PDF

Published

2024-01-11

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 4 (2024)

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Bondoc Jr., R. S. (2024). ICT-Driven instructional and assessment strategies for physical education in the new normal. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i4.2155

ICT-Driven instructional and assessment strategies for physical education in the new normal

Roberto S. Bondoc Jr.

College of Sports Science and Physical Education, Western Mindanao State University


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i4.2155


Keywords: ICT-aided strategies, instruction delivery, physical education, self-efficacy

Abstract

Technology shaped the educational system since it enabled teachers to build several instructional methods that are both flexible and effective. It is undeniable that the use of ICT-aided teaching strategies in physical education enable the Physical Education (PE) teachers to adapt to the shifting educational environment. It has been established that several forms of ICT-aided methods were utilized by physical education teachers based on the applicability of these strategies and the teachers’ abilities to put them into practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the use of ICT-aided strategies across HEIs and secondary schools. There were total of 130 PE instructors from HEIs and secondary schools who participated in the study. Descriptive-comparative design was employed to emphasize the need to determine how nominal characteristics influenced competencies. Notably, the findings indicated that demonstration-based assessment was applicable among HEIs because of the intensive physical education curriculum. Male PE instructors were more competent in applying formative assessment and demonstration-based assessment. Competency of PE instructors within these metrics was remarkably high with an emphasis on self-efficacy. Teachers’ engagement to ICT-aided strategies reflected their teaching competencies having traces of motivational, leniency, and flexible learning. Limitations of the study represent the need to assess other factors that were relevant in teaching other that being described (e.g., social, economic, organizational). Nevertheless, ICT-aided strategies transformed the competencies of PE instructors towards sustainable learning in new normal.

References

[1]. Naji S. The Impact of ICT on Schools. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 2017, 19(01): 83–85. doi: 10.9790/487x-1901078385

[2]. Kretschmann R. Developing competencies by playing digital sportsgames. US-China Education Review. 2010, 7(2): 67–75.

[3]. Kretschmann R. Physical education in the year 2100-Scenarios and visions of future school sports development (German). In: Frei P, Körner S (editors). Ungewissheit. Sportpädagogische Felder im Wandel (pp. 221–226). Hamburg: Czwalina; 2010.

[4]. Kretschmann R. Evaluation of an Informal Introduction to Departmental Student’s Life via an E-Learning Environment Performed by the Departmental Student Commission of a Department of Sport Science – Initiating a Digital Learning Culture. International Journal of Health, Physical Education and Computer Science in Sports. 2011, 4(1): 8–11.

[5]. Martin AJ. The Student Motivation Scale: A Tool for Measuring and Enhancing Motivation. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools. 2001, 11: 1–20. doi: 10.1017/s1037291100004301

[6]. Elliot AJ, Covington MV. Educational Psychology Review. 2001, 13(2): 73–92. doi: 10.1023/a: 1009009018235

[7]. Meece JL, Glienke BB, Burg S. Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology. 2006, 44(5): 351–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004

[8]. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. Physical Education’s Role in Public Health. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1991, 62(2): 124–137. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1991.10608701

[9]. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon. 2001, 9(5): 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816

[10]. Chen TL. Integrating Lecture Capture and Clickers in the Economics Classroom via Bring Your Own Device. IJERN. 2022.

[11]. Kretschmann R. Exergames and Health Promotion – Nintendo Wii Sports: Physiological Measures vs. Perceived Opinions. In: Sánchez Molina JAs, Carballo Iglesias O, González Valeiro MAn (editors). Physical education professionals in the promotion of an active lifestyle: Proceedings of the Congress of the International Association of Schools of Physical Education (AIESEP) (Spanish). Alcoy: Alto Rendimiento; 2011.

[12]. Salama R, Uzunboylu H, Alkaddah B. Distance learning system, learning programming languages by using mobile applications. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020, 7(2): 23–47. doi: 10.18844/prosoc.v7i2.5015

[13]. Mercier K, Centeio E, Garn A, Erwin H, Marttinen R, Foley J. Physical education teachers’ experiences with remote instruction during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Teaching in Physical education. 2021, 40(2), 337–342.

[14]. Dunn KE, Mulvenon SW. A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation. 2019, 14(1), 7

[15]. Sudakova NE, Savina TN, Masalimova AR, Mikhaylovsky MN, Karandeeva LG, Zhdanov SP. Online formative assessment in higher education: bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences 2022, 12(3), 209.

