Published
2024-02-29
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Optimal pedagogical strategies in research methodology: Insights from student experiences
Le Thanh Thao
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Doan Phuong Uyen
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Hai Nhu
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Dong Dinh Nghi
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Vo Huu Khanh
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Ho Thanh Vy
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Hong Sa
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Nguyen Thanh Hieu Vy
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
Le Huu Huy
Can Tho University, Can Tho City, 90000, Vietnam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i4.2342
Keywords: optimal pedagogical strategies, student experiences, the research methodology subject
Abstract
This study embarked on an exploratory journey to understand the nuances of effective pedagogy within the context of a Research Methodology course. With a participant pool of 24 students, qualitative methodologies were employed to delve deep into their experiences, perceptions, and reflections. Several emergent themes underscored the dynamics of a successful learning environment. Collaborative learning stood out as a key facilitator of understanding, highlighting the value of peer interactions and group endeavors. The instructor’s mediatory role emerged as pivotal, acting as a bridge between content and comprehension. Participants highlighted the profound impact of integrating real-world applications to enhance conceptual clarity, making abstract concepts tangible and relevant. Reflective practices and feedback mechanisms were underscored as instrumental in deepening understanding and fostering growth, respectively. The intertwining of theory and practice, along with the instructor’s adaptability, were deemed essential for comprehensive learning. Furthermore, culturally relevant pedagogy emerged as a necessity, emphasizing the symbiotic relationship between culture and cognition. Lastly, the motivational and encouraging role of the instructor significantly influenced the students’ commitment and enthusiasm. While these findings shed light on the intricate dance of effective pedagogy, they also pave the way for future research to further refine our understanding of optimal educational strategies.References
[1]. Gast DL, Ledford JR. Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. Routledge; 2009.
[2]. Marley SA, Siani A, Sims S. Real‐life research projects improve student engagement and provide reliable data for academics. Ecology and Evolution. 2022; 12(12). doi: 10.1002/ece3.9593
[3]. Roulston K, Shelton SA. Reconceptualizing Bias in Teaching Qualitative Research Methods. Qualitative Inquiry. 2015; 21(4): 332-342. doi: 10.1177/1077800414563803
[4]. Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, et al. Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice. The Milbank Quarterly. 2012; 90(2): 311-346. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x
[5]. Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press; 1978.
[6]. Steenkamp AL, McCord SA. Approach to teaching research methodology for information technology. Journal of Information Systems Education. 2007; 18(2): 255-269.
[7]. Colomer J, Serra T, Cañabate D, et al. Reflective Learning in Higher Education: Active Methodologies for Transformative Practices. Sustainability. 2020; 12(9): 3827. doi: 10.3390/su12093827
[8]. Duke NK, Del Nero JR. Best practices in literacy instruction. Guilford Press; 2011.
[9]. Hartley J, Alford J, Knies E, et al. Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory. Public Management Review. 2016; 19(5): 670-685. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192166
[10]. Chu J, Liu J, Liu S. Research and Countermeasure Analysis of College Students’ Employment Issues. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2020; 08(01): 129-138. doi: 10.4236/jss.2020.81011
[11]. Tomczyk Ł, Vanek B, Pavlov I, et al. Critical thinking, problem-solving strategies and individual development assessment among NEETs – research conducted in Slovakia, Poland and Estonia. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2018; 37(6): 701-718. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2018.1550446
[12]. Mahdi OR, Nassar IA, Almuslamani HA. The Role of Using Case Studies Method in Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education. 2020; 9(2): 297. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p297
[13]. Lasrado F. Fostering Creativity and Innovation. Springer International Publishing; 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99121-4
[14]. Borrego M, Newswander LK. Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes. The Review of Higher Education. 2010; 34(1): 61-84. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2010.0006
[15]. Nunnaley D. Professional development to build data literacy: The view from a professional development provider. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies. 2013; 13(2): 39-49.
[16]. Klassen RM, Kim LE. Selecting teachers and prospective teachers: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. 2019; 26: 32-51. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.12.003
[17]. Huber RA, Moore CJ. A Model for Extending Hands‐On Science to Be Inquiry Based. School Science and Mathematics. 2001; 101(1): 32-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18187.x
[18]. Ball CT, Pelco LE. Teaching research methods to undergraduate psychology students using an active cooperative learning approach. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2006; 17(2): 147-154.
[19]. Pandey P, Pandey MM. Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center; 2021.
[20]. Sointu ET, Savolainen H, Lappalainen K, et al. Longitudinal associations of student–teacher relationships and behavioural and emotional strengths on academic achievement. Educational Psychology. 2016; 37(4): 457-467. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2016.1165796
[21]. Blase J, Blase J. Teachers bringing out the best in teachers: A guide to peer consultation for administrators and teachers. Corwin Press; 2006.
