on the relationship between internal communication and employee engagement, particularly in the Malaysian context. By drawing on stakeholders’ and relationship management theories, this research provides valuable insights into the theoretical foundations of this relationship, confirming the relevance of these theories in the organisational setting.
Author Biography
Muhammad Danial Rezza Rosli, Faculty of Applied Communication, Multimedia University
Faculty of Applied Communication
Rsearch Assistant
References
[1]. Department of Statistics, Malaysia. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=394&bul_id=em1vRTNvcWVqcVQwTXd6dk5Dc2kwdz09&menu_id=b0pIV1E3RW40VWRTUkZocEhyZ1pLUT09 (accessed on 30 November 2023).
[2]. Madan S, Pérez-Morón J, Chua XN, et al. Analysis of the Shopee’s Strategies to Succeed in the Global E-commerce Market: Malaysia Case. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in Asia Pasific. 2022, 5(1). doi: 10.32535/ijthap.v5i1.1400
[3]. Malaysia eCommerce: Most popular international e-commerce sites 2022. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1012711/malaysia-leading-b2c-ecommerce-sites-international/ (accessed on 7 June 2023).
[4]. Krywalski Santiago J. The influence of internal communication satisfaction on employees’ organisational identification: Effect of perceived organisational support. Journal of Economics and Management. 2020, 42: 70-98. doi: 10.22367/jem.2020.42.04
[5]. Men LR, Neill M, Yue CA. Examining the effects of symmetrical internal communication and employee engagement on organizational change outcomes. Public Relations Journal. 2020, 13(4), 1-19.
[6]. Bao LH, Mohd Arif LS, Omar R, Shaari R. The relationship between internal communication and employee engagement at favourite design. Jurnal Kemanusiaan. 2020, 18(1).
[7]. Sun R, Li JYQ, Lee Y, et al. The Role of Symmetrical Internal Communication in Improving Employee Experiences and Organizational Identification During COVID-19 Pandemic-Induced Organizational Change. International Journal of Business Communication. 2021, 60(4): 1398-1426. doi: 10.1177/23294884211050628
[8]. Špoljarić A, Tkalac Verčič A. Internal communication satisfaction and employee engagement as determinants of the employer brand. Journal of Communication Management. 2021, 26(1): 130-148. doi: 10.1108/jcom-01-2021-0011
[9]. Markos S, Gossaye B. The effect of internal communication on employee engagement: Empirical evidence from commercial Bank of Ethiopia. International Journal of information, Business and management. 2021, 13(2), 47-71.
[10]. Shaheen S, Zulfiqar S, Saleem S, et al. Does Organizational Cronyism Lead to Lower Employee Performance? Examining the Mediating Role of Employee Engagement and Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579560
[11]. Mbhele S. Internal communication in achieving employee engagement within a South African government department [PhD thesis]. University of Pretoria; 2016.
[12]. Chanana N, Sangeeta. Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Public Affairs. 2020, 21(4). doi: 10.1002/pa.2508
[13]. Sutton LBM, Le Roux T, Fourie LM. Internal communication in a diverse and developing world context: Challenges for corporate South Africa. Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa. 2022, 41(2): 90-102. doi: 10.36615/jcsa.v41i2.1452
[14]. Balakrishnan K, Harji MB, Angusamy A. Determinants of Multicultural Identity for Well-Being and Performance. Asian Journal of Social Science. 2020, 48(5-6): 488-512. doi: 10.1163/15685314-04805015
[15]. Balakrishnan K, Harji MB, Angusamy A. Intercultural Communication Competence: Well-being and Performance of Multicultural Teams. Journal of Intercultural Communication. 2022, 21(2): 82-96. doi: 10.36923/jicc.v21i2.16
[16]. Chmielecki M. Factors Influencing Effectiveness of Internal Communication. Management and Business Administration, Central Europe. 2015, 23(2): 24-38. doi: 10.7206/mba.ce.2084-3356.139
[17]. Ellenkamp JJH, Brouwers EPM, Embregts PJCM, et al. Work Environment-Related Factors in Obtaining and Maintaining Work in a Competitive Employment Setting for Employees with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2015, 26(1): 56-69. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9586-1
[18]. Freeman RE. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984.