[16]. Stanja J, Gritz W, Krugel J, Hoppe A, Dannemann S. Formative assessment strategies for students' conceptions—The potential of learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2023, 54(1), 58–75.

[17]. Sardareh SA, Mohd Saad MR. Defining assessment for learning: a proposed definition from a sociocultural perspective. Life Science Journal. 2013, 10(2): 2493–2497.

[18]. O’Shaughnessy SM, Joyce P. Summative and Formative Assessment in Medicine: The Experience of an Anaesthesia Trainee. International Journal of Higher Education. 2015, 4(2). doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p198

[19]. Weeldenburg G, Borghouts L, Laak T van de, et al. TARGETing secondary school students’ motivation towards physical education: The role of student-perceived mastery climate teaching strategies. PLOS ONE. 2022, 17(9): e0274964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274964

[20]. Chavez J, Ceneciro C. Hybridization of Learning Management Systems in Tertiary Schools. IOER International Multidiciplinary Research Journal. 2021, 3(4): 116–122.

[21]. Urdan T, Kaplan A. The origins, evolution, and future directions of achievement goal theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2020, 61: 101862. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101862

[22]. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications; 2017.

[23]. Ryan RM, Deci EL, Vansteenkiste M, et al. Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science. 2021, 7(2): 97–110. doi: 10.1037/mot0000194

[24]. Aelterman N, Vansteenkiste M, Haerens L, et al. Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2019, 111(3): 497–521. doi: 10.1037/edu0000293

[25]. Moustakas L, Robrade D. The Challenges and Realities of E-Learning during COVID-19: The Case of University Sport and Physical Education. Challenges. 2022, 13(1): 9. doi: 10.3390/challe13010009

[26]. de Souza Júnior AF, de Oliveira MRR, de Araújo AC. The debate of digital technology in the continuing Physical Education teacher education: uses and concepts for teaching and learning. Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación. 2022, (46): 694–704.

[27]. Ali L, Dmour NAHHA. The Shift to Online Assessment Due to COVID-19: An Empirical Study of University Students, Behaviour and Performance, in the Region of UAE. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2021, 11(5): 220–228. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1515

[28]. Krishnan J, Black RW, Olson CB. The Power of Context: Exploring Teachers’ Formative Assessment for Online Collaborative Writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2020, 37(3): 201–220. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2020.1764888

[29]. Shahat MA, Ambusaidi AK, Treagust D. Omani Science Teachers’ Perceived Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching Science as Inquiry: Influences of Gender, Teaching Experience, and Preparation Programme. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2022, 19(3).

[30]. Abdzadeh Y, Baker W. Cultural awareness in an Iranian English language classroom: A teaching intervention in an interculturally “conservative” setting. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca. 2020, 9(1): 57–80. doi: 10.1515/jelf-2020-2030

[31]. Opie TR, Livingston B, Greenberg DN, et al. Building gender inclusivity: disentangling the influence of classroom demography on classroom participation. Higher Education. 2019, 77(1): 37–58. doi: 10.1007/s10734-018-0245-2

[32]. Cooper LA. Impact of Conscious Discipline on Teacher Efficacy and Burnout: Perspectives for Elementary Teachers. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership. 2019, 15(14). doi: 10.22230/ijepl.2019v15n14a882

[33]. Cruz RA, Manchanda S, Firestone AR, et al. An Examination of Teachers’ Culturally Responsive Teaching Self-Efficacy. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. 2019, 43(3): 197–214. doi: 10.1177/0888406419875194

[34]. Isil A. Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, performance and personal outcomes of Turkish physical education teachers. Educational Research and Reviews. 2015, 10(3): 328–337. doi: 10.5897/err2014.2016

[35]. Fröberg A, Lundvall S. Sustainable Development Perspectives in Physical Education Teacher Education Course Syllabi: An Analysis of Learning Outcomes. Sustainability. 2022, 14(10): 5955. doi: 10.3390/su14105955

[36]. Eroglu C, Unlu H. Self-efficacy: Its effects on physical education teacher candidates’ attitudes toward the teaching profession. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 2015, 15(1).

[37]. Aarskog E. ‘No assessment, no learning’: exploring student participation in assessment in Norwegian physical education (PE). Sport, Education and Society. 2020, 26(8): 875–888. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2020.1791064

[38]. Mödinger M, Woll A, Wagner I. Video-based visual feedback to enhance motor learning in physical education—a systematic review. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. 2021, 52(3): 447–460. doi: 10.1007/s12662-021-00782-y

[39]. Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, et al. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2013, 20(1): 21–53. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com