Published
2024-02-01
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Assessing the impact of intellectual capital on audit quality within the audit market dynamics
Chao Meng
Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Faculty of Accounting, Hebei Finance University
Dewi Fariha Abdullah
Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Saleh F. A. Khatib
Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Norhalimah Idris
Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2269
Keywords: audit quality, intellectual capital, competitive audit market, financial reporting, knowledge-based assets
Abstract
This study aims to analyse the relationship between Intellectual Capital and Audit Quality in the context of the competitive Audit Market. The main goal of the research is to analyse the impact of Intellectual Capital on Audit Quality, specifically focusing on its presence and management. The methodology utilised a systematic literature review approach, which involved creating a detailed protocol to define the research question, guide the synthesis methodology, and establish criteria for inclusion and quality assessment. The Scopus database was used to conduct a search based on predetermined criteria. This search yielded a total of 217 initial results. After a process of refinement and thematic selection, a total of 144 papers and reviews were chosen for analysis. The selection was made in accordance with the PRISMA statement filtration. The study highlights the significant connection between Intellectual Capital and Audit Quality, underscoring the strategic value of intellectual assets in improving the effectiveness and trustworthiness of audit services in competitive auditing firms. The study highlights the importance of consistently investing in knowledge-based skills, advanced technology, and human capital to effectively respond to changing client demands and regulatory obligations. The implications of this extend to various parties such as auditors, policymakers, and stakeholders. It highlights the significance of promoting a culture that encourages knowledge sharing, investing in training and development initiatives, and adopting advanced audit procedures. These measures are crucial for improving overall audit quality and enhancing the credibility of financial reporting in the ever-changing audit market.
References
[1]. Roszkowska P. Fintech in financial reporting and audit for fraud prevention and safeguarding equity investments. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. 2021, 17(2): 164-196. doi: 10.1108/jaoc-09-2019-0098
[2]. Suryanto T, Thalassinos JE, Thalassinos EI. Board characteristics, audit committee and audit quality: The case of Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration. 2017.
[3]. Tayles M, Bramley A, Adshead N, et al. Dealing with the management of intellectual capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2002, 15(2): 251-267. doi: 10.1108/09513570210425574
[4]. Yaseen SG, Dajani D, Hasan Y. The impact of intellectual capital on the competitive advantage: Applied study in Jordanian telecommunication companies. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016, 62: 168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.075
[5]. Salvi A, Vitolla F, Giakoumelou A, et al. Intellectual capital disclosure in integrated reports: The effect on firm value. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020, 160: 120228. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120228
[6]. Urban B, Joubert GCDS. Multidimensional and comparative study on intellectual capital and organisational performance. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. 2017, 18(1): 84–99. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2016.1255990
[7]. Appuhami R, Bhuyan M. Examining the influence of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2015, 30(4/5): 347-372. doi: 10.1108/maj-04-2014-1022
[8]. Fedyk A, Hodson J, Khimich N, et al. Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process? Review of Accounting Studies. 2022, 27(3): 938-985. doi: 10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x
[9]. Abbott LJ, Daugherty B, Parker S, Peters GF. Internal Audit Quality and Financial Reporting Quality: The Joint Importance of Independence and Competence. Journal of Accounting Research. 2015, 54(1): 3-40. doi: 10.1111/1475-679x.12099
[10]. Chowdhury LAM, Rana T, Akter M, et al. Impact of intellectual capital on financial performance: evidence from the Bangladeshi textile sector. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. 2018, 14(4): 429-454. doi: 10.1108/jaoc-11-2017-0109
[11]. Weqar F, Khan AM, Raushan MohdA, et al. Measuring the Impact of Intellectual Capital on the Financial Performance of the Finance Sector of India. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2021, 12(3): 1134-1151. doi: 10.1007/s13132-020-00654-0
[12]. Forte W, Tucker J, Matonti G, et al. Measuring the intellectual capital of Italian listed companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2017, 18(4): 710-732. doi: 10.1108/jic-08-2016-0083
[13]. Amendola C, Gennaro A, Labella S, et al. The evolution of intellectual capital disclosure driven by European regulatory change: evidence from the Italian stock market. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2023, 24(5): 1136-1163. doi: 10.1108/jic-10-2022-0195
[14]. Mosteanu NR, Faccia A. Digital Systems and New Challenges of Financial Management – FinTech, XBRL, Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies. Quality—Access to Success. 2020, 21(174): 159–166.
