Coping with math anxiety and lack of confidence through AI-assisted Learning
Vol 9, Issue 5, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 2393 (Abstract) 1020 (PDF)
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in education transforms the instructional processes and learning competence of students. AI can adapt to the individual learning needs of students. By analyzing students’ progress, performance, and preferences, AI systems can deliver tailored content, recommend additional resources, and provide feedback. The purpose of this study was to develop initial understanding on how AI models help students cope with math anxiety and lack of confidence in engaging with mathematics learning. This exploratory research established the connections between what students feel when using AI and how it benefits them. College students (n = 20) enrolled in different math-related programs (i.e., engineering, statistics/mathematics, computer science, education) were purposively sampled for a one-on-one interview. Thematic analysis indicated that students are now turning to AI models as a coping mechanism to alleviate math anxiety and boost their self-assurance. These AI models function as “mentors” and “math companions” that offer step-by-step explanations and personalized support. Their adaptability and personalized approach make mathematics more accessible to students, with the potential to reduce anxiety and enhance the overall learning experience. Moreover, the use of AI models encourages a sense of independence, motivating students to actively engage in self-guided learning. The findings open new questions about using AI models in improving the self-efficacy and confidence of students in mathematics learning. There is also an opportunity to build an AI-assisted learning with a focus on psychological interventions and behavioral interconnections mediating students’ academic performance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Mohamed MZB, Hidayat R, Suhaizi NNB, et al. Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2022, 17(3): em0694. doi: 10.29333/iejme/12132
2. Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access. 2020, 8: 75264-75278. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2988510
3. Cope B, Kalantzis M, Searsmith D. Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2020, 53(12): 1229-1245. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732
4. He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, et al. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nature Medicine. 2019, 25(1): 30-36. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0
5. Salinas KJH, Tolibao JR, Moneva DJC. Student’s anxiety in mathematics. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning. 2019, 6(1): 46-55.
6. Schiff D. Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: the future of artificial intelligence in education. AI & Society. 2021, 36(1): 331-348.
7. Vaishya R, Javaid M, Khan IH, et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2020, 14(4): 337-339. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.012
8. Gao S. Innovative Teaching of Integration of Artificial Intelligence and University Mathematics in Big Data Environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020, 750(1): 012137. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/750/1/012137
9. Wu R. Visualization of Basic Mathematics Teaching Based on Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021, 1992(4): 042042. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1992/4/042042
10. Hwang GJ, Tu YF. Roles and Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and Systematic Review. Mathematics. 2021, 9(6): 584. doi: 10.3390/math9060584
11. Voskoglou MG, Salem ABM. Benefits and Limitations of the Artificial with Respect to the Traditional Learning of Mathematics. Mathematics. 2020, 8(4): 611. doi: 10.3390/math8040611
12. Jeong Y, Lee E, Do J. Development and evaluation of AI-based algorithm models for analysis of learning trends in adult learners. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education. 2021, 25(5): 813-824.
13. Kim K, Han HJ. A design and effect of maker education using educational artificial intelligence tools in elementary online environment. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2021, 19(6): 61-71.
14. Ma Y, Siau KL. Artificial intelligence impacts on higher education. 2018.
15. Min SA, Jeon IS, Song KS. The effects of artificial intelligence convergence education using machine learning platform on STEAM literacy and learning flow. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information. 2021, 26(10): 199-208.
16. Guan C, Mou J, Jiang Z. Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2020, 4(4): 134-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001
17. Popenici SAD, Kerr S. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. 2017, 12(1). doi: 10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
18. Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, et al. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019, 16(1). doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
19. Ramirez G, Chang H, Maloney EA, et al. On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2016, 141: 83-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.014
20. Zakaria A, Budiarto MT, Sulaiman R. The Relational Thinking Process of Secondary School Student with High Mathematical Ability in Solving Mathematics Problem. In Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference. Atlantis Press, 2018, 127‒129.
21. Caviola S, Carey E, Mammarella IC, et al. Stress, Time Pressure, Strategy Selection and Math Anxiety in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017, 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01488
22. Soysal D, Bani-Yaghoub M, Riggers-Piehl TA. Analysis of Anxiety, Motivation, and Confidence of STEM Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2022, 17(2): em0684. doi: 10.29333/iejme/11836
23. Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion. 2007, 7(2), 336.
24. Mammarella IC, Caviola S, Dowker A, et al. Mathematics Anxiety. Routledge, 2019. doi: 10.4324/9780429199981
25. Živković M, Pellizzoni S, Mammarella IC, et al. Executive functions, math anxiety and math performance in middle school students. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2022, 40(3): 438-452. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12412
26. Ashcraft MH. Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2002, 11(5): 181-185.
27. Serhan D. Transitioning from Face-to-Face to Remote Learning: Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Using Zoom during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science. 2020, 4(4): 335-342.