[19]. de Beer E, Rensburg R. Towards a theoretical framework for the governing of stakeholder relationships: a perspective from South Africa. Journal of Public Affairs. 2011, 11(4): 208-225. doi: 10.1002/pa.414
[20]. Harley MB. An Investigation Exploring the Drivers of Employee Engagement: A United States Customs and Border Protection Perspective [PhD thesis]. Dublin, National College of Ireland; 2019.
[21]. Cropanzano R, Anthony EL, Daniels SR, et al. Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies. Academy of Management Annals. 2017, 11(1): 479-516. doi: 10.5465/annals.2015.0099
[22]. Karanges E, Johnston K, Beatson A, et al. The influence of internal communication on employee engagement: A pilot study. Public Relations Review. 2015, 41(1): 129-131. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.003
[23]. Iddagoda YA, Opatha HHDNP. Identified Research Gaps in Employee Engagement. International Business Research. 2016, 10(2): 63. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v10n2p63
[24]. Manoli AE, Hodgkinson IR. Exploring internal organisational communication dynamics in the professional football industry. European Journal of Marketing. 2021, 55(11): 2894-2916. doi: 10.1108/ejm-05-2019-0422
[25]. Jaupi F, Llaci S. The Impact of Communication Satisfaction and Demographic Variables on Employee Engagement. Journal of Service Science and Management. 2015, 8(2): 191-200. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2015.82021
[26]. Nguyen CMA, Ha MT. The interplay between internal communication, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and employee loyalty in higher education institutions in Vietnam. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023, 10(1). doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01806-8
[27]. Willacy M. Two-Way Symmetric Communication Between Public Utilities and the Public. Available online: https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/td/1234 (accessed on 30 November 2023).
[28]. Scherrer L. Leadership communication and employee engagement. Gonzaga University; 2016.
[29]. Babbie E, Mouton J. The Practice of Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015
[30]. Queirós A, Faria D, Almeida F. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies. 2017.
[31]. Sharma G. Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research. 2017, 3(7), 749-752.
[32]. Fugard AJB, Potts HWW. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2015, 18(6): 669-684. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453
[33]. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods. 2007, 39(2): 175-191.
[34]. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus. Routledge; 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203807644
[35]. Hair JF, Hauff S, Hult GTM, et al. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM): Sage Publications. 2017. doi: 10.15358/9783800653614
[36]. Urbach N, Ahlemann F. Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application. 2010, 11(2): 5-40.
[37]. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981, 18(1): 39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
[38]. Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In: Marcoulides G (editor). Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998. pp.295-336.
[39]. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Assessing mediation in communication research. London: The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research; 2008.
[40]. Markos S, Gossaye B. The effect of internal communication on employee engagement: Empirical evidence from commercial Bank of Ethiopia. International Journal of information, Business and management. 2021, 13(2): 47-71.
[41]. Holá J, Pikhart M. The implementation of internal communication system as a way to company efficiency. E+M Ekonomie a Management. 2014, XVII(2): 161-169. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-012
[42]. Osborne S, Hammoud MS. Effective employee engagement in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology. 2017,16(1): 4. doi: 10.5590/IJAMT.2017.16.1.04
[43]. Southwick SM, Southwick FS. The Loss of Social Connectedness as a Major Contributor to Physician Burnout. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020, 77(5): 449. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4800
[44]. Muhamedi M, Ariffin MYM. Importance of communication channels between managers and employees’ in management communication. The Social Sciences. 2017. doi: 10.36478/sscience.2017.1541.1552
[45]. Kang M, Sung M. How symmetrical employee communication leads to employee engagement and positive employee communication behaviors: The mediation of employee-organization relationships. Journal of Communication Management. 2017, 21(1): 82-102. doi: 10.1108/JCOM-04-2016-0026