[15]. Ali MA, Hussin N, Flayyih HH, et al. A Multidimensional View of Intellectual Capital and Dynamic Innovative Performance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2023, 16(3): 139. doi: 10.3390/jrfm16030139
[16]. Abhayawansa S, Guthrie J. Drivers and semantic properties of intellectual capital information in sell-side analysts’ reports. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. 2016, 12(4): 434-471. doi: 10.1108/jaoc-05-2014-0027
[17]. Polytech Soc Man Sci Salehi PM, Moradi M, Paiydarmanesh N, et al. The Effect of Corporate Governance and Audit Quality on Disclosure Quality: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences. 2017, 25(1): 32–48. doi: 10.3311/PPSO.8354
[18]. Mustapha I, Khan N, Qureshi MI, et al. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) from the Last Decade. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM). 2021, 15(18): 116. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v15i18.25531
[19]. Nohman Khan, Mustapha I, Muhammad Imran Qureshi. Review paper on sustainable manufacturing in ASEAN countries. Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Journal. 2020, 1(1): 7-29. doi: 10.54480/slrm.v1i1.4
[20]. Sikandar H, Vaicondam Y, Khan N, et al. Scientific Mapping of Industry 4.0 Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM). 2021, 15(18): 129. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v15i18.25535
[21]. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 2017, 11(4): 959-975. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
[22]. Majiwala H, Kant R. A bibliometric review of a decade’ research on industry 4.0 & supply chain management. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023, 72: 824-833. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.058
[23]. Buyamin B, Rahayu B, Suradi S, et al. The Influence of War and Global Economy on Article Publication (Bibliometric Analysis using Biblioshiny-R). Published online March 21, 2023. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2680363/v1
[24]. Mustapha I, Ali M, Khan N, Sikandar H. The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Innovative Organisations, A Thematic Review using the PRISMA Statement 2020. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM). 2023, 17(09): 88–105. doi: 10.3991/IJIM.V17I09.39465
[25]. Khan N, Nguyen Thuy Van, Amina Imran, et al. Ecotourism is the future of alternative tourism for environmental sustainability and natural areas protection. Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Journal. 2021, 1(2): 99-116. doi: 10.54480/slrm.v1i2.8
[26]. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, et al. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics. 2011, 5(1): 146-166. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
[27]. Chen X, Lun Y, Yan J, et al. Discovering thematic change and evolution of utilizing social media for healthcare research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2019, 19(S2). doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0757-4
[28]. Sengupta S, Vaish A. A study on social media and higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Universal Access in the Information Society. Published online March 20, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10209-023-00988-x
[29]. Khan N, Qureshi MI, Mustapha I, et al. The Digital Marketing Past, Present, and Future in Malaysia. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. 2020, 17(2): 583-595. doi: 10.1166/jctn.2020.8732
[30]. Qureshi MI, Khan N. Impact of COVID-19 CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC on sustainable development goals: What we learn from the past and where we are heading? Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Journal. 2020, 1(1): 30–47. doi: 10.54480/SLRM.V1I1.3
[31]. Thiéry S, Lhuillery S, Tellechea M. How can governance, human capital, and communication practices enhance internal audit quality? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 2023, 52: 100566. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2023.100566
[32]. Jahagirdar R, Bankar S, Karad V. A conceptual proposition of intangible assets and organizational citizenship behavior. Central European Management Journal. 2022, 30(4): 2405–2427. doi: 10.57030/23364890.CEMJ.30.4.256
[33]. Abrate G, Bruno C, Erbetta F, et al. Which Future for Traditional Travel Agencies? A Dynamic Capabilities Approach. Journal of Travel Research. 2019, 59(5): 777-791. doi: 10.1177/0047287519870250
[34]. La Torre M, Botes VL, Dumay J, et al. The fall and rise of intellectual capital accounting: new prospects from the Big Data revolution. Meditari Accountancy Research. 2018, 26(3): 381-399. doi: 10.1108/medar-05-2018-0344
[35]. Iskandar Y, Joeliaty, Kaltum U, Hilmiana. The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Performance of Social Enterprises: A Literature Review. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2021, 10(5): 309. doi: 10.36941/ajis-2021-0141