28. Mubeen S, Norman REİD. The measurement of motivation with science student. European Journal of Educational Research. 2014, 3(3): 129-144.
29. Dowker A, Sarkar A, Looi CY. Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years? Frontiers in Psychology. 2016, 7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
30. Eysenck MW, Calvo MG. Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency Theory. Cognition & Emotion. 1992, 6(6): 409-434. doi: 10.1080/02699939208409696
31. Hopko DR, Ashcraft MH, Gute J, et al. Mathematics Anxiety and Working Memory. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 1998, 12(4): 343-355. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(98)00019-x
32. Mammarella IC, Giofrè D, Caviola S. Learning Geometry: the Development of Geometrical Concepts and the Role of Cognitive Processes. Acquisition of Complex Arithmetic Skills and Higher-Order Mathematics Concepts. Published online 2017: 221-246. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-805086-6.00010-2
33. Van den Bussche E, Vanmeert K, Aben B, et al. Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes. Scientific Reports. 2020, 10(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76920-7
34. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2020, 2(4): 314-324. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.195
35. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1977.
36. Li X, Jiang MY chao, Jong MS yung, et al. Understanding Medical Students’ Perceptions of and Behavioral Intentions toward Learning Artificial Intelligence: A Survey Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022, 19(14): 8733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148733
37. Lee J, Cerreto FA, Lee J. Theory of planned behavior and teachers’ decisions regarding use of educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2010, 13(1): 152-164.
38. Amoako-Gyampah K. Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in Human Behavior. 2007, 23(3): 1232-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.002
39. Buabbas AJ, Miskin B, Alnaqi AA, et al. Investigating Students’ Perceptions towards Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education. Healthcare. 2023, 11(9): 1298. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091298
40. Kwak Y, Ahn JW, Seo YH. Influence of AI ethics awareness, attitude, anxiety, and self-efficacy on nursing students’ behavioral intentions. BMC Nursing. 2022, 21(1). doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01048-0
41. Wagner RV, Sherwood JJ. The study of attitude change. Belmont, California: Brooks. 1969.
42. Kim SW, Lee Y. Development of test tool of attitude toward artificial intelligence for middle school students. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education. 2020, 23(3): 17-30.
43. Pinto dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S, et al. Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey. European Radiology. 2018, 29(4): 1640-1646. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1
44. Sassis L, Kefala-Karli P, Sassi M, Zervides C. Exploring medical students’ and faculty’s perception on artificial intelligence and robotics. A questionnaire survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Medical Sciences. 2021, 2(1-2): 76-84.
45. Al-Badi A, Khan A, Eid-Alotaibi. Perceptions of Learners and Instructors towards Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning. Procedia Computer Science. 2022, 201: 445-451. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.03.058
46. Chang J, Lu X. The Study on Students’ Participation in Personalized Learning Under the Background of Artificial Intelligence. 2019 10th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME). Published online August 2019. doi: 10.1109/itme.2019.00131
47. Sie RL, Delahunty J, Bell K, et al. Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Learning Design in UOW Online, a Unified Approach to Fully Online Learning. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE). Published online December 2018. doi: 10.1109/tale.2018.8615283
48. Magomadov VS. The application of artificial intelligence and Big Data analytics in personalized learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020, 1691(1): 012169. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012169
49. Palanisamy P, Thilarajah S, Chen Z. Providing equitable education through personalised adaptive learning. ASCILITE 2021: Back to the Future – ASCILITE ‘21 Proceedings ASCILITE 2021 in Armidale. Published online December 1, 2021. doi: 10.14742/ascilite2021.0129
50. D’Mello S, Olney A, Williams C, et al. Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2012, 70(5): 377-398. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.004
51. Deng X, Yu Z. A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education. Sustainability. 2023, 15(4): 2940. doi: 10.3390/su15042940
52. Firat M. What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. 2023, 6(1).
53. Winkler R, Soellner M. Unleashing the Potential of Chatbots in Education: A State-Of-The-Art Analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2018, 2018(1): 15903. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2018.15903abstract
54. Bozkurt A. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 2023, 18(1): 198-204.
55. Sengupta S, Chakraborty T. Use of chatbots in higher education: A study of student engagement and satisfaction. Education and Information Technologies. 2020, 25(6): 5147-5165.
56. Alotaibi R, Al-Shehri S, Al-Harbi R, Al-Mutairi M. Enhancing learning outcomes through chatbot technology in computer science education. Education and Information Technologies. 2020, 25(6): 5167-5183.