[22]. Menéndez IYC, Napa MAC, Moreira MLM, et al. The importance of formative assessment in the learning teaching process. International journal of social sciences and humanities. 2019; 3(2): 238-249. doi: 10.29332/ijssh.v3n2.322
[23]. Scott GW. Active engagement with assessment and feedback can improve group-work outcomes and boost student confidence. Higher Education Pedagogies. 2017; 2(1): 1-13. doi: 10.1080/23752696.2017.1307692
[24]. Zepeda SJ. Professional development: What works. Routledge; 2019.
[25]. Brookfield SD. The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
[26]. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis: A reflexive approach. SAGE Publications; 2023.
[27]. Freyn SL, Sedaghatjou M, Rodney S. Collaborative engagement experience-based learning: a teaching framework for business education. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. 2021; 11(5): 1252-1266. doi: 10.1108/heswbl-08-2020-0182
[28]. Mebert L, Barnes R, Dalley J, et al. Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies. 2020; 5(1): 30-51. doi: 10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306
[29]. Sobko S, Unadkat D, Adams J, Hull G. Learning through collaboration: A networked approach to online pedagogy. E-Learning and Digital Media. 2020; 17(1): 36-55. doi: 10.1177/20427530198825
[30]. Truong TD, Hallinger P, Sanga K. Confucian values and school leadership in Vietnam. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2016; 45(1): 77-100. doi: 10.1177/1741143215607877
[31]. Lewis R, Romi S, Qui X, et al. Teachers’ classroom discipline and student misbehavior in Australia, China and Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2005; 21(6): 729-741. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.008
[32]. Martin F, Wang C, Sadaf A. Facilitation Matters: Instructor Perception of Helpfulness of Facilitation Strategies in Online Courses. Online Learning. 2020; 24(1). doi: 10.24059/olj.v24i1.1980
[33]. Laurillard D. Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge; 2013.
[34]. Khan A, Egbue O, Palkie B, Madden J. Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of E-learning. 2017; 15(2): 107-115.
[35]. Thanh PTH. Implementing a student-centered learning approach at Vietnamese higher education institutions: barriers under. Journal of Futures Studies. 2010; 15(1): 21-38.
[36]. Beavers E, Orange A, Kirkwood D. Fostering critical and reflective thinking in an authentic learning situation. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education. 2017; 38(1): 3-18. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2016.1274693
[37]. Gundala RR, Singh M, Cochran TK. Perceptions of Integrated Experiential Learning of Graduate Marketing Students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2018; 18(2): 74-89. doi: 10.14434/josotl.v18i2.22498
[38]. Phan HP. Self-Efficacy, Reflection, and Achievement: A Short-Term Longitudinal Examination. The Journal of Educational Research. 2013; 107(2): 90-102. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2012.753860
[39]. Farrell TS, Ives J. Exploring teacher beliefs and classroom practices through reflective practice: A case study. Language Teaching Research. 2014; 19(5): 594-610. doi: 10.1177/1362168814541722
[40]. Lee CD. 2008 Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture—The Centrality of Culture to the Scientific Study of Learning and Development: How an Ecological Framework in Education Research Facilitates Civic Responsibility. Educational Researcher. 2008; 37(5): 267-279. doi: 10.3102/0013189x08322683
[41]. Kumar R, Zusho A, Bondie R. Weaving Cultural Relevance and Achievement Motivation Into Inclusive Classroom Cultures. Educational Psychologist. 2018; 53(2): 78-96. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1432361
[42]. Irons A, Elkington S. Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback. Published online August 25, 2021. doi: 10.4324/9781138610514
[43]. Carless D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education. 2006; 31(2): 219-233. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572132
[44]. Jarvis P, Holford J, Griffin C, et al. The Theory and Practice of Learning. Routledge; 2003. doi: 10.4324/9780203465653
[45]. Hajian S. Transfer of Learning and Teaching: A Review of Transfer Theories and Effective Instructional Practices. IAFOR Journal of Education. 2019; 7(1). doi: 10.22492/ije.7.1.06
[46]. Bondie RS, Dahnke C, Zusho A. How Does Changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to Differentiated Instruction Affect Teaching? Review of Research in Education. 2019; 43(1): 336-362. doi: 10.3102/0091732x18821130
[47]. Nottingham AJ. Investigating relationships between teaching behaviors and pupil outcomes. University of Virginia; 2005.
[48]. Brophy J. Motivating Students to Learn. Routledge; 2004. doi: 10.4324/9781410610218
[49]. Watt HMG, Richardson PW. Motivational Factors Influencing Teaching as a Career Choice: Development and Validation of the FIT-Choice Scale. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2007; 75(3): 167-202. doi: 10.3200/jexe.75.3.167-202
[50]. Cukur CS. The development of the teacher emotional labor scale (TELS): Validity and reliability. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 2009; 9(2): 559-574.