57. Chavez J. Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals. 2022, 13(3).
58. Chavez JV, Del Prado RT. Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality. In Forum for Linguistic Studies. 2023, 5(1), 55-71. doi: 10.18063/fls.v5i1.1530
59. Chavez JV, Lamorinas DD, Ceneciro CC. Message patterns of online gender-based humor, discriminatory practices, biases, stereotyping, and disempowering tools through discourse analysis. In Forum for Linguistic Studies. 2023, 5(2): 1535.
60. Murro RA, Lobo JG, Inso ARC, Chavez JV. Difficulties of parents with low educational attainment in assisting their children in modular distance learning during pandemic. Environment and Social Psychology. 2023, 9(1).
61. Caulfield J. How to Do Thematic Analysis. Available online: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/ (accessed on 2 June 2022).
62. Aguirre, JKC, Vicente MB, Chavez JV, et al. Content Analysis of Consumer Reviews on Preferred Characteristics of Accommodation Products. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture. 2023, 33. doi: 10.59670/jns.v33i.2717
63. Ceneciro CC, Estoque MR, Chavez JV. Analysis of debate skills to the learners’ confidence and anxiety in the use of the English language in academic engagements. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture. 2023, 33: 4544-4569.
64. Netson BPH, Ain SQ. Factors Causing Difficulty in Learning Mathematics for Elementary School Students. International Journal of Elementary Education. 2022, 6(1): 134-141.
65. Lei W, Wang X, Dai DY, et al. Academic self‐efficacy and academic performance among high school students: A moderated mediation model of academic buoyancy and social support. Psychology in the Schools. 2022, 59(5): 885-899. doi: 10.1002/pits.22653
66. Supervia UP, Bordás SC, Robres QA. The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between resilience and academic performance in adolescence. Learning and Motivation. 2022, 78, 101814.
67. Usán P, Salavera C, Quílez-Robres A. Self-Efficacy, Optimism, and Academic Performance as Psychoeducational Variables: Mediation Approach in Students. Children. 2022, 9(3): 420. doi: 10.3390/children9030420
68. Koh J, Farruggia SP, Back LT, et al. Self-efficacy and academic success among diverse first-generation college students: The mediating role of self-regulation. Social Psychology of Education. 2022, 25(5): 1071-1092. doi: 10.1007/s11218-022-09713-7
69. Morton S, Mergler A, Boman P. Managing the Transition: The Role of Optimism and Self-Efficacy for First-Year Australian University Students. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 2013, 24(1): 90-108. doi: 10.1017/jgc.2013.29
70. Ghaderi AR, Rangaiah B. Influence of self-efficacy on depression, anxiety and stress among Indian and Iranian students. Journal of Psychosocial Research. 2011, 6(2): 231.
71. Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, et al. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin. 2007, 133(1): 1–24.
72. Coombes SA, Higgins T, Gamble KM, et al. Attentional control theory: Anxiety, emotion, and motor planning. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2009, 23(8): 1072-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.009
73. Long D, Magerko B. What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Published online April 21, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376727
74. Ng DTK, Leung JKL, Chu KWS, Qiao MS. AI literacy: Defnition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2021, 58(1): 504–509.
75. Ng DTK, Leung JKL, Chu SKW, et al. Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2021, 2: 100041. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
76. Ng DTK, Lee M, Tan RJY, et al. A review of AI teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies. 2022, 28(7): 8445-8501. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11491-w
77. Napoles MAR, Lacbayin SMC, Pellerin J, Rodriguez JR. Coping Mechanism among College Students on Stress in Laboratory Activities in Time of Pandemic. Puissant. 2022, 3: 538-557.
78. Maslihah S, Waluya SB, Rochmad, et al. Increasing mathematical literacy ability and learning independence through problem-based learning model with realistic mathematic education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021, 1918(4): 042123. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042123
79. Sipayung TN, Imelda, Siswono TYE, et al. An analysis of students learning independence in mathematics based on google classroom. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2022, 2157(1): 012037. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2157/1/012037
80. Mulyono D, Asmawi M, Nuriah T. The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching, Student Facilitator and Explaining and Learning Independence on Mathematical Learning Results by Controlling the Initial Ability of Students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2018, 13(3). doi: 10.12973/iejme/3838
81. Duhaylungsod AV, Chavez JV. ChatGPT and other AI users: Innovative and creative utilitarian value and mindset shift. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture. 2023, 33: 4367-4378. doi: 10.59670/jns.v33i.2791
82. Chavez JV. Assessing Online Academic Integrity and Humanized Teaching in Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences. 2023, 19(1): 9-17.
83. Chavez JV, Lamorinas DD. Reconfiguring assessment practices and strategies in online education during the pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2023, 10(1), 160-174.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2228
(2393 Abstract Views, 1020 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Hermie V. Inoferio, Marcelino M. Espartero, Masnona S. Asiri, Michelle D. Damin, Jason V. Chavez